et al. in 2006. Furtherevaluation of this instrument will benefit educators and their efforts to immerseengineering into K-12 curricula.ParticipantsThe DET instrument was taken by 405 elementary teachers, who attended a teacherprofessional program between 2006 and 2010. Table 1 shows the detailed composition ofthe sample across four background variables: gender, ethnicity, years of teaching andsurvey format. Among these respondents, 88% were females, while 12% were males.Approximately 36 percent of them had no more than five years of teaching experience,while 40 percent had six to fifteen years and 24 percent had more than fifteen years ofexperience. Caucasian teachers dominated the sample with 82 percent, as compared to the18 percent of non
Experience for Teachers program, funded by the National Science Foundation(NSF), is designed to encourage active participation of K-12 teachers and community collegefaculty in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) research, in order toenable them to teach STEM concepts to their students and to encourage students to pursuecareers in engineering and computer science.1 Since its inception in 2001, the NSF RETprogram has facilitated direct research experiences of either one or two summers in duration.Participants use their research as a springboard for the development of new classroom teachingmaterials. These materials provide students with new knowledge, skills, and abilities andcommunicate the wonder of science and the marvels of
with their partner teachers to engage middle and highschool students in science and engineering demonstrations, presentations, and activities related tothe fellows’ research. The two primary goals of the IMPACT LA Program are to 1) change teachers, students,and parents’ perceptions of engineers and encourage K-12 students to explore engineering andresearch careers, and 2) to enhance the communication and research skills of graduate fellows.4To achieve these goals, during workshops teachers participate in a wide range of researchexperiences designed by fellows to introduce and update teachers to their research areas.Graduate fellows conduct Master’s thesis research in Computer Science, Computer/ElectricalEngineering, Bioinformatics
. Three applets were built andtested in the fall of 2010. These applets included one for conducting generalized linearrelationships, one specialized for helping students to understand mass, volume and density andone to introduce students to the concept of structure-property relationships. The design strategyand methodology used is discussed as well as the architecture of the applets. Outcomes from thepilot test with high school students are also presented.IntroductionScience and engineering are moving towards a discovery-based strategy that increasingly relieson the use of computational techniques 1. As our quantitative understanding of the physicalworld increases and as computer technology improves, becomes faster and has more memorycapabilities
viaformation, nurturance and sustaining an important targeted school-university urban educationalpartnership. Our university has partnered with large urban school districts to plan, deliver andsustain a targeted inservice teacher professional development and a middle and high schoolSTEM curriculum intervention. The partnership goals are to assist inservice middle and highschool science teachers in: (1) designing and implementing integrated science and engineeringcurricula and (2) development of instructional methods and strategies that enable teachers toeffectively (a) teach challenging content and research skills in middle and high school asdemanded by state/national science standards; (b) generate knowledge and transform practice inhigh school STEM
mentors and the overall scope of theorganization. Existing models of mentorship do not adequately describe the specific relationshipbetween the college and high schools students: (1) Due to the proximity in both age andexperience, the college students cannot be considered more experienced (traditional model ofmentorship) and (2) Due to the fact that both student populations are in different educationalsystems, the college students cannot be considered peer mentors. To help understand thisalternative mentoring relationship, this study was guided by two research questions:1) Whatmotivates PFP participants to become mentors to high school students? 2) What do theseundergraduate students learn by mentoring high school students? A survey of
accrediting body, New England Association of Schools and Colleges (NEASC),now requires assessment of general education outcomes, and further mandates thatundergraduates demonstrate competence in written and oral communication; the ability forscientific and quantitative reasoning, critical analysis and logical thinking; and the capability forcontinuing learning, including information literacy.1 As a university, we aspire to promote andintegrate excellence in liberal and professional education. We have, therefore, undertaken aproject to identify a series of core undergraduate learning outcomes, to be addressed andassessed both in general education and in the majors. These outcomes will help our studentsdevelop the knowledge, skills, and habits of mind
