the Advancement of Engineering Education. Center for the Advancement ofEngineering Education.Brozina, C. (2018). Measuring commuter student support and success through academicintegration. In 2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education (FIE) (pp. 1-4). San, Jose, CA. IEEE.Chen, Y., Johri, A. & Rangwala, H. (2018). Running Out of STEM: A Comparative Study acrossSTEM Majors of College Students At-Risk of Dropping Out Early. Proceedings of LearningAnalytics and Knowledge (LAK).Duck, S. (1991). Diaries and Logs. In B. Montgomery & S. W. Duck (Eds.) StudyingInterpersonal Interaction. Guilford: New York, 1991. pp 141-161.Johri, A. (2019). The Age of Analytics. ASEE Prism, 28 (6), 21-21Johri, A. (2018). Absorptive Capacity and Routines: Understanding
organizations such as the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) and National Society of Black Engineers (NSBE). To contact Dr. Long, email: Leroy.Long@erau.edu.Ms. Claudia Morello, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Claudia Morello graduated from Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University with a B.S. in Astronomy and Astrophysics in 2018. She is now a graduate student in physics at Kansas State University, where she does light scattering research. She has helped teach many science and engineering classes, and wants to increase the diversity in STEM fields. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Using More Frequent and Formative Assessment When
. His research on the longitudinal study of engineering students, team assign- ment, peer evaluation, and active and collaborative teaching methods has been supported by the National Science Foundation and the Sloan Foundation and his team received for the best paper published in the Journal of Engineering Education in 2008, 2011, and 2019 and from the IEEE Transactions on Education in 2011 and 2015. Dr. Ohland is an ABET Program Evaluator for ASEE. He was the 2002–2006 President of Tau Beta Pi and is a Fellow of the ASEE, IEEE, and AAAS.Hayaam Osman, Purdue University at West Lafayette American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Advanced Placement
pedagogical research that enhances students class experience and interdisciplinary research in which software engineering is used to empower other disciplines. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Lean Manufacturing Initiative to Streamline the Advising Process, A Work-in-progressAbstract In this work-in-progress, we describe a novel advising process that employs student Peer Mentors (PM) to enhance the operational efficiency of academic advisors. A “Lean manufacturing” framework is used to classify all activities as value-added or non-value- added ones. By applying this framework to our current advising process for first-year students within the School of
predictors of preparedness for college (SAT scores), thoseexam attendees (attending 2 or 3 exam sessions) outperformed their non-exam (attending 0 or 1exam session) attending peers with similar scores. Qualitative survey data indicated strongpositive perceptions of the collaborative exam review and its impact on students’ study time anduse of effective study strategies.IntroductionIn the summer of 2019, our research collaborators attended the Annual ASEE Conference and inparticular, a session presentation on the use of collaborative practice exams in historicallydifficult introductory math and science courses at the University of Kansas [1]. The methodimplemented by this team is detailed in their paper and described below.The collaborative mock exam
University. He has degrees from Swarthmore College, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, and the University of Florida. His research on the longitudinal study of engineering students, team assign- ment, peer evaluation, and active and collaborative teaching methods has been supported by the National Science Foundation and the Sloan Foundation and his team received for the best paper published in the Journal of Engineering Education in 2008, 2011, and 2019 and from the IEEE Transactions on Education in 2011 and 2015. Dr. Ohland is an ABET Program Evaluator for ASEE. He was the 2002–2006 President of Tau Beta Pi and is a Fellow of the ASEE, IEEE, and AAAS. American c
Jan 2019].[3] K. Reid, D. Reeping, “A classification scheme for ”Introduction to Engineering” courses:defining first-year courses based on descriptions, outcomes and assessment”, 2014 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana, June, 2014.[4] M. Yatchmeneff, M. Calhoun, “Exploring engineering identity in a common Introduction toEngineering course to improve retention”, 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition,Columbus, Ohio, June, 2017.[5] S. Peuker, N.A.G. Schauss, “Improving student success and retention rates in engineering: aninnovative approach for first-year courses”, 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition,Seattle, Washington, June, 2015.[6] M. Darbeheshti, D. R. Edmonds, “A creative first-year program to
, broadimpressions, and intuition. Thinking types are logical and fact-based, while feeling types aresubjective and value-based. Judging types prefer structure, order, and a task-orientation, whileperceiving types prefer an open and flexible approach. No personality type is considered to bebetter than another; it is just a tool to help individuals know more about their strengths, weaknesses,likes, dislikes, compatibility with other people and even possible career preferences. A study doneby the ASEE-MBTI Consortium in 1980 showed that the majority of engineering students tend tohave thinking and judging personality types and often they are introverted [2-3]. While this studyis quite old, it is the most comprehensive study on the personality types of
-Dux, H. A., & Salim, A. (2009). Problem formulation during model-eliciting activities: Characterization of first-year students’ responses. In Proceedings of the Research in Engineering Education Symposium. 7[23] Mercer, K., Weaver, K., & Stables-Kennedy, A. (2019). Understanding undergraduate engineering student information access and needs: Results from a scoping review. 2019 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Tampa, FL.[24] K Becker, K., & Mentzer, N. (2015, September). Engineering design thinking: High school students' performance and knowledge. In 2015 International conference on interactive collaborative learning (ICL) (pp. 5-12
Students Through Product Archaeology,” in American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, 2019.[17] S. Bakrania, K. E. Mallouk, and K. K. Bhatia, “Consumer reports inspired introduction to engineering project,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2015.
