standard undergraduate courses of study.1. U.S. Green Building Council, LEED for New Construction and Major Renovations, Version 2.2, October, 2005.2. Kosmatka, S., Kerkhoff, B., and Panarese, W.; Design and Control of Concrete Mixtures, 14th Edition, PortlandCement Association, Skokie, Illinois, 2002. 6
-learning projects that involve meaningful reflection will helpdevelop better engineers, Coast Guard Officers, and citizens.References 1 Jamieson, L.H. “The Case for Engineering Service-Learning”. Presented at the NAE Conference for Service Learning in Engineering. May 24, 2006. 2 The United States Coast Guard Academy Catalog of Courses. 2006-2007. New London, CT. 3 Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (1998) Engineering Criteria 2000. 4 Rosser, S. “Effectiveness of Service Learning: Does it Make Engineering More Female Friendly?” Presented at the NAE Conference on Service Learning. May 24, 2006. 5 Tsang, E. (2000) “Introduction” In: Projects that Matter: Concepts and Models for Service-learning in Engineering. American
from the Technical University of Gdansk, Poland, and S.M.Arch.S from MassachusettsInstitute of Technology, Cambridge, MA. Contact: andrzej.zarzycki@njit.eduBibliographyFord, Ed; The Details of Modern Architecture; Cambridge: MIT Press; 2003Guidera, S., 2006, BIM Applications in Design Studio: An Integrative Approach to DevelopingStudent Skills with Computer Modeling, in “Synthetic Landscapes”: The ACADIA 2006Leatherbarrow, David; “Architecture’s Unscripted Performance”; Performative Architecture –Beyond Instrumentality; NY: Spon Press; 2005.Penttila, Hannu; Dong, A, Vande Moere, A & JS Gero (eds), Early Architectural Design andBIM, CAADFutures’07, 291-302. Springer.References1. Alberti, Leon Battista; On the Art of Buildings in Ten Books
. graphical language,” Journal of Science Education and Technology, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 1-7, 2004. [12] Esmaeili, M., & Eydgahi, A. (2013, July 1). An Evaluation Model for[4] D . C. Hakk, et al. (ed.), “Increased structure and active learning Project Based Active Learning in an Engineering Technology reduce the achievement gap in introductory biology,” Vol. 332, No. Freshman Course. International Conference on Engineering Education 6034, pp. 1213-1216, 2011. Research.[5] A. Y. Scales and E. T. Varnado, “Active Learning for [13] Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995c
. [5] Rua, Y., R. Muren, S. M. Reckinger. “Limitations of Additive Manufacturing on Microfluidic Heat Exchanger Components.” Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering. (2014), unpublished. [6] Attila Bonyár et. al. “Rapid Prototyping Technology (RPT) as a powerful tool in microfluidic development.” Procedia Engineering. 5 (2010) 291–294
engineering education to the new century”, National Academy ofnew Engineering program at that University. The lab and the Engineering, Washington D.C., 2005.impacted course described here received very positive [4] S. D. Sheppard, K. Macatanagay, A. Colby, and W. Sullivan,feedback from the students and have even encouraged many “Educating engineers: designing for the Future of the Field”, The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Preparation forof them to pursue electrical project applications outside of the the Professions, Josey-Bass, 2009. pp 79-81, December, 200
may paradigms, ed. 2. Prentice-Hall: Issue, 2007.undergo profound transformations. The process of beginning to [2] A. S. Tanenbaum, Computer Networks. 4. ed. Amsterdam, Holanda:the formation of clouds of locusts is the appearance of Campus, 2003. 632 p.favorable environmental conditions that lead to the [3] F. H. R Silva, Um Estudo Sobre os Benefícios e os Riscos de Segurançaproliferation of insects[8]. na Utilização de Cloud Computing. 2010. 15f. Artigo científico de conclusão de curso apresentado no Centro Universitário Augusto Motta, A grasshopper can only
Median = 4 SD = 0.654.a. Explain the use of a flowchart for PIC programming. Mean = 3.93 Median = 4 SD = 1.014.b. Calculate and write a time delay loop(s). Mean = 4.07 Median = 4
fundamental outcomes through different methods, including written reports,principles: multiple means of engagement (the ‘why’ of oral presentations, and visual storytelling. Some students arelearning), multiple means of representation (the ‘what’ of better at analytical writing, while others communicate theirlearning), and multiple means of action & expression (the learning more effectively through oral discussion and exchange‘how’ of learning). UDL, which began in the 1980’s continues of ideas, and some do better at date-driven visualizations andto evolve, integrating AI, adaptive learning, and digital graphs. This range of methods gives all students theaccessibility to