environment where wehave been able to work with both Schools to create two courses that serve both their needs;making social studies and humanities students aware of the role of technology in the story ofhumanity, and providing engineering students with a course that truly responds to the ABET2000 requirement of presenting the process of engineering in a cultural context.The authors of this paper have therefore set themselves four short-term goals: 1. To conduct some sort of broader survey of the current state of affairs to confirm their suspicions that most ABET-accredited institutions are not requiring their students to be exposed to the social context and, specifically, the social history of technology; 2. to consider the practical
on the following questions:1) In what ways, if any, do practitioners’ sentence structures and use of active vs passive voice reflect concerns of engineering practice? In other words, do the practitioners just use standard English that could be used in any formal written communication, or are aspects of engineering practice integrated into the grammar of their texts?2) To what extent and in what ways do students’ sentence structures and use of active vs passive voice differ from the practitioners’? To what extent do differences demonstrate neglect for concerns that are important in engineering practice?We answer these questions with an analysis of reports and technical memoranda (tech memos)written by civil engineering practitioners
building 1. Project-directed writing assistance: a. 50-minute writing workshop before the first draft b. Review of Draft 1 and marginal feedback provided online c. 30-minute writing feedback and critique meeting of Draft 1 d. Review of writing of both Drafts 1 and 2 using the rubric 2. Student questionnaire to gain additional insights about the helpfulness of writing assistanceThe ultimate goal of the study is to identify (a) whether project-directed writing assistance helpsCM students improve their writing in areas that are typically problematic for them and (b) towhat extent such intervention is effective so that such student writers can be provided withtargeted writing instruction
means by which we might strive Table 1. NAE’s Grand Challenges18to meet such challenges? Make solar energy economical Provide energy from fusionAs this paper examines these four broad areas, it Develop carbon sequestration methodsproduces a set of questions for further exploration in Manage the nitrogen cycleboth engineering ethics and engineering studies. The Provide access to clean waterpaper closes with a sketch of a classroom Restore and improve urban infrastructureimplementation that guides students in asking similar Advance health informaticsquestions of the Grand Challenges as they explore
Committee. Page 22.1456.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Myths of Race and Gender: The Engineering “Pipeline” Metaphor and the Careers of Female Deans of EngineeringIntroductionWho does engineering is important, since engineers are key contributors to the design oftechnologies that shape our world.1 While women have made significant gains in their proportionof degrees earned and their representation in the professoriate in the past 30 years, they remainsignificantly underrepresented in engineering.2 In 2009, women earned just 17.8% of the 74,387bachelor’s degrees awarded in
been underexplored within engineeringeducation.IntroductionThe importance of interdisciplinary teamwork is widely recognized.1-4 Some engineeringeducation research on interdisciplinary teamwork has begun to focus on student and facultybeliefs about interdisciplinary work, competencies, learning outcomes, and assessment, but themajority of engineering education publications are limited to course and program descriptions.4-6Further, there are few, if any, studies of the day-to-day practices of interdisciplinary teams inengineering education settings and the objects they create and use in those practices. In Scienceand Technology Studies (STS) and Engineering Studies, on the other hand, observations ofscientists’ and engineers’ work practices
for Engineering Education, 2011 Teaching the Unbalanced Equation: Technical Opportunities and Social Barriers in the NAE Grand Challenges and BeyondIntroductionThe National Academy of Engineering (NAE) released its report Grand Challenges forEngineering in 2008, describing 14 major engineering challenges that must be overcome to makethe world “a more sustainable, safe, healthy, and joyous—in other words, better—place.” 1 Thechallenges identified encompass areas as diverse as energy, environment, infrastructure, health,security, learning, and research, but in each case the emphasis is on “engineering” dimensions ofthe larger problem domain and, in particular, on the technologies
