engineering and those defined for all students of the University by the Office ofInternational Affairs at Ohio State University. The eight are: 1. Understanding of global cultural diversities and their impact on engineering decisions. 2. Ability to deal with ethical issues arising from cultural or national differences. 3. Proficiency in a second language. 4. Ability to communicate across cultural and linguistic boundaries. 5. Proficiency in working in an ethnically and culturally diverse team. 6. Understanding of the connectedness of the world and the workings of the global economy. 7. Understanding of the international aspects of engineering topics such as supply chain
school stakeholder groups. Then thethirteen FE program outcomes that were evaluated in this research are: 1. An ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science and engineering. 2. An ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as analyze and interpret data 3. An ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs. 4. An ability to function on multidisciplinary teams 5. An ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems. 6. An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility. 7. An ability to communicate effectively 8. The broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context. 9. A recognition of
faster way and in a larger community. For engineers, the decisionprocess is even more complex once the implications have serious impact not only to the targetcustomers but also to the society as a whole and to the environment. This is an aspect that showsthe necessity for engineers to search for the acquisition of an ability to respond to socialnecessities having in mind the cultural aspects when developing a project.The effects of this aspect in engineering formation implies a different approach providing thefuture engineers a notion about policy, ethics and social sciences, which are so important toprepare them to the future work market that will require the respect and promotion of society andenvironment as assets1.Most of social groups have
experience the benefits that will last alifetime. (3)III. The Mentor as a FriendSome academics believe and advice strongly in maintaining a business-like relationshipbetween mentors and mentees. They claim that: a professor should not have any casualrelationships with students, and such relationships “conflict with our fundamentalobligations as faculty members,(4) and the ethics of the relationship require that thefaculty member remains “dispassionate,” avoiding any appearance of partiality. Thefaculty member should “not seek to be their psychiatrist, friend, or lover.” (5) While someof us may agree about the psychiatrist and lover part, many of us do not agree thatfriendship between students and faculty members has ill effects and should not
available (http://www.laccei.org/index.php/initiatives/accreditation).The LACCEI Par Amigo training is modular and contains a module (Module A) coveringgeneral accreditation information and a second module (Module B) specific to particularaccreditation agencies. Module A can be completed online or at LACCEI annual conferencesand events or other educational conferences. Module B is delivered in collaboration withaccreditation agencies at LACCEI annual conferences and events.Individuals certified and registered in the Par Amigo Registry through LACCEI need to be experienced faculty/engineers knowledgeable in the relevant accreditation process requirements ethical and diplomatic with a clear understanding of and respect for the
3 IET-317 Industrial Economic Analysis 3MFG-431 Controls for Industrial Automation 3 MFG-427 CIM & Global Manufacturing 3ECT-490 Senior Project 3 MFG-490 Senior Project 3PHL-316 PHL-316 Engineering Ethics 3 PHL-316 PHL-316 Engineering Ethics 3 Spring 2013 Total 18 Spring 2013 Total 18* ENG-270 + 271 will fulfill the University of Dayton requirements for ENG-101 + 102.Shanghai Normal University
institutions in developing countries with the goal of promoting international bridge-building and understanding by bringing together students and faculty in an intense teachingand societal experience. The objectives are to place nanoscience in the context of thedeveloping world and demonstrate the societal and ethical dimensions of nanotechnology. Inaddition, we hope to establish relationships with foreign researchers while providing anintense course on select NSE topics.Each year, approximately 10-15 U.S. graduate students and 5-7 U.S. faculty participate in arigorous course in an emerging and research-intensive interdisciplinary NSE topic at a hostinstitution in a developing country. Host country faculty also participate in the courseoffering. The
supply thecomprehensive understanding swiftly transforming field demands. It is a full-time PhD programthat lasts two years, offering classes conducted on an undergraduate-type schedule.It has a curriculum that addresses the time-crunch problem by integrating professional practicesinto the technical curriculum — that is, professional practices are contextualized in engineeringin ways that reinforce and strengthen students’ understanding and their ability to apply thatunderstanding to address engineering problems. Throughout their graduate program, studentswork to master the engineering body of knowledge and simultaneously become skillfulcommunicators, ethical decision makers, team leaders, creative thinkers and problem solvers.Today, engineers