Optimization Conference Melaka,[2] Musée Louis Braille, “Braille Today,” Accessed: Malaysia, 2012, pp. 361–366.December, 2024 [Online]. Available:https://museelouisbraille.com/en/le-braille-aujourd-hui[3] A. Ghosh, T. Hossain, M. J. UI Islam, M. Kundu, N. B. Appendix 1: Simplified G-code dictionaryNizam, and S. A. Fattah, ‘Brindle: A Low-Cost RefreshableBraille Display with Slider Mechanism’, in 2023 IEEE 9th 0 Placeholder for a blank space, if 0 is input railInternational Women in Engineering (WIE) Conference on motor moves one “Full_Step”Electrical and Computer Engineering (WIECON-ECE), 2023,pp. 201–205
, 1995. 11. Bloom, Benjamin S., ed. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Longman, Newark, New Jersey, 1956. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 8 2015 ASEE Zone III Conference (Gulf Southwest – Midwest – North Midwest Sections) 12. Felder, R.M., and L.K. Silverman, L.K. “Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education [Electronic Version],” Engineering Education, 78 (7), pp.674-681, 1988. http://www4.ncsu.edu./unity/lockers/users/f/felder/public/Papers/LS- 1988.pdf, accessed July 10, 2015. 13.Biographical
students could easilyface. The magazine published many of critical letters including one from a career advisor at theUniversity of Missouri-Rolla (now Missouri S&T) that read, “… (The student’s) word should mean something. … (Otherwise) his/her word may be questioned in the future. … (The students would) leave the company in a poor position. … We tell students to quit interviewing when they have accepted a job. It is like continuing to date after you are married.”Students frequently ask about professional expectations. At what point am I committed to take a job – after a verbal acceptance or after papers are signed? What if the company will not wait longer for an answer to a job offer? How long should one work at a
/s based on the plot? 5. The experimental result is obtained from the setup of the following system in the figure below. a. Write the equation of motion. b. The mass of the hanging weight is 500 gram. Using the frequency obtained from experimental result in problem 4, calculate the spring constant k.
Student Outcomes" , Proceedings of the 2008 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Pittsburgh, PA: ASEE, 2008.2 King, Paul H., ―Capstone Design and ABET Program Outcomes in the U. S.‖, European Society for Engineering Education, TN 37235-163.3 Helbling, Jim, David Lanning, Ron Madler, Angela Beck, and Patric McElwain. ―Integrating Communications into Team-Taught Senior Design Courses‖, Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Washington DC: ASEE, 2005.4 Catalano, George D.. "Senior capstone design and ethics: A bridge to the professional world.", Science and Engineering Ethics
efforts.Bibliography 1. Cone, C., Chadwick, S., Gally, T., Helbling, J., and Shaffer, R. (2005). "Interdisciplinary Freshman Experience," Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 12-15, Portland, Oregon. 2. Helbling, J., Lanning, D., Madler, R., Beck, A., and McElwain, R. (2005). “Integrating Communications into Team-Taught Senior design Courses,” Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 12-15, Portland, Oregon. 3. Helbling, J., Lanning, D., Madler, R., Marriott, D., and Siebold, K. (2007). "Impact of New Facilities on Engineering Student Outcomes," Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 24-27, Honolulu, Hawaii. 4. Coffin, L.F. Jr. (1954). A
). MethodsInstrument and VariablesWe used the Advisor Support and Self-Efficacy for Thesis completion (ASSET) survey to gatherdata for our study. With engineering graduate programs at HSIs as a focus and SCCT as atheoretical underpinning, ASSET was designed to explore graduate students' thesis ordissertation self-efficacy and their perceptions of advisor support. The instrument is based onVarney’s Dissertation Self-Efficacy (2010) and Zhao et al.’s Advisor Behavior (2007) scales,adapted to the engineering context as the Thesis Self-Efficacy and Advisor Support constructs.Previous work, which comprised an exploratory factor analysis (EFA), provided constructvalidity evidence for the adapted scales in the instrument (Mercado Rivera et al., 2023).The survey
Paper ID #45214Fostering Tomorrow’s Black STEM Entrepreneurs: Insights from an InnovativeSTEM Program Promoting Equity-Centered EntrepreneurshipDr. Ebony Omotola McGee, The Johns Hopkins University Ebony McGee, associate professor of diversity and STEM education at Vanderbilt Universityˆa C™s Peabody College, investigates what it means to be racially marginalized in the context of learning and achieving in STEM higher education and industry. In particDr. Shelly Engelman, The Johns Hopkins University Shelly Engelman, Ph.D., is a Research Manager at Johns Hopkins University and also the Director of Research and Evaluation at
