work at Tufts Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy (U.S. Foreign Policy), in Madrid, Spain (language pedagogy) and Ameri- can University (International Law and Organizations). She also served as a Fellow to the United Nations University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 What is the Length of a Toilet Paper Tube? A Hands-On, Team-Based Lesson in the Ethics of Data CollectionAbstractWe describe a hands-on, team-based classroom activity designed to help engineering studentsunderstand the ethics of data collection, analysis and reporting processes. This lesson ispresented to students as a “mini research competition” involving the collection of data to answerthe
realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility g) an ability to communicate effectively h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context i) a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning j) a knowledge of contemporary issues k) an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for
• Track II: Construction Management”MS in Technology Management program outcomes [15] are listed as: 1. “Graduates will have knowledge and competency in the field of technology management with an emphasis on engineering technologies. 2. Graduates will have the knowledge and skills necessary to be imaginative, critical thinkers who are able to discover problems and questions, develop logical answers, and apply effective solutions in the practice of technology management. 3. Graduates will have knowledge of ethical behavior in professional positions in all aspects of technology management. 4. Graduates will have competency in the management and leadership of technology in global
displayspecific traits and perform a multitude of other indispensable activities including ethical andprofessional behavior, resilience, clear communication, change management, risk-taking, teambuilding, conflict management, and decision-making [7,8]. The criticality of these issues andpotential ways to expose students to such skill sets has been encouraged by the publication of aSpecial Issue on Engineering Education: Beyond Technical Skills [7]. ABET also indicates theneed for such skill development via Criterion 3 where students must display the ability tofunction on multidisciplinary teams, understand professional and ethical responsibility,communicate effectively, and understand the impact of engineering solutions in a context thatincludes global
Program: Preparing the Future Professoriate andPedagogical Practices in Contemporary Contexts (Contemporary Pedagogy). Preparing theFuture Professoriate, taught by Dean DePauw, provides students with context and fundamentalknowledge of modern issues they may face as a future faculty member in the United States orabroad. The semester begins with discussions about the structure of the university and facultyresponsibilities within the university. The remainder of the semester gives an overview of highereducation, including topics such as shifting student demographics, diversity and inclusion, theimpact of technology in the classroom, ethical standards in research, and paradigm shifts ineducation and university policy. In Preparing the Future
entities at the university that align with progression through a doctoral program. Examples of the modules include: ₋ Year 1: time management, success in graduate school ₋ Year 2: responsible conduct of research, data management, teamwork, ethics, mentoring, oral presentations, writing conference abstracts ₋ Year 3: writing academic papers, effective graphics for presentations, networking, responding to reviews, having difficult conversations ₋ Year 4
Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Dr. Linda Naimi is Associate Professor in Technology Leadership and Innovation at Purdue University and an Attorney at law. Her research interests include ethics and law for leaders in engineering and technology; global technology leadership; innovation and commercialization; and intellectual property. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 The Professional Doctorate in Technology Leadership, Research & Innovation K. Newton Professor & Associate Dean for Graduate Programs Purdue Polytechnic
, developmentally appropriate way to enable them to evaluate evidence critically, make informed judgments, and act ethically. Creat[ing] a vibrant campus learning community that blends curricular and cocurricular learning opportunities and capitalizes on the roles of all constituents (faculty, staff, and students) in promoting student learning.” (p. 19)In the summer of 2011, the College of Engineering at Michigan State University (MSU)introduced a comprehensive professional development program to complement its existingundergraduate summer research internships.12–16 As part of this EnSURE (Engineering SummerUndergraduate Research Experience) program, students participated in weekly professionaldevelopment seminars and periodic
provides enrichment activities geared towardcreating awareness plus developing interest and providing logistical information about graduateschool. For example, workshops include topics on developing research skills, general graduateschool information, the Graduate Record Examination (GRE), research ethics andprofessionalism, and communicating research. Additional workshops are geared towardundergraduate student retention for expanding the pool of potential graduate students. Facultymentor the students in developing graduate school applications their senior year. Students arealso provided tools to help them obtain internships and undergraduate research experiences. AllSIIRE students have financial need, and scholarships are provided through an NSF
