Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI) Technical Session 3

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Maria Eugenia Cabrera, University of Massachusetts, Lowell; John Raiti, University of Washington

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI)

, 2005.[17] Krystian Radlak and Marcin Fojcik. Integration of robotic arm manipulator with computer vision in a project-based learning environment. In 2015 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), pages 1–4. IEEE, 2015.[18] Christopher Crick, Graylin Trevor Jay, Sarah Osentoski, Benjamin Pitzer, and Odest Chadwicke Jenkins. rosbridge: ROS for non-ROS users. In International Symposium on Robotics Research (ISRR 2011), Flagstaff, AZ, August 2011.[19] S. Osentoski, G. Jay, C. Crick, B. Pitzer, C. DuHadway, and O. C. Jenkins. Robots as web services: Reproducible experimentation and application development using rosjs. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, 2011.[20

Conference Session

Cooperative and Experiential Education Division (CEED) Technical Session 3

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Darcie Christensen, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Alexander Steven Victor Krummi; Arynn J. Lorentz, Iron Range Engineering; Cody Mann, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Kaitlyn Mann; Andrew Lillesve, Minnesota State University, Mankato

Tagged Divisions

Cooperative and Experiential Education Division (CEED)

group meeting with all theirlearning coach students. This gave the students an opportunity to learn what other students aredoing on co-ops and internships, talk about common challenges, and build a sense of comraderywith each other.While learning coaches are rotated each semester so that students have the opportunity to learntips, techniques, knowledge, and more from multiple facilitators, students and learning coachesalike are always welcomed and encouraged to reach out to past learning coach relationshipparticipants if desired. In the end, Iron Range Engineering hopes “that our relationship(s) canevolve from ‘learning coach’ to ‘lifetime mentor’” (Facilitator 3, para. 3).Adapting to Student NeedsOnce the foundation of the relationship is

Conference Session

MECH - Technical Session 2: Enhancing Learning through Hands-On Design

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Aminul Islam Khan, Northern Arizona University; Bernard J. Van Wie, Washington State University; Prashanta Dutta, Washington State University; David B. Thiessen, Washington State University; Jacqueline Gartner Ph.D., Campbell University; Olusola Adesope, Washington State University; MD SHARIFUL ISLAM, Washington State University; Talodabiolorun Anne Oni, Washington State University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering Division (MECH)

Desktop Learning Modules," International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 1536-1549, 2022.[17] A. Khan, "Khan, A, Reynolds, OM, Thiessen, DB, Adesope, OO, Van Wie, BJ, Dutta, P, Design, Fabrication, Testing, and Implementation of a Low-Cost Venturi Meter, 39 (4), 1- 15, 2023," International journal of engineering education, vol. 39, no. 4, 2023.[18] O. Reynolds, "Development and Implementation of a Low-Cost Desktop Learning Module for Double Pipe Heat Exchange," Chemical Engineering Education, vol. 56, no. 2, 2021.[19] R. K. Shah and D. P. Sekulic, Fundamentals of heat exchanger design. John Wiley & Sons, 2003.[20] S. Kakac, H. Liu, and A. Pramuanjaroenkij, Heat exchangers: selection

Conference Session

AI and Tools for Transdisciplinary Work

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Todd Nicewonger, Virginia Tech; Lisa D. McNair, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES)

Engineering Education, 2024 Meta-Activity Theory as a Conceptual Toolfor Supporting Transdisciplinary Curricular Experimentation in Undergraduate Learning ContextsWhen it comes to carrying out external evaluations of academic plans in higher education, LisaR. Lattuca and Joan S. Stark’s text, Shaping the College Curriculum: Academic Plans inContext, has provided a critical resource (Lattuca and Stark, 2011). The text lays out aframework for analyzing the social aspects of curricular plans, which often involves examininghow the intended curricular design of an academic program compares to the actual livedexperiences of students and faculty who are involved in the curriculum. By drawing on Lattucaand Stark’s framework, external

Conference Session

Engineering Physics and Physics Division Technical Session

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

JAMES WANLISS, Anderson University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Physics and Physics Division (EP2D)

) Accreditation for Mechanical Engineering Program." Eng. Technol. Open Access J 3 (2021): 119-134.[20] Alhorani, Rana AM, Wejdan Abu Elhaija, Subhi M. Bazlamit, and Hesham S. Ahmad. "ABET accreditation requirements and preparation: Lessons learned from a case study of Civil Engineering Program." Cogent Engineering 8, no. 1 (2021): 1995109.[21] Sarker, Iqbal H. "Deep learning: a comprehensive overview on techniques, taxonomy, applications and research directions." SN Computer Science 2, no. 6 (2021): 420.[22] Pashentsev, Evgeny. "The malicious use of artificial intelligence through agenda setting: Challenges to political stability." In Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on the Impact of Artificial

