young inits own right. Aptly named, HCD is an empathic approach to solving complex problems thatfocuses on identifying the direct needs of the end-user or stakeholder and employing acollaborative and iterative design process to achieve a customized solution [1]. This is a differentapproach than the more traditional design methods typically taught in undergraduate engineeringcourses, which focus on process efficiency and product optimization [2]. Empathy is recognizedas an important element of students’ emotional engagement [3], both with their design task andtheir teammates. Furthermore, the development of empathy is necessary for promoting emotionalintelligence [4], making HCD valuable for students’ personal development. To effectivelyprepare
study. Theconsent and questionnaire was sent out via Qualtrics. Students in Spring 2022 received extracredit for completing the questionnaire. This partially explains the difference in responserate between semesters.2.2 Data CollectionStudents were asked to volunteer and answer a questionnaire with 60 questions that weretaken from the following validated instruments: the Index of Learning Styles [8], the IntrinsicMotivation Inventory [1], the Growth Mindset Scale [2], and sense of belonging questionnaire[5].2.3 InstrumentsThe Intrinsic Motivation Inventory is an instrument that assesses participants’ intrinsicmotivation based on the following six subscale scores related to performing an activity: In-terest/Enjoyment, Perceived Competence
engagement among learners.IntroductionIn recent years, technological advancements have significantly impacted how we learn, withmany K-12 education programs incorporating a hands-on, constructivist approach to teachingand learning [1]–[3]. However, as students transition to undergraduate programs, there isoften a lack of continuity in the teaching methods used, leading to challenges inunderstanding and applying the lessons taught, aside from continuing in the discipline.Therefore, there is a need to seek out a teaching methodology that can stimulate themotivation of learners and further learners’ zeal in the chosen field.Experiment-centric pedagogy (ECP) is a hands-on learner-centered teaching technique thatemploys inexpensive, portable instruments
library, innovating classroom teachingmethods and practice teaching mode, which provides a case of engineering educationfor sustainable development for the engineering education community. Figure 1 The vision and actions of engineering education for sustainable development of ECUSTI. Educational Vision ECUST has proposed the core qualities of engineering education for sustainabledevelopment in three dimensions: knowledge, skills and attitude. A new concept ofgreen engineering education has also been put forward. It integrates the 12 principlesof green engineering into the talent training link of engineering education to cultivatesystematic thinking of students of consciously following the principles
this paper shows results from a surveyof faculty from these programs that aimed to identify: 1) courses/topics with content that doesnot dramatically change over time and does not need to be constantly updated, 2) courses/topicsthat need constant updating and for what reasons, 3) courses/topics that are novel and representmaterial that is in the forefront of construction engineering/management technology, and 4)topics that will be appearing in curricula in the near future.The results of this investigation will help construction programs plan their future curricula andhelp program administrators ensure an even faculty workload distribution.Key words: Construction, Course Preparation, EducationBackgroundFaculty should strive to improve their
Your Hand, a multidisciplinary collaboration between engineering and the artsAbstract: Raise Your Hand is an immersive, interactive sensor-driven dynamic art exhibit.Vision tracking software changes the video projections, mechatronics, and music composition inresponse to the height of a visitor’s raised arm. The 1 ½-year project brought together studentsand faculty from computer engineering, computer science, electrical engineering, industrialdesign, mechanical engineering, literature, media and communication, computational media, andmusic technology. Further, students were integrated into the project in different forms, includingcapstone design teams, Vertically Integrated Project (VIP) students, undergraduate research
Implementing Project Management Skills Training Through Thesis Research Within STEM Graduate EducationScience, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) graduate education traditionallyhas focused on developing technical and research skills needed to be successful in academic andresearch settings. In the past decade, however, STEM graduate students increasingly have soughtpositions in the industry [1]; a recent study by Sherman et al. [2] found that non-academicindustry jobs were the most preferred career choice for STEM doctoral students. Despite thispreference, graduate education has yet to adapt to better prepare students for their industrypositions; a significant portion of students need critical professional skills, such as
qualitative, ethnographic, partic- ipatory, and action-oriented research methods to examine and improve equity in engineering education contexts. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Intersectionality, Identity Dilemmas, and Cultural Homelessness: A Discourse Analysis of the Experiences of a Female Undergraduate International and Transracial Adoptee in Engineering (Research)1. IntroductionA home is a place where we experience a sense of safety and belonging. We may think of a home as aphysical structure, but we can also recognize the importance of people in creating that sense of safety andbelonging. In this paper, we tie the sense of having a cultural home to the
