the project to assessEM and the skillsets gained because of the EML activities experience. The results of the studyare organized according to the following research question. Fourteen students participated in thepre- and post-survey.Research Question: What do the students gain in EM and Skillsets from the beginning to theend of the project?The mean and standard error were calculated for each skill or behavior assessment pre- and post-survey and the results are shown in Figure 1. The mean perception scores varied from 3 (Q 3) to3.5 (Q 1) and 3.8 (Q 6) to 4.3 (Q 4) on the pre- and post-survey, respectively. A statisticalanalysis was conducted on pre- and post-survey data to detect changes in students’ gains in EMskillsets over the semester. A
instructors.References1. R.S. Harichandran, N.O. Erdil, M-I. Carnasciali, J. Nocito-Gobel, and Q. Li, “Developing an Entrepreneurial Mindset in Engineering Students using Integrated E-learning Modules.” Adv. Eng. Educ., vol. 7, no. 1, 2018. Available: https://advances.asee.org/wp- content/uploads/vol07/issue01/Papers/AEE-Mindset-8-Harich.pdf2. N.O. Erdil, R.S. Harichandran, J. Nocito-Gobel, M.Carnasciali, and C.Q. Li, “Integrating E- Learning Modules into Engineering Courses to Develop an Entrepreneurial Mindset in Students.” in Proceedings of the 123rd ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, LA, June 2016. Available: https://strategy.asee.org/25800.3. N.O. Erdil, R.S. Harichandran, J. Nocito-Gobel, C.Q. Li, and M.Carnasciali, “Impact
indicated negativeresponses to stress.3.2 Indirect Assessment AnalysisThe 7-point Likert-type scale data from each of the indirect assessments were extracted fromQualtrics and cleaned to eliminate participants who did not complete the ratings across all scaleitems. Indirect assessment data from 103 students in the 2021-2022 cohort and 127 studentsbelonging to the 2022-2023 cohort were included for analysis.Upon cleaning the data, averages were computed for each of the Curiosity, Connections, andCreating Value constructs identified from prior work [21]. Construct averages were computed perparticipant following the scoring instructions defined by Kashdan et al. [27]. Q-Q plots for thepre- and post-data of each construct for both cohorts were
'Teacher-Centered' to 'Learner-Centered' Education. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.98CH36214), 1998, vol. 1, pp. 466-469. Available: doi: 10.1109/FIE.1998.736894. [accessed in December 2022].[3]. R. J. Fornaro, M. R. Heil, and A. L. Tharp, “Reflections on 10 years of sponsored senior design projects: Students win–clients win!,” Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 80, no. 8, pp. 1209-1216, 2007. 9[4]. R. Grantz and M. Thomas, "Internships: Academic Learning Outcomes" Higher Education, 93, 1996. Available: https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/slcehighered/93. [accessed in December 2022].[5]. Q. Liu, S. Kovalchuk, C. Rottmann, and D. Reeve, “Engineering co-op and internship
wereinconsiderate or disrespectful of each other, particularly during the Q&A parts of theirpresentations. In the future, we might offer modest prizes for the best projects, and/or penaltiesfor inappropriate behavior. We might also adopt a “code of conduct” [22]–[24] for the StartupWeekend or Palm Institute more broadly.5. ConclusionsThis paper has described the Palm Institute GreenLab and some of its offerings, including its firstGreenLab Startup Weekend. We have described the motivation, structure, things that workedwell, and things that could be improved. As noted above, the TechStars Startup Weekend hasbeen widely successful, and our scaled down model could easily be adapted in other settings.(We would be happy to share slides and handouts on