Conference Session

Cultivating Community, Wellness, and Character Development

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Victoria E Goodrich, University of Notre Dame

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering Division (ChED)

/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for- accrediting-engineering-programs-2022-2023/ , Accessed October 22, 2023. 2. Karwat, D. M. A., Eagle, W. E., Wooldridge, M. S., & Princen, T. E. (2014). Activist engineering: changing engineering practice by deploying praxis. Science and Engineering Ethics, 21(1), 227–239. 3. Herkert, J.R. (2000) Engineering ethics education in the USA: Content, pedagogy and curriculum, European Journal of Engineering Education, 25:4, 303-313. 4. Mitcham, C., Englehardt, E.E. (2019). Ethics Across the Curriculum: Prospects for Broader (and Deeper) Teaching and Learning in Research and Engineering Ethics, Science and Engineering Ethics, 25, 1735–1762. 5. Das, M., Roeder, G., Ostrowski, A

Conference Session

MECH - Technical Session 15: Engineering Education Research and Reviews

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Isabel Xu, Louis D. Brandeis High School

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering Division (MECH)

the present with FIRST and robotics, they can also become useful inmy future career paths. For instance, in college, students will most likely be expected to worktogether in group projects, providing an opportunity for them to exercise their communicationskills. Even outside of school, employees may be expected to work in teams to completeprojects. Teamwork is an extremely important quality that is often made commonplace in many,if not all, collaborative environments as it can result in effective collaboration betweensubordinates due to the presence and flow of diverse ideas and perspectives. Since I, similar tomany others, was able to develop these skills through the FIRST program(s), I am now able toexercise these skills in practically

Conference Session

Engineering Libraries Division (ELD) Technical Session 1

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dianna Morganti, Texas A&M University; Angie Dunn, Texas A&M University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Libraries Division (ELD)

paper, so please chat with me early if you’re falling behind on this.5. Lit Review: Publishing outlet or presentation opportunity identification and evaluation a. Identifying a target engineering journal or conference for your paper is the next step in the draft paper assignment. You will present your outlet, give a summary of it (history, publisher information) and discuss its impact score(s) and your reason for choosing this outlet. b. Give its author guidelines, and discuss the impacts to your paper (i.e. headings they require, etc.). When guidelines are not available, students must look at similar papers published in this outlet to give their expected headings and

Conference Session

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM) Technical Session 7

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mac Joseph Gray, Duke University; Rabih Younes, Duke University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

discussion, 2012. URL https://edstem.org/. [5] Charles Severance. Sakai learning management system, 2005. URL https://www.sakailms.org/. [6] C. Romero and S. Ventura. Educational data mining: A survey from 1995 to 2005. Expert Systems with Applications, 33(1):135–146, 2007. ISSN 0957-4174. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2006.04.005. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957417406001266. [7] Concepci´on Burgos, Mar´ıa L. Campanario, David de la Pe˜na, Juan A. Lara, David Lizcano, and Mar´ıa A. Mart´ınez. Data mining for modeling students’ performance: A tutoring action plan to prevent academic dropout. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 66:541–556, 2018. ISSN 0045-7906. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016

Collection

2013 GSW

Authors

Melanie Sattler

Collection

2016 Rocky Mountain Section Conference

Authors

Jing Guo; John M. Santiago

. Assignment “07AA Active Assignments Week 7” provides an overviewof the work that needs to be competed in week 7.Figure 1. 07AA Active Assignments Week 7As shown in Figure 1, Week 7’s work started from “WK07 Intellipath Type Questions.Intellipath is an adaptive learning platform and a personalized learning technology3 which can beviewed as an intelligent tutoring system. It customizes learning for students based on students’pre-determined knowledge state on a particular subject or topic3. Intellipath was adopted inCTU’s existing online courses such as math courses. By using this platform, students report thatthey can move quickly through the course material on what they know and focus on what they donot know, so they are not left behind or doing

