, doi: 10.2304/elea.2009.6.4.372.[9] B. Nkonge and L. E. Gueldenzoph, “Best practices in online education: Implications for policy and practice,” Bus. Educ. Dig., no. 15, pp. 42–53, May 2006.[10] T. A. Fuhrmann and J. Hoth, “Interactive online learning modules for engineering students based on JiTT and PI,” in SEFI 49th Annual Conference: Blended Learning in Engineering Education: Challenging, Enlightening - and Lasting?, Berlin, Germany, 2021, pp. 825–835.[11] R. S. Harichandran, M.-I. Carnasciali, N. O. Erdil, C. Q. Li, J. Nocito-Gobel, and S. D. Daniels, “Developing entrepreneurial thinking in engineering students by utilizing integrated online modules,” presented at the 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
faculty across campus. This is where weuncovered the true paradox embroiled in connecting with our community. For example, we set upa meeting with a senior-level C/P faculty-member with first-hand knowledge of the promotionprocess for C/P faculty at the university level. On the whole, our conversation was valuable inaffirming that we were at least asking the right questions. However, when we expressed our lackof clarity around the process for promotion, the first response was to send us back to ourdepartments for examples and written expectations. Our departments did not have examples andthe written expectations were vague so we continued the conversation as follows. Q: “Can you tell us something about what a successful promotion package
and M. Talha, “Turnitin: Is it a text matching or plagiarism detection tool?,”Saudi J. Anaesth., vol. 13, no. Suppl 1, pp. S48–S51, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_772_18.[6] E. Eckel, “Textual Appropriation and Attribution in Engineering Theses andDissertations: An Exploratory Study,” in 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & ExpositionProceedings, Indianapolis, Indiana: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2014, p. 24.1184.1-24.1184.16. doi:10.18260/1-2--23117.[7] D. Simpson, “Academic dishonesty: An international student perspective,” High. Educ.Polit. Econ., vol. 2, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Apr. 2016, doi: 10.32674/hepe.v2i1.22.[8] Y. (Helen) Zhang, H. Lin, X. Zhang, and Q. Ye, “The next steps in academic integrity —education, awareness, norms
. Thomas, Q. T. Chie, M. Abraham, S. Jalarajan Raj, and L.-S. Beh, “A Qualitative Review of Literature on Peer Review of Teaching in Higher Education: An Application of the SWOT Framework,” Rev. Educ. Res., vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 112–159, Mar. 2014, doi: 10.3102/0034654313499617.[7] R. Esterhazy, T. de Lange, S. Bastiansen, and A. L. Wittek, “Moving Beyond Peer Review of Teaching: A Conceptual Framework for Collegial Faculty Development,” Rev. Educ. Res., vol. 91, no. 2, pp. 237–271, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.3102/0034654321990721.[8] “Reducing teachers’ resistance to reciprocal peer observation - Ribosa - European Journal of Education - Wiley Online Library.” Accessed: Feb. 08, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com
offering additional optionalworkshops because of the variance in TA duties across the college, but this would requireadditional staff and logistics that are a direction for future growth in this area.The required NEO workshops are Introductions, Implicit Bias, Grading and Feedback, EngagingStudents, Navigating Challenges, Presentation Skills, and a Q&A session with experienced TAs.Attendance and engagement in training workshops give TAs an opportunity to understandapplied learning and share meaningful experiences [11]. Approximately 180 TAs participate inNEO each year; it is offered every semester to all first-time teaching assistants in the College ofEngineering (80% of overall participants) while the other 20% come from the College
drastically different, as I replaced in-person office visits with online Q&A. (#93) Content: often could not cover as much online Delivery: many videos created, used webcam/doc cams, Zoom Preparation time: about double the preparation Assessment methods: online exams had to be a completely different format to lower effect of cheating Supporting students: bookable virtual office hours and more 1-on-1 meetings. (#42)Of those instructors who completed the survey (n=81), 85% (i.e., 69 instructors) reported havingaccessed at least one of the eight options in the survey for instructional support during thepandemic. As shown in Table 2, the most widely accessed one was the online resources providedby the education
, USA: Bantam Books, 1995.[24] P. E. Spector and B. J. O'Connell, “The contribution of personality traits, negative affectivity, locus of control and type A to the subsequent reports of job stressors and job strains,” J. Occup. Organ. Psych., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 1994. doi: 10.1111/j.2044- 8325.1994.tb00545.x[25] M. C. Saffie‐Robertson and J. Fiset, “Finding a tenure‐track position in academia in North America: Development of an employability model for new assistant professors,” High. Educ. Q., vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 263–277, 2020. doi: 10.1111/hequ.12278[26] Y. Brijmohan, G. Panther, and H. A. Diefes-Dux, “Response process validity of an adaptability instrument for use with engineering instructors,” in Proc. ASEE Conf
Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 117, no. 2, pp. 260–281, Aug. 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000154.[16] L. Williams, Q. A. Hirschi, C. Hulleman, and J. Roksa, “Belonging in STEM: Growth mindset as a filter of contextual cue,” International Journal of Community Well-Being, Mar. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42413-021-00111-z.[17] K. Muenks, V. X. Yan, N. R. Woodward, and S. E. Frey, “Elaborative learning practices are associated with perceived faculty growth mindset in undergraduate science classrooms,” Learning and Individual Differences, vol. 92, p. 102088, Dec. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2021.102088.[18] E. S. O’Leary et al., “Creating inclusive classrooms by
Feedback Form.” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://courseevaluationsupport.campuslabs.com/hc/en- us/articles/360038360953-IDEA-Diagnostic-Feedback-Form[16] D. J. Bernstein, J. Jonson, and K. Smith, “An examination of the implementation of peer review of teaching,” New Directions for Teaching and Learning, vol. 83, pp. 73–86, 2000. 5[17] M. Dennin et al., “Aligning practice to policies: Changing the culture to recognize and reward teaching at research universities,” CBE - Life Sciences Education, vol. 16, no. 4, p. 5, 2017, doi: 10.1187/cbe.17-02-0032.[18] S. Thomas, Q. T. Chie, M. Abraham, S. J. Raj, and L. Beh, “A qualitative review of the literature on peer review of teaching
. Farquhar, “Not just understudies: The dynamics of short‐term leadership,” Hum Resour Manage, vol. 34, no. 1, 1995, doi: 10.1002/hrm.3930340105.[6] D. Goss and J. Bridson, “Understanding interim management,” Human Resource Management Journal, vol. 8, no. 4, 1998, doi: 10.1111/j.1748-8583.1998.tb00179.x.[7] C. H. Mooney, M. Semadeni, and I. F. Kesner, “Six ways companies use interim CEOs,” Organ Dyn, vol. 41, no. 1, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2011.12.003.[8] N. Nicholson, “A Theory of Work Role Transitions,” Adm Sci Q, vol. 29, no. 2, 1984, doi: 10.2307/2393172.[9] S. V. Manderscheid and A. Ardichvili, “A conceptual model for leadership transition,” Performance Improvement Quarterly, vol. 20, no. 3–4, 2008
the last decade, she has dedicated her education efforts towards developing new experiential learning curriculum, creating preparation programs to address opportunity gaps, and enhancing involvement of student organizations in engineering education. Her academic research interest includes include sensing, sensors, soft materials, wearable sensors, and remote health monitoring/devices, where she has spent the last seven years developing thin-film optical pressure sensors and infant feeding dysfunction diagnostic devices.Prof. Truong Nguyen, University of California, San Diego Truong Q. Nguyen received the B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees in electrical engineering from the California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
, O. A. Adedokun and G. C. Weaver, “Teachers’ perceptions of rural STEM teaching: Implications for rural teacher retention”, The Rural Educator, vol.33, no.3, 2012.[35] Y. Hu, Q. Zhang and B. Wu, “Analyzing teaching characteristics and interaction patterns of STEM classroom from the perspective of multi-dimensional evaluation”, Chinese Journal of Distance Education, vol.42, no.9, pp.44-52, 2022.[36] K. Mitchem, D. Wells and J. Wells, “Using evaluation to ensure quality professional development in rural schools”, Journal of research in rural education, vol.18, no.2, pp.96-103, 2003.[37] C. Zhao, W. Zhao and Z. Jiang, “The Design of 5E Inquiry Teaching Model for STEM Education”, Modern Educational Technology, vol.29
: 10.1088/1742-6596/1607/1/012127.[13] N. Li, Q. Shen, R. Song, Y. Chi, and H. Xu, “MEduKG: A Deep-Learning-Based Approach for Multi-Modal Educational Knowledge Graph Construction,” Information, vol. 13, no. 2, p. 91, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.3390/info13020091.[14] N. F. Noy and D. L. McGuinness, “Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology.” Stanford knowledge systems laboratory technical report KSL-01-05 and …, 2001.[15] R. R. Starr and J. M. P. de Oliveira, “Concept maps as the first step in an ontology construction method,” Information Systems, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 771–783, 2013, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2012.05.010.[16] American Association of Colleges and Universities, “High Impact Practices,” AAC&
incident technique,” Psychol. Bull., vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 327– 358, 1954, doi: 10.1037/h0061470.[32] American Society for Engineering Education, “Engineering and Engineering Technology by the Numbers 2020,” Washington, DC, 2021.[33] M. Q. Patton, Qualitative research & evaluation methods: integrating theory and practice, Fourth edition. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc, 2015.[34] D. J. Clandinin and F. M. Connelly, Narrative Inquiry: Experience and Story in Qualitative Research. John Wiley & Sons, 2004.[35] T. D. Allen, L. T. Eby, and E. Lentz, “Mentorship behaviors and mentorship quality associated with formal mentoring programs: Closing the gap between research and practice.,” J. Appl. Psychol