,” 2017, retrieved from https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/tables/2010-2017/state/totals/[2] World Population Review, “Native American Population by State 2017,” 2017, retrieved from http://worldpopulationreview.com/states/native-american-population/[3] G. Padmanabhan, R. Pieri, and C. Davis, (2011). “A Unique University-Tribal College Collaboration to Strengthen Native American Pathways to STEM Education”. ASEE. AC 2011-184. [4] ND-EPSCoR, “Previous STEM Capacity Review Papers,” 2020, retrieved from https://www.ndepscor.ndus.edu/serving-our- state/partnershipstobuildstemcapacity/previouswhitepaperversions/[5] National Center for Education Statistics, “The Condition of Education 2019,” NCES 2019
Engineering Education Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 914– 925, 2013[4] Lamers, Maarten H., Peter van der Putten, and Fons J., Verbeek,”Chapter 8: Observations on Tinkering” in Scientific Education in Entertaining the Whole World, A. D. Cheok (editor), Springer-Verlag, London, 2014, 137-145.[5] Nathan Holland, Brian Aufderheide, and Demetris Geddis, “Addition of Arduino Kits to Introductory Engineering Course,” ASEE Southeastern Section Conference Proceedings, 2019[6] International Organization for Standardization. (2019). _ Ergonomics of human-system interaction — Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems_ (ISO Standard No. 9241-210:2019). Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/standard/77520.html[7] Norman, Don
thatthey acquire through their senses, while intuitive people dwell on abstract theory and intuition.Thinking people make decisions based on logical and often impersonal facts, while feeling peopletend to be subjective and value-based. Finally, judging people prefer orderly, structured, task-oriented lives, while perceiving people prefer flexibility and openness.A 1980 study by the ASEE-MBTI Engineering Consortium of eight universities showed that GenX engineering students are dominated by thinking and judging personality types and are moreoften introverted; there was little difference between sensing and intuitive types [1]. Thesefindings are supported by other researchers [2-7].Course Description and SurveyStudents in the first-year course
forBiomedicine, BioScience, Volume 65, Issue 2, February 2015, Pages 183–188.[11] Beigpourian, B., & Ohland, M. W. (2019, June), A Systematized Review: Gender and Racein Teamwork in Undergraduate Engineering Classrooms Paper presented at 2019 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition , Tampa, Florida. 10.18260/1-2--32011[12] Ruha Benjamin, Race After Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code, SocialForces, Volume 98, Issue 4, June 2020, Pages 1–3.[13] Accreditation Criteria and Support Documents,http://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditationcriteria/ Accessed on March 4, 2021[14] National Society of Professional Engineers. 2013. NSPE Engineering Body of Knowledge.http://www.nspe.org/sites/default/files/resources/nspe-body-of-knowledge.pdf
Initiatives to Promote Engineering Success,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition 2018, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, June 2018.[2] P. Treuer, and L. Whisler, “Entangled learning: An overview,” retrieved from https://www.EntangledLearning.org, 2019.[3] L. Whisler, and P. Treuer, “How to entangle peer educators,” Synergy, 10, 2017.[4] A. Badir, J. Liao, T. Kunberger, G.I. Papkov, L.D. Nguyen, and R. O'Neill, “Exam Wrappers, Reflection, and Student Performance in Engineering Mechanics,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition 2018, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, June, 2018.[5] P. Gezer-Templeton, E. Mayhew, D. Korte, and S. Schmidt, “Use of Exam Wrappers to Enhance Students’ Metacognitive Skills in a Large
sharing presentations are an instructional tool that can be utilized by otherengineering educators at the university level to provide holistic benefits to students.References[1] E.A. Stephan, L. Whisler, and A. Stephan, “Work in progress: Strategic, translational retention initiatives to promote engineering success,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition 2018, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, June 2018.[2] L. Whisler, A. Stephan, and E.A. Stephan, “Promoting metacognitive awareness in a first-year learning strategies course for cohorted general engineering students,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition 2019, Tampa, Florida, USA, June 2019.[3] E. Kjolsing, and L.V. Den Einde, “Peer instruction: Using isomorphic