Collection

2016 Rocky Mountain Section Conference

Authors

Angela R. Bielefeldt; Daniel Knight; Christopher Swan; Nathan Canney

, American Society for Engineering Education, 2001, 90 (2), 223-229.13 Bielefeldt, A.R., N.E. Canney, C. Swan, and D. Knight, “Efficacy of Macroethics Education in Engineering,” American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, 2016, New Orleans LA.14 Knight, D., A. Bielefeldt, N. Canney, C. Swan, “Macroethics Instruction in Co-curricular Settings: The Development and Results of a National Survey,” Frontiers in Education (FIE) Conference Proceedings, 2016.15 Eagan, K., E.B. Stolzenberg, J. Berdan Lozano, M.C. Aragon, M. Ramirez Suchard, and S. Hurtado, “Undergraduate Teaching Faculty: The 2013-2014 HERI Faculty Survey,” Higher Education Research Institute

Collection

2009 ASEE Midwest Section Conference

Authors

Bruce Dvorak; Dennis Schulte; Mary Garbacz; Shari Aldrich; David Admiraal; Julia Soulakova

Collection

2010 ASEE Midwest Section Conference

Authors

Shauna A. Morimoto; Anna M. Zajicek; Valerie H. Hunt; Joseph J. Rencis

and More Than You Think: A Status Report on Gender Diversity in Biomedical Engineering,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering, Vol. 38, No. 5, pp. 1928-1935, 2010.   Proceedings of the 2010 Midwest Section Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education  15   8. Canes, B. J., and Rosen, H. S., “Following in her footsteps? Faculty Gender Composition and Women’s Choices of College Majors,” Industrial & Labor Relations Review, Vol. 48, No. 3, pp. 486-504, 1995.9. Sonnert, G., Fox, M. F., and Adkins, K., “Undergraduate Women in

Collection

2010 Spring ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Conference

Authors

Andrew Grossfield P.E.

integration about 1906.During the 1700’s, developments in mathematical theory were dominated by Leonhard Euler.Euler had more mathematical insight, made more mathematical discoveries and had moremathematical fun than anyone else either before or since except maybe Erdos. However, theviews of Euler on the nature of mathematics differed sharply from the views of the nineteenthcentury mathematicians. In fact, he understood a function to be in the constellation of ideasregarding equations in two variables, curves and tables. To quote David M. Bressoud4: … to the mathematicians before 1807, functions were polynomials, roots, powers, and logarithms; trigonometric functions and their inverses; and whatever could be built up by addition

Collection

2010 Spring ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Conference

Authors

Beth Richards; Karen Walsh

Bonnie Lisle. Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2007.13. Frederickson, George M. “Models of Ethnic Relations: A Historical Perspective.” Rereading America: CulturalContexts for Critical Thinking and Writing. Ed. Gary Columbo, Robert Cullen, and Bonnie Lisle. Bedford/St.Martin’s, 2007.14. Parillo, Vincent M. “Causes of Prejudice.” Rereading America: Cultural Contexts for Critical Thinking andWriting. Ed. Gary Columbo, Robert Cullen, and Bonnie Lisle. Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2007.15. Nugent, pp. 189-90.16. Dunwoody, A. Bruce, Patrick J. Cramond, Susan E. Nesbit, Carla S. Peterson, and Tatiana N. Teslenko.Fundamental Competencies for Engineers. Toronto: Oxford University Press, 2006.17. Wolfe, Joanna. “How Technical Communication Textbooks Fail Engineering

Conference Session

ELOS Technical Session 6: Bring Your Own Experiment!

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joseph Richard Midiri, Rowan University; Kathy Trieu, Rowan University; Wei Xue, Rowan University; Mitja Trkov, Rowan University; Cassandra Sue Ellen Jamison, Rowan University; Smitesh Bakrania, Rowan University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies Division (DELOS)

, the simplicity of the project naturally yields the project to be used in awide variety of learning environments and student learners. When implementation does occur, the generatedresults would need to be studied and further modifications would be made to the teaching approach.Eventually, the module and learning materials along with the project will be made highly accessible toeducators through a centralized soft robotic teaching website being developed at Rowan University.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work partially supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.2235647. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this material are thoseof the authors(s) and do not necessarily reflect the

Conference Session

Innovative Strategies for Enhancing Engineering Education Across Diverse Learning Environments

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Todd Jeffrey Freeborn, The University of Alabama

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer Engineering Division (ECE)

Paper ID #41346Comparison of Engineering and Computer Science Student Performance andOpinions of Instruction of a Microcomputers Course Across Delivery FormatsDr. Todd Jeffrey Freeborn, The University of Alabama Todd Freeborn, PhD, is an associate professor with the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at The University of Alabama. Through NSF funding, he has coordinated REU Sites for engineering students to explore renewable resources and speech pathology. He is also the coordinator for an NSF S-STEM program to prepare students for gateway courses across different disciplines of engineering to support and

