Teaching Engineering Design with a focus on the developing world Beena Sukumaran, Joshua Bonzella, Kevin McGarvey, Heather Klein College of Engineering, Rowan UniversityAbstractThe paper describes a program, Entrepreneurs without Borders and a project undertaken through theprogram. The program seeks to establish entrepreneurship opportunities for the developing world. Thiswill be done through student teams comprising both engineering and business majors at RowanUniversity. The engineering and business students perform a survey of local communities in thedeveloping world, identified as having a need for engineering skills by Engineers without Borders1.During this initial survey, the students
Teaching Engineering Design with a focus on the developing world Beena Sukumaran, Joshua Bonzella, Kevin McGarvey, Heather Klein College of Engineering, Rowan UniversityAbstractThe paper describes a program, Entrepreneurs without Borders and a project undertaken through theprogram. The program seeks to establish entrepreneurship opportunities for the developing world. Thiswill be done through student teams comprising both engineering and business majors at RowanUniversity. The engineering and business students perform a survey of local communities in thedeveloping world, identified as having a need for engineering skills by Engineers without Borders1.During this initial survey, the students
students from all backgrounds. Throughout the year-longprogram, we are conducting longitudinal interviews and surveys to follow the participants’growth trajectories with regards to their understanding and implementation of inclusivepedagogies in engineering classrooms and the impact the program has on cultivating equity-minded practitioners in engineering education. The focus of this paper is the preliminary resultsregarding the motivations of engineering faculty to participate in this type of facultydevelopment program and significantly redesign one of their courses. We seek to answer thefollowing research question: What motivates engineering faculty to participate in an inclusiveexcellence faculty development program?Through a qualitative
solvecomplex engineering problems by applying principles of engineering, science, andmathematics.” 1 It goes on to say that a “complex” engineering problem must meet one or morecriteria such as having multiple solutions, no obvious or unique solution, include many subproblems, involve multiple disciplines etc. When designing assessments that accurately portray astudent’s ability to identify, formulate, and solve complex engineering problems, it is critical thatinstructors keep in mind the definition of complex engineering problems. As students are stillgaining knowledge skills and cognition skills in earlier courses, it can be difficult to assess truecomplex engineering problems in lower-level engineering courses 2 . Within one privateuniversity’s
state of mind and belief ingraduating in their study program. Persistence is one of the main contributing factors to completingan engineering degree. Persistence in E/CS can be defined as a students’ choice to stay in anengineering major or complete an engineering degree [15]. Enough motivation and self-efficacyare needed to overcome several adversities faced during their engineering programs [16]. To thiseffect, researchers have spent a considerable about of resources to know the completion rates ofengineering majors and the cause of attrition from engineering /computer science degrees [17, 18].There are several factors that affects a student’s persistence in their respective degrees includingstudent identity [19], interest, recognition, and
Paper ID #33251Understanding Non-Traditional Students in Engineering and Computing(Work in Progress)Dr. Stephen Secules, Florida International University Stephen is an Assistant Professor of Engineering and Computing Education at Florida International Uni- versity. He has a prior academic and professional background in engineering, having worked profession- ally as an acoustical engineer. He has taught a number of courses on engineering and education, including courses on engineering design, systems in society, and learning theories. Stephen’s research interests include equity, culture, and the sociocultural dimensions of
University. She spent 12 years teaching secondary science and engineering in Oklahoma, and is a 2014 recipient of the Presidential Award for Excellence in Mathematics and Science Teaching.Dr. Nick Lux, Montana State University Dr. Nicholas Lux has is an Associate Professor of Curriculum and Instruction in MSU’s Department of Education. His teaching and research interests are in the area of educational technology. He has worked in the fields of K-12 and higher education for 18 years, and currently teaches in the Montana State University Teacher Education Program. He has experience in educational technology theory and practice in K-12 contexts and teacher education, with a focus on STEM teaching and learning, technology
