, lectures, examples, and assignments.Participants in this study were recruited for a free introductory Python coursethrough LinkedIn and Twitter. Participants were randomly assigned either to theinstructor-led or the self-paced versions of the course. It appears that based on thescores and lower attrition rates, a student-driven approach using Colab notebooksis at least approximately as effective in helping students learn the concepts.1. IntroductionThe supply of workers capable of performing effectively in software development is not keepingup with industry demand; unfortunately, the supply of instructors capable of training those futuresoftware developers is also likely to fall short of what is necessary. Growth in softwaredevelopment jobs is
institutions and classrooms, openquestions remain on how to transform institutions to embed game-based learning not as anintervention but as a key part of the curriculum.IntroductionIn recent decades, government and industrial leaders, policy makers, academic and fundingagencies have been calling for drastic shifts in engineering education [1-3]. Since engineeringpractice relies on one’s ability to understand potential problems and design appropriate solutions,one of the more frequently cited needs for engineering education is that students engage inpractical training and gain authentic hands-on experience [4-6]. For example, Kosa et al. [7]highlight that traditional “theory-only” methods do not provide novice engineers with anunderstanding of real
positive psychological and socialoutcomes 1 . Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL), grounded in the SocialConstructivism Theory, leverages technologies to facilitate and encourage interactions amongstudents across domains 2 . Although CSCL has been incorporated into education by variousstudies 3,4,5,6 , teachers and policymakers may lack understanding of how group collaboration canbe effectively integrated into instructional strategies 7 . The use of CSCL technologies,pedagogies, and curricula by both teachers and students requires further investigation.Past CS education research has attempted to detect individual-level problem-solving behaviors toassist struggling students, including identifying error-fixing patterns 8 and latent
homogeneously (the same for allstudents) or in a mixed environment (students or teams have different projects). Typical sourcesinclude industries, service learning, student competitions and faculty projects [1]. A study from2015 of capstone programs in the U.S. showed that industry and government were the mostcommon capstone project source for most engineering departments and for 96% of the surveyedmultidisciplinary engineering programs [2]. The second most used project source for allrespondents was faculty research, followed by student/entrepreneurial, external competitions,service learning and others.Faculty projects are typically faculty from the same institution who have research or academicdesign projects. Service-learning projects are typically
Force (VTF)AbstractRecent events in the UK during COVID 19 have raised questions about the scientific andtechnological capabilities of civil servants that have a bearing on the meaning and scope oftechnological literacy, and therefore, for the work and purpose of the TELPhE Division ofASEE. This paper is based on the view set out at the beginning (section 1) that technologicalliteracy is not a particular discipline of a study but a skill that enables a learner to bringtogether different components of knowledge and skills to the solution of technological andscientific problems in all kinds of human situation.The argument is supported by a case study of Britain’s Vaccine Task Force (VTF). “The longShot. The Inside Story of the Race to Vaccinate
, Indiana. She earned her BS, MS and PhD in Industrial Engineering from The Univers ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Identification of Student Outcomes for the Electric Propulsion Aircraft Industry Based on Industry-developed Consensus StandardsIntroduction Electric-drive cars are becoming more common on the roads, so it is imaginable toforesee a time when electric propulsion aircraft and air mobility vehicles are in the airspace.With over 200 electric aircraft in development in 2023, the market size for electric propulsionaircraft is expected to exceed $25 billion by 2030 [1]. With regulations and internationalconsensus driving the
graduate education, faculty hiring, and the pathway to an academic career. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Lessons Learned: Faculty Search Committees’ Attitudes Towards and Against Rubrics Gabriella Coloyan Fleming, Maura BorregoIntroduction Faculty search committees are the gatekeepers to the next generation of tenure-trackfaculty [1]. The tenure-track faculty search process typically follows similar steps: 1)development and marketing of the position, 2) narrowing the candidate pool from all applicantsto a “long list” for first-round interview (often, on the phone or a video call), 3) conducting first-round interviews, 4
