Rui Liu, Behnam Ghalamchi Cal Poly, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis ObispoAbstractThis study presents an in-depth exploration of the implications of integrating digital twins intoengineering education. Drawing on an extensive review of published research papers, conferencepapers, and case studies, the research is structured into several key chapters focusing on thedefinition of digital twins (DT), their relationship with engineering education, their influence ondiversity and inclusion, and their alignment with ethical engineering principles. The studyculminates in proposing a novel approach to integrating digital twins into engineering education.We propose a new lab for the mechanical vibrations course
” that would guide a department committee in(eventually) redesigning the curriculum: Problem Solving; Communication; Professional Identityand Ethics; Teamwork, Leadership, and Inclusivity; Information Literacy, Judgement, andCritical Thinking; Character Traits and Self-Directed Learning.As all readers will know, the Covid-19 pandemic caused many workplace plans and initiatives togrind to a screeching halt. This curriculum renewal initiative of the mechanical engineeringprogram at Ohio State University was no exception. Over the course of 2020-2022, slowprogress was made on writing specific program goals to match each of the six guiding areasdeveloped during the 2019 retreat. Next, progress was made on developing the student learningoutcomes that
]. Specifically, graduates from an engineering program leave with the overallimpression that engineering decisions made in the real world are completely objective and without bias.General consensus in the field firmly believes that engineering and science can be separated from politicaland social concerns as long as “rigorous” engineering and scientific methods of design and inquiry arefollowed. But if we consider some recent history of engineering, we find many examples and exceptionsthat disprove this supposed neutrality rule [18-20]. From the Space Shuttle Challenger disaster [21] to theVolkswagen “Dieselgate” scandal [22] to Democratic Republic of Congo conflict minerals ethics [23] toCOVID-19 vaccinations [24], decisions regarding and perceptions of
surface. To broaden the activity and scale itback, simply bring the failed assembly into the classroom for analysis without the investigationroom. Even simplified for expediency, this is a worthwhile activity that will still require studentsto think critically to identify the failure mode and comment upon whether it was as predicted.Phase 2, in the form presented in this publication, supports ABET Student Learning Outcomes 1(identify, formulate, and solve complex engineering problems), 4 (ability to recognize ethical andprofessional responsibilities), 5 (function effectively on a team), 6 (analyze and interpret data,and use engineering judgment to draw conclusions), and 7 (acquire and apply new knowledge)[11].Phase 3: Presentation. Teams are
give a professional presentation at the end of the course. 4. Learn about engineering ethics, continuing education, contemporary issues, global context, etc. 5. Learn about the importance of using computers and software in solving engineering problems. Course textbook: • Kirk D. Hagen, Introduction to Engineering Analysis, 4th Ed. Pearson. Course topics: Design Project: • What’s Mechanical Engineering? The student teams are assigned to predict the • Trigonometry Review and Units speed and distance traveled by a Hot Wheels toy • Vectors and Applications car along a defined track. Each team was • Forces and Applications
(Table 3) ABET4 Recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgements, which must consider the impact of engineering solutions inSignificant global, economic, environmental, and societal contextsLearning - ABET5 Function effectively on a team whose members togetherProfessional provide leadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives ABET7 Acquire and apply new knowledge as needed, using appropriate learning strategies Table 3. “What” code levelsLevels
clarified that the use of AI tools was permissible, provided that it was recognized inthe report's acknowledgement section. Nearly all student reports acknowledged using ChatGPT,and a few also acknowledging the use of QuillBot [11] and Grammarly [12]. The students wereallowed to work in teams of up to three members, yet many students opted to workindependently. Each report was to have a section describing economic, environmental, andsocietal considerations, as well as a section summarizing the ethical obligations of professionalengineers. Students were given a suggested outline for the report, description of required reportformatting, and a detailed grading rubric.ReportsReports from two semesters are compared. Reports collected in the Spring 2022
FEDT as soon as possible andstop making changes to it to accumulate historic data. As we accumulate historic data,we will look to see if we observe any trends of low success in any topics that requireintervention.With the approval of IRB, we would like to add student background data to the FEDTtest. For the first set of FEDT, we manually divided the students into MNSU studentsand transfer students' groups after all juniors took the test, which was time consumingand may not be accurate. We would like to add the questions FEDT to obtain thisinformation and to factor transferred 1XX – 2XX courses for efficient assessment.Moreover, we would like to add more modules starting from Ethics and ProfessionalResponsibility Disciplines. Since FE results
Paper ID #41887Mechanical Engineering Sustainability Curricular Content and Bachelor’sDegrees Awarded to WomenDr. Angela R Bielefeldt, University of Colorado Boulder Angela Bielefeldt is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder in the Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE) and Director of the Integrated Design Engineering program. Her research interests include ethics, social responsibility, sustainability, and community engagement.Ms. Joan Tisdale, University of Colorado Boulder Joan Tisdale holds degrees in both Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering from Auburn University and MIT
Judgment," 2016.[6] J. E. S. Swenson and A. W. Johnson, "Exhibiting Productive Beginnings of Engineering Judgment during Open-Ended Modeling Problems in an Introductory Mechanics of Materials Course," 2019.[7] J. Gainsburg, "The Mathematical Disposition of Structural Engineers," 2007.[8] M. Davis, "A Plea for Judgment," Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 789-808, 12 2012.[9] J. Swenson, A. Johnson and J. Toftegaard, "The Effect of Assignment Scaffolding on Engineering Judgement," Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE, Vols. 2021-October, 2021.[10] R. M. Marra, K. A. Rodgers, D. Shen and B. Bogue, "Women engineering students and self-efficacy: A multi-year, multi-institution study of women engineering