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI) Technical Session 8

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rana Hussein, Boston University; Muhammad Hamid Zaman, Boston University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI)

., Dzombak, R., & Martin, S. (2018). Building 21st century skills through development engineering. International Journal of Engineering Education, 34, 619-631. 9. Passino K. M. (2009). Educating the humanitarian engineer. Science and engineering ethics, 15(4), 577–600. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-009-9184-8 10. Baaoum, M. (2018). Humanizing Engineering Education: A Comprehensive Model for Fostering Humanitarian Engineering Education. International Journal of Modern Education Studies, 2(1), 1-23. 11. U.S. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2023, March). Addressing Challenges of Forced Displacement through STEM Education: A Workshop. https://www.nationalacademies.org/event/03-09-2023

Collection

2012 Spring ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Conference

Authors

Mauro J. Caputi

end of thesemester. Over 95% of the students write favorable comments about the Lecture, includingcomments for improvements. The feedback has been used to modify and strengthen severalportions of the Lecture media and Class Workbook.BIBLIOGRAPHY[1] Caputi, M. J., DESIGN 15 Class Workbook & Lab Manual, Season 11 - Fall 2011. Hofstra Engineering Dept., 2011.[2] Hacker, M., Burghardt, D, Technology Education: Learning by Design. Pearson Prentice Hall, 2004.[3] Hill, P. J., The Science of Engineering Design. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1970.[4] Niku, S. B., Creative Design of Products and Systems. Wiley, 2009.[5] Hofstra First-Year Connections. URL http://www.hofstra.edu/Academics/Colleges/Hclas/FYC/index.html

Collection

2012 Spring ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Conference

Authors

Yacob Astatke; Craig Scott; Kemi Ladeji-Osias; Petronella James

,” International Journal of Continuing Education Lifelong Learning, 2010, vol. 3, Issue: 1, pp: 53-71.[7]. R. Oliver, “Exploring Benchmarks and Standards for Assuring Quality Online Teaching and Learning in Higher Education,” Proceedings of the 16th Open Distance Learning Association of Australia Biennial Forum, Canberra, October 2003.[8]. D. Millard, M. Chouikha, and F. Berry, "Improving Student Intuition via Rensselaer‛s New Mobile Studio Pedagogy", ASEE 2007 Annual Conference, Honolulu, HW, June 2007.[9]. K. Conner, et. al., “Multi-Institutional Development of Mobile Studio Based Education and Outreach,” 2011 American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, June 26-29, 2011.[10

Collection

2012 Spring ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Conference

Authors

Lunal Khuon; Timothy Camise; Clayton Bannan; Kevin Buckley

, S., Singh, P., O’Brien, J, Jones, G., Char, E., Mer- cede, F., Weinstein, R., and Yost, J., Project-Based Freshman Engineering Experience: The Core Course, ASEE Annual Meeting, 2010. 2. Nitzan, M., Automatic Noninvasive Measurement of Arterial Blood Pressure, IEEE Instru- mentation & Measurement Magazine, pp. 32-37, Feb. 2011. 3. Neuman, M., Measurement of Blood Pressure, IEEE Pulse Magazine, pp. 39-44, Mar.-Apr. 2011. 4. Drzewiecki, G., Hood, R. and Apple, H., Theory of the Oscillometric Maximum and the Systolic and Diastolic Ratios, Annals of Biomedical Engineering, Vol. 22, pp. 88-96, 1994. 5. Chua, C.S. and Hin, S.M., Digital Blood Pressure Meter, Freescale Semiconductor Appli- cation Note, AN1571, Rev 1

Collection

2009 Spring ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Conference

Authors

Alfred A. Scalza

motivate too many individuals. We need something more specific such as a parent telling their son or daughter to set their sights on getting “A”s because graduate school may depend on it. Edwin Loche wrote in 1960 that a person’s intention to work toward a goal that was specific, achievable and had feedback was a great motivator for most people.8 He felt that goals not only tell the person what has to be done but they give a good approximation of the amount of effort required. Also, as well as goal setting works, it works better when the goal is higher rather than lower so long as the goal was accepted by the student. Higher, not lower expectations from the teacher are motivating. Students require feedback to be motivated so