thesetechnologies for both coordination and communication in the field help them increase productivityand quality of the work process, which ultimately increase profitability and lower the potentialdelay and undocumented issues.References1. C.H. Nam and C.B. Tatum (1992). Strategies for technology push: lessons from construction innovations, Construction Engineering and Management2. Chitkara, K. K. (1998). Construction project management: Planning, scheduling and controlling, McGraw-Hill, New Delhi.3. Emmitt, S. and Gorse, C. 2003, Construction Communication, Blackwell Publishing Ltd.4. Higgin, G., and Jessop, N. (1965). Communications in the building industry: The report of a pilot study, Tavistock Publications, London.5. T.M. Toole
concepts. Moreover,during the oral examination, the ULAs offer additional individual explanations anddemonstrations to cover students’ conceptual and technical deficiencies.Final Project ECE175 Spring 2013The final project is to write a c program to simulate the card game called “War”. The rules are: 1. You are to play with a deck of 52 cards, ranking from low to high as follows: two, three, …ten, jack, queen, king and ace. There are 4 suits (H S D C) of each numbered and face cards, although for the game, suits are ignored. The deck needs to be shuffled, then deal 26 cards to each of two players (This is called a hand). 2. Each player places the top card face up on the table and the player with the higher card takes the
technologies.References1. H. G. Yeh, D. F. Gayme, S. H. Low “Adaptive VAR Control for Distribution Circuits with Photovoltaic Generators,” IEEE Trans. On Power Systems, Vol 27, No. 3, August 2012.2. C. Demoulias, “A New Simple Analytical method for Calculating the Optimum Inverter Size in Grid- connected PV Plants” Electric Power System Research, vol. 80, Issue 10, pp. 1197-1204, October 2010.3. R. Manly. (2013, Nov 15). Energy Conference Returns [Online]. Available:4. http://www.csulb.edu/misc/inside/?p=44313 Proceedings of the 2014 American Society for Engineering Education Zone IV Conference Copyright © 2014, American Society for Engineering Education
Configurations”, San Jose, California, Feb., 2009.3. Andrew S. Tanenbaum, Todd Austin, “Structured Computer Organization”, Pearson publisher, 2012.4. Robert Duron, Barbara Limbach, and Wendy Waugh, “Critical Thinking Framework for Any Discipline”, International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, Vol. 17, No. 2, Pages 160-166, 2006.5. James Graham, Karla Conn Welch, Jeffrey Lloyd Hieb, and Shamus McNamara, “Critical Thinking in Electrical and Computer Engineering,” in Proceedings of the ASEE 2012 Annual Conference, 2012.6. Robert J. Niewoehner, “Applying a Critical Thinking Model for Engineering Education,” 2006 World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, Vol.5, No.2, 2006.7. Belgin Yildirim, Sukran Ozkahraman
received first by the instructional designers that are responsible forsetting up the support system, then by the RLE responsible for providing support and finally bythe student-inmate. This multiple responsibility challenges the instructor, who is then worriedabout certain content that may not comply with copyright laws. It is for this reason that theinstructor limits the number of images within in the instructional materials and asks for theseitems to be returned at the end of the year. This, at various levels, seems to the instructor, aconstraint. The instructor thus adopts a more conservative attitude with regards to the contenttransmitted, claiming the need for strict compliance with copyright laws, a constraint that s/hemay never have voiced
., Dick, M., Markham, S., Macdonald I., Walsh M., “Cheating and plagiarism: perceptions and practices of first year IT students”, Proceedings of ACM-SIGCSE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE’02), 2002, pp. 183-18711. Upchurch, R. L., and Williams L., “In Support of Student Pair Programming.”, Proceedings of ACM- SIGCSE’01 technical symposium on Computer Science Education, March 2001, pp. 327-33112. Williams, L. and Kessler, R.R. “Pair programming illuminated”, Boston, Mass.: Addison Wesley, 2003 Proceedings of the 2015 American Society for Engineering Education Pacific Southwest Conference Copyright © 2015, American Society for Engineering Education
