Intelligence, vol. 6, p. 100210, 2024/06/01/ 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100210.[8] C. Romero, S. Ventura, M. Pechenizkiy, and R. Baker, Handbook of Educational Data Mining. 2010.[9] B. Hamner and M. D. Shermis, "Contrasting state-of-the-art automated scoring of essays: analysis," 2012.[10] C. Dede, "The Role of Digital Technologies in Deeper Learning. Students at the Center: Deeper Learning Research Series," 2014.[11] B. Williamson, R. Eynon, and J. Potter, "Pandemic politics, pedagogies and practices: digital technologies and distance education during the coronavirus emergency," Learning, Media and Technology, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 107-114, 2020/04/02 2020
.[6] B. Zimmerman, "Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn," Contemporary EducationalPsychology, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 82–91, 2000.[7] Z. S. Seidametova, "Hackathons in computer science education: Monitoring and evaluationof programming projects," Educational Technology Quarterly, vol. 2022, no. 1, pp. 20–34, 2022.[8] C. Rennick, G. Litster, C. Hulls, and A. Hurst, "Curricular hackathons for engineering designlearning: The case of engineering design days," TechRxiv Preprint, 2022.[9] I. Fronza, et al., "Keeping fun alive: An experience report on running online code camps," inProc. IEEE/ACM 44th Int. Conf. Softw. Eng.: Softw. Eng. Educ. Training (ICSE-SEET), 2022.[10] R. Hewitt, (2021). TigerCodeCamp. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com
, while focus on performance aims to do well compared to others. Additionally, students canfocus on s on achieving positive outcomes (success) or avoiding negative outcomes (failure)[14]. By combining these concepts, there are four types of achievement goals. • Mastery-Approach: Focused on achieving personal growth or mastering a task. • Performance-Approach: Focused on being better than others and gaining recognition. • Mastery-Avoidance: Focused on avoiding misunderstanding or failing to learn. • Performance-Avoidance: Focused on not being seen as worse than others.Feeling of inclusion A sense of inclusion refers to student’s perceptions of acceptance by others. However,underrepresented students face additional challenges
Pneumatic Payload 2500 Vacuum SR Slot and Stäubli 20-100 Electrical series Key Stäubli S series Clamp 5-40 None Proceedings of the 2025 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX Copyright 2025, American Society for Engineering Education 6These tool changers allow for automatic alignment, repeatability, strength, and variety of pass-throughmodules that could
TRANSACTIONS ON EDUCATION, VOL. 57, NO. 2, p. 99-106. (2014)4. K. J. Reid, “Study of the Success or Failure of Changing Freshman Engineering Technology Courses to an Online Format: Did it Work?”, Proceedings of the 36th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, October 28 – 31, 2006, San Diego, CA. p. S1J-28 - S1J-33. (2006)5. S. Pisupati, J. Mathews, “Differences in teaching and learning outcomes in face-to-face, online and hybrid modes of energy conservation course”, Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 22, 2008 - June 24, 2008. (2008)6. J. Douglas, “Comparing learning outcomes and content mastery in online and face-to-face engineering statics courses”, Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and
., Seattle, WA, June14 to 17, 2015, Paper ID #11324.[3] S. E. Lee, K. J. Woods, K. K. Tonissen, “Writing Activities Embedded in BioscienceLaboratory Courses to Change Students’ Attitudes and Enhance their Scientific Writing,”Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, vo. 7, no. 3, March, 2011.[4] C. A. Hubka, E. Chi, Y. Chen, V. Svihla, J. Gomez, A. K. Datye, T. L. Mallette, “A Writingin the Disciplines Approach to Technical Report Writing in Chemical Engineering LaboratoryCourses,” Presented at the 126th ASEE Annu. Conf. & Expo., Tampa, FL, June 15 to 19, 2019,Paper ID #252222. Proceedings of the 2025 ASCE North Central Regional Conference © 2025American Society of Engineering
course, with a focus on providing clearer guidance, increasing collaborativeopportunities, and continuing to integrate real-world tools and applications into the labenvironment. By addressing these areas, the course can more effectively engage students andsupport their development into confident, capable engineers.References:[1] Ford, M., Fatehboroujeni S., Fisher E.M, Ritz H., “A Hands-on Guided-inquiry Materials Laboratory that Supports Student Agency,” Advances in Engineering Education. 11 (1). 2023. doi:10.18260/3-1-1153-36041[2] Persano Adorno D., Scardulla F., D’Acquisto L., Pizzolato N., “Design of an open-lab activity for engineering students: A case study,” International Journal of Mechanical Engineering
. Norton & Company, 2024.[10] O. Gambelin. Responsible AI: Implement an Ethical Approach in Your Organization. New York, New York: Kogan Page, 2024.[11] NSPE. “NSPE Code of Ethics for Engineers,” 2025. [Online]. Available http://https://www.nspe.org/resources/ethics/code-ethics[12] University of Kentucky. “AI Course Policy Examples,” 2025. [Online]. Available https://celt.uky.edu/ai-course-policy-examples[13] E. Mollick. “AI has a strategy,” 2022. [Online]. Available https://www.oneusefulthing.org/p/ai-has-a-strategy[14] A. Narayanan and S. Kapoor. AI Snake Oil: What Artificial Intelligence Can Do, What it Can’t, and How to Tell the Difference. Princeton University Press, 2024.[15] M. Wheatley
participation andprofessional development rather than assuming that This HSI Pilot Project: Fostering Hispanic Achievement inprofessional skills have already been developed by graduation Computer Science and Engineering with Affinity Research(Buket et al., 2023). To show the university's commitment to Group Model (Project Achieve) is supported by the Nationalthe initiative beyond grant funding, the newly developed Science Foundation under Award Number FAIN-2150048.course, Introduction to Scientific Research. was supported by Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendationsa $3,000 donation from the School of Engineering to expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do