Asee peer logo
Displaying all 16 results
Conference Session
Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 11
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Leonardo Pollettini Marcos, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Tiantian Li, Purdue University, West Lafayette ; Kristin Bartlett; Wanju Huang, Purdue University, West Lafayette ; Kerrie A. Douglas, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Divisions
Faculty Development Division (FDD)
, doi: 10.2304/elea.2009.6.4.372.[9] B. Nkonge and L. E. Gueldenzoph, “Best practices in online education: Implications for policy and practice,” Bus. Educ. Dig., no. 15, pp. 42–53, May 2006.[10] T. A. Fuhrmann and J. Hoth, “Interactive online learning modules for engineering students based on JiTT and PI,” in SEFI 49th Annual Conference: Blended Learning in Engineering Education: Challenging, Enlightening - and Lasting?, Berlin, Germany, 2021, pp. 825–835.[11] R. S. Harichandran, M.-I. Carnasciali, N. O. Erdil, C. Q. Li, J. Nocito-Gobel, and S. D. Daniels, “Developing entrepreneurial thinking in engineering students by utilizing integrated online modules,” presented at the 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Conference Session
Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 4
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
James Canino, Purdue University; Steve France, Purdue University; Ruth Wertz, Purdue University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Faculty Development Division (FDD)
faculty across campus. This is where weuncovered the true paradox embroiled in connecting with our community. For example, we set upa meeting with a senior-level C/P faculty-member with first-hand knowledge of the promotionprocess for C/P faculty at the university level. On the whole, our conversation was valuable inaffirming that we were at least asking the right questions. However, when we expressed our lackof clarity around the process for promotion, the first response was to send us back to ourdepartments for examples and written expectations. Our departments did not have examples andthe written expectations were vague so we continued the conversation as follows. Q: “Can you tell us something about what a successful promotion package
Conference Session
Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 1
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Mireia Perera-Gonzalez, Northeastern University; Shiaoming Shi, Northeastern University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Faculty Development Division (FDD)
and M. Talha, “Turnitin: Is it a text matching or plagiarism detection tool?,”Saudi J. Anaesth., vol. 13, no. Suppl 1, pp. S48–S51, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_772_18.[6] E. Eckel, “Textual Appropriation and Attribution in Engineering Theses andDissertations: An Exploratory Study,” in 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & ExpositionProceedings, Indianapolis, Indiana: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2014, p. 24.1184.1-24.1184.16. doi:10.18260/1-2--23117.[7] D. Simpson, “Academic dishonesty: An international student perspective,” High. Educ.Polit. Econ., vol. 2, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Apr. 2016, doi: 10.32674/hepe.v2i1.22.[8] Y. (Helen) Zhang, H. Lin, X. Zhang, and Q. Ye, “The next steps in academic integrity —education, awareness, norms
Conference Session
Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 10
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Nyna Jaye DeWitt, University of Georgia; Animesh Paul, University of Georgia; John Ray Morelock, University of Georgia
Tagged Divisions
Faculty Development Division (FDD)
. Thomas, Q. T. Chie, M. Abraham, S. Jalarajan Raj, and L.-S. Beh, “A Qualitative Review of Literature on Peer Review of Teaching in Higher Education: An Application of the SWOT Framework,” Rev. Educ. Res., vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 112–159, Mar. 2014, doi: 10.3102/0034654313499617.[7] R. Esterhazy, T. de Lange, S. Bastiansen, and A. L. Wittek, “Moving Beyond Peer Review of Teaching: A Conceptual Framework for Collegial Faculty Development,” Rev. Educ. Res., vol. 91, no. 2, pp. 237–271, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.3102/0034654321990721.[8] “Reducing teachers’ resistance to reciprocal peer observation - Ribosa - European Journal of Education - Wiley Online Library.” Accessed: Feb. 08, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com
Conference Session
Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 5
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Haley Briel, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Deesha Chadha; Chris Dakes, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Erica Jean Hagen, University of Wisconsin, Madison; James Iain Campbell, Imperial College London; Umang Vinubhai Shah
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Faculty Development Division (FDD)
offering additional optionalworkshops because of the variance in TA duties across the college, but this would requireadditional staff and logistics that are a direction for future growth in this area.The required NEO workshops are Introductions, Implicit Bias, Grading and Feedback, EngagingStudents, Navigating Challenges, Presentation Skills, and a Q&A session with experienced TAs.Attendance and engagement in training workshops give TAs an opportunity to understandapplied learning and share meaningful experiences [11]. Approximately 180 TAs participate inNEO each year; it is offered every semester to all first-time teaching assistants in the College ofEngineering (80% of overall participants) while the other 20% come from the College
