systems. Dr. Tzouanas is an ABET Program Evaluator (PEV) for Engineering and Engineering Technology programs. He is also member of AIChE and ASEE.Dr. Lisa Deane Morano, University of Houston, Downtown c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Solar Powered Aquaponics System: Modeling Real World Solutions through Engineering TechnologyI. IntroductionOne of the challenges we face as the word population expands is that our needs for food water andenergy also expand. The central questions is how to balance all of these needs. This is sometimescalled the energy-water-food nexus and it has enormous implications for food policy and the futuretechnology needs [1]. How can we grow more
c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019The Motivations of STEM MentorsIntroductionSchool-Based mentoring (SBM) currently is the most widely available and fastest-growing formof mentoring in the United States [1]. One challenge limiting mentoring programs is their abilityto attract and retain mentors. Why mentors decide to become involved and the conditions underwhich they persist as mentors are questions that require robust answers due to the importance ofcultivating deep relationships between mentors and mentees in order to obtain positive results[2], [3], [4]. While we know some demographics about individuals who mentor, we know lessabout why mentors decide to become mentors and why they persist. Existing research points
Engineering Education, 2019 Stuck on the Verge or in the Midst of a Sea Change? What Papers from the 2018 Annual Conference Tell Us About Liberal Education for Engineers Full fathom five thy father lies; Of his bones are coral made: Those are pearls that were his eyes: Nothing of him that doth fade, But doth suffer a sea-change Into something rich and strange --Shakespeare, The Tempest (1611), Act 1, Scene 2In their editors’ preface, “A Sea Change in Engineering Education,” Ollis, Neeley, andLuegenbiehl (2004) argued that ABET had “freed undergraduate curricula from their disciplinaryfetters” and faculty from “our
theirprototype but were not always intentional in how they planned or conducted their interactions.These three perspectives point to specific gaps in student knowledge related to user interactionsthat future design pedagogy might target to help students elicit requirements and solicit designfeedback from users more effectively.1. IntroductionThose who have a relationship of use with design solutions – defined as “users” – play animportant role in engineering design projects [1]. The use of any technology is defined by thosewho use that technology [2]–[7], and user acceptance strongly influences which technologiesbecome widely adopted [7]–[10]. Designers may interact with users for a number of reasons,such as to elicit user requirements or to solicit
instructors.IntroductionTeams are common in engineering courses, for a variety of pedagogical and logistical reasons.Working in teams, especially without significant support from instructors or mentors, is stressfulfor some students and can lead to negative outcomes [1]. Many potential pitfalls have beenidentified in the literature and resonate with us from our combined >20 years of teaching a team-based first year engineering course, including inequitable task allocation [2-4] and inequitablegroup conversational dynamics [5,6].To minimize students’ negative experiences with teamwork, faculty should critically considerhow they choose to support teams. Many factors necessarily impact that decision, including classsize, team size, and student level. There are a
successive programming courses. The results were analyzed using mixedmodel ANOVA for repeated measures of questions on self-efficacy, intimidation by programming,and feelings of inclusion.Statistically significant results include: We observed a decrease in self-efficacy during the termfor both courses in our study, although the effect is small and the decrease is slightly larger forURM students than non-URM students in Course 1; and a decrease in inclusion for students inCourse 1, though again the effect is small. Overall, the perceptions of URM students are similarto non-URM students.Introduction and MotivationA recent survey by the National Science Foundation showed that higher education is stillstruggling to increase the number of
entirely different level as opposed to being a participant. The student team leaders are nowpeer-teachers that must be able to lead the activities and probe the students for understanding ofthe models and system behavior demonstrated in the activities. This paper presents a roadmap forusing hands-on discovery activities that may better engage students of the current generation.The paper presents the learning objectives, two of the successful activities, student perspectiveson leading and learning, and lessons learned on how to implement these activities in theclassroom.Literature ReviewSystems thinking [1], [2], [3] is applied to understand complex system behavior in many settingssuch as tourism [4], nursing [5] and education [6]. There continue