this approach or whatits impact might be on the engineering leadership development of college students.The primary purpose of the practice paper is to present a short-term activity that models anidentity-based approach (reflexive instruction) to engineering leadership instruction. By using amodular format that can be easily scaled, this research presents instructional activities that can beapplied easily in a wide spectrum of courses, from introductory engineering to senior capstoneclasses. The lessons take 1-2 class periods; they are based on easily accessible resources; andthey require minimal preparation by instructors. Activities include an introduction into severalleadership styles, a teamwork activity, class discussion, and two essays.In
decision-making. Overall, the literature review has uncovered several research gaps that the engineeringeducation should begin addressing.Conceptual Framework The conceptual framework for the larger study is based on Eccles’ Situated Expectancy-Value Theory (SEVT), a motivation theory that focuses on understanding student achievement-related choices through expectancy and subjective task values (Eccles, 1983; Eccles & Wigfield,2020; M. Te Wang & Eccles, 2013; Wigfield & Eccles, 2000). We employed the socializerperspective with which Eccles and colleagues argued that student expectancy and subjective taskvalues are influenced by their surroundings, including the instructors and learning environments(Eccles, 2007). Figure 1 shows
a one-week civil engineering summercourse, high school students were challenged to approach engineering problems with thisintegrated mindset. The authors introduced the students to an eight-phase engineering designprocess on the first day of class. This framework was developed in [1] based on realisticscenarios used in engineering and was proven effective in the literature for novice audiences inengineering. In class, students interacted with real-world problems and brainstormed creative andinnovative solutions each day, either working toward the final project or with in-class activities.Using this framework, students were encouraged to identify and/or create new, unique, oratypical solutions while accommodating real-life constraints such
and community and the importance of equitable and inclusive practices,policies, and procedures. This paper describes the planning of the student day, lessons learned,and assessment of the student day.INTRODUCTION A diverse university community opens all students up to a broader range of perspectives,enable them to be global thinkers and actors, to respect diverse values, and to attain acompetitive edge as well-rounded and creative leaders in their fields [1]. Diversity, Equity, andInclusion (DEI) has long been an important part of personal, professional, and curriculardevelopment for university faculty, yet students continue to voice a desire for improvedengagement with concepts of race, racism, bias, cultural awareness and social justice
regard, Vargas et al. reported the retention ratesfrom Texas Public University (Table 1), which demonstrate that schools with a large number ofminority students have a lower retention rate [28], [29]. Table 1. Texas Public Universities Freshman Retention Rates. Freshman entering in Fall 2015 through Fall 2018 [28], [29]. Average Freshman Texas Public University Retention Rate UT Austin 95% Texas A&M University 92
evaluation in the future.Tags: Postdoctoral Development, Future Faculty Development Program, Program Evaluation,Underrepresented IdentitiesBackground Postdoctoral (postdoc) appointments are meant to be temporary opportunities for thesescholars to develop important skills and enhance their research while still under the guidance ofanother scholar in their field. These appointments often appeal to PhD earners interested inpursuing a tenure-track faculty position, but feel they need additional development in a neededskill or to build on their research portfolio [1]. When considering that postdoc appointmentstructures and expectations can vary wildly depending on discipline, location, and funding, andthe number of postdocs at any given
, Design, and Construction (VDC) tools and techniquesavailable to skilled laborers and employees who can handle and utilize these tools to speed up theprocess of construction projects and improve cost, productivity, and overall marketing strategiesof new construction. Researchers have identified various successful strategies, metrics, andscorecards to evaluate the role of VDC in a project's success and how it changed howconstruction projects and stakeholders communicate [1]–[4].Introducing Building Information Modeling (BIM) education is not new to the constructionmanagement curriculum. Many faculty experts and industry practitioners excel in teaching BIMto students and helping them understand the core concepts of BIM [5]–[7]. However
nationa ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Evaluation of a Work-Integrated Learning Program for Undergraduate STEM Outreach InstructorsThis paper describes and evaluates a comprehensive work-integrated learning program,developed and delivered by Actua, a Canadian National STEM organization. The programprovides instructors with a variety of opportunities to improve their skills, career readiness, andtheir employer connections and networks. The program consisted of four sets of activities: (1) Aset of skills-focused training modules to prepare participants for their more immediate STEMoutreach work and longer-term work readiness; (2) Industry-Led Activities andMicro