forstudents in the early stages of their learning journey with limited practical experience. Inconclusion, our study underlines the need for a cautious and conservative approach to theincorporation of ChatGPT in engineering education, particularly in tasks that are relevant onreasoning, with human educators continuing to play an irreplaceable role. To help facultiesteaching similar subjects, we recommend the following strategies:Discuss AI’s Limitations and Ethical Issues. It’s vital to teach students about AI’s shortcomings,such as biases, inaccuracies, and mistakes. This can lead to a more comprehensive understandingof what AI can and cannot do.Host Workshops on ChatGPT and Other AI Tools. Offer workshops or seminars that givestudents practical
engineeringprograms, emphasizing the need for students to design within various constraints, including economic,environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability [4].Meeting these broad ABET requirements is achievable through various instructional approaches andcourse designs.Teaching machine design traditionally is challenging as many students lack familiarity with machinecomponents and their real-world applications [4]. Due to logistical challenges, such as large class sizesand limited access to physical devices, instructors often resort to using images, videos, and CAD modelsto illustrate machine component functionality. Lectures typically involve board explanations or pre-designed slides, which may lack
and social science courses intheir curriculum, wondering whether a direct focus on technical subjects is more beneficial.However, a comprehensive education is crucial for addressing complex engineering challenges.Engineers need to be well-rounded professionals, equipped not only with technical competencebut also critical thinking, ethical skills, cultural understanding, and awareness of the socialimpact of their work. We propose an approach that infuses historical figures (mathematician,scientists, engineers) and case studies into two junior level engineering courses to address thisconcern.In this paper, we investigate the impact of introducing historical figures and unique case studiesinto engineering courses. Selected historical figures and
, professionalorganizations, and engineering ethics. Planned Strategies for the CAM program: CAM scholarmeetings will include career and graduate school preparedness topics every year (with theassistance of the Career and Internship Center) so that the students are prepared at all academiclevels. E-portfolios will be created with applications for internships, jobs, and graduate schoolsin mind.5. Current Academic Tutoring. In addition to general academic tutoring available through theUniversity, the CET offers tutoring specific to engineering in lower-level classes at theEngineering Tutoring Lab. Tutors are advanced upper-level students. CAM scholarship recipientswill receive tutoring as needed. Planned Strategies for the CAM program: Additional tutors willbe hired
. Minichiello and A. Iqbal, "Perceived Factors Contributing to the SubjectiveWellbeing of Undergraduate Engineering Students: An Exploratory Study," International Journal ofEnvironmental Research and Public Health, vol. 19, (23), 2022. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192316284.[3] D. Kim and B. K. Jesiek, "Work-in-Progress: Emotion and Intuition in Engineering Students’ EthicalDecision Making and Implications for Engineering Ethics Education," 2019. DOI: 10.18260/1-2--33666.[4] N. N. Kellam et al, "Uncovering the role of emotion in engineering education within an integratedcurricular experience," in 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2011.[5] L. F. Barrett, "The theory of constructed emotion: an active inference account of interoceptionand categorization
locations in the middle of the span. In actualpractice, mechanical engineers are more likely to design machines which are not strictlycomposed of two-force members and have non-obvious failure locations. There is therefore aneed to provide students in Statics with learning experiences that allow for open-ended,conceptual (rather than procedural) approaches to problem-solving.Effective Problem-Solving Approaches in EngineeringSupporting and improving students’ analytical and problem-solving skills is critical forproducing engineering graduates who can generate technological solutions that are safe, ethical,and meet the needs of end users [10]. As a fundamental engineering course, Statics requiresstudents to develop and use disciplinary analytical
learning, 5. providing mentorship, not supervising, as students choose objectives, methods, and testing and assessment process of their project, 6. enabling students to reflect on what they learned from their projects and how these projects relate to the real world through survey and open discussions, 7. having consistent follow-up through scaffolded PBL assignments, as well as providing formative feedback for improvement, and 8. making project prepared and presented for external audience to motivate student accomplishment [16].Although PBL activities have been employed in courses to help students quickly learn newconcepts as well as prepare students with skills such as leadership, team building, ethical
study did not measure the extent to which students were able to transfer skillslearned in this course to subsequent courses. Given that Technical Communications is afoundational course in our undergraduate program, which embeds writing across the curriculum[6, 9, 22, 23], we plan to employ common templates, exemplars, and rubrics in otherundergraduate courses where technical communication skills are required. Future research willinvestigate longitudinal transfer of technical communications skills by students from this courseto subsequent courses in their undergraduate programs of study.In future iterations of the course, we plan to embed workplace-relevant ethical considerationsinto assignments and meaningfully integrate AI tools to promote
requisiteskillsets suitable for GEI in the future. The intervention plans we developed and used for thisstudy align with the United Nations Decade of Education for Sustainable Developmentframework, which emphasizes the need for high-quality education for sustainabledevelopment. This educational approach requires a multi-method approach, a combination ofdifferent pedagogical approaches that resonate with students [7]. The surveys developed forthis study used a synthesis of twelve sustainability competencies available in the literature,namely systems thinking, empathy & change of perspective, personal involvement,interdisciplinary work, anticipatory thinking, justice, responsibility & ethics, and strategicaction [9], critical thinking & analysis
argue and change their grades.While these features of traditional grading can be criticized for how they can impede studentlearning, we also want to balance the view that these features have their own reason in theeducation system. For example, summative grades are important for managing academicstandings, scholarships, and graduate school admission. One-off examinations are common inprofessional licensure processes (e.g., engineering ethics examination). The complexity behindgrading stems from the fact that grades are not just intended for student learning; they are alsoimportant for social and professional constructs [4].In response to the negative effects of traditional grading, ungrading has been advocated toremove grades entirely from the