analysis.When asked to define adaptability, managers explicitly described it in terms of behaviors fromthe IAT framework, including learning new knowledge, being open-minded, adjusting toambiguous and unpredictable situations, and handling unexpected challenges. They also namedcuriosity about new knowledge as a key mindset to adaptability but did not mention othermindsets present in the CCT framework, such as confidence, feeling in control, or feelingconcerned (i.e., invested) about their work.Beyond the IAT and CCT frameworks, managers also mentioned other mindsets and behaviorsassociated with engineering adaptability, alluding to three categories: technical, interpersonal,and intrapersonal (our characterization). Engineering managers suggested that
initial team building activity. Many of the designs were entered in a competition to raisemoney for Pennies for Peace (an organization that builds schools in Pakistan and Afghanistan).The students completed a basic statistical analysis on the funds collected and summarized theresults. In ENG1101, students were introduced to the engineering design process as theyprogressed through an eight-week, design/construct, team-based project that focused on greenengineering. Design constraints for the project imposed a 50% lower limit on post-consumermaterials used in construction, and the student teams were instructed to keep the environmentalimpact of their design very much in mind from the beginning of the design process and as theymoved through to
2006-413: BEYOND MEASUREMENT: DESIGNING ENGINEERING OUTCOMESTO FOSTER STUDENT ACHIEVEMENTDarryl Morrell, Arizona State UniversityChell Roberts, Arizona State UniversityRobert Grondin, Arizona State UniversityChen-Yuan Kuo, Arizona State UniversityRobert Hinks, Arizona State UniversityMark Henderson, Arizona State UniversityThomas Sugar, Arizona State UniversityScott Danielson, Arizona State University Page 11.270.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Beyond Measurement: Designing Engineering Outcomes to Foster Student AchievementAbstractThis paper describes the design of a novel program-level assessment framework consisting
Essential Teamwork and Leadership skills The engineering design process Civil Engineering Mechanical Engineering Electrical EngineeringEven though students were introduced to all types of engineering, they only did hands-on, minds-on activities on three major engineering disciplines: civil, mechanical, and electrical through acomprehensive project that combined the three.PreparationEngineering is quite a broad field so the instructor had to be very careful on how to introduce itto the students and how to make students interested in the subject as well as keep them engagedduring the program since they had to spend about 6.5 hrs every day from Monday to Friday inthe classroom. To achieve this, a balance among concepts, hands-on
Paper ID #18362Philosophy and Engineering Education; should teachers have a philosophy ofEducation?Dr. John Heywood, Trinity College-Dublin John Heywood is professorial Fellow Emeritus of Trinity College Dublin- The University of Dublin. He is a Fellow of ASEE and Life Fellow of IEEE. He has special interest in education for the professions and the role of professions in society. He is author of Engineering Education. research and develop- ment in Curriculum and Instruction. His most recent book is The Assessment of learning in Engineering Education. Practice and Policy. c American Society for
Paper ID #18454Development of the Engineering Learning Classroom Observation Tool (EL-COT)Ms. Timeri K. Tolnay, Colorado School of Mines Timeri joined Mines in November of 2015 to support the growth and Development of the Trefny Innova- tive Instruction (I) Center, and to bring her extensive background in instructional coaching to the college level. Prior to joining Mines, Timeri worked for a nationally recognized online Learning and Assessment System called ShowEvidence where she supported educational institutions in transferring their teaching, learning, and assessment practices online to create greater coherence
first person focus. The meditation session helped participants to calm their minds. In that calm and focused state of mind, they were asked to think of the activities that they would undertake, if they do not have to work to earn livelihood i.e. for sheer joy.3. The workshop faculty then explained the engineering education scenario by discussing the challenges at the global [26] and national levels [27], and the critical responsibility that today’s engineering educators have to develop workforce to tackle the challenges. The workshop faculty encouraged them to think beyond traditional teaching and research responsibilities and undertake innovative initiatives to develop engineers who can fulfill the requirements of the 21st
. However, they do so without any formal lectures or assignments and simplyout of necessity to make their implementation process easier. With that in mind, my colleaguesand I are planning on designing an intermediate Verilog class focused on many of the conceptshighlighted in the previous paragraph. Unlike the introductory computer engineering coursedescribed in this paper, the course will focus solely on Verilog. The lectures will cover Verilogsyntax, best practices, synthesis, etc. and the students must implement all of the homeworkassignments and projects in Verilog to give them more and more practice. We plan to roll out thisintermediate Verilog course in the near future and intend to study the course in a similar manneras the study described