relationship among belongingness, self-efficacy and perceivedlearning and yet distinctness of these learning outcome metrics. In addition, the perceivedaccessibility is confirmed to be uniquely useful for understanding the needs of SWD, and thusdeserves more attention to help them succeed.IntroductionThe accessibility of course content plays a critical role in student success. Students withdisabilities (SWD) face extra challenges when digital content is inaccessible or difficult to use.This is a significant challenge for many students that instructors are often unaware of; nationalstatistics by the NSF and NCES report [1] 19% of the 4-year undergraduate population have adisability, but according to a Wisconsin research study [2] the majority (75%) of
-influenced, and factors considered to be influenced by bothstudent and institution. Smith and Van Aken’s conceptual model was based on a review ofprevious research on engineering transfer student persistence which included a few studieslimited to ET majors. In our study, persistence is designated as baccalaureate ET degreecompletion. The variables included in the study were informed by a review of the literature onengineering transfer student persistence- see Figure 1.Methods In this study, we examined the influence of student characteristics, academic factors, andinstitutional factors on the academic performance and persistence of ET transfer students whotransferred from two-year institutions to four-year institutions in North Carolina from
have observed that incoming first-yearstudents often struggle with teamwork, and several instructors from the program attended aworkshop in Summer 2022 led by Worcester Polytechnic Institute (WPI) with lengthy experienceleading project-based learning first-year engineering courses. The facilitators of this workshopprovided activities that can be integrated into existing or new courses to help foster equitableteaming practices in a project based learning setting. These tools had previously beenimplemented in a program at WPI and are available in Pfeifer and Stoddard, 2020 [1]; this paperexplores implementations and impact of integrating these equitable teaming tools at a largerscale.The instructors of the first-year engineering course who
verbal and written communication. The goal being toincrease teaching and learning effectiveness. Instructors are obligated to share knowledge, information, and skill sets with their students.However, many instructors are unaware of their students' preferred communication styles.Furthermore, even across different sections of the same course, each individual class canhave a completely different communication style. Many people are even unsure of their owncommunication style. As a result, each course should be adapted to meet the needs of eachdifferent group of students each semester the course is taught. According to the literature,engineering students are hands-on, active, and visual learners [1]-[4]. Comparisons of thestudent's self-assessment
fine-grained,as overall sentiment scores may not capture teaching-related qualities and do not differentiatebetween fine-grained teaching qualities such as helpfulness and clarity.LEEQ can be used by the research community to allow for full analyses of teaching evaluations,rather than focusing solely on quantitative metrics; in this paper, we perform a case study thathighlights one such analysis. Prior work has found that course evaluations can easily be biasedagainst certain identity groups; for example, female instructors and instructors of color tend to berated lower or more harshly compared to white male instructors [1, 2]. The switch fromtraditional in-person learning to hybrid or remote learning during the COVID-19 pandemic alsolikely
spaceflight and medicine, as well as practices skills related to user experience and statistical analysis.Joseph Roland Keebler, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona Beach ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Impact of critical narrative on students' abilities to recognize ethical dilemmas in engineering workIntroductionThis paper contains preliminary results from a quasi-experimental study that seeks to evaluatethe efficacy of “critical narrative” as a pedagogical tool to help engineering students thinkcritically about the broader impacts of their profession. Consistent with ABET Student Outcome(SO) 2 and SO4 [1], we assume broader impacts to include the economic, social
to deliver lectures and supplement instruction has been onan upswing for a number of years. This trend showed a tremendous growth over the pandemic asexpected with the transition to some variation of online delivery whether it was remote teachingor via the development of high quality online courses. A dominant mechanism for lecturedelivery in engineering disciplines at a large university in the southwest has been the use ofvideo. A short survey of faculty identified 3 dominant strains in video production (1) Videocontent captured using Zoom (2) Video content captured in professional studio settings and (3)Video content captured in classrooms using existing lecture capture technologies built in class.The second strain of video creation has