Conference Session
Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 11
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Qin Liu; Greg Evans P.Eng.; Milad Moghaddas; Tamara Kecman
Tagged Divisions
Faculty Development Division (FDD)
drastically different, as I replaced in-person office visits with online Q&A. (#93) Content: often could not cover as much online Delivery: many videos created, used webcam/doc cams, Zoom Preparation time: about double the preparation Assessment methods: online exams had to be a completely different format to lower effect of cheating Supporting students: bookable virtual office hours and more 1-on-1 meetings. (#42)Of those instructors who completed the survey (n=81), 85% (i.e., 69 instructors) reported havingaccessed at least one of the eight options in the survey for instructional support during thepandemic. As shown in Table 2, the most widely accessed one was the online resources providedby the education
Conference Session
Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 7
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, University of Nebraska, Lincoln; Grace Panther, University of Nebraska, Lincoln; Kayla Osen
Tagged Divisions
Faculty Development Division (FDD)
, USA: Bantam Books, 1995.[24] P. E. Spector and B. J. O'Connell, “The contribution of personality traits, negative affectivity, locus of control and type A to the subsequent reports of job stressors and job strains,” J. Occup. Organ. Psych., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 1994. doi: 10.1111/j.2044- 8325.1994.tb00545.x[25] M. C. Saffie‐Robertson and J. Fiset, “Finding a tenure‐track position in academia in North America: Development of an employability model for new assistant professors,” High. Educ. Q., vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 263–277, 2020. doi: 10.1111/hequ.12278[26] Y. Brijmohan, G. Panther, and H. A. Diefes-Dux, “Response process validity of an adaptability instrument for use with engineering instructors,” in Proc. ASEE Conf
Conference Session
Faculty Development Division (FDD) Poster Session
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Minju Kim, University of California, San Diego; Carolyn L Sandoval, University of California, San Diego; Josephine Relaford-Doyle, University of California, San Diego; Torus Washington II, University of California, San Diego; Saharnaz Baghdadchi, University of California, San Diego; Nathan Delson, University of California, San Diego; Marko Lubarda, University of California, San Diego; Alex M. Phan, University of California, San Diego; Curt Schurgers, University of California, San Diego; Huihui Qi, University of California, San Diego
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Faculty Development Division (FDD)
Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 117, no. 2, pp. 260–281, Aug. 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000154.[16] L. Williams, Q. A. Hirschi, C. Hulleman, and J. Roksa, “Belonging in STEM: Growth mindset as a filter of contextual cue,” International Journal of Community Well-Being, Mar. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42413-021-00111-z.[17] K. Muenks, V. X. Yan, N. R. Woodward, and S. E. Frey, “Elaborative learning practices are associated with perceived faculty growth mindset in undergraduate science classrooms,” Learning and Individual Differences, vol. 92, p. 102088, Dec. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2021.102088.[18] E. S. O’Leary et al., “Creating inclusive classrooms by
Conference Session
Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 7
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sarah Lynn Orton P.E., University of Missouri, Columbia
Tagged Divisions
Faculty Development Division (FDD)
Feedback Form.” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://courseevaluationsupport.campuslabs.com/hc/en- us/articles/360038360953-IDEA-Diagnostic-Feedback-Form[16] D. J. Bernstein, J. Jonson, and K. Smith, “An examination of the implementation of peer review of teaching,” New Directions for Teaching and Learning, vol. 83, pp. 73–86, 2000. 5[17] M. Dennin et al., “Aligning practice to policies: Changing the culture to recognize and reward teaching at research universities,” CBE - Life Sciences Education, vol. 16, no. 4, p. 5, 2017, doi: 10.1187/cbe.17-02-0032.[18] S. Thomas, Q. T. Chie, M. Abraham, S. J. Raj, and L. Beh, “A qualitative review of the literature on peer review of teaching
Conference Session
Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 4
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Michael James McGinnis, LeTourneau University; Matthew G. Green, LeTourneau University
Tagged Divisions
Faculty Development Division (FDD)
. Farquhar, “Not just understudies: The dynamics of short‐term leadership,” Hum Resour Manage, vol. 34, no. 1, 1995, doi: 10.1002/hrm.3930340105.[6] D. Goss and J. Bridson, “Understanding interim management,” Human Resource Management Journal, vol. 8, no. 4, 1998, doi: 10.1111/j.1748-8583.1998.tb00179.x.[7] C. H. Mooney, M. Semadeni, and I. F. Kesner, “Six ways companies use interim CEOs,” Organ Dyn, vol. 41, no. 1, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2011.12.003.[8] N. Nicholson, “A Theory of Work Role Transitions,” Adm Sci Q, vol. 29, no. 2, 1984, doi: 10.2307/2393172.[9] S. V. Manderscheid and A. Ardichvili, “A conceptual model for leadership transition,” Performance Improvement Quarterly, vol. 20, no. 3–4, 2008