. Kamali’s work is supported by funding from National Science Foundation and local/international companies. He is a member of IEEE and ASEE. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Improving Retention in Entry Level Engineering Education by Adding Hands-on Courses of Clinics of Engineering in The First Year of StudyIntroductionThe four-year BS degree in Electrical Engineering (EE) program is well established at manyuniversities. Since most of the EE programs were successful in previous decades, there were lesschanges in the lower-division courses and students are taking very few or not any courses fromtheir major in the first two years of the program. But in recent
throughout due to the team-based nature of the course. One example of cooperativelearning present in ENGR 111 is periodic peer evaluations amongst team members with respect toteamwork effectiveness. The ENGR 111 Cornerstone project is an example of project-basedlearning, where students work toward completion of a fully realized project. Finally, discovery-based learning is employed throughout ENGR 111 course lesson plans.In the Spring 2019 iteration of ENGR 111, students were surveyed a ten-point Likert scale on theirintentions to continue pursuing an engineering major. Students were then instructed to answer afollow-up question that asked the degree of impact their ENGR 111 experience had on their answerto the previous question. Out of the 440
Education, pp. 319-336, October 2010.[18] M. Morris, R. Hensel, and J. Dygert, “Why Do Students Leave? An Investigation Into Why Well-Supported Students Leave a First-Year Engineering Program,” ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition,Tampa, Florida, June 2019.[19] Changing the Conversation Messages for Improving Public Understanding of Engineering. National Academy of Sciences, 2008.
, K. Bazargan, S. Mantell, J. M. Feinberg, and R. J. Holmes, “Engaging First-YearStudents with a Hands-On Course using Student-Driven Projects,” in Proc. 126st ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, Tampa, FL, June, 2019.[6] A. Kemppainen, G. Hein, N. Manser, “Does an Open-Ended Design Project increase Creativity in EngineeringStudents?,” in Proc. Frontiers in Education 2017, Indianapolis, IN, October, 2017.[7] C. Wang, “Teaching Entrepreneurial Mindset in a First Year Introduction to Engineering Course,” in Proc. 126stASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio, June, 2017.[8] KEEN Engineering Unleased, Retrieved from http://engineeringunleashed.com/keen/[9] R. M. Ryan, and E. L. Deci, “Self-Determination Theory and the
the data, e.g., when only one or two out offour members completed the assessment, and incorporating qualitative research methods such asfocus groups, interviews, and observations for a more thorough analysis.References[1] National Academy of Engineering. 2004. The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering inthe New Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.[2] ABET, "Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2018 - 2019," ABET, 2018.[Online]. Available:https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2018-2019/. [Accessed 30 Jan 2019].[3] Bodnar, L. J., & Lagoudas, M. Z., & Hodge, J. Q., & Smith, T. A., & Orozco, J. A., & Corso,J. G., & Sanchez, C
the Assistant Director. In this role, he serves as the engineering lab coordinator for the EDD 111/112 courses. Mr. Gieskes received both his B.S. and M.S. degrees in Mechanical Engineering from Binghamton University. In 2019, he received the SUNY Chancellor’s Award for Excellence in Teaching. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Work-In-Progress: 1st-Year Engineering Students and Factors in Their Selection of a MajorIntroduction1st-year engineering students often are unsure which field of engineering they want to pursue. Totrack the impact of its 1st-year engineering program, students in the Watson College
Integrated Projects at NYU. His Vertically Integrated Projects course is on Smart Cities Technology with a focus on trans- portation. His primary focus is developing curriculum, mentoring students, and engineering education research, particularly for project-based curriculum, first-year engineering, and transportation. He is ac- tive in the American Society for Engineering Education and is the Webmaster for the ASEE First-Year Programs Division and the First-Year Engineering Experience Conference. He is affiliated with the Trans- portation Engineering program in the NYU Civil and Urban Engineering Department, and is the Associate Director for Education and Workforce Development Initiatives for the Connected Cities for
