Industrial, Manufacturing, and Systems Engineering (IMSE) Day held at thecampus of the XXXXXXXXXX during the days of the 24th and 25th of April. The focus of theseminars was to continue with the offering a series of professional development sessions toaddress key issues currently debated and discussed in the Green Energy Manufacturing field.The majority of the planned workshops were directed to address important topics and problemsrelated to green manufacturing education as well as the current leadership directions in preparing21st century technology-savvy workforce and leaders. Six workshops were conducted, wherein,three were geared towards engineering ethics and technical leadership and the other three werebased on Green Manufacturing and energy
program's various constituencies in which theobjectives are determined and periodically evaluated (Criterion #2);2. The students in the program must attain “an ability to design a system, component, orprocess to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic,environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, andsustainability” (Criterion #3); and3. The overall competence of the faculty may be judged by such factors as education,diversity of backgrounds, engineering experience, teaching experience, ability tocommunicate, enthusiasm for developing more effective programs, level of scholarship,participation in professional societies, and licensure as professional engineers (Criterion#5).Teaching
the socio-economic dynamicsand business culture globally even to succeed locally. Recognizing the need, many engineeringschools in the U.S. have started offering ethics and study abroad programs to their undergraduatestudents. Our research shows that selection of countries for study abroad programs have widenedsignificantly in the recent years. For example, in the nineties, the US Universities were offeringstudy abroad programs mostly in European and few other developed countries in the Asia pacificregion. In recent years, that list has grown significantly including many other countries aroundthe world like South Africa, Brazil, Russia, China, Chile, and India to name a few. This paperpresents a survey of select U.S. engineering schools
MATH 224 MultiVariable Calculus and Geometry I 5 EE 352 Introduction to Automation and Controls 4 PHYS 162 Physics with Calculus II 5 PCE 372 Introduction to Composites Materials and Processes 5 MFGE 333 Design for Manufacture 4 Fall ENGR 214 Statics 4 Fall MFGE 491 Project Research, Planning and Ethics 4 MATH 204 Linear Algebra
courses that: Accumulate project knowledge Transmit project knowledgeFor social implications – important concepts are those that: Promote and safeguard the health and safety as well as the welfare of the public; Demonstrate an awareness of the consequences any negative impact; Follows a code of ethics that promotes integrity and engineering professionalism.Students that adhere to this process are expected to work on different aspects of their seniorprojects as they take classes that deal with the above concepts in a gradual but interactive format[18].ConclusionThe senior project course EGT417 outcomes are mapped according to the ABET accreditationcriteria [1], as depicted in table 2. Similarly all other MMET program courses are
faculty and students, e) Place a greater emphasis on teaching, f) Provide numerous, well-equipped facilities, and g) Produce graduates with more knowledge on materials and processes.Nelson4 analyzed inputs from directors of ABET accredited programs to identify key technicalcompetencies for manufacturing graduates. Among 264 competencies, the highest rankedcompetencies related to quality, communication, and personal ethics. Baird7 proposed alaboratory exercise to simulate mass production environment. Although such laboratory workwas more difficult to develop as compared to the traditional teaching practice, the benefits of theformer approach were numerous since it would: a) Simulate industry practice, b) Develop specific hard-skill and
Engineering Mechanics of Human Motion EGR 453 Biomedical Materials EGR 463 Alternative Energy Systems and Applications MTH 201 Calculus I MTH 202 Calculus II MTH 203 Calculus III MTH 302 Linear Algebra and Differential Equations PHI 102 Ethics PHY 230 Principles of Physics I PHY 234 Engineering Physics STA 315 Design of Experiments WRT 150 Strategies in Writing Another important note is the nature of the cooperative education system. Each student is placed with an employer that provides exposure to their processes, systems, and expectations. The result is that many, but not all, students have had training and use of systems like FMEA
constraintssuch as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability,and sustainability ”. The topic of sustainability has become part of corporate strategy, consumerchoice processes, university initiatives, engineering, and technology programs within thebusiness discipline7-11. We are moving toward more sustainable business practices and education, Page 26.716.3as a direct result of an increasing awareness of the significant green manufacturing, covering abroad spectrum, from development of green technology products, implementation of advancedmanufacturing and production technologies, and introduction of energy
productcriteria to produce superior products. An approach known as, triple bottom-line approachproposes that reliable product design includes supply chain mechanism, consisting of economics,green technology, and ethics. The products and/or services are developed to be more sustainablein a Triple Bottom Line (TBL) context. This is interpreted as achieving an optimum balancebetween environmental protection, social equity and economic prosperity, while still meetingtraditional product requirements, e.g. quality, market, technical and cost issues, etc.Figure 1 Business Impact of Sustainable Product (Source: Four Winds Research (copyright2012)The three levels of factors that greatly influence sustainable product design i. Economic compliance factor
5 4 4.53. This course improved my proficiency in designing ofproducts, equipments, tooling and /or environment formanufacturing systems. 5 4 5 3 4.254. This course enhanced my competency to functioneffectively in a team. 5 4 5 5 4.755. This course improved my ability to identify, formulate, andsolve engineering problems. 4 4 5 5 4.56. This course improved my understanding of engineeringprofession ethical responsibility. 5 4 5 4 4.57. This course helped me to communicate more effectively. 5 4 4 3 48. This course