Conference Session
Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 9
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Phuong Truong, University of California, San Diego; Truong Nguyen, University of California, San Diego; James Friend, University of California, San Diego; Alex M. Phan, University of California, San Diego
Tagged Divisions
Faculty Development Division (FDD)
the last decade, she has dedicated her education efforts towards developing new experiential learning curriculum, creating preparation programs to address opportunity gaps, and enhancing involvement of student organizations in engineering education. Her academic research interest includes include sensing, sensors, soft materials, wearable sensors, and remote health monitoring/devices, where she has spent the last seven years developing thin-film optical pressure sensors and infant feeding dysfunction diagnostic devices.Prof. Truong Nguyen, University of California, San Diego Truong Q. Nguyen received the B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees in electrical engineering from the California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
Conference Session
Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 10
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Yi Wang; Fangyuan Chai; Yuan Liu; Jun Zhu; Jing Jin
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Faculty Development Division (FDD)
, O. A. Adedokun and G. C. Weaver, “Teachers’ perceptions of rural STEM teaching: Implications for rural teacher retention”, The Rural Educator, vol.33, no.3, 2012.[35] Y. Hu, Q. Zhang and B. Wu, “Analyzing teaching characteristics and interaction patterns of STEM classroom from the perspective of multi-dimensional evaluation”, Chinese Journal of Distance Education, vol.42, no.9, pp.44-52, 2022.[36] K. Mitchem, D. Wells and J. Wells, “Using evaluation to ensure quality professional development in rural schools”, Journal of research in rural education, vol.18, no.2, pp.96-103, 2003.[37] C. Zhao, W. Zhao and Z. Jiang, “The Design of 5E Inquiry Teaching Model for STEM Education”, Modern Educational Technology, vol.29
Conference Session
Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 8
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Natalia Villanueva Rosales, The University of Texas at El Paso; Ann C. Gates, The University of Texas at El Paso; Lani Nicole Godenzi, The University of Texas at El Paso; Francisco Osuna, The University of Texas at El Paso; Angel U. Ortega, The University of Texas at El Paso; Veronica A. Carrillo, The University of Texas at El Paso
Tagged Divisions
Faculty Development Division (FDD)
: 10.1088/1742-6596/1607/1/012127.[13] N. Li, Q. Shen, R. Song, Y. Chi, and H. Xu, “MEduKG: A Deep-Learning-Based Approach for Multi-Modal Educational Knowledge Graph Construction,” Information, vol. 13, no. 2, p. 91, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.3390/info13020091.[14] N. F. Noy and D. L. McGuinness, “Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology.” Stanford knowledge systems laboratory technical report KSL-01-05 and …, 2001.[15] R. R. Starr and J. M. P. de Oliveira, “Concept maps as the first step in an ontology construction method,” Information Systems, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 771–783, 2013, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2012.05.010.[16] American Association of Colleges and Universities, “High Impact Practices,” AAC&
Conference Session
Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 3
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Moses Olayemi, Purdue University, West Lafayette ; Jennifer Deboer, Purdue University, West Lafayette ; Mohammad Javad Ahmadi
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Faculty Development Division (FDD)
Conference Session
Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 6
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jennifer Hadley Perkins, Arizona State University; Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Arizona State University; Adam R. Carberry, Arizona State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Faculty Development Division (FDD)
incident technique,” Psychol. Bull., vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 327– 358, 1954, doi: 10.1037/h0061470.[32] American Society for Engineering Education, “Engineering and Engineering Technology by the Numbers 2020,” Washington, DC, 2021.[33] M. Q. Patton, Qualitative research & evaluation methods: integrating theory and practice, Fourth edition. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc, 2015.[34] D. J. Clandinin and F. M. Connelly, Narrative Inquiry: Experience and Story in Qualitative Research. John Wiley & Sons, 2004.[35] T. D. Allen, L. T. Eby, and E. Lentz, “Mentorship behaviors and mentorship quality associated with formal mentoring programs: Closing the gap between research and practice.,” J. Appl. Psychol
Conference Session
Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 2
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Idalis Villanueva Alarcón, University of Florida; Laura Melissa Cruz Castro, University of Florida; John Alexander Mendoza-Garcia, University of Florida; Edward Latorre-Navarro, University of Florida; Diego Alvarado, University of Florida; Lilianny Virguez, University of Florida
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Faculty Development Division (FDD)