AssessingEngineering Education,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 105–115, 2004,[17] “Intercultural Knowledge and Competence VALUE rubric.” Association of AmericanColleges and Universities, 2009https://www.aacu.org/initiatives/value-initiative/value-rubrics/value-rubrics-intercultural-knowledge-and-competence[18] “Integrative and Applied Learning VALUE rubric.” Association of American Colleges andUniversities, 2009https://www.aacu.org/initiatives/value-initiative/value-rubrics/value-rubrics-integrative-and-applied-learning[19] Hylton, J. B., and Hays, B. A., “Modifying the VALUE Rubrics to Assess theEntrepreneurial Mind-set” Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition,Tampa, Florida. June 2019.[20] Li, C. Q., & Harichandran, R. S
technical and professional skills,” International Journal forService Learning in Engineering, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 1, Spring 2013.[25] R. S. Harichandran, M.-I. Carnasciali, N. O. Erdil, C. Q. Li, J. Nocito-Gobel, and S. D.Daniels, “Developing entrepreneurial thinking in engineering students by utilizing integratedonline modules,” presented at the 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2015, pp.[26] N. O. Erdil, R. S. Harichandran, J. Nocito-Gobel, C. Q. Li, and M.-I. Carnasciali, “Impact ofintegrated e-learning modules in developing an entrepreneurial mindset based on deployment at25 institutions,” presented
between entrepreneurship and strategicthinking." Neostrategic management: an international perspective on trends andchallenges (2016): 75-93[26] QS Ranking 2022 - Canada - Results | UniversityRankings.ch,https://www.universityrankings.ch/results/QS/2022?ranking=QS&year=2022®ion=&q=Canada, Accessed: 2023-02-13[27] Systems Innovation Capstone Project - Institute of Health Policy, Management andEvaluation, https://ihpme.utoronto.ca/course/had2040y/?highlight=systems%20thinking,Accessed: 2023-02-13[28] INFO 4620 - Systems Thinking and Changemaking Studio - Acalog ACMS™,https://catalog.mtroyal.ca/preview_course_nopop.php?catoid=17&coid=30732, Accessed: 2023-02-13 © American Society for Engineering Education
. [19]. The prompted responses to these questions werea combination of a five-point Likert scale, polar (Yes/No), and short answer. The complete survey and response type are provided in Table 1. Participants were instructed to circle a number from one to five, with one being least confident and five being most confident, indicating how they felt towards each question. able 1.Pre- and post-survey questions and associatedresponse types. Students were asked toTcomplete these questions during the first and last week of the GCSP-REU. uestion Q Question Response Type Number 1 I know how to identify a research lab and mentor
and Non- Cognitive Skills,” Int. J. Educ. Math. Sci. Technol., pp. 363–379, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.18404/ijemst.440339.[5] M. S. Griggs, S. E. Rimm-Kaufman, E. G. Merritt, and C. L. Patton, “The Responsive Classroom approach and fifth grade students’ math and science anxiety and self-efficacy,” Sch. Psychol. Q., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 360–373, 2013, doi: 10.1037/spq0000026.[6] G. Ramirez, H. Chang, E. A. Maloney, S. C. Levine, and S. L. Beilock, “On the relationship between math anxiety and math achievement in early elementary school: The role of problem solving strategies,” J. Exp. Child Psychol., vol. 141, pp. 83–100, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2015.07.014.[7] ChangeMaker Consulting LLC, “Camp Invention Evaluation
qualitative data analysis.,” in Analyzing and interpreting qualitative research: after the interview, C. Vanover, P. Mihas, and J. Saldaña, Eds., First Edition.Los Angeles: SAGE, 2022, pp. 133– 146.[32] J. Fereday and E. Muir-Cochrane, “Demonstrating Rigor Using Thematic Analysis: A Hybrid Approach of Inductive and Deductive Coding and Theme Development,” Int. J. Qual. Methods, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 80–92, Mar. 2006, doi: 10.1177/160940690600500107.[33] “Entrepreneurial Mindset | Engineering Unleashed.” https://engineeringunleashed.com/mindset (accessed Nov. 26, 2022).[34] M. B. Miles, A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldana, Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. SAGE Publications, 2013.[35] M. Q. Patton, Qualitative