significantly. Thestudents were surveyed on the following questions regarding agile practices: Q-A1: “Working in pairs on this project was challenging.” Q-A2: “Having bi-weekly gate presentations to briefly discuss the progress in team project helped me to be more engaged in the group's progress and makes team work and communication between the students and the instructor more transparent.”The survey results show that only 20% of students found working in pair to be challenging,which was previously pointed out by students as a main challenge during the second yearimplementation of the design project (only PBL). This was complemented by the results of thesecond question where 80% of students found the bi-weekly gate presentations
horizontal direction. Develop the standardequations of motion for this system. Also, in the special case with Fa 0 , determine the natural(undamped) frequency n for small-amplitude oscillations of the system due to gravity alone.Constraints and RelationsBased upon the rolling-without-slipping condition for the disk on the support surface, it is foundthat the kinematics and relative positions of various points on the system are governed by xP rd vP rd aP rd (31) rQ/P 12 lb [sin i cos j] , rC/P rd j (32)where points P and Q identify the respective mass centers of the disk and bar, and C identifiesthe point of contact
fictional student’s answer to a qualitative problem on static equivalence. They are thenasked to answer the following three questions a. Do you agree with Peter? Justify your answer. b. Compare the resulting forces in systems I and II. c. Compare the resulting moments relative to point Q for both systems.which roughly correspond to the three steps in the instructional strategy outlined above. Page 22.792.10 12Nm 6N IPeter: "System II is equivalent to sys- P Qtem I. Remember, M = d × F
equivalent arrow names in the submission and answer. A regularexpression is used to replace instances of the submission arrow names in the answer equationand vice-versa. If the arrows were drawn in different directions in the submission and answerdiagram, then a negative sign is added during the replacement. We check both the submissionagainst the answer and the answer against the submission due to the possible algebraiccombination of terms. For example, a problem may have two applied forces, both called Q, butthe instructor may decide to label them Q1, Q2. The student may submit both forces labeled Q,and neither the instructor answer nor student submission are wrong. If just the submission isconverted to the instructor variable space, then the
error signal is 𝑒 𝑛; 𝛩 =𝑋 𝑛 − 𝑋 𝑛, 𝛩 13.The goal of any optimization algorithm is to minimize a given error metric. For simplicity,consider the replacement of the argument t by the argument n to describe the sampled-datasystem, where n represents a sample instance. The output 𝑋(𝑛) can be represented as e f 𝑋 𝑛 = 𝑅 𝑛 (Eq. 9) g f where 𝐴 𝑞 and 𝐵 𝑞 are polynomials, whose ratio 𝐵(𝑞)/𝐴 𝑞 is the true transfer function ofthe unknown system. The forward shift operator is represented by q, defined such that𝑞j" 𝑋 𝑛 = 𝑋(𝑛 − 𝑖).The output of the prediction filter
category 0.36 CATS overall and 0.26 0.22 0.29 0.39 0.29 0.22 0.17 0.31 0.29 0.29 0.15 average scores on associated categories Note 1: Discrimination Index DI = (C1 – C4)/Q, where C1 (C4) is the number of correct responses from students in the upper (lower) quartile with respect to overall score, and Q is the average number of students in each quartile14. Note 2: Pearson Correlations: (ASCI Post, CATS-avg-assoc) = 0.525; (ASCI , CATS-avg-assoc) = 0.451; (ASCI Post, CATS-overall) = 0.162; (ASCI Post, Final Exam) = 0.508; (CATS-overall, Final Exam) = 0.426. Note 3: CATS scores are normalized to range from 0 to 1 for
paper thatpropounded the method of model formulas.1 For convenience of readers, let us take a brief over-view of how these model formulas are obtained. Basically, it starts out with the loading functionq, written in terms of singularity functions for the beam ab in Fig. 1; as follows: q = Va < x >− 1 + M a < x >− 2 − P < x − x P >− 1 + K < x − x K >− 2 − w0 < x − x w >0 w − w0 w − w0 − 1 < x − x w >1 + w1< x − u w > 0 + 1 < x − u w >1 u w − xw u w − xw (14) + m 0 < x − x m >− 1 − m 0 < x − u m > −1By integrating
theirlearning is likely due to the fact that many exam problems are similar to these examples. It isalso noteworthy that the mean rating for overarching problems was significantly lower forMechanics II. This is likely attributed to the increased complexity of the overarching problemsin the second course, as described later in the section of this paper entitled Challenges. Table 5. Student ratings of course instruments in Mechanics I and II Mean Rating Mechanics I Mechanics II Q: How well did the following contribute to your learning in this course? Fall