; Music began as a collaboration that developed amongengineering faculty and technicians who have a love of and interest in music as well as a stronginterest in engineering education. During a semester long, one-credit course at RowanUniversity that introduced students to consulting and entrepreneurship, the faculty developed amodule that used music to encourage student participation and teamwork. The popularity of thistechnique led faculty to explore the interest level and backgrounds of the first year students inmusic. For the incoming 2009 class the results are shown in Table 1. Table 1: Survey of Engineering Freshmen, Fall 2009 First Year Engineering Students Who: Play an
’ overall grade.The Project - ArticleAs previously stated, each graduate student and pair of undergraduates was required to submit a“State of the Art” paper on a concrete durability related topic. There were only two projectrequirements. These included a bibliography of at least 20 journal articles and adhering to thejournal’s style guide.The second day of class, the students were distributed a handout that outlined the project. Five“State of the Art” articles that had been published in peer-reviewed journals were alsoprovided.1-6 For the undergraduates and for some of the graduate students, this was their firstintroduction to “State of the Art” articles. The entire second class period was spent discussingthe structure or outline of the articles
still needs to be learnedabout the specific deficiencies in communication skills of entry-level engineers. One step thatcould be taken is for engineering departments to conduct longitudinal studies about how welltheir instruction on writing and oral communication prepares students for later classes, forinternships and co-ops, and for employment. Departments at different institutions shouldconsider adopting a core of common survey questions so that survey results can be compared.Another recommendation is that when incorporating writing into a course, engineeringdepartments should consider the following two questions: 1. What communication skills do we want students to acquire? 2. How can technical assignments be designed to help students
PowerPoint and, implicitly or explicitly, eitherforeshadowed the success of PowerPoint or attempted to deflect criticism of it. These accountshave much to recommend them, including proximity to the events of interest, but by their naturelack objectivity and comprehensiveness. This paper begins the process of transforming thathistory into a more coherent and credible form.Our method in constructing this history, therefore, has focused on four categories of documentsthat qualify as primary sources: (1) the history of the word ―bullet‖ as documented in the OxfordEnglish Dictionary (OED), (2) the proposals in which the product we know as PowerPoint wasfirst described, (3) communication textbooks and handbooks, and (4) NASA reports in whichbullets are
attempts to correct minority underrepresentation in the engineering disciplines,educational researchers, cognitive psychologists, and scholars in related fields have since the1980s developed many studies centered on the notion of student self-efficacy. 1-6 These studiesseek to measure the degree to which under-represented minority or otherwise marginalizedstudents experience a sense of self-confidence or feeling that they are able to counter "barrierconditions." Those conditions might include discrimination or other challenging social andintellectual situations encountered in college. While such studies are certainly preferable to adenial of differences between minority and majority experiences, they intentionally or otherwisesupport the notion
with the humanistic and democratic potential of engineering.IntroductionThe Grand Challenges lately developed by the National Academy of Engineering with theirexcited inducements for twenty-first century engineers to "Reengineer the Human Brain," "Make Page 22.1104.2Solar Energy Affordable," "Restore and Improve Urban Infrastructure," "Enhance VirtualReality," and undertake ten other tasks, enter a long historical tradition of such epically scaledto-do lists.1 As early as the 1850s, as the first formal organizations of American engineers tookshape, the individuals involved sought to project long-term goals and professional guidelines fortheir
summaryof modern versus classic philosophy. How to Expand this Construct Further A few, other concepts need to be outlined: treatment of the self from Karl Jaspers; andthe strict notion of identity from Sonnemann. Jaspers’ work as outlined by Schrag(36) presents adivide akin to Sartre’s Being and Nothingness or as Schrag and others have put it, immanenceand transcendence (Figure 1). Immanence describes the realm of empirical existence. Thehuman being who navigates the world as is participates in immanence. The immanent that liesbeyond the grasp of the human being’s immediate proximity but can possibly be accessed by himor her is the world. When human beings project their perceptions of the immanent, they in turncreate the transcendent
engineering education and technical and professional communication,4 the role ofcommunication in the work life of engineers is becoming more complex and far reaching. Weneed to help our students prepare for the challenges associated with this expanded role.The exploratory study reported here investigates students’ conceptions of the communication ofengineers by analyzing the content of portfolios created by five undergraduates in a studiosetting. Responses to selected survey items were also analyzed. We found that each of thestudents discussed or otherwise acknowledged (1) the situated nature of communication, (2) theways in which communication can be empowering, and (3) the importance of familiarity with abroad range of communication activities for
