Paper ID #39840Rogue Engineering: Teaching Frankenstein as a Parable of (Un)ethicalEngineering PracticeDr. Benjamin J. Laugelli, University of Virginia Dr. Laugelli is an Assistant Professor of Engineering and Society at the University of Virginia. He teaches courses that analyze social and ethical aspects of engineering design and practice. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Rogue Engineering: Teaching Frankenstein as a Parable of (Un)ethical Engineering PracticeAbstractMary Shelley’s novel Frankenstein is widely regarded as a foundational work of
Paper ID #43601Left on their Own: Confronting Absences of AI Ethics Training among EngineeringMaster’s StudentsElana Goldenkoff, University of MichiganDr. Erin A. Cech, University of Michigan ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Left on their Own: Confronting Absences of AI Ethics Training amongEngineering Master’s StudentsAbstractAlthough development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies has been underway fordecades, the acceleration of AI capabilities and rapid expansion of user access in the past fewyears has elicited public excitement as well as alarm. Leaders in government and academia, aswell as members of the
ResearchersAbstractThis pilot study explores engineering students' views on social responsibility in undergraduateresearch experiences. Participants displayed high concern for human welfare and safety butneeded more education and training to understand the importance of being socially responsiblescientists and engineers. To address this, the authors recommend incorporating a formalcurriculum to facilitate students' understanding and articulation of their views on socialresponsibility in science and engineering research. The authors provide suggested case studiesfor engineering educators to incorporate social responsibility topics into their curriculum,enabling students to learn and debate the ethical and social implications of their research,promoting critical
student success; and (c) cultivate more ethical future scientists and engineers by blending social, political and technological spheres. She prioritizes working on projects that seek to share power with students and orient to stu- dents as partners in educational transformation. She pursues projects that aim to advance social justice in undergraduate STEM programs and she makes these struggles for change a direct focus of her research.Devyn Elizabeth ShaferDr. Brianne Gutmann, San Jos´e State University Brianne Gutmann (she/her) is an Assistant Professor at San Jos´e State University. She does physics education research with expertise in adaptive online learning tools, identity-responsive mentoring and community
respond to the complex ethical, social, political, andenvironmental challenges of today, they may begin to eschew traditional case studies that portrayengineering as objective and apolitical. In this way, they may begin to “transgress” againstdominant views of engineering that can limit students’ critical thinking and engagement withsocio-political issues within engineering contexts. Liberatory pedagogy also disrupts the statusquo of power dynamics and practices in the postsecondary classroom, opening up space for newclassroom activities and assessments that create a more collaborative and equitable learningenvironment [1].In this paper, I explore the redesign of an undergraduate engineering technology and societycourse in relation to the idea of
the University of Toronto. Her research interests include engineering culture, engineering careers in the public sector, and ethics and equity in STEM. Dimpho has several years of experience in thDr. Emily Moore P.Eng., University of Toronto Emily Moore is the Director of the Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering (Troost ILead) at the University of Toronto. Emily spent 20 years as a professional engineer, first as an R&D engineer in a Fortune 500 company, and then leadingDr. Andrea Chan, University of Toronto Andrea Chan is a Senior Research Associate at the Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering | University of TorontoMs. Emily Macdonald-Roach, University of Toronto
University Channel Islands and Virginia tech he explores community empowerment for environmental justice, global engineering ethics, critical pedagogy coupled to STS, He specializes in sustainable technology, social movements, and community engagement stemming from a background in Science and Technology Studies. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Cultivating “global competency” in a divided world Cultivating “global competency” in a divided world: A collaborative autoethnography of the cross-border, dialogue-based curriculum designINTRODUCTIONBACKGROUNDAmid the pandemic and geopolitical conflicts, the world and local communities are facingsupply chain
