, 2016. 5. T. F. Smith, D. Wilson, D. C. Jones, M. Plett, R. A. Bates, and N. M. Veilleux, “Investigation of belonging for engineering and science undergraduates by year in school,” in 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, Texas, June, 2012. 6. J. Edwards