industries. This encourages toursto be organized for students to learn what different industries focus on and if they are interestedin that line of work. It is also an opportunity for students that participate in the tours to observeand take note of professional skills and conduct in the workplace.ResultsBefore the student can graduate with an MSPS degree, the student must complete a 250-hourinternship with a business that is related to their field of study. This internship replaces thetraditional thesis requirement. While a thesis teaches the student work ethic and proper researchskills, it lacks providing the student much needed hands-on experience he/she receives from realworld industry exposure.3 Students develop problem-solving skills that can
skills with various types of tools and equipment.13 They tendto have better time management skills than younger students14, greater ethical awareness12, and ahigher work ethic and motivation level.12,13They do face certain challenges, though, due to their non-traditional pathways. They may havechallenges in finding the appropriate graduate program, navigating the admission process, andsecuring funding, since they have been out of the university environment and immersed in adifferent environment.2,15 Once these students are admitted, they may find that they need torefresh their knowledge of higher-level mathematics and learn new computer programs.9Furthermore, they may need to deal with personal and family responsibilities that youngerstudents do
existing knowledge, identifying and accessing appropriate resources and other sources of relevant information and critically analyzing and evaluating one’s own findings and those of others Master application of existing research methodologies, techniques, and technical skills Communicate in a style appropriate to the discipline7The University of Virginia cites the importance of many similar skills for their graduate studentsacross disciplines and to these lists adds the ability to deal with ambiguity, to reach and defendconclusions, ethics and integrity, leadership, seeing a project through from inception tocompletion, being self-motivated, and demonstrating strategic
socialization;presentation skills; leadership and management; career management; writing and publishing;teaching and mentoring; professionalism and ethics; and wellness and life balance. PEGS21scholars participate in at least two (2) professional development GradPathways workshops eachquarter. Participants are then asked to reflect on the value of each workshop on their learning.PEGS21 participants self-select the workshops they attended.For each of the graduate pathways workshops attended, participants complete a post-workshopreflection assignment on why they selected the workshop topic and what they learned from theworkshop. Reflections are submitted electronically for review and comment based on a completeand thorough exposition of the writer’s
of teaching.1. IntroductionSkills such as communication, professionalism, ethics, and project management are notspecifically taught within the engineering graduate curriculum. These skills, referred to as softskills or professional skills, are often assumed to be acquired as a result of performing academictasks and “constant” communication with other graduate students and faculty members [1]. TheCanadian Association of Graduate Studies (CAGS) recognizes the duty and responsibility ofuniversities to train these soft skills. CAGS defines professional development as knowledge thatmust be provided along with practice and continuous coaching within the graduate programs [2].During their first year of graduate studies, many engineering students
Paper ID #28515Developing and Sustaining a Research Group: A Novel Approach toOnboarding Doctoral StudentsDr. Madeline Polmear, University of Florida Madeline Polmear is a postdoctoral researcher in the Department of Civil and Coastal Engineering at the University of Florida. Her research interests include workforce development and engineering ethics education.Dr. Denise Rutledge Simmons P.E., University of Florida Denise R. Simmons, Ph.D., PE, LEED-AP, is an associate professor in the Department of Civil and Coastal Engineering in the Herbert Wertheim College of Engineering at the University of Florida. She holds a
analytical portions of the test are converted to apercentile score to allow for comparison of scores across testing dates.Perceptions of the GREThere have been studies conducted on how students perceive the GRE and whether it is viewedas being a fair test by different social classes and ethical groups. Research conducted by Kliegeret al. in 2017 concluded that for United States citizens, “the average standardized test scores ofWhite and Asian examinees have generally exceeded the average scores of Black and Hispanicexaminees by at least one half to a full standard deviation [5].” This seems to support the claimmade by Groeger in 1998 who indicated that a “sample of 4,248 first-year graduate studentsshowed that 96% of the Black applicants indicated
2020 from Purdue. Ali has been a researcher at the Concrete Technology and Durability Research Center at AUT for 3 years, and has served as a research scholar at IUST for 2 years. At Purdue, he has served as a teaching assistant since 2015 and head teaching assistant at EPICS since 2017. Ali has more than 30 publications on different aspects of civil engineering, education and curriculum design, and engineering ethics. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Engineering Graduate Education: An Overwhelming Journey of First-Generation Immigrants Hoda EHSAN1, Shabnam GHOTBI2, Hossein EBRAHIMINEZHAD3, and Seyedali
assumptions about their intellect and identity in the forms of bias, derogatory remarks,toxic stereotypes, and microaggressions [16]. Due to their assumptions about minoritizedstudents, they often interacted with them assuming that they had poor work ethic or lack inacademic ability [22]. Discrimination includes stereotypes, biases, isolation, unwelcomingcultures, and many of the other factors examined in this review.Advisor and Faculty SupportMinoritized students’ relationships with their advisor and faculty can prove to be a double-edgedsword that can have a negative or positive influence on retention [12]. Graduate students cannotprogress through their respective programs without the constant support of their advisor. Thistype of mentorship