personal insights, emotions, and experiences through poetry writing. 5. Fostering Interdisciplinary Connections: Explore the intersection of engineering and other disciplines, such as literature and art, to foster interdisciplinary thinking and broaden students' perspectives on their field of study. 6. Stimulating Critical Thinking: Challenge students to analyze and interpret poetry written by others, including poems related to engineering themes, to develop critical thinking skills and appreciate diverse perspectives. 7. Promoting Empathy and Ethical Awareness: Encourage students to consider the societal, environmental, and ethical implications of engineering projects through poetry that explores
intention to major, which reinforces theimportance of curricular structures that enable students to experience a sense of community andconnection.” While the National Academy of Engineering in [14] states the system to educateengineers should include several elements including “the economic, political, ethical, and socialconstraints as boundary conditions that define the possible range of solutions for engineeringproblems and demand the interaction of engineers with the public.[14, p. 18]” The NationalAcademy also stated that surveys of pre-college students consistently demonstrate an interest incareers where “helping-others” is a key aspect and that it would be “particularly helpful if theengineering community could successfully communicate the
promote a movement toward Solidarity Engineering that contributes to an ethic of care,love, equity, and justice among people and planet.Keywords: Solidarity Engineering, Ethics of Care, Love, Social Justice, Equity, Sustainability,Capitalism, Militarism, Collaborative Inquiry, Engineering PathwaysIntroduction “We live in a world in which a tree is worth more, financially, dead than alive, in a world in which a whale is worth more dead than alive. For so long as our economy works in that way and corporations go unregulated, they're going to continue to destroy trees, to kill whales, to mine the earth, and to continue to pull oil out of the ground, even though we know it is destroying the planet and we know that
, invokes a context inwhich “societal actors and innovators become mutually responsive to each other with a view onthe (ethical) acceptability, sustainability, and societal desirability of the innovation process andits marketable products” (Von Schomberg quoted by Schwartz-Plaschg, p. 149). In other words,the language of RRI assumes a very different kind of relationship between actors than does thelanguage of regulation. An awareness of the power of analogies can heighten our sensibilitiesregarding the linguistic choices we habitually make.Where analogical imagination refers to the context evoked by a particular choice of words,analogical reasoning is a form of critical thinking in which we make an implicit comparisonexplicit and explore how the
Paper ID #42156The Power of Place: A Critical Examination of Engineering Enculturation &Identity FormationDr. Timothy Duane Reedy, University of Maryland, College ParkDr. David Tomblin, University of Maryland, College Park David is the director of the Science, Technology and Society program at the University of Maryland, College Park. He works with STEM majors on the ethical and social dimensions of science and technology. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 The Power of Place: A Critical Examination of Engineering Enculturation and Identity FormationAbstract
crucialmechanism by which U.S. engineering education settings have grappled with unwanted politicalsensibilities is through silencing. There is an enduring sense that rigorous, respectableengineering training, as well as engineering in action, from the technical classroom, at the labbench, or on the factory floor must exclude the subjectivities we know as “politics.” This isdespite the concession by some that value systems known as “ethics” or “rigor” may (must) bebolstered [26], [27]. Across many technical subdisciplines, so-named ethics and other liabilitysystems are today seen to represent the universe of Engineers’ moral responsibilities in itsentirety. We are prompted to ask, then: How precisely does such apparent depoliticization ofEngineering
Proceedings of the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.[7] Gupta, A. (2017, June). A practitioner account of integrating macro-ethics discussion in an engineering design class. In 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.[8] Hess, J. L., & Fore, G. (2018). A systematic literature review of US engineering ethics interventions. Science and engineering ethics, 24, 551-583.[9] Winiecki, D., & Salzman, N. (2019, January). Analyzing and Working-Out Ways of Addressing Problems of Social-Justice in an Engineering or Computer-Science Context. In 2019 NSF REDCON (Revolutionizing Engineering & Computer Science Department CONference), Arlington, VA.[10] Gupta, A., Turpen, C., Philip, T., & Elby, A
University of Virginia. He is the principal investigator at University of Virginia on the ’4C Project’ on Cultivating Cultures of Ethical STEM education with col- leagues from Notre Dame, Xavier University and St. Mary’s College. His research focuses on wicked problems that arise at the intersection of society and technology. Rider holds a Ph.D. in Sustainability from Arizona State University, and a Master’s degree in Environmental Management from Harvard Uni- versity and a Bachelor’s degree in Environmental Science from University of New Hampshire. Before earning his doctorate, he has worked for a decade in consulting and emergency response for Triumvirate Environmental Inc.Andrew LiRebecca Jun, University of Virginia
