- Conference Session
- Student Division (STDT) Technical Session 1: Student Success and Mentoring
- Collection
- 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Ibukun Samuel Osunbunmi, Utah State University; Ning Fang, Utah State University
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Student Division (STDT)
considered except for motivation have a P-value greater than 0.05 for boththe Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk tests. The normality plots (see appendix): Q-Q plotsand the box plots for all the variables show that the test fulfilled the normality assumptionoverall. Therefore, we assumed that the data fulfilled normality assumptions. Table 2: Normality test results Variables Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig. Course Learning Experience 0.102 51 0.200 0.986 51 0.802 Campus Facilities 0.116 51 0.083
- Conference Session
- Student Division (STDT) Technical Session 5: Motivation and Support for Success
- Collection
- 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
D'Andre Jermaine Wilson-Ihejirika, University of Toronto, Canada; Qin Liu, University of Toronto, Canada; Joanna Meihui Li, University of Toronto, Canada; Mustafa Nisar, University of Toronto, Canada; Jiawen Lin, University of Toronto, Canada
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Student Division (STDT)
- Conference Session
- Student Division (STDT) Technical Session 6: Underserved Student Experiences
- Collection
- 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Abigail Nichole Lehto, American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE); Ning Fang, Utah State University
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Student Division (STDT)
Continuing-Generation College Students,” Research in Higher Education, vol. 62, Aug. 2019.[9] M. E. Thompson, “Grade Expectations: The Role of First-Year Grades in Predicting the Pursuit of STEM Majors for First- and Continuing-Generation Students,” Journal of Higher Education, vol. 92, no. 6, pp. 961-985[10] Q. H. Mazumder, S. Sultana, and F. Mazumder, “Correlation between Classroom Engagement and Academic Performance of Engineering Students,” International Journal of Higher Education, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 240-247, Apr. 2020.[11] M. Polmear, A. D. Chau, and D. R. Simmons, “Intersection of Diversity, Out-of-Class Engagement, and Engineer of 2020 Outcomes for Civil Engineering Students,” Journal of
- Conference Session
- Student Division (STDT) Technical Session 1: Student Success and Mentoring
- Collection
- 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Alexander V Struck Jannini, Purdue University Library TSS
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Student Division (STDT)
about mentoring their students,and perhaps see some techniques or skills that they would like to explore for themselves.References[1] R. D. Augustine, “Persistent and attrition of engineering students, a study of freshman and sophomore engineering students at three Midwestern universities,” 1966.[2] L. A. McDade, “Knowing the ‘right stuff’: Attrition, gender, and scientific literacy,” Anthropol. Educ. Q., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 93–114, 1988.[3] C. Adelman, “Women and men of the engineering path: A model for analyses of undergraduate careers,” 1998.[4] M. Besterfield-Sacre, C. J. Atman, and L. J. Shuman, “Characteristics of freshman engineering students: Models for determining student attrition in engineering,” J
- Conference Session
- Student Division (STDT) Technical Session 4: Minoritized Student Experiences
- Collection
- 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Mei-Yun Lin, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Hsinju Chen, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Holly M. Golecki, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Leah Espenhahn; Erin Marie Raftery; Alyssa Huang; Mayura Kulkarni
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Student Division (STDT)
beginning of each event. • Emphasize the participation of HUG students: We put a line in the registration form stating that “This program is designed for HUG students. If you don’t identify as HUG, we kindly ask you to quietly observe, refrain from asking questions, and not take up space during the event.” • Implementing an online anonymous comment tool: From the experiences of the first two panel events, we found that HUG students favored asking questions and providing feedback anonymously instead of raising their hands in front of audiences. Thus, we included the interactive Q&A online tool, allowing attendees to ask questions anonymously. • Discuss HUG students’ challenges in pursuing a research career
- Conference Session
- Student Division Technical Session 5: Self- Efficacy
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Jeffrey Luke Morrison, University of South Florida; Chris S Ferekides, University of South Florida; Dhinesh Balaji Radhakrishnan, Purdue University
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Student Division (STDT)
. Nelson, “A Model of Factors Contributing to STEM Learning and Career Orientation,” Int. J. Sci. Educ., vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 1067–1088, May 2015, doi: 10.1080/09500693.2015.1017863.[16] X. Wang, “Why Students Choose STEM Majors: Motivation, High School Learning, and Postsecondary Context of Support,” Am. Educ. Res. J., vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 1081–1121, Oct. 2013, doi: 10.3102/0002831213488622.[17] K. W. Tao and A. M. Gloria, “Should I Stay or Should I Go? The Role of Impostorism in STEM Persistence,” Psychol. Women Q., vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 151–164, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.1177/0361684318802333.[18] E. Litzler and C. Samuelson, “How Underrepresented Minority Engineering Students Derive a Sense of Belonging from Engineering,” in 2013
- Conference Session
- Student Division (STDT) Poster Session
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Tahlia Altgold, The Ohio State University
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Student Division (STDT)
theirrole as engineers in the greater context of engineering culture and society.AcknowledgementsThe author would like to thank Dr. Benjamin Ahn and Dr. Deborah Kuzawa for their insights andcomments on the manuscript.References[1] B. Jesiek, Q. Zhu, S. Woo, J. Thompson, and A. Mazzurco, “Global Engineering Competency in Context: Situations and Behaviors,” Online Journal for Global Engineering Education, vol. 8, no. 1, Mar. 2014, [Online]. Available: https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/ojgee/vol8/iss1/1[2] C. Baillie, “Engineers within a Local and Global Society,” Synthesis Lectures on Engineers, Technology and Society, vol. 1, pp. 1–76, Jan. 2006, doi: 10.2200/S00059ED1V01Y200609ETS002.[3] “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs
- Conference Session
- Student Division (STDT) Technical Session 5: Motivation and Support for Success
- Collection
- 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Sepehr Khorshid, University of Alabama; Siyuan Song, University of Alabama
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Student Division (STDT)
: 10.18260/1-2--32418.[8] Q. Wang and T. Du, “Implementation of the college student mental health education course (CSMHEC) in undergraduate medical curriculum: effects and insights,” BMC Medical Education, vol. 20, no. 1, p. 505, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02438-1.[9] Jensen, K., Johnson, E., Mirabelli, J., & Vohra, S. "CAREER: Characterizing undergraduate engineering students’ experiences with mental health in engineering culture". In 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.[10] M. Deziel, D. Olawo, L. Truchon, and L. Golab, Analyzing the Mental Health of Engineering Students using Classification and Regression. 2013, pp. 228–231. [Online]. Available: https://www.educationaldatamining.org/EDM2013/papers