, assessment methods related to these outcomes that rely onLikert-type responses or structured assignments may be susceptible to social desirability orpositive response bias. When prompted, students will normally agree that ethics are importantand can select the correct answer for simple ESI questions. But what do engineering andcomputing students quickly draw to mind in relation to ESI? To explore this, students were askedto respond to two open-ended survey questions: (1) How do you view your role in society as anengineer or computer scientist? (2) List the ethical issues that you think are relevant to engineersand/or computer scientists. It was of interest to determine if student responses would vary fromthe beginning to the end of a term or across
-centered strategies for promoting, supportive, diverse environments in graduate education Colleen E. Bronner, Alin Wakefield, Kara Maloney University of California, Davis Jean VanderGheynst University of Massachusetts, DartmouthIntroductionCurrent STEM graduate education is not meeting the needs of all students. In the 2018 GraduateSTEM Education for the 21st Century report, educational leaders call for transformation of thecurrent STEM graduate education to a system that is 1) student-centered, 2) provides diverse,equitable, and inclusive environments; 3) supports graduate student mental
, including the increased use of cubesats, aircraft aerodynamicefficiency and noise reduction efforts, as well as the explosion in the field of UAS [1]. In additionto these are the potential for the aerospace workforce to suffer reductions of current personnel asa result of retirements over the next decade [2], [3], [4]. As a result of these factors, aerospaceengineering remains a strong area of interest for many students today [6].Local experience reflects this same desire by students from Alaska and in the Pacific northwest.UAF counselors have provided feedback that new opportunities, including the school’s recentlyinstituted aerospace engineering minor, AIAA student chapter, and UAS-related courses are themost sought-after experiences by
Engineering Education, 2019 Students’ Experience with Collaborative Engineering Design Challenges in a Middle School Engineering Course (Evaluation)IntroductionThe recent emergence of engineering as a curricular priority in K-12 schools has spurred thedevelopment and implementation of new approaches for engaging students of all ages in theengineering design process [1]. With this increased prominence of engineering as a K-12discipline, education researchers have begun to explore the outcomes of engineering educationin the context of K-12 schools. One review of P-12 engineering students from 2000 - 2015documented an increase in engineering education research during this period, highlighting anumber of themes within the literature
in Physics Engineering from Tecnologico de Monterrey and a doctoral degree in Mathe- matics Education from Syracuse University, NY. Dr. Dominguez is a member of the Researchers’ National System in Mexico (SNI-1) and has been a visiting researcher at Syracuse University, at UT-Austin and at Universidad Andres Bello. She teaches undergraduate courses in Mathematics, graduate courses in Education, and is a thesis advisor on the master and doctoral programs on education at the Tecnologico de Monterrey. Her main research areas are: faculty development, teaching methods, and gender issues in STEM education.Prof. Genaro Zavala, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico and Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago,Chile
to changes in geometry or operating conditions.In the course of developing this ability, students need to gain experience both in analyticalmodeling, and in making experimental measurements. In industrial scenarios in particular, it isoften important that experimental measurements be planned and executed in manner that causesminimal disruption of operations in addition to being carried out with sufficient accuracy for theresults to address the interests of the business.Development of these skills in the course of baccalaureate engineering technology programsaddresses three of the outcomes from the Criterion 3. Student Outcomes section of the 2019-20ABET documentation for accrediting engineering technology programs [1]. These Outcomesare:(1
these types of security projects become moreprevalent across undergraduate education. The descriptions will also detail the level of projectthat students of various backgrounds and class levels can accomplish within the cybersecurityfield without monetary resources or years of experience. This work will provide new instructorsand project supervisors information to guide similar projects, paving the way for much neededcybersecurity professionals to gain valuable experience during their undergraduateeducation.1 IntroductionDigital components are ubiquitous and widely integrated, including smart phones, tablets, laptops,servers, smart-home devices, etc. all networked together, leaving myriad vulnerabilities within thehardware and software
