Paper ID #30541How to Use Q Methodology in Engineering Education ResearchMs. Renee Desing, The Ohio State University Renee Desing is currently a PhD Candidate at the Ohio State University in the Department of Engineering Education. Ms. Desing holds a B.S. in Industrial Engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology and a M.S. in Industrial Engineering and Operations Research from the Pennsylvania State University. Most recently, Ms. Desing worked as a managing consultant for IBM Public Sector Advanced Analytics.Dr. Rachel Louis Kajfez, The Ohio State University Dr. Rachel Louis Kajfez is an Assistant Professor in the
or deductive coding. This manual theming was supplemented using theNVIVO software to identify common words and phrases leading to any additional or missedthemes. Throughout this process, discussions and checks were conducted with the research teamfor agreement on final themes. Table 1: Interview questions with faculty Question Question No. Q.1 Tell me about yourself. Q.2 Explain how and why COVID pandemic impacted the functioning and behavior of your STEM students. Q.3 Explain how and why COVID pandemic impacted the performance of your STEM students. Q.4 Explain how and why you responded to changes in STEM student
. . [5] Tai, R. H., Liu, C. Q., Maltese, A. V, & Fan, X. (2006). CAREER CHOICE: Enhanced: Planning Early for Careers in Science. Science, 312(5777), 1143–1144. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1128690 eed.osu.edu
Bret Male Caucasian Frankie Male Caucasian Devi Female Indian Kai Male White/Pacific islander Qiang unreported unreportedThe interview questions were framed around the students’ experiences in general during theirtime in the university, with few questions focusing particularly on how they spend their time in agiven week, and the kind of activities they are involved in. The questions used for the analysisfor this paper are:Q. Could you please walk me through a recent week of studying? What does your timetable oftaught sessions and studying look like during a week?Q
Satisfaction Measures:question was missing). (m) Personal satisfaction from work (n) Satisfaction with quality of work unitSurvey respondents were asked “do you consider (o) Satisfaction with working conditionsyourself to be one or more of the following,” with (p) Employee empowermentthe following response categories offered: (q) Co-workers cooperation“Heterosexual or Straight,” “Gay, Lesbian, (r) Satisfaction with procedures (s) Overall job satisfactionBisexual, or Transgender,” or “Prefer not to say.”Respondents who answered “prefer not to say” were excluded from
after of a TechFriday. Q: My Current level of interest in learning about Charlieplexing is: Figure 1. Pre Survey of Charlieplexing with Arduino Tech Friday Q: After participating in today’s Tech Friday, my current level of interest in Charlieplexing is: Figure 2. Post Survey of Charlieplexing with Arduino Tech FridayStudent Mentoring and TutoringOur mentoring program helps recruit STEM major students from community colleges. As a teamof
-9411- y.[26] J. M. Holland, D. A. Major, and K. A. Orvis, “Understanding How Peer Mentoring and Capitalization Link STEM Students to Their Majors,” Career Dev. Q., vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 343–354, Dec. 2012, doi: 10.1002/j.2161-0045.2012.00026.x.[27] R. T. Fitch, “Characteristics and Motivations of College Students Volunteering for Community Service.,” J. Coll. Student Pers., vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 424–31, 1987.[28] J. L. Holland, The self-directed search professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources., 1985.[29] I. Simon Rampasso et al., “Preparing future professionals to act towards sustainable development: an analysis of undergraduate students’ motivations towards voluntary
. (2015). Developing the Postsecondary Student Engagement Survey (PosSES) to Measure Undergraduate Engineering Students’ Out of Class Involvement. Paper presented at the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Seattle, WA.14. Simmons, D. R., & Yu, R. (2015). Conducting a Q Study to Refine and Develop New Measures of Engineering Student Co-Curricular Involvement. Paper presented at the Research in Engineering Education Symposium 2015, Dublin, Ireland.15. Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research: Sage.16. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches: Sage publications.17. Patton, M. Q. (1987). How to use qualitative methods in evaluation: Sage.18
, pp. 271–286, May 2007.[8] T. E. Basford, L. R. Offermann, and T. S. Behrend, “Do You See What I See? Perceptions of Gender Microaggressions in the Workplace,” Psychol. Women Q., vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 340–349, Nov. 2013.[9] N. F. Sulaiman and H. AlMuftah, “A Qatari perspective on women in the engineering pipeline: an exploratory study,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 507–517, 2010.[10] A. Berrais, “Arab Women in Engineering Education: Current State and Future Perspective,” in Symposium Female Higher Education: Trends and Perspectives, 2011.[11] A. Powell, B. Bagilhole, and A. Dainty, “How Women Engineers Do and Undo Gender: Consequences for Gender Equality,” Gender, Work & Organization, vol. 16, no. 4. pp. 411
. 144–152, 2013.[10] I. Drewelow, “Exploring graduate teaching assistants’ perspectives on their roles in a foreign language hybrid course,” System, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 1006–1022, 2013.[11] J. Paulsen and A. C. McCormick, “Reassessing Disparities in Online Learner Student Engagement in Higher Education,” Educ. Res., vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 20–29, 2020.[12] K. Sobel, S. Avery, and I. J. Ferrer-Vinent, “Teaching Them to Teach: Programmatic Evaluation of Graduate Assistants’ Teaching Performance,” Public Serv. Q., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 189–213, 2016.[13] B. C. O. Neal, M. Wright, T. Perorazio, and J. Purkiss, “The Impact of Teaching on Student Retention in the Sciences,” 2002.[14] B. Melton and Y. Bodur, “Effects of a
“Yes” was observed for Q . Lastly, for Q5, hada positive shift towards “Yes” in survey data. In addition to awareness, pre- and post-survey data was used to gauge student’s familiarity on SDOH (Figure 3A) and theimportance of SDOH (Figure 3B). Students (response count N = 25) were as ed, “How familiar are you with socialdeterminants of health?” using a 5-point Likert scale of familiarity (Figure 3A, 1-notfamiliar, 2- slightly familiar, 3 – moderately familiar, 4- very familiar, and 5 – extremelyfamiliar). A positive trend toward familiarity was observed when comparing pre surveydata (N = 4) to post survey data (N = 16) for students indicating they were “veryfamiliar” and “e tremely familiar”. When prompted in the post survey “Here is a