Paper ID #38922Impact of Inclusion of Makerspace and Project Types on Student Comfortwith Additive Manufacturing and Three-Dimensional Modeling in First-YearEngineering ProgramDr. Andrew Charles Bartolini, University of Notre Dame Assistant Teaching Professor, University of Notre Dame Coordinator, First-Year Engineering Program, University of Notre DameSimran Moolchandaney, University of Notre Dame Simran Moolchandaney is a class of 2023 undergraduate student at the University of Notre Dame major- ing in Computer Science and minoring in Bioengineering. Outside the classroom, Simran is an NCAA Division 1 Fencer, and an active
scholarship program. The project builds on prior research suggesting thataffective factors including sense of belonging, identity, and self-efficacy play important yet notfully understood roles in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) students’academic persistence and successful progression toward careers, and that these factors can proveparticularly influential for individuals from groups that have been historically marginalized inSTEM [1]-[6]. Prior studies conducted as part of this research project have demonstrated impactsof Scholars’ math-related experiences on their developing identities [7] and found that structuresassociated with the scholarship program helped support Scholars’ developing sense of belongingdespite the shift
the underrepresentation ofwomen and historically marginalized communities [1]. The need for skilled workers in STEMcontinues to grow, yet women make up only 1/3rd of the STEM workforce [1]. This issue is evenmore pronounced when considering the field of engineering where women hold only 16% thejobs. Furthermore, students in high-poverty populations score significantly worse onmathematics and science assessments in 4th and 8th grade, and classroom teachers with lessexperience in STEM are more prevalent at schools with high-minority or high-povertypopulations [1]. The pandemic exacerbated disparities, with isolation and limited opportunitiesfor formal and informal educational engagement. K-12 education in mathematics and science arethe
Mindsets Over the Course of a Semester: A Longitudinal Study AbstractStudents, like all people, have elements of both growth and fixed mindsets. We studied shifts inboth types of student mindsets over three one-semester courses. We found no significant changein students’ growth mindset at the beginning of the semester compared to the end of the semester.However, students’ fixed mindsets showed a statistically significant increase of 0.37-points fromthe beginning of the semester to the end of the semester, with an effect size of 0.43. Two multilevelmodels were used to understand why students’ fixed mindsets may have increased 1) personalsources¾mastery goal, performance
of inspiration when solving problems and designingsolutions [1], [2]. Engineering products created through natural inspiration are plentiful andinclude examples such as the bullet train, Velcro, and umbrellas [3]. Yet, the field of biologicallyinspired design (BID) is still relatively new within engineering [4]. Nonetheless, undergraduateand graduate engineering programs have emphasized integrating BID into their engineeringcurriculum to better prepare engineers for the global economy [5]. Studies have demonstratedthat BID integration has the potential to provide students with unique experiences that canencourage interdisciplinary interactions [6], [7]. Furthermore, due to its diverse nature, BID canincrease students’ interest and
instructors as to how theyshould guide a team that is struggling with interpersonal conflict and/or difficulty in completingproject work cooperatively.BackgroundIt is widely agreed that the ability to function productively on a team is an important engineeringskill [1]. This ability is also a common learning outcome in project-based introductoryengineering courses [2]. Quite often, student teams are not self-selected, in order to simulatesimilar situations in the engineering workplace, and to prompt students to develop additionalflexibility and objectivity toward fellow team members’ diverse educational, cultural, andbehavioral orientations. Since these courses and teams often last for only one semester, theamount of time to develop this ability is
approach,survey data was collected to assess students' sense of belonging as engineering students. Thevalidated survey consists of 33 items distributed in four constructs: 1) Sense of belonging-general, 2) sense of belonging-interactions, 3) Self-efficacy and 4) Perceived institutionalsupport. From this, we identify and discuss the student's sense of belonging and how itinteracts with self-efficacy and perceived institutional support. This research allows us to haveevidence that supports the visibility and creation of initiatives on the services offered tostudents, which impact their sense of belonging.Keywords: sense of belonging; self-efficacy; gender studies; women in engineeringI. Introduction and theoretical frameworkThe sense of belonging is
highschool internships that engage students in authentic STEM environments [2], [3]. High schoolinternships are especially impactful for underrepresented minority (URM) female students inSTEM [1]. Prior research has shown that these internship opportunities can increase students’sense of self-efficacy in STEM fields, give students insight into career paths they might nototherwise be exposed to, and increase students’ interest in and pursuit of STEM-related majorsand careers.The home environment can also provide opportunity for students to increase and strengthenSTEM identity and the consideration of STEM careers. A model for STEM identity has beendeveloped as a framework building on disciplinary studies and includes the interplay of threeelements
