Director of the Rockwell Automation laboratory at Texas A&M University, a state-of-the-art facility for education and research in the areas of automation, control, and automated system integration. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Research Projects and Lessons Learned from Research Experiences for Undergraduates Program in Automated System DesignAbstractAutomated systems affect the way we do things and impact our daily lives. Designing andbuilding automated systems is complex and requires an integrated skill set. The knowledgeneeded cuts across multiple disciplines of mechanical engineering, control/electrical engineering,and manufacturing engineering. U.S. manufacturers are
studentsparticipated in at least two different poster competitions (2017 Appalachian Energy summit, andMSIPP Consortium for Advanced Manufacturing 1st, 2nd, and 3rd Annual CAM Scholar PosterCompetitors), utilizing the work learned at the summer camp. These competitions are usuallydesigned for undergraduate and graduate university students.More evaluation research utilizes mixed-methods approach employing both qualitative andquantitative data sources to determine the impact of the workshop on student learning. Mixedmethods designs are methodologically superior to simpler designs because of the ability toleverage the strengths of several different methods. Consistent data from both qualitative andquantitative methods increases the trust worthiness of
materials developed for this program.Teachers/Instructors Recruitment and SelectionThe program targets teachers/instructors who 1) are teaching math, science, or career andtechnology education (CATE) and/or involved in robotics-related activities such as BoostingEngineering, Science and Technology (BEST) competitions. Instructors from institutions withhigh percentages of minority and socio-economically disadvantaged students were encouraged toapply. A flyer was designed and direct emailed to over 800 STEM teachers and administrators atschool districts and two-year colleges in Texas. In addition, information about the program wasdistributed via ASEE’s Engineering Technology Division’s listserv (ETD-L) and at the annualHigh Impact Technology Exchange
Paper ID #14917Adapting a Freshman Manufacturing Course to Different Learning StylesMr. Aaron Lalley P.E., South Dakota School of Mines and Technology AAaron Lalley P.E. Aaron Lalley is an instructor at the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology (SDSM&T). His current research includes chatter modeling of a machining process with fixture optimiza- tion. Prior to academia Aaron worked for 23 years as an engineer for Hutchinson Technology, Caterpillar, Midwest Precision Tool and Die, Unified Theory Inc. and Manufacturing Works in the areas of machine design, tool design, product design, CNC programming, HVAC, MRP
Paper ID #15514Intellectual Development for Sustainability in Design and ManufacturingDr. Jaby Mohammed, The Petroleum Institute, Abu Dhabi Jaby Mohammed is a faculty at The Petroleum Institute, Abu Dhabi, UAE. He received his PhD in Indus- trial Engineering from University of Louisville (2006), masters in Industrial Engineering from University of Louisville (2003) and also a master’s in business administration from Indira Gandhi National Open Uni- versity (2001). His research interests include advanced manufacturing, design methodologies, six sigma, lean manufacturing, and engineering education. He previously taught at
. Page 26.628.12References:1. Goldberg, M.R. and Pearlman, J.L. Best Practices for Team-Based Assistive Technology Design Courses. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 2013. 41(9): p. 1880-1888.2. Catalano, J. D., P. Wray, and S. Cornelio. Compassion practicum: a capstone design experience at the United States Military Academy. Journal of Engineering Education, 2000. 89(4): p. 471–4743. Enderle, J. D. An overview of the National Science Foundation program on senior design projects to aid persons with disabilities. International Journal of Engineering Education, 2000. 15(4): p. 288–2974. Green, M. G., J. S. Linsey, C. Seepersad , K. Schmidt, and K. L. Wood. Design for Frontier Environments: A Novel Methodology and Results of
students towards Additive Manufacturing technologies for improving their interest inScience, Technology, and Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) fields. The instructional set upinvolved using of Solid Works® software by high school students to develop computer aideddesign models which were then visualized and printed using 3D Printers. Design of Experiments(DOE) based statistical techniques were then used to identify the best-built conditions for theparts developed by the students. The approach for creating an effective learning environment forhigh school students in a university setting along with the course structure used and projectfindings are presented in this paper. It is found that the students involved showed a basic level ofunderstanding
exam outcomesprove the success of this approach.I. IntroductionThe available funding for manufacturing research and national strategic directions have inspiredresearchers and produced a surge in manufacturing education and research among educationalinstitutes including high schools, community colleges, vocational training centers, anduniversities. Although there are more students interested in manufacturing, some institutes haveto balance between the steep increment of student enrollment and available resources. Aproportional increasing of resource to the student population growth would solve the problem ifthere is unlimited resource; however, when resource is limited then creative ideas are sought tomodify the current teaching practice for
of a product with respect to “X”. DfX can be defined as “methodologies,techniques and working practices that cause a product to be designed and manufactured for theoptimum manufacturing cost, the optimum quality, and the optimum achievement of lifecyclesupport”5.The term “X” refers to a particular design aspect that is determined based on the importancegiven by a stakeholder6. Mentioned below are a few design aspects of DfX based on different X: 1. Design for Environment (DfE): Design for Environment explores upon the design approach that addresses to reduce the impact of a product, process or a service throughout the life cycle on human health and environment. The main goals of DfE are: a. Encouraging and recognizing