that URM students hadlower rates of success in key undergraduate STEM courses. Each new generation has its ownchallenges. Although lecture-based classes may have worked in the past, they are no longeradequate [1]. Universities must acknowledge this and take steps to adjust pedagogyaccordingly. A seminal report published by the National Research Council in 1999, HowPeople Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School [2], includes a call for a university culturewhere a deep understanding of how students learn determines both the content of thecurriculum and how it is taught. Instead of the classroom being the sole source of learning,faculty should function as learning guides. The Model Institutions for Excellence (MIE)program, funded by the NSF and
collaborationcentered extra-curricular resources can improve the project experience for first-year engineeringstudents.Background and Motivation First-year engineering education and its impact on student retention, culture, andexperience is an important topic to current educators trying to improve university levelengineering education. Persistence in an engineering program is directly related to the first-yearexperience [1]. The first-year curriculum and surrounding environment are essential componentsto providing students with points of both learning and discovery that will ultimately impact theirdecision to stay within their chosen path [1]. Although the engineering path may not be the bestpath for every student, there is a serious concern over
the Network leader for the Metropolitan Cleveland Consortium for STEM Regional Ohio STEM Learning Network Hub and Co-Director of the Center for Innovation in STEM Education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Supporting Students with Mobility, Dexterity, and Psychological Disabilities in a Research Experiences for Undergraduates Summer ProgramIntroductionIn the United States, people with disabilities are underrepresented in both engineering educationand practice. 4.3% of undergraduate students with disabilities major in engineering vs. 5.3% ofstudents without disabilities [1]. 8% of graduate students with disabilities study math,engineering, or
identifies perceived benefits and challenges for the students engaged in thecompetition. Complementing the report of the team's experience at the 2018 RTZ, this studyemphasizes the importance of teamwork collaboration in the present context of the AEC industrywhile drawing upon concepts of sustainable construction. The study encompasses data collectedfrom: (1) a survey with all the 8 students, (2) interviews with the faculty leader and the studentteam leader, and (3) the reflections of two of the authors of this paper based on their ownexperiences and observations as participants in the 2018 RTZ competition team. Three categoriesemerged from the data and background literature analyzed: teamwork, education and knowledge,skills, and abilities (KSA
Significant Achievement by an Individual from the US Distance Learning Association, and a national Emmy for a documentary he both wrote and produced.Mr. Chris Hoehn-Saric, Shorelight EducationJanet Donghee KangDr. Katherine Newman c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Synchronous Cohort-Based International EducationAbstractMany universities are striving to reach a broader audience of students by expanding into the inter-national market, especially for graduate degree programs. The two dominant types of educationalofferings to international students are (1) online degree programs or (2) establishment of an interna-tional branch campus. Both approaches present significant challenges
absolute relative absolute relative variation variation variation variation Technical 0.41 12% 0.43 13% Complementary 0.49 15% 0.60 17% Interpersonal 0.83 24% 0.83 24%Table 1: Absolute variation per competence category and per program.When analyzing differences between the host universities, it was discovered that Spanishstudents perceived bigger improvement when studying in Scandinavian universities for technicaland interpersonal competencies than in other countries. The country with the highest results for“teamwork” was
of digital signal processing (DSP), forexample digital filters, used in smartphones.1. INTRODUCTION.In ECE courses with high mathematical contents, it is helpful for student learning andunderstanding to use examples, demonstrations and computer simulations to explain seeminglyabstract concepts. We use the Electromagnetics (EM) course offered during Fall 2018 semesteras example in this paper. The course topics include: Static Electric and Magnetic Fields, EnergyStorage in these fields, Time-Varying EM Fields, Maxwell’s Equations, Transmission Lines, andWave Propagation. Several textbooks are available for this subject matter including References[1], [2], [3], and [4]. During course introduction we show applications of materials learned in
specificapplications of AM that DOE is using in these facilities. The camp also included a half-day visitto a facility on campus that uses computer graphics designs and 3D-printing. The afternoon of thelast day of the workshop was dedicated to students’ presentations where each student gave a twentyto thirty minute presentation about his/her design. The presentations are aimed to improvestudents’ communication skills. Also, parents were invited to attend the presentations.Workshop Objectives and General Description:The two-week summer camp was part of an outreach program that includes lectures, activities andpresentations. Specifically, this program has multiple goals: 1) Train the students to use Inventor™ 3D CAD computer program to design objects and