3515. Pestana, A, Alves, T., and Barbosa, A. (2014). “Application of Lean Construction Concepts to Manage the Submittal in AEC Projects.” J. Manage. Eng. 30(4), 05014006.6. S. Mohamed, P.A. Tilley, S.N. Tucker. “Quantifying the Time and Cost Associated with the Request for Information (RFI) Process in Construction.” Acadamia.edu. http://www.academia.edu/3580760/quantifying_the_time_and_cost_associated_with_the_request_for_infor mation_rfi_process_in_construction.7. Chin, Chang-Sun (2010). “RFI Responsiveness of Paper-Based vs. Web-Based Information Processing Systems.” Proceedings IGLC-18, Technion, Haifa, Isreal8. Tsao, Cynthia C.Y., John Draper, Gregory Howell. (2014). “An Overview, Analysis, and Facilitation tips for Simulations
level. Findings/ Data: KEYR= Right L=Left B= Back S= Stomach Sys= Systolic Dia= Diastolic Proceedings of the 2015 American Society for Engineering Education/Pacific South West Conference Copyright © 2015, American Society for Engineering Education 356 The following results are average systolic and diastolic blood pressures and pulses (on the Y axis) of each of the twenty participants (on the X axis) in the experiment. Systolic and diastolic are recorded in millimeter of mercury
River, NJ.3. Angelo, T.A. (1993). "A Teacher's Dozen: Fourteen General Research-Based Principles for Improving Higher Learning in our Classrooms." American Assoc. for Higher Education (AAHE) Bulletin, 45(8): 3-13.4. Donnelly, R. & Fitzmaurice, M. (2005). "Designing Modules for Learning." In: Emerging Issues in the Practice of University Learning and Teaching, O’Neill, G., Moore, S., and McMullin, B. (Eds.), All Ireland Society for Higher Education (AISHE), Dublin.5. Fiegel, G.L. (2013). "Incorporating Leaning Outcomes into an Introductory Geotechnical Engineering Course." European Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 38, No. 3, Taylor & Francis, London, 238-253.6. Bloom, B.S., Engelhart, M.D
., et al. "Benefits of industry involvement in multidisciplinary capstone design courses." Int. J. of Eng. Ed. (2014).3. https://utdesign.utdallas.edu/4. Polk, Todd W. and Robert A. Hart. “Evaluation of Team Mentoring in a Large Capstone Course.” 2024 Capstone Design Conference, June 3-5, 2024, Knoxville, Tennessee.5. Gravell, Jaime, Robert A. Hart, and Todd W. Polk. "Implementation of Internal Design Reviews in a Capstone Course.” 2022 Capstone Design Conference, June 6-8, 2022, Dallas, Texas.6. S Ohland, Matthew W., H. R. Pomeranz, and H. W. Feinstein, “The Comprehensive Assessment of Team Member Effectiveness: A New Peer Evaluation Instrument,” Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education Annual
10 defense.gov/Portals/45/Documents/defbudget/FY2024/FY2024_Budget_Request_Overview_Book.pdf. 8. U.S. Department of Defense, "FY 2025 Defense Budget Overview," 2024. Available: https://comptroller. defense.gov/Portals/45/Documents/defbudget/FY2025/FY2025_Budget_Request_Overview_Book.pdf. 9. Korki, Jin, and Tian, "Real-Time Cyber-physical Systems: State-of-the-Art and Future Trends," 2022. Available: https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-981-287-251-7_37. 10. J. B. Awotunde, K. A. Amuda, Y. J. Oguns, N. Nigar, T. A. Adeleke, K. M. Olagunju, and S. A. Ajagbe, "Cyber-Physical Systems Security: Analysis, Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Prospects," 2022. Available: https
the lecture notesinto videos. This will allow the complete learning modules to be shared with the global engineeringteaching community through the university’s library system. AcknowledgmentThis work was supported by the National Science Foundation Grant EEC-2022275. References1. R. J. Marandi, B. K. Smith, R. F. Burch, and S. C. Vick, “Engineering soft skills vs. engineering entrepreneurial skills,” Int J Eng Educ, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 988-998, 2019.2. R. Reagans and E. W. Zuckerman, “Networks, diversity, and productivity: The social capital of corporate R&D teams,” Organization Science, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 502-517, 2001.3. P
disciplines. Advances in Peer Led Learning. Published online December 19, 2022:55-71. doi:10.54935/apll2022-01-05-553. Guden JM, Bellen JA. A scoping review of the peer-led team learning to learner-participants and peer leaders in STEM courses. International Journal of Research Studies in Education. 2020;9(5). doi:10.5861/ijrse.2020.50084. Brown T. Change by Design: How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation. Harper Business; 2009.5. Fila ND, Mckilligan S, Guerin K. Design Thinking in engineering course design. In: 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. ; 2018.6. Wrigley C, Straker K. Design Thinking pedagogy: the educational design ladder. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. 2017;54(4