,” ABET.[3] Bodnar, C. A., Jadeja, S., and Barrella, E., 2020, “Creating a Master Entrepreneurial Mindset Concept Map,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, American Society for Engineering Education.[4] Jackson, A., Barrella, E., Bodnar, C. A., Carnasciali, M. I., Cruz, J., Dillon, H. E., Kecskemety, K. M., and miskioglu, Elif, 2021, “Refining an Entrepreneurial Mindset Master Concept Map through Multi-Institutional Collaboration,” 9th Research in Engineering Education Symposium and 32nd Australasian Association for Engineering Education Conference (REES AAEE 2021).[5] Martine, M. M., Mahoney, L. X., Sunbury, C. M., Schneider, J. A., Hixson, C., and Bodnar, C. A., 2019, “Concept Maps as an
, and L. Benson, “Work in progress: How differences in student motivation characterize differences between engineering disciplines,” in Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE, 2012.[33] D. Shah, E. Kames, C. C. McKenzie, and B. Morkos, “Examining the differences in student motivation for industry projects and non-industry projects in senior capstone design,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2019.[34] L. Bosman, N. Duval-Couetil, and K. Jarr, “Mentoring Engineering Educators with an Entrepreneurial Mindset – Focused SOTL Professional Development Experience.” ASEE Conferences, Minneapolis, MN.
-generationstudents.References[1] B. Schadl, S. Sheppard, and H. Chen, “Career Certainty: Differences Between Career Certain and Uncertain Engineering Students,” in ASEE , 2017.[2] B. Hughes, W. Schell, B. Tallman, R. Beigel, E. Annand, and M. Kwapisz, “Do I Think I’m an Engineer? Understanding the Impact of Engineering Identity on Retention,” in ASEE Annual Conference, 2019.[3] C. T. Amelink and E. G. Creamer, “Gender differences in elements of the undergraduate experience that influence satisfaction with the engineering maior and the intent to pursue engineering as a career,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 81–92, 2010, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01044.x.[4] M. W. Ohland, S. A. Frillman, G. Zhang, C. E
physical prototyping and detailed design activities can mesh with this intervention.References:[1] National Academy of Engineering, U. S. (2004). The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineeringin the new century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.[2] Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked Problems in Design Thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5–21.https://doi.org/10.2307/1511637[3] Lönngren, J. (2017). Wicked problems in engineering education: preparing future engineers towork for sustainability. Chalmers University of Technology.[4] “Grand Challenges - 14 Grand Challenges for Engineering,” Engineeringchallenges.org, 2019.http://www.engineeringchallenges.org/challenges.aspx[5] De Graaff, E., & Kolmos, A. (2007). Management of change: implementation of
,and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and donot necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References1. Cropley, D.H. (2015) Creativity in Engineering: Novel Solutions to Complex Problems. Academic Press.2. National Academy of Engineering (2005) Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century. National Academies Press.3. Bloom EA, VanSlyke-Briggs K (2019). The Demise of Creativity in Tomorrow's Teachers. Journal of Inquiry and Action in Education, 10(2): 90-111.4. Tabarrok, A. (2011). Launching the Innovation Renaissance: A New Path to Bring Smart Ideas to Market Faster. TED Books: Book 8. Available as e-book.5. Whitelaw, L