Gratitude, Meaning, and MindfulnessIntroductionIn this work-in-progress research paper, we evaluate the impact of a novel interdisciplinary coursein which we taught undergraduate engineering students about gratitude, meaning, mindfulness,and other topics relevant to thriving. In this paper, we define thriving as the process in whichstudents develop and refine asset-based competencies that allow them to achieve optimalfunctioning in engineering. The one-credit elective course was developed at a large midwesternuniversity as the first step to investigate whether non-cognitive competencies relevant to thrivingand wellbeing could be taught. Currently, thriving remains an underexplored area in engineeringcontexts [1]. We hypothesize that interventions
e n tia l n a tio n a l r e p o r t in 1 9 8 3 [1 ] . I n th is r e p o r t, th e y c h a lle n g e d e d u c a tio n a l in s titu tio n s toc o o p e r a te . T h e A m e r ic a n A s s o c ia tio n f o r H ig h e r E d u c a tio n r e s p o n d e d b y m a k in g c o lla b o ra tio n ak e y f o c u s o f its n a tio n a l r e f o rm a g e n d a . T h is h a s s p u r r e d a n u m b e r o f p a r tn e rs h ip s o v e r th e p a s t2 5 y e a rs . T h e f o c u s h a s b e e n o n s tro n g e r c o n n e c tio n s b e tw e e n K - 1 2 s c h o o ls a n d p o s t - s e c o n d a r yin s titu tio n s , p ro f e s s io n a l d e v e lo p m e n t o p p o r tu n itie s f o r c o lle g e f a c u lty , a n d d e v e lo p m e n t o fa r tic u la
; this includes a two-strand research program focused on (1) authentic assessment, often aided by interactive technology, and (2) design learning, in which she studies engineers designing devices, scientists designing investigations, teachers designing learning experiences and students designing to learn. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Techno-economic modeling as an inquiry-based design activity in a core chemical engineering courseAbstractPurpose. Authentic engineering practice is often introduced to students through engineeringproblem-solving in the classroom. These problems usually have a single, correct answer and failto guide students’ problem framing
organizations thatpromote integration of art and science are Art & Science Collaborations, Inc. (ASCI),International Society of the Arts, Mathematics, and Architecture (ISAMA) and InternationalSociety for the Arts, Sciences, and Technology (ISAST). In academia, educators are alwaysexperimenting new methods to increase students engagement in the course materials. One sucheffort in fluid mechanics is a course on the physics and art of flow visualization, by Dr. JeanHertzberg (at the University of Colorado, Boulder) [1-3]. The course is offered since 2003 as atechnical elective to the engineering students and as studio credit to the fine arts students and hasshown to be very effective. Gary Settles (at Pennsylvania State University) is a
engineering inuniversities has entered the implementation stage.Purpose/Hypothesis This study in-depth interviews with 15 typical "New Engineering"universities, aiming to extract the implementation path of "new engineering" in China, andprovide a useful reference for the development of "new engineering ." Specifically, theresearch questions in this study are: (1) What are the core paths of China's new engineeringconstruction? (2) What is the selection model of the "new engineering" construction path fordifferent types of colleges and universities?Design/Method Firstly, based on the previous literature, the theoretical model of "newengineering" construction was constructed. Then, through semi-structured interview method,the first-hand data of new
and challenge exclusionary thoughts andpractices” (p. 46). In their study on the effects of problem-oriented educational strategies onincreasing the student diversity among community college students, Noravian and Irvine (2014)found that moving from well-structured to ill-structured problem solving is beneficial to studentsand suggested the restructure of engineering education “so that students experience early in theirtraining what engineers do” (p. 294). As stated by King (2011), the low number of people ofcolor and women in engineering can be attributed to the highly quantitative focus and “the lackof evidence of social impact of engineering in the early engineering curriculum” (p. 1).In another effort, Knight et al. (2012) argued for the
techniciansprograms [1]–[3].In its five-year history, KS has also provided technical assistance for developing and submittingproposals to NSF but has engaged 2-year HSIs exclusively. Prior to proposal development, KSfacilitates a STEM self-assessment and strengths/gap heatmap discussion with a cross-departmental STEM team at each participating college [4] [5]. KS then facilitates the 2-year HSISTEM team in developing a STEM plan and prioritized research concepts that align with theCollege Strategy, leverage STEM strengths, and address STEM gaps. This approach by KS hasgenerated a portfolio of potential research funding opportunities for STEM improvements at each2-year HSI prior to proposal development.The approach for the HSI ATE Hub is a 2-step intervention