efforts related to improving equity and inclusion, with specific attention to supporting premajor students. Women in WWU ENGD Underserved Students in WWU ENGD Vs. National Average vs National Average25.0% 25.0%20.0% 20.0%15.0% 15.0%10.0% 10.0% 5.0% 5.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2016 2017 2018 2019
Affordances and Challenges to Incorporating Visual Methods in Mixed Methods Research,” American Behavioral Scientist, vol. 62, no. 7, pp. 935–955, 2018.[25] J. Saldaña, The coding manual for qualitative researchers, 2nd ed. Los Angeles: SAGE, 2013.[26] M. B. James, K. Hodges, and J. L. Lo, “Enhancing Student Perceptions of Engineering Disciplines through Showcasing of Career Paths,” presented at the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2019, Accessed: Apr. 27, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/enhancing-student-perceptions-of-engineering-disciplines-through- showcasing-of-career-paths.
of Alavi FTIR Spectroscopic Imaging Lab (AFISIL) and supervises multi- ple undergraduate students in their research. Her research interest includes characterization of biological samples by employing FTIR Spectroscopic Imaging techniques and developing novel digital image pro- cessing and analysis algorithms to process the collected FTIR-spectro-microscopic data. Additionally, Dr Alavi is a member of IEEE, ASEE and she has been a member of McLeod Institute of Simulation Science and pursues research in advanced control systems simulation. Dr Alavi also conducts research in promoting electrical engineering undergraduate education and is the recipient of the best paper award in the Electrical and Computer Engineering
currently investigating the use of the flipped classroom model and collaborative learning. His research in cyber security for industrial control systems is focused on high assurance field devices using microkernel architectures. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 An Interdisciplinary Research Collaboration to Understand First-Year Engineering RetentionAbstractThis Evidence-based practice paper documents the collaboration, research, and future work ofthe interdisciplinary research team, the Guild for Engineering Education, Achievement,Retention and Success (GEARS) at the University of Louisville’s J.B. Speed School ofEngineering. Over the last 9 years (2010-2018
“Introduction to Engineering” Course Paper presented at2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida. 10.18260/1-2—33140[3] Rabb, R. J., & Howison, J., & Skenes, K. (2015, June), Assessing and Developing a First-year Introduction to Mechanical Engineering Course Paper presented at 2015 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington. 10.18260/p.23576[4] ABET Accreditation Procedure and Policy Manual (APPM) 2021-2022, ABET [online].Available https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/accreditation-policy-and-procedure-manual-appm-2021-2022/ [Accessed Mar. 8, 2021].[5] Robinson, B. S., & Hawkins, N., & Lewis, J. E., & Foreman, J. C. (2019, June), Creation,Development, and Delivery of a New
and success is tightly correlated with a sense of belonging, between student peers andbetween students and their program. By bringing full-time faculty into close and persistentcontact with students in the fall freshman year and throughout the curriculum, the engineeringprograms at York College of Pennsylvania hope to create an environment where students feelsupported and encouraged to survive the significant challenges of an undergraduate engineeringeducation.References [1] ABET, “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2019 – 2020,” ABET, 2018. [2] V. Ercolano, “From Sleep to 101 to Success 101,” ASEE Prism, pp. 24–29, September 1995. [3] V. Ercolano, “Designing Freshman,” ASEE Prism, pp. 20–25, April 1996. [4] S. Sheppard and R
Paper ID #33450Cohort-Based Supplemental Instruction Sessions as a Holistic RetentionApproach in a First-Year Engineering CourseMiss Nisha Abraham, University of Texas at Austin Nisha coordinates the Supplemental Instruction program. She received her B.S. in cell and molecular biology from The University of Texas at Austin in 2007, her M.S. in biology from Texas A&M University in 2012 and her M.A. in STEM Education from The University of Texas at Austin in 2019. Additionally, she has over five years of combined industry and science research experience, has worked as a senior bioscience associate at UT’s Austin Technology