, our Assessment Committee,which reviews the work output from the spring BME Design courses annually, has noted thatteams often run out of time in the semester for thorough testing, so it would be beneficial toincentivize them to prototype sooner [1, 2] . In response, we devised a low-stakes Show and Tellsession which occurs semesterly between existing presentations to capitalize on our students’aptitude for providing valuable verbal feedback. Thus, the Show and Tell’s intended outcomeswere threefold: first, provide a formal yet ungraded opportunity for peer-to-peer feedback;second, further the achievement of ABET Outcome 3: communicate effectively with a range ofaudiences through the repetitive delivery of an elevator pitch; third, drive teams
inform how educators can use making to design learning environments thatsupport engineering students’ (re)negotiation with their disciplinary relationships.IntroductionDespite the need for diversity in all forms (e.g. racial, gender, socioeconomic status, etc.) inengineering [1], marginalizing narratives still exist that affect individuals’ participation inengineering. These narratives include: engineering is masculine and competitive [2], andengineering values technical competency much more than creativity and social interactions [1],[3], [4]. These narratives can lead to students feeling little sense of belonging, and their identitiesnot being validated in engineering [5] [6]. Studies show that students shifting narratives abouttheir
Educational Model namely Tec21 is a competence-based model and it is a studentcentered model [1-5]. These competences can be disciplinary competences or transversecompetencies, e.g. soft competences such as collaborative work. In every coursestudents have to solve challenges or real life scenarios that are related to the situationsthey will face in industry once they have graduated. For this reason, every challenge isassociated with scenarios that provided by industry, society through non-governmentorganizations, local governments or research centers. All these entities are calledStrategic Forming Partners (SFP).The structure of the educational model is distributed basically in four basic elements:Subjects (courses), Blocks (challenge-based courses
research at the Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Diversity (CEED), both at Virginia Tech. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023A Comparative Analysis of Support Perceptions between Transfer and First- Time-in-College Students in Engineering, Science, and Mathematics ProgramsIntroductionAn important mechanism for retaining engineering students is offering support programs at thecollege level, which includes, for example, formal structures such as living-learning communitiesas well as both formal or informal opportunities for mentoring by faculty and peers. However,traditional student retention theories concentrate primarily on the institutional level [1]–[5]. TheSTEM
contexts. Third, we compare the methods and tools used to assess teamworkin engineering in the two cultures. Finally, we briefly discuss the implications of such acomparative literature review for constructing a more comprehensive, culturally responsiveapproach to defining, developing, and assessing teamwork.1. IntroductionThere has been increasing pressure on higher education institutions to be accountable forprofessional outcomes since approximately the mid-1980s [1]. Especially since the 1990s and theintensification of globalization, higher engineering education in the United States hasexperienced numerous calls for increased accountability due to public concerns about the qualityof engineering and engineers [2]. The ABET (incorporated as the
they do not continue reproducing unfair neo-colonial practices andassumptions of past development practices. Here we explore how STS concepts have servedengineering students to develop critical praxis, a more robust and responsible understanding ofthe relationships between engineering faculty, students, and communities, and the materialand social worlds in which they are embedded, using community development projects relatedto artisanal gold mining, inclusive management of electronic waste, and water access forunderserved communities as examples.BackgroundAs shown in our 2022 ASEE paper [1], pedagogies of formation are explorations that implicatethe self in questioning “what engineering is for” and how answers to these questions begin toshow
developed using various pedagogies and educational theories toincrease student learning and satisfaction through the incorporation of various interactive features(i.e., an interactive textbook). Although the intent of these different online textbooks is to augmentstudent learning, their efficacy has not thoroughly been scrutinized. To this end, a comparativestudy between the use of a traditional static textbook and an interactive, online textbook on studentperformance is presented.The authors of this study previously developed an interactive online textbook titled “Statics andMechanics of Materials: An Example-based Approach” using Top Hat’s teaching and learningplatform [1]. The organization of the textbook followed Cognitive Load Theory (CLT) [2