. Salomone. Investigating “sense of belonging” in first-year college students. Journal of College Student Retention, 4(3):227– 256, 2003.[13] P. Pintrich, D. Smith, T. Garcia, and W. McKeachie. A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Technical report, National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning, Ann Arbor, MI, 1991.[14] P. W. Maloney, M. J. Grawitch, and L. K. Barber. The multi-factor structure of the Brief Self-Control Scale: Discriminant validity of restraint and impulsivity. Journal of Research in Personality,46(1):111–115, 2012.[15] B. M. Gadzella, M. Baloglu, W. G. Masten, and Q. Wang. Evaluation of the Student Life Stress Inventory
other. There is energy associated with this interaction shown by: Ees ? Â , q= m R12charge, R12 = distance between particles.Examinations: Along with conventional teaching, some specific questions might be put in testsor quizzes; some of them can include:Why does Young’s modulus change at the scales?How does one compare the Young’s modulus of Carbon Nanotube with steels?How is the strength related to molecular interactions?How does molecular bonding impact strength?What is van der Waal’s interaction?Can you compare the deflection of carbon nanotube with a steel bar of the same size?What is a pico stress and what does TPa stands for?Educational
., G. Scheuermann, J. Frey, Z. Yang, B. Hamann, K. Joy, and H. Hagen, “Tensor visualizations in computational geomechanics,” International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Page 11.502.10 Geomechanics, 2002; 26: 925-944.[7] Zhou, Y. Q.-L. Li, and S.-D. Ma, “Visualization of Geostress Tensor Along Oil Well Trajectory,” Proceedings of Computer Graphics International 2001, 3-6 July 2001, Hong Kong.[8] Zheng, X. and A. Pang, “Volume Deformation for Tensor Visualization,” IEEE Visualization 2002, Oct. 27 – Nov. 1, 2002, Boston, MA.[9] Almusallam, A. and S. E.-D. Taher, “Three-Dimensional Mohr’s Circle for Shear
Teaching. John Wiley & Sons, 2010.[13] Devin R. Berg. Evaluation of student learning outcomes due to self-guided engineering analysis of surroundings. In 2014 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, June 2014. ASEE.[14] Raymond Cleveland. An impact #engmech https://vine.co/v/OKOQmi03xmH, October 2014. URL https://twitter.com/rayscleveland/status/518826491036303362.[15] Twitter / search - #engmech. URL https://twitter.com/search?q=%23engmech&f=realtime.[16] Patrick Rohlfing. The tension in the line to over come ff in the bearings and the mass moment of inertia to spin is 1/16oz #engmech pic.twitter.com/j2j3xt6hjv, November 2014. URL https://twitter.com/pj rohlf12/status/529673177639952384.[17] Travis
classes. you could analyze the velocity at the top as the arm is lowered.#mech293 pic.twitter.com/xGdgldiOxc, December 2013. URL https://twitter.com/webbt0498/status/410563673304743936.[15] Olivia Trueblood. Solving the internal forces in a dome would be tricky! the roman’s figured it out though #mech293 pic.twitter.com/vTmoEiGzw3, October 2013. URL https://twitter.com/xtravgnoliveoil/statuses/395276149569253378.[16] Twitter / search - #mech293. URL https://twitter.com/search?q=%23mech293&f=realtime.[17] Laura McCullough. Science news and the science classroom. Journal of College Science Teaching, 36(3): 30–33, January 2006. ISSN 0047-231X
Online . 10.18260/1-2--34766, June 21 - 24, 2020[12] Wagner E.D. (1994) In support of a functional definition of interaction. Am J Distance Educ 8(2):6–26[13] Bickle, M. C., and Rucker,R., “Student-to-student interaction: Humanizing the online classroom using technology and group assignments,” Q. Rev. Distance Educ., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2018.[14] Zhang D, Zhou L, Briggs RO, Nunamaker JF (2006) Instructional video in e-learning: assessing the impact of interactive video on learning effectiveness. Inf Manag 43(1):15–27[15] Shaw, E., Kim, J., & Yoo, J. (2014). Mediators of participation in online discussions. Proceedings of the 2014 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference. Indianapolis, June
audience response system,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 413-423, 2011.[5] L. R. Barroso and J. R. Morgan, “Developing a dynamics and vibrations course for civil engineering students based on fundamental principles,” Advances in Engineering Education, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1-35, winter 2012.[6] G. T. G. Shim, A. M. H. A. Shakawi, and F. L. Azizan, “Relationship between Students’ diagnostic assessment and achievement in a pre-university mathematics course,” Journal of Education and Learning, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 364-371, 2017.[7] J. Shi, W. B. Wood, J. M. Martin, N. A. Guild, Q. Vicens, and J. K. Knight, “A diagnostic assessment for introductory molecular and cell biology,” CBE
-441, 1993. Available:http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/104973239300300403. DOI:10.1177/104973239300300403.[26] M. Q. Patton, Qualitative Research. 2005.[27] C. Singh, "When physical intuition fails," American Journal of Physics, vol. 70, (11), pp.1103-1109, 2002. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.1512659. DOI: 10.1119/1.1512659.[28] Y. Rogers, H. Sharp and J. Preece, Interaction Design: Beyond Human-ComputerInteraction. 2011.[29] K. A. Ericsson and H. A. Simon, "Verbal reports as data." Psychol. Rev., vol. 87, (3), pp.215, 1980.[30] V. Braun and V. Clarke, "Using thematic analysis in psychology," Qualitative Research inPsychology, vol. 3, (2), pp. 77-101, 2006. Available:http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1191