convinced that “Participate indeveloping existing & new products & and operations” is an important high demand skill formanufacturing technicians, but that skill is currently missing in their workforce. Only 12% of thecollege faculty considered this skill as a significant skill for their graduates to possess. For theother case: “3D CAD & printing/ prototyping” is extremely popular, 60%, among faculty but amoderate, 36%, at best priority among the manufacturers. Thus, in Florida, an industry identifiedskills need, “Participate in developing …” is not currently a priority for the faculty andsubsequently not incorporated regularly in the curriculum, while the State-wide faculty interestin “3D CAD & printing/ prototyping” is extensively
active member of American Educational Research Association’s Division D (Measurement) Graduate Student Welfare and Mentoring Committee and program chair for AERA’s Professors of Educational Research SIG in 2014-2016. Educational Background: 1979 Bachelor of Science in Mathematics University of Texas-Pan American 1982 Masters of Science in Mathematics Education University of Texas-Pan American 1989 Philosophy Degree in Educational Psychology Texas A&M University Job Experience: 1989-1991 Assistant Professor Texas A&M University 1991-2006 Associate Professor Texas Tech Uni- versity 2006-2008 Professor Texas Tech University 2008 to present Professor University of Texas at El PasoDr. Eric D. Smith
developments, best learning theoryimplementations and most effective teaching practices and innovations [14].Due to the fast evolution in electro-mechanical and electronic systems, and the ever-changingaspects involved in modern industry, the maintenance of professional and academic currency isabsolutely essential. An annual faculty professional development plan is proposed in a rotationschedule, in order to provide opportunities to faculty members to stay current. The plan followsthe framework proposed by Odden et al. [15] (where applicable) and it is depicted in Table 2. Table 2. Cost Structure for Professional DevelopmentNKU Existing and Proposed Facilities for the ProgramEngineering Technology Programs occupy 9 rooms on the
learning outcomes is alsodescribed.Introduction:During the summer of 2020, we hosted a virtual summer camp for high school and early-college STEM students. The subject is related to advanced manufacturing (AM) and 3Dprinting. This outreach is funded by the Department of Energy DOE consortium project. Withthis summer program, our objective is to prepare a pool of students in the AM area, in highdemand in industrial and national research laboratories.High school Architectural and Engineering Drafting teachers from Guilford Countyparticipated in the workshop to help with teaching and designing the activities and theprogram. A University faculty participated in organizing the workshop activities andinstructed the students on a number of engineering
able to live, learn, and understand othercultures and environments (NAE, 2005; Specking et al., 2013). Therefore, the sooner thislearning process for future success begins, the greater would be the benefits for both the studentsand their employers. Recognizing this need many universities in the United States offer studyabroad programs, both at graduate and undergraduate levels. Shuman et al. (2005) argue thatmanufacturing and global supply chain can best be studied “if classroom work is combined withtruly multidisciplinary team projects and well-designed field visits” in other countries.Furthermore, one of the ABET accreditation criteria (also known as ‘outcomes h’) requiresengineering programs to provide students with a broad understanding of
: “This Is Rocket Science”There is strong evidence in the literature [cf., 5, 6] that retention to graduation in highereducation is improved by interventions and engagement in the first year. Such first-yearinterventions might take the form of a “low-stakes” course that includes close interactionbetween faculty and students, and/or connecting to student clubs and university research labs.The “This Is Rocket Science” first-year seminar (FYS) is designed to provide just suchopportunities for engagement. Two faculty members, each with experience in space engineeringand research, lead the class and work with the students during the semester. The teachingobjectives for the class include: 1. Introduce first-year engineering students to atmospheric
across a broad swath of American manufacturing industriesincluding the machine tool and auto industries. Many of those that remained are reaching the ageof retirement and will take valuable expertise with them when they leave their companies. Forthis reason the education of new engineers remains a critical need for many states across the US.As important as this need is, budgetary constraints occurring simultaneously with the economicdownturn, have resulted in challenges to four-year schools graduating engineers in sufficientnumbers. In particular manufacturing engineers, whose expertise is best matched to theproduction of goods, only graduate from fewer than 20 programs here in the United States.Part of the need for manufacturing engineers is
, Biomedical Device Design and Manufacturing, Automation and Robotics, and CAE in Manufacturing Processes fields. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016Mapping Professional Performance Metrics into ABET Outcomes Assessment ProcessAbstractIn this manufacturing engineering program, the internship course is mandatory. The benefit ofsuch course is that the permanent placement rates of this program are higher when compared tosimilar institutions. Many of the students are staying in their internship companies as engineersafter graduation. On the contrary, it is becoming harder to place all of the students into industrialinternships due to increasing enrollments in both the domestic
Training: The hands- are also available at a website maintained by the on training takes place on the Center for Manufacturing Research [16]. second day of the workshop and AM-WATCH participants designed and printed includes training the participants innovative/entrepreneurial work pieces during the on using Arduino or Python second day of the studio workshops and rated their coding for advanced learning practices tied to ABET Student Outcomes manufacturing applications. at the end of the programs [17]. Educational Modules: Six educational Two-day, on-ground, train-the-trainer studios modules were developed on
Paper ID #23752MAKER: Simple Making Activities to Expose Middle School Girls to STEMCareersDr. Lunal Khuon, Drexel University Dr. Lunal Khuon is an Associate Clinical Professor at Drexel University in the Engineering Technology (ET) Department. He also serves as the Assistant Department Head for Graduate Studies and the Director of Research for the ET Department as well as oversees the Biomedical Engineering Technology concen- tration. Prior to Drexel, Dr. Khuon had previously held design and system positions at Texas Instruments, Motorola, Hughes, and IBM and faculty positions as an Assistant Professor at Villanova