studentsreceive is that the majority of people who will be responsible for fabrication of the design on siteare not members of the class. Thus, the level of documentation and planning required issignificant, even when compared to a capstone design course, since the design team will not bepresent for the construction phase. Figure 5 shows that all students agreed that the class helpedtheir engineering and workplace skills. The overwhelming majority also said they wouldrecommend this class to their peers.Figure 5: Student responses to end-of-semester IDEA [24] survey supplemental questions: “(60)The critical reflection papers helped me to consider and understand the principles of CST. (61)The service-learning experience in this course (the design project
craft. The goals are to foster interdisciplinary student collaboration and to providestudents with the opportunity to learn and apply the hands-on skills promoted by the Makerculture. Each semester, a different Maker is selected through an application process. The Makerleads a small group of students through a series of hands-on fabrication workshops during thesemester. When the project is complete, the program culminates in a capstone event that sharesthe project with the larger University community.The MIR executive committee, which consists of 6-8 undergraduate students, leads andadministers the program with faculty support. The committee issues the Call for Proposals forboth Makers and student participants; conducts interviews and reference
to Disabilities Studies course isto challenge each student’s perception of “disability” and expand their product designcapabilities beyond the required components of a capstone design experience. Studentscompleted readings about assistive technology19 and discussed the impact of a variety ofassistive technology devices such as cochlear implants, closed-captioned videos, braille watches,prosthetic limbs, canes, crutches, walkers, etc.Design project detailsMultidisciplinary student teams were challenged to design and develop a conceptual prototype ofa new product for a person with a disability. Specifically, we asked students to focus on aproduct that encourages full participation in life. We wanted to move students away from solvinga problem
full list in Table 1). While the rubric was designed to allowfor assessment of a variety of project types, it has only been applied to civil engineering studentdesign projects.5The rubric includes two four-point rating scales to aid evaluators in judging capstone reportsbased on the 16 sustainable design criteria. The earned points scale [0-3] captures the extent towhich students consider each sustainable design criterion in their capstone projects. Evaluatorsassign a score of 0 to projects that show no evidence of incorporating the design criterion, whilea score of 3 is assigned if the project shows evidence of extensive criterion application. Thepotential points scale [0-3] describes the extent to which each sustainable design criterion
engineering profession, and through this coursework, to learn frameworks for analysis: a policy or an economic framework, for example. These courses are also open to (and popular with) nonmajors, leading to interdisciplinary discussions and project teams. The curriculum builds to a unique capstone experience (e.g. Rossmann and Sanford Bernhardt, 2015).Engineering students at Lafayette College also take approximately one-third of theircourses outside STEM subjects, in the humanities, arts, and social sciences. Thesedistribution requirements introduce engineering students to alternate “ways of knowing,”comprising a liberal education. However, these requirements are not necessarilyintegrative; they may provide opportunities for
, particularly in engineering departmentswhere general education courses have never been offered. The process of developing the minorand assessing its core courses is described more fully in another research project presented atASEE 20175. The Innovation Pathways Minor (IPM) is for students who want to develop as innovatorsin an interdisciplinary context. This minor provides a core sequence of classes with opportunitiesto practice these skills, as well as elective credits for students to pursue their personal interests.This minor also fills a unique niche by helping students expand their entrepreneurial ideasthrough customer discovery and business model activities. At the end of the minor, students willhave a capstone opportunity to unite their
ePortfolio; Engineering N/ACapstone taken simultaneously with a capstone design courseDesign Engineering/ Critique & Practice Incorporates all skills learned in the minor in aCapstone Various in Design & Arts team project A pervasive challenge of developing a minor like the IPM is communicating clearlyacross disciplines. Because the IPM core sequence includes courses from three differentcolleges, the faculty teaching these courses have had to work closely to negotiate terminologyand outcomes throughout the minor. One example of this is the term “design,” which can beviewed differently
anexample conversation loosely synthesized from an engineering senior capstone project (detailschanged) follow: Person A: We're falling behind on our capstone project. I really don't think the software platform we're designing is appropriate for the high school students we are supposedly making it for, and want to switch to a more beginner-friendly programming language for them, but we're already two weeks behind and my teammates just want to keep going... (continues describing the issue, then steps back for B and C to discuss) Person B: It sounds like A feels like she should be working extra hours outside of class to prototype the project in a different language so she can show her team it works
discussion pedagogy (Barnes et al.1994). We wish to synergistically combine the two pedagogies and the two learning paradigmsin our program by (1) having faculty members develop multi-disciplinary case studies (perhapswith the aid of MS theses students), (2) using these as scaffolding examples for students in multi-disciplinary teams at the junior level, and (3) measuring the improvement in a student’smetacognition process when the student undertakes a capstone team project in a later semester(Bransford et al, 2000).Theoretical Basis:Conceptualization of active student engagement (ASE) is associated with a critical reflection onknowledge gains including theoretical premises such as motivation; building results-orientedmindset, “learning in context
preparation for [sic] engineering coursework at MIT or Olin College.”34 Unlike the “big ideas”approach used at Princeton, here the course covers themes such as mechanism design, feedbackand control, modeling, and a project-based design capstone. The emphasis on “rigor” is perhapsnot surprising given the potential of the course to serve as a prerequisite for other engineeringcoursework. As a women’s college, this emphasis on rigor may also be doing a certain kind ofwork at Wellesley in establishing qualifications for female students seeking to enter more male-focused environments.At Smith College, engineering fundamentals is cast to include hands-on work, design,experimentation, and exploration, taking more of an engineering-practices focus. Smith
different levels of emphasis on experiential learning. Those schoolswith less experiential learning courses tended to feature more courses where students learnedconcepts and demonstrated competence through traditional exercises like problem sets andexams. Engineering educators have steadily incorporated problem-based learning exercises,projects and capstone experiences into undergraduate engineering education. Problem-basedLearning (PBL) has been one technique introduced in order to bring ‘real life’ problems into theclassroom. Those educational exercises, particularly PBL, emphasize information-seeking as askill that will be developed through participation in the exercise. What we may see in these datais the payoff of those activities, but as one
the curriculum with social context Architectural Civil Environmental Mechanical First year First-year projects: some sections S-L, some community context, some little/no social context AR/CV Intro (2-cr) EV Intro (1-cr) Second year Engineering Geology* Fund Environmental Eng Professional Sustainability Principles Issues Third year Intro to Fund Environmental Eng Env Microbiology Construction Intro to Construction Air Pollution Control Fourth year Capstone
students, not just GE students. As such, it isbeing developed by faculty within and outside GE.1st Year: User-Centered DesignOne major challenge that engineers universally face is the disconnect of their work from itsusers. In this first year class, we stress that designs cannot be based simply on the designers’ ownunderstanding, and we emphasize the need to develop empathy for users, who may have differentassumptions and experiences. In an effort to better integrate social justice into engineering, thiscourse aims to help students understand their own privileges, which we achieve throughreflection journals, activities such as a trip to a local museum with an exhibit on race, andclassroom discussion. The course project entails a community
ofexperience or too little experience. [Some of them] were beneath my degree … There wasnothing…. tailored at the entry-level. It took a while to find something.” The handful of applicationshe submitted through online job boards were all unsuccessful. Yet his social connections helped tooffset his inexperience. He eventually secured a job offer through a family friend who providedinformation on a company and manager recruiting for a position.Milan also credited landing a job to his involvement in extra-curricular activities: “I would say themost valuable things were the extracurricular, [and] my summer co-op. I did put some courses, my[capstone] project because it showed that I managed a project, went through the entire designprocess. I don’t think
. We see potential for this approach of holistic assessment to be useful outside of UVA,especially for other institutions’ evaluations of how HSS and STS contribute to engineeringeducation. Engineering educators already value assessing technical skills through real-worldcase-study evaluations, such as in capstone research and design projects and in the Principles andPractice of Engineering (PE) exam. The difficulties of assessing students’ abilities to integratetheir various kinds of knowledge are also present in these technical activities. Our approach canhelp pave the way for identifying indicators of students’ integration of information and holisticcritical thinking across subjects and skills. Also, it was clear from the spread of the