Books, Medford, New Jersey, 2012.[9] R. J. Wlodkowski, Enhancing adult motivation to learn : a comprehensive guide for teaching all adults. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, A Wiley Imprint, 2008.[10] J. Bransford, “Learning: from speculation to science.,” in How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school, National Research Council (US), 2000, pp. 3–27.[11] A. Johri and B. M. Olds, Cambridge handbook of engineering education research. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.[12] E. Wenger, Communities of practice : learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, U.K.; New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press, 1998.[13] K. A. Smith, S. D. Sheppard, D. W. Johnson, and R. T. Johnson, “Pedagogies of engagement: classroom
Radford University. She received her doctorate in instructional design and technology from Virginia Tech.Dr. Marlena McGlothlin Lester, Virginia Tech Marlena McGlothlin Lester is the Director of Advising for the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. She leads the undergraduate advising team and oversees the advising process for all General Engineering students. She is responsible for the development of a hands-on, minds-on orien- tation model for all first-year engineering students, the creation of a comprehensive engineering major exploration tool, Explore Engineering, and enhancement of the academic planning resources available for first-year engineering students. Marlena strives to transform the
Paper ID #26062Implementation of a Design Project in a Freshman Engineering Physics CourseDr. Inci Ruzybayev, York College of Pennsylvania Inci Ruzybayev is Assistant Professor in Engineering and Computer Science at York College of Pennsyl- vaniaBenjamin J. ZileDr. Scott F. Kiefer, York College of Pennsylvania Scott Kiefer has spent the past eighteen years teaching mechanical engineering at four institutions. As an exemplary teaching specialist in mechanical engineering at Michigan State University, Scott received the Withrow Award for Teaching Excellence, given to one faculty member in the College in Engineering for
. Support at that level made it a fundraising priority inthe college and the first course was offered within one year. That support was essential to theprogram’s development and implementation.Institutional mission and contextThe vision for this program is rooted in the Jesuit mission of the institution, which names “thedevelopment of leadership expressed in service to others…for the common benefit of the humancommunity” as one of its four pillars.[6] In addition, the charisms found in the Jesuit’s historyvalue educating the whole person – mind and heart. The call for the type of engineer and leaderthe university hopes to graduate is clear. As a result, the models of leadership chosen to guidethe program and student participants are rooted in this
present often was ethics. Weattributed that to a combination of factors. First, many students may have not considered ethicsas a concept that they should include in their concept map because it is not the first thing thatcomes to mind when doing a homework assignment for an engineering class. One other important observation from the Figure 4 map is that moments seem to beisolated from the rest of the concepts. It seems that students struggled to connect moments withthe rest the concepts, perhaps because it is a difficult concept that often gets introduced withoutmuch pretense. An encouraging aspect of this map is that students did do a successful jobgrasping a large majority of the concepts. Finally, in order to ensure the validity of the
habits of mind can enhance pre-college students’ learning abilities. Page 26.177.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 An Assessment Tool to Evaluate Student Learning of Engineering (Fundamental) Strand: K-12 Engineering Resources: Best practices in curriculum designWhile STEM subjects have traditionally been taught separately in K-12 schools the newinitiatives share a focus on integrated approaches to teaching STEM. For example, the recentlyreleased Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS)1 addressed the need for explicit integrationof
phrases that come to mind when you hear Engineer? Be honest and don’t over think it.”In an effort to identify if differing secondary student perceptions were a factor in the largediscrepancy in female enrollment between disciplines, this question was repeated three times, butwith Chemical Engineer, Mechanical Engineer, and Civil Engineer specified. For example,“What are the first three descriptive words or phrases that come to mind when you hearMechanical Engineer? Be honest and don’t over think it.” These three disciplines were selectedbecause they are three of the original, long-standing, engineering disciplines with vastly differentfemale enrollments. Chemical engineering had high female enrollment, mechanical engineeringhad low enrollment