therecruitment of undergraduate women and underrepresented minorities into computer science and mathematics.AbstractIn 2018 women, Black and Hispanic students accounted for 19.9, 9 and 11%, respectively, ofundergraduate degrees in computer science (CS). Black students were awarded 5% of degrees inmath and Hispanic students 11% [1]. This project studied the impact of an Emerging ScholarsProgram, a Peer-Led Team Learning program with the goal of recruiting women andunderrepresented minorities into math and CS. A collaboration between the Mathematics and CSDepartments was established in 2013 at the University of Pennsylvania. Freshman andsophomores with undeclared majors were actively recruited. Workshops led by peer leaders andconducted
faculty teach engineering and architecture courses at MSU Denver starting in 2014 through present1.1.3 Related sustainability initiativesOver the last decade, the UP and FEIT have introduced concepts of sustainability into thecurriculum [1], and concurrently, MSU Denver has likewise developed and initiated theSustainable Systems Engineering undergraduate program [2]. However, even with theseinitiatives, there remains a demand for graduate education that provides a holistic view ofsustainability of the built environment across multiple disciplines.The arrival of the pandemic and the subsequent transition to online teaching, ironically, providedthe opportunity for greater collaboration in teaching between MSU Denver EAET and UP FEIT,as
young learners to engineering as a profession and broaden theirviews of opportunities in this field. The recruitment methods used for these camps show thatnomination-based recruitment methods have the potential for greater impact on changingstudents’ engineering trajectories.Introduction Many universities offer K-12 engineering outreach programs such as summer camps [1],afterschool clubs [2], in-class activities [3], printed brochures [4], and single-day on-campusvisits [5] as ways to increase students’ awareness of and interest in engineering. While many ofthese are short-term programs, longer-term outreach programs have been recommended, asstudents with sustained engineering exposure report greater long-term interest in
in industry. Thisresearch spans a multitude of domains and industries. This section summarizes the findings ofthose research papers. In particular, it summarizes the generalized techniques and findings that canapply to our domain of helping students determine if they would like to pursue a career inacademia.Job Shadowing and Experiential LearningJob shadowing is a type of experiential learning. Experiential learning is a broad category of hands-on learning techniques that are common both in classroom settings (labs and projects) and outsideof it (fieldwork and internships) [1]. Job shadowing has been studied in relation to variousoutcomes and has been found to positively impact knowledge transfer, student motivation,training, and more. The
student employees aiding in daily operation [1]–[3]. Thereare naturally ongoing conversations about best practices at academic conferences, and this papercontributes an additional set of practices, as well as a novel assessment of student employeeexperiences.At Virginia Tech, well over 2000 students each year complete a two-semester generalengineering program before selecting a specific discipline. The second semester generalengineering course is dedicated to a hands-on design project. This project is supported by anacademic makerspace accessible only to first-year engineering students. The makerspace has alsohistorically provided students opportunities to pursue personal projects, and supported smallerprojects run by some faculty as part of the
be leveraged inengineering education research and provide a step-by-step method for social media analytics.People around the world use social media platforms (e.g., Facebook, Reddit, SnapChat, TikTok,and Twitter) to share content that express their personal and professional identities and connectwith others like them [1]–[4]. Social media is a public space full of rich information andconversations that can show how and who people interact with and what people publicly shareabout themselves. Particularly, social media has served as a platform for marginalizedcommunities to connect, organize and collaborate, disseminate information, and negotiate theiridentities [5]–[11]. Social media is a rich and vast source of information that
readiness, faculty skills, and industrial fundingto support academic experiences.IntroductionTeaching through experiential learning practice is a given for an Engineering Technology (ET)baccalaureate program, but experiential learning comes in many forms. It is also expected that anaccredited Engineering Technology (ET) baccalaureate program require capstone coursework asone of the ways to execute experiential learning. Since TC2K was implemented as the “new”wave of accreditation for ET programs at the turn of the century, ABET has required that ETprogram content be integrated within a capstone course that develops student competencies inapplying both technical and non-technical skills in solving problems [1]. This experientiallearning encounter
. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Examining an Equity-focused Collective Impact Project through the Lens of Alliance Members’ Prior Experiences Rebecca Zarch1 and Monica M. McGill2 1 SageFox Consulting Group 2 CSEdResearch.org 1 rzarch@sagefoxgroup.com, 2 monica@csedresearch.org Abstract Research Problem: A Collective Impact (CI) model provides a foundation for bringing together independent organizations, networks, and societies in a structured way to achieve large-scale