Collection

2011 Pacific Southwest Section Meeting

Authors

Shoba Krishnan; Ruth Davis; Marco Bravo; Melissa Gilbert

for their support. Proceedings of the 2011 PSW American Society for Engineering Education Zone IV Conference  Copyright © 2011, American Society for Engineering Education  184 References 1. Davis, R. E. (2005). Community-Based Learning Develops Diverse Engineering Workforce. In W. Aung, R. Altenkirch, T Cermak, R. W. King & L.M. S. Ruiz (Eds), Innovations 2005: World Innovations in Engineering Education and Research. pp. 7-16, Arlington VA, iNEER/Begell House Publishing. 2. Mattern, N., & Schau, C. (2002). Gender differences in science attitude-achievement relationships over time

Collection

2009 Northeast Section Meeting

Authors

Alfred A. Scalza

motivate too many individuals. We need something more specific such as a parent telling their son or daughter to set their sights on getting “A”s because graduate school may depend on it. Edwin Loche wrote in 1960 that a person’s intention to work toward a goal that was specific, achievable and had feedback was a great motivator for most people.8 He felt that goals not only tell the person what has to be done but they give a good approximation of the amount of effort required. Also, as well as goal setting works, it works better when the goal is higher rather than lower so long as the goal was accepted by the student. Higher, not lower expectations from the teacher are motivating. Students require feedback to be motivated so

Collection

2010 Northeast Section Meeting

Authors

Beth Richards; Karen Walsh

Bonnie Lisle. Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2007.13. Frederickson, George M. “Models of Ethnic Relations: A Historical Perspective.” Rereading America: CulturalContexts for Critical Thinking and Writing. Ed. Gary Columbo, Robert Cullen, and Bonnie Lisle. Bedford/St.Martin’s, 2007.14. Parillo, Vincent M. “Causes of Prejudice.” Rereading America: Cultural Contexts for Critical Thinking andWriting. Ed. Gary Columbo, Robert Cullen, and Bonnie Lisle. Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2007.15. Nugent, pp. 189-90.16. Dunwoody, A. Bruce, Patrick J. Cramond, Susan E. Nesbit, Carla S. Peterson, and Tatiana N. Teslenko.Fundamental Competencies for Engineers. Toronto: Oxford University Press, 2006.17. Wolfe, Joanna. “How Technical Communication Textbooks Fail Engineering

Collection

2012 ASEE Zone 1 Conference

Authors

Yacob Astatke; Craig Scott; Kemi Ladeji-Osias; Petronella James

,” International Journal of Continuing Education Lifelong Learning, 2010, vol. 3, Issue: 1, pp: 53-71.[7]. R. Oliver, “Exploring Benchmarks and Standards for Assuring Quality Online Teaching and Learning in Higher Education,” Proceedings of the 16th Open Distance Learning Association of Australia Biennial Forum, Canberra, October 2003.[8]. D. Millard, M. Chouikha, and F. Berry, "Improving Student Intuition via Rensselaer‛s New Mobile Studio Pedagogy", ASEE 2007 Annual Conference, Honolulu, HW, June 2007.[9]. K. Conner, et. al., “Multi-Institutional Development of Mobile Studio Based Education and Outreach,” 2011 American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, June 26-29, 2011.[10

Collection

2014 ASEE Zone 1 Conference

Authors

Melody Baglione

Conference Session

Professional Papers

Collection

2025 ASEE Southeast Conference

Authors

Bryn Elizabeth Seabrook, University of Virginia

Tagged Topics

Professional Papers

. Norton & Company, 2024.[10] O. Gambelin. Responsible AI: Implement an Ethical Approach in Your Organization. New York, New York: Kogan Page, 2024.[11] NSPE. “NSPE Code of Ethics for Engineers,” 2025. [Online]. Available http://https://www.nspe.org/resources/ethics/code-ethics[12] University of Kentucky. “AI Course Policy Examples,” 2025. [Online]. Available https://celt.uky.edu/ai-course-policy-examples[13] E. Mollick. “AI has a strategy,” 2022. [Online]. Available https://www.oneusefulthing.org/p/ai-has-a-strategy[14] A. Narayanan and S. Kapoor. AI Snake Oil: What Artificial Intelligence Can Do, What it Can’t, and How to Tell the Difference. Princeton University Press, 2024.[15] M. Wheatley

Collection

2008 ASEE Zone 1 Conference

Authors

NADIYE O. ERDIL; KOENRAAD E. GIESKES

what extent How well did the How well satisfied regularly were the did assignments exam(s) measure were the were have you objectives of contribute to your how much you course you with attended the course overall learning learned in the objectives this this SECTION RATE defined? in the course? course? achieved? course? class? Excellent 46.9% 50.0% 25.0% 34.4% 37.5% 87.5% Good 40.6% 31.3% 43.8% 40.6% 37.5