learning outcomes associated with ABET 2021-2022 (Seshagiri &Goteti, 2014). Being attentive to the guidance (and oversight) related to ABET accreditationoffers students, parents, employers, and society the assurance that a college or universityprogram is meeting a standard of quality that is required in the professional engineering domain.A purposeful trajectory toward a rigorous engineering education is critical, in a race to safely,methodically, and ethically address complex technological systems meeting the speed andfinancial pressures of creative design (Dekker, 2011).Capstone design as professional preparation/readinessThe concept of creating multidisciplinary or interdisciplinary capstone design courses at the post-secondary education
HurricaneKatrina. Two readings covered: 1) the culmination of many decisions that led to segregation andinequity in New Orleans, and 2) the engineering failures of the levy system which lefthistorically black neighborhoods at risk. Class discussion began by acknowledging the sensitivityof these topics. The discussion focused on the convergence of the articles. This topic relates topower imbalances in both political institutions and engineering decision-making.Third, we asked students to select a scenario either local to the community the university is in ortheir hometowns that centered on public health, environmental, or ethical concerns related toinfrastructure or industry. Scenarios selected included historical sites, such as the Love Canal, tomodern
followed human subjects research ethics guidance from theuniversity at which the interviews were conducted and the authors’ university.ContextSeveral contextual factors undoubtedly shaped the interviews that were analyzed for this paper.First, a COVID-19 resurgence drove many campus activities back to the virtual realm. Second,Canada’s Indigenous people were frequently in the news. The nation’s Truth and ReconciliationCommission ,which was formed as a result of growing awareness the horrific situation withResidential Schools, was frequently in the news [25]. Canada recognized Sep. 30 as the NationalDay for Truth and Reconciliation with a number of educational and recognition activities.Perhaps related to all of the news and events, it is not
,pedagogical and student experiences. Similarly, with a focus on an engineering thermodynamics course,Riley [5] motivates the use of liberative pedagogies in engineering education by relating pedagogy tostudents’ prior experiences, student responsibility and authority, including ethics and policy, decenteringwestern knowledge systems.Institutional and Data Collection ContextThe student co-authors of this paper, who are currently in their sophomore year, are enrolled in anundergraduate engineering program developed around the intellectual theme of “human-centered”engineering. The program integrates the university’s liberal arts curriculum with an experientialengineering curriculum emphasizing societal responsibility.For the liberal arts requirement of
the participants’ likelihood of success byfostering development of personal or individual adaptive strengths. Building on this, Burt et al.(2021) propose a new model of wholeness in graduate advising based on an ethic of care. Thefocus on wholeness directs attention to the need to recognize black male students as wholepersons, including the influence of family (Brooms & Davis, 2017; Tolbert Smith, 2022). Forexample, Tolbert Smith (2022) shows that black families and extended family members providedblack men’s primary sources of support, although black men also benefited from bi-directionalexchange of cultural capital when navigating non-inclusive environments. In the same vein,Burrell et al. (2015) suggest that while teacher expectations
the Social Responsibility Attitudes of Engineering Students Over Time,” Sci Eng Ethics, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 1535–1551, Oct. 2016, doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9706-5.[13] J. Huff, B. K. Jesiek, C. B. Zoltowski, K. D. Ramane, and W. C. Oakes, “Social and Technical Dimensions of Engineering Identity,” presented at the 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2016. Accessed: Jan. 18, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/social-and-technical-dimensions-of- engineering-identity[14] M. H. Hwang, E. Trueblood, and S. A. Claussen, “Engineering Identity, Perceptions of Sociotechnical Education, and Views of Engineering Practice in Undergraduate Students,” in 2022 IEEE Frontiers in Education
Paper ID #43452Extraordinary Engineering Impacts on Society: Over Seven Decades of Contributionsfrom the National Science Foundation: A U.S. National Academy of EngineeringStudyMs. Casey Gibson, National Academy of Engineering Casey Gibson, M.S., is an Associate Program Officer at the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) of the U.S. National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine where she contributes to the Cultural, Ethical, Social, and Environmental Responsibility in Engineering (CESER) program. Gibson holds an M.S. from the Colorado School of Mines in Humanitarian Engineering and Science with a specialization