Paper ID #14994Why a Testing Career is Not the First Choice of EngineersDr. Pradeep Kashinath Waychal, NMIMS University Dr Pradeep Waychal is a founder trustee and the chair of Guruji Education Foundation that provides holistic support to the education of underprivileged students and operates on funding from friends. The foundation has recently extended its work in diverse areas such as research in engineering education, youth employability and teaching computer science to adolescents. Earlier, Dr Waychal has worked at Patni Computer Systems for 20 years in various positions including the head of innovations, NMIMS as
Paper ID #18537An Intervention in Engineering Mathematics: Flipping the Differential Equa-tions ClassroomCampbell Rightmyer Bego, University of Louisville Campbell Rightmyer Bego is currently pursuing a doctoral degree in Cognitive science at the University of Louisville. She is researching STEM learning, focusing on math learning and performance. She is particularly interested in interventions and teaching methods that alleviate working memory constraints. Ms. Bego is also working with the Speed School of Engineering as a graduate research assistant, helping to implement educational interventions and organize and
An Institution-Wide Student Outcome for Engineering: Development, Implementation and Assessment Sarmiento, T., Anderson, M., Rhymer, D., and Cooper, C. US Air Force Academy, COAbstractThe United States Air Force Academy in Colorado is an undergraduate institution whose missionis to “educate, train, and inspire men and women to become leaders of character, motivated tolead the United States Air Force in service to our nation.” The employer of the institution’sgraduates desires well-rounded graduates with a more-homogeneous education than would beexpected at an otherwise similar university. As such, the institution prescribes a large generaleducation (or
to “enter” a narrower portalthat will show on the screen only those stages to be taught. Additionally, since the pilot, fewfaculty (even the developers) seem to have actually used all of the material in the lesson they areteaching. Along with our new project team, we intend to explore more carefully the ways to dowhat Michael Davis has suggested: insert into an existing course an “ethics moment” that arisesorganically from the design, practice, or research issues at hand. 36 Davis teaches a workshop tohelp faculty develop their own ethics moment; with that goal in mind we plan to develop withour engineering partners a series of discrete problems or writing assignments specific toindividual disciplines: environmental, industrial, electrical
ethics and communication, will help biomedical undergraduates better appreciate thecomplexities of their field and explore the broader social and political implications of theresearch. That, and a more thorough understanding of learning theory, will make tomorrow’sbioengineers better practitioners and more capable teachers.AcknowledgementsThis work was supported primarily by the Engineering Research Centers Program of theNational Science Foundation under Award Number EEC-9876363.References1 http://www.VaNTH.org2 Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1999.3 Roselli, R. VaNTH NSF ERC Research Experience for Undergraduates. Resubmission
beenmultiple measure assessments (pre-post). Some were designed to assess understanding of basicengineering and technology content (such as “What is Engineering?”), while others have focusedon measuring STEM learning resulting from student interaction with specific EiE units. Page 15.199.2Theoretical FrameworkThe main goal of the EiE curriculum is to help children to learn engineering and technology—not merely facts from and about these fields of study, but practices, habits of mind, and ways oflooking at the world through disciplinary lenses. At the dawn of the twentieth century, JohnDewey 1 advocated that progressive education should provide
AC 2010-1080: GROWING PAINS: CHINESE ENGINEERING EDUCATIONDURING THE LATE QING DYNASTYJunqiu Wang, Purdue UniversityNathan McNeill, Purdue UniversitySensen Li, Purdue University, West Lafayette Page 15.635.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Growing pains: Chinese engineering education in the late Qing DynastyAbstractWith the continued advancement of engineering as a global field of activity, it becomes criticalto understand engineering education from a more global perspective. Specifically, Chineseengineering education has been experiencing radical transformation and development over thepast twenty years, especially in
development of achat-bot built on student’s questions and understandings and perceptions of course contentprovides the instructor with a unique look onto the minds of students. With the oversight anddirection of the instructor and with the aid of students a true content specific engineeringartificial intelligence may be created. Through this process we may better understand thecomplex learning process of our students. Page 15.181.12Bibliography1. S. Crown, "Using Web-Based Games to Enhance the Teaching of Engineering Graphics" Proceedings of theIASTED International Conference, Computers and Advanced Technology in Education. Philadelphia, PA. May1999