of placing students on teams is critical toensuring students are successful in the program and project results meet sponsor expectations.Students are placed on teams by the program staff based on a project ranking survey they mustsubmit after attending presentations about each project. These presentations are given by thefaculty who will coach each project. The main survey questions are to rank the projects based ontheir preferences and skills. This study evaluates the project presentations and survey resultsfrom four years to explore the following questions: (1) How much effort do students place onproject placement? (2) What type of features have the most impact on students when rankingprojects? (3) Which engineering features make projects
University, a liberal artsuniversity on the East coast. A once-a-month asynchronous format (four hours) was used at thisinstitution, versus the two-day, six-hour format used at James Madison. Programming impacted12% of engineering students. This paper presents the framework for offering asynchronouswellness programing within a department, as well as best practices and lessons learned.1. IntroductionDuring the pandemic, reports from academic-focused sources [1-3] emphasized the importanceof providing services that address student well-being. A need to help students in the area ofmental health and wellness within an undergraduate only department of engineering wasrecognized.To address this need, two engineering programs housed at East coast, liberal
classroom using videoconferencing softwareand corresponding hardware technology makes it possible for faculty and students to interact andcollaborate in real-time on learning and engage with the class [1], [2], [3]. However, little isunderstood about student attitudes towards such remote teaching initiatives. Recent researchseeks to better understand the perceived advantages and disadvantages of remote teaching andlearning and its effect on the ability to acquire knowledge and succeed academically, ability toadapt to changing or complex circumstances, and quality of student-to-student interactions,among other things [4], [5], [6], [7].This paper contributes to this effort by evaluating certain experiences with the remote-synchronous course delivery
recommendations for enhancing thementors’ effectiveness. Overall, the results indicate that the mentors positively supported studentlearning and enhanced their success in their first-year design course.Review of LiteratureStudy Framework: Supporting Student Development. We framed our research by embracingChickering and Reisser's [1] seven-vector student development model. The model aligns wellwith our focus on students working in teams, developing a sense of belonging, increasing theirconfidence for learning, and gaining a professional identity. The seven vectors are developingprofessional relationships, enhancing personal competence, monitoring emotions, gaining apersonal identity, internalizing a sense of purpose, realizing personal interdependence
cybersecurity education approach on high school student cybersecurity learning Sai Suma Sudha1, Sai Sushmitha Sudha1, Ahmad Y Javaid1, Quamar Niyaz2, Xiaoli Yang3 1 EECS Department, The University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, United States 2 ECE Department, Purdue University Northwest, Hammond, IN, United States 3 CS Department, Fairfield University, Fairfield, CT, United States {saisuma.sudha, saisushmitha.sudha, ahmad.javaid}@utoledo.edu, qniyaz@pnw.edu, xyang@fairfiled.eduIntroductionThe need for cybersecurity is growing as we become more dependent on digital tools and programsto run our daily lives
requirements to be fulfilled by researchculminating in a patent application. The Pathways to Entrepreneurship (PAtENT) model aims tobring greater alignment between doctoral degrees and the rapidly changing employmentlandscape. Given that seventy percent of PhDs exit academic careers within three years [1],creating doctoral pathways that align with multiple career options is an imperative. We describethe PAtENT model, rationale and goals. Components of the pilot program will be explainedthrough a curriculum alignment describing key activities that respond to recommendation forSTEM graduate programs identified by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering andMedicine [2]: developing scientific and technological literacy and conducting original
theofferings of engineering courses is an ongoing national effort [12]. This is an involved effortbecause students taking the same course can engage with it and experience it in differentways depending on the prior background that they bring with them to the course suchas their motivation, sense of belonging and study resources. Researchers in Engineeringeducation are working to identify such sets of student features that play a role in courseperformance Specifically, researchers studied whether aspects related to their motivation,such as expectancy to do well, is related to course outcomes [1, 8, 9], whether high performingstudents have different study behaviors than low performing students [10], and whether othersources such as sense of belonging