Paper ID #6392Problem-Solving Learning Environments for an Introduction to Food Engi-neering CourseProf. Tammara Ram´ırez , Universidad de las Americas Puebla Tammara Ramrez is a Science, Engineering, and Technology Education Ph.D. student at Universidad de las Americas Puebla in Mexico. She teaches ethics and development complex thinking skills related courses. Her research interests include faculty development, outcomes assessment, and creating effective learning environments.Prof. Aurelio Lopez-Malo, Universidad de las Americas PueblaDr. Enrique Palou, Universidad de las Americas Puebla Professor Palou is director of
future and educating engineers to meetthe needs of the new era Engineer of 202022. The report on “The Engineer of 2020: Vision ofEngineering in the New Century” completed in 2004, and “Educating the Engineer of 2020:Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century” completed in 2005 discusses variousfuture scenarios based on scientific and technological trends for United States to maintain itseconomic competitiveness and improve the quality of life for people around the world. It alsoidentifies ideal attributes of the engineer of 2020, and recommends ways to improve training toprepare engineers for addressing the complex technical, social, and ethical questions raised byemerging technologies.22,23 Many engineering institutions in the US are
their plan to become engage in international accreditation. In 2011 the Center’sboard of directors agreed that IRTE’s operations should be folded into NCATE as of July2012, with each active IRTE member given a plan for leveraging its current status with IRTEinto eventual candidacy for accreditation with NCATE, TEAC or CAEP.4. Issues in foreign evaluationsWhile the authors of this paper are strong supporters of the international agendas of USaccreditors of professional programs, these activities also raise operational challenges andsuggest ethical dilemmas.Agency capacityAccreditation bodies in the US are non-profit and non-governmental, and as such rely heavilyupon volunteers as evaluators and reviewers. It often takes years for a given
; f) understanding of professional and ethical responsibility; g) the ability to communicate effectively; h) the understanding of the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context; i) the need for an ability to engage in life-long learning; j) knowledge of contemporary issues; k) the ability to use techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools for engineering practice.Industrial ExposureWeek two began with a train and subway ride to the FrankfurtMesse (fairgrounds), where the triennial ACHEMA exhibitionwas occurring. ACHEMA is arguably the world’s largestexhibition of equipment for the chemical and process industries;including exhibits of analytical and laboratory equipment andcomponents, process
Paper ID #6175The Teaching and Evaluation of Technology and Engineering Concepts to Do-minican Junior High and High School StudentsDr. Geoff Wright, Brigham Young University Dr. Geoffrey A. Wright is an assistant Professor of Technology and Engineering Education in the College of Engineering at Brigham Young University.Prof. Ron Terry, Brigham Young University Ron is a Professor of Technology and Engineering Education at Brigham Young University. His scholar- ship centers on pedagogy, student learning, and engineering ethics and has presented/published numerous articles in engineering education.Dr. Steven L Shumway
, and is one of the best universities in Mexico.The Tecnológico de Monterrey has more than 126,000 registered students and almost 8,000faculty members on its 33 Campuses. The Tecnológico de Monterrey has been accredited by theSouthern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS). The mission of Tecnológico deMonterrey is to: form persons with integrity, ethical standards and a humanistic outlook, who areinternationally competitive in their professional fields and will, at the same time, be goodcitizens committed to the economic, political, social, and cultural development of theircommunity and to the sustainable use of natural resources. Given these missions, Tecnológicode Monterrey and its community are committed to contributing to the
through human interaction, such as how tocompromise, inspire, persuade; how to build a life of high ethics and moral value;how to work creatively with people of different backgrounds; when, and how, tospeak — and when, and how, to listen. The university of the future should offerthe best of both worlds, integrating the best ways to learn online with the bestways to learn in person (Reif, 2012). Schools should blend new educationaldelivery methods with their traditional, hands-on model to make residentialeducation even more effective. Ideally, by adopting the new technologies to helpimprove education, the cost of residential education can be lowered whilesimultaneously improving its quality (Reif, 2012).Universities and colleges should act and
, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability with the mindset of using nature as a design inspiration The ability to function on multidisciplinary teams by using resources and references from biology, life sciences, and multiple engineering disciplines The ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems by using nature as a mentor for design concepts The ability to communicate