year enrolled in the capstone design course. The courseis separated into two three-credit classes over two semesters. Typically there are around sevenprojects supporting five to eight students depending on the complexity of the project. At thebeginning of the year, the engineering students took the Kolb learning style quick assessment.Retrieved from https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=kolb+quick+assessment. This quickassessment consists of twenty questions that determine the learning style or preference of astudent as described in table 1. Engineering students with project teams consisted mostly ofstudent learning styles that are converging and assimilating. However, each team also had one ortwo students with learning styles of diverging and
modules.Bibliography[1] J. M. &. P. C. &. P. V. C. Papadopoulos, "Philosophy of Integrating FEA Practice Throughout the Undergraduate CE/ME Curriculum," in Proceedings of 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, BC, 2011.[2] N. Smith and J. Davis, "Connecting Theory and Software: Experience with an Undergraduate Finite Element Course," in 2015 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Seattle, 2015.[3] Q. Ma and L. Yaw, "Finite Element Method as a Useful Modern Engineering Tool to Enhance Learning of Deformation Concepts," in 2015 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Seattle, 2015.[4] H.-H. Lee, Finite Element Simulations with ANSYS Workbench 17, Mission, KS: SDC Publications, 2017.[5] R. Budynas and K. Nisbett, Shigley's
. Matusovich, Ruth A. Streveler and Ronald M. Miller, How They See Themselves: Students whoidentify with engineering persist in the field. ASEE Prism, Vol. 20, Number 3, November 2010, page 47.17. Debbie Chachra, Adding Value to Teaching: what can we offer that students can’t get online?.ASEE Prism, Vol. 20, Number 3, November 2010, page 84.18. Group2: Drew Hudson, Jordan Knerr, and Jacques Janssens, Dynamics, CE/ME 251, Spring 2010.19. Group4: Blake Pettit, Joshua Schrock, and Zaadvinder Singh “Tony”, Dynamics, CE/ME 251, Spring 2010.20. http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Average_height_pro_basketball_player#ixzz1AO9jH4Ed Page 22.218.13
the course. Figure 1. Sample of a dashboard from Dynamics at the end of a semester. The mastery objectives are shown in the lower right portion of the dashboard.You can tell a lot about the student by looking at the dashboard. This student was reluctant to participatein the activities called Q&C and MA Self-Assessment and missed a few classes near the end of thesemester. The student mastered 12 of 16 objectives (note that H.1 is considered close enough in ourscheme). It appears that the student had some trouble finishing the module assessments because objectiveJ is the very last step in all problems. The student was well above the class in mastering conservation ofmomentum, likely because they worked hard on the associated
the end of the semester.What is Chegg and how do students use it to cheat on exams?To begin, the authors must again emphasize that Chegg is not unique. Many companies providesimilar services for students. The services detailed here are not the only services Chegg offers tostudents, they are the ones that were used to cheat on exams in this class.Students sign up for a Chegg account for a monthly fee. This subscription gives them access tomany services, but the two used for cheating are “homework solutions” and “expert Q&A”.The homework solutions section allows students to search Chegg’s vast database of solvedhomework problems. Students can search for questions by key words or typing phrases from theproblem into Chegg’s search engine. For
. Page 11.79.2 y L φa φ(x) φb Ta x a b T q, moment/length b x Figure 2. Material Law Formulas for a uniform shaft with end torsional couples and
, solicited comments seem to imply that the Page 24.1357.17benefit of shorter videos may be a moot point in the face of playback controls that allow studentsto watch a video, no matter its length, at whatever pace is to their liking. The authors lookforward to seeing future studies, along the lines of the one conducted by Kim et al.10, that wouldexamine student viewing patterns when having the option to watch a video at 1.5×, 2×, etc., andeventually link those patterns to learning and retention.References[1] N. Halyo and Q. Le, “Use of video technology to improve student learning,” 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, GA
Page 12.806.8paper will talk about Johann (John) Bernoulli the most, it is Nicolaus 1623-1708 insightful to learn something of the others and some of the things named after them. Jacob Nicolaus Johann1654-1705 1662-1716 1667-1748 Nicolaus (I) In mathematics, Bernoulli’s equation y ¦ ? p( x ) y - q( x ) y n 1687-1759 is named after Jacob Bernoulli, as are the Bernoulli numbers. Daniel Bernoulli