knowing are valid, and whoseapproach to communication can be valued” (p.20). The predicament and challenge ofcommunication across difference also presents opportunities and ethical imperatives, contendscholars working on social justice in technical communication [22], [23]. These scholars, amongmany others, highlight a social justice imperative and work to foreground the influence ofidentity and culture on technical communication.Problems of access, representation, and equity are not unique to STEM contexts. Social justiceresearch takes up the problem of injustice and discrimination in TPC research and workplaces,illuminating both problems of inequity and possibilities for change [20]. Issues of power,privilege, and positionality circulate
Purdue University. His current research interests focus on engineering ethics, the connections between personal morals and professional ethics, and how students ethically develop as engineers. He earned a B.S. in Chemical and Biochemical Engineering at the Colorado School of Mines (Golden, CO) in 2020.Polly Parkinson, Utah State UniversityFawn Groves, Utah State UniversityDr. Angela Minichiello, Utah State University Angela (Angie) Minichiello is a military veteran, licensed mechanical engineer, and associate professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Utah State University. Her research examines issues of access, equity, and identity in the formation of engineers and a diverse, transdisciplinary 21st century
Paper ID #37619The Development of Career Resilience for Early Career Engineers inChina: A Grounded Theory StudyMr. Lichao Ma, Tsinghua University Lichao MA, male, PhD. student, Division of Engineering Education Research Tsinghua University. His scholarship focuses on higher education policy and management, engineering education. He is devoted to understanding and facilitating Chinese higher engineering education reform, through which he expects to cultivate engineers who can demonstrate innovation, resilience, social competency, responsibility and ethics. His research is published with journals like The Asia-Pacific
working full time for four years, earning my PE during that time, I left to entergraduate school, studying ethics, religion, and focusing ultimately on women’s, gender, andqueer studies. I continued to work in engineering part time remotely as a I completed mymaster’s and PhD. My academic training is in humanities, but religion is an interdisciplinaryfield that allows for many methods, including ethnographic methods. For my dissertation, Iundertook a qualitative study of Cambodian women who were leaders in their Buddhist andChristian religious communities, my work funded by a Fulbright award. My work always looksfor the underlying, unspoken values and the effects of these, my academic lens influencedespecially by the work of queer theorists (e.g
Past President and Wise Woman of the Organization for the Study of Communication, Language, and Gender. She has received career achievement awards from ICA, NCA, the Central States Communication Association, and Purdue University where she was a Distinguished University Professor in communication and engineer- ing education (by courtesy) and Endowed Chair and Director of the Susan Bulkeley Butler Center for Leadership Excellence. Her primary research areas are organizational communication, career, work-life, resilience, feminist/gender, and design. Her grants have focused on ethics, institutional transformation, and diversity-equity-inclusion-belongingness in the professional formation of engineers.Dr. Sean M
evaluation that aligns withthe learning objectives of the respective courses while providing an evaluation model thatempowers learners.To move this opportunity forward, we have identified two primary areas for further explorationof visual methods-based assessment and evaluation in STEM education. First, a more concretecomparison to traditional methods regarding effectiveness and validity is necessary. The secondarea is more internalized, where we further explore the benefits and consequently, limitations ofvisual methods in assessment and evaluation, particularly to identify what circumstances best fitspecific visual method options. More generally, future research should focus on developingeffective and ethical practices for integrating visual
of mentors and advisors from nonprofit organizations also participated in curricularactivities, but the nonprofit partners were not involved in course instruction, and theirinvolvement in ongoing curricular design and programming was mostly limited to mentoringactivities that focused on exposing students to nonprofit models. Finally, the instructional staffwas supplemented by buy-outs of faculty with expertise in communication, humanities,engineering, ethics, and data analytics.Integral to the curricular organization of this academic plan were collaborative, cross-disciplinary projects where students were introduced to “real world problems” that they workedon in small groups or teams. Outside of this studio course, students were also