makes a difference, but is there a difference in motivation? Some findings from the Academic Pathways StudyIntroduction Despite years of research and intervention, women continue to be underrepresented inengineering [1]. In 2008, women comprised 18.4% of all recipients of an engineering degree [2],continuing an historical trend spanning the last 30 years, during which women’s share ofengineering degrees has remained stable or even declined. One of the goals of the AcademicPathways Study (APS) of which the present analysis is a part, was to contribute to the ongoingdialogue about underrepresentation in engineering, on both explanatory and remedial topics. Thepresent study discusses some APS
groomed for management and leadership positions.A 2006 nation-wide survey sponsored by the American Association of Colleges and Universitiesfound that 76% of participating employers would like colleges to place more emphasis onteamwork skills. (1) Anecdotal evidence from the authors‟ experience as well as discussions withcolleagues from other institutions indicates that despite the inclusion of team projects in the Page 22.1504.2curriculum, students still struggle with the interpersonal dynamics of teamwork. The authorshypothesize that teaming skills are competencies that faculty often assume have been learnedelsewhere when in fact, students may
sink beneath the surface and he is free . . .” wrote Jacques-Yves Cousteau.[1] Hebypassed the gravity constraints and co-developed the first aqualung device. Cousteau redefinedthe problem. He charted a new frontier as his solution made the invisible visible. This is ametaphor for educators continually confronted with the weight of prescriptive curricula in needof alternative innovation.Two trends were found after investigating the top eleven undergraduate engineering programsranked by the U.S. News and World Report. The curricula are very doctrinaire and the coursedescriptions are indicative of synchronous engagements between the instructor and the learner.Conversely, none of the eleven schools appear to dedicate a course that has a
ofnegative emotions at the beginning of projects and positive emotions later in the project suggestsa need for more scaffolding of projects and activities at the beginning of the time period and lesslater in the project or activity.IntroductionRecently there has been an increase in the amount of research exploring emotions in education.[1]Furthermore, there have been recent developments in neuroscience that point to the critical roleof emotion in learning and decision-making.[2-5] We have often considered emotion as a by-product of learning, but recent developments demonstrate that emotion is an integral part oflearning.[6]There has been some discussion within engineering education concerning how intellectualdevelopment is influenced by a student's
AC 2011-2825: UNLOCKING THE HEART OF ENGINEERING GRANDCHALLENGES: LISTENING TO THE QUIET VOICESGeorge D. Catalano, State University of New York, Binghamton Page 22.1582.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Unlocking the Heart of Engineering Grand Challenges: Listening to the Quiet VoicesI. IntroductionThe National Academy of Engineering listed a series of Grand Challenges for Engineeringduring this past year.1 The challenges ranged from making solar energy economical to providingaccess to clean water to re-engineering the brain to list just a few. Surely, it may be difficult
grow by 6%by 2018; however, this increase is expected to add only 17,600 new jobs.On the other hand, the same report suggests that the shift in the U.S. economy away fromgoods-producing in favor of service-providing is expected to continue. Service-providingindustries are anticipated to generate approximately 14.5 million new wage and salaryjobs. Similar to goods-producing industries, growth among service-providing industries isexpected to vary as shown in Figure 1. Figure 1: Projected change in employment in service providing industry Page 22.1181.2 during the period 2008 – 2018 (Source: BLS).These data sets suggest that the
undergraduate student travel grants.This paper will discuss the research and design conducted by the students on a reusable StirFriction Welding tool.Stir Friction WeldingStir Friction Welding is a relatively new development in the welding industry compared totraditional machining processes.1 Since SFW’s invention, SFW has seen much innovation inimproving its welding process and is seeing world wide attention with welding aluminum alloys.SFW uses a solid-state joining process, which heats the material just under its melting point byusing friction under pressure to heat the material just under its melting point (see Figure 1). Thisheat is used to form the weld along the joint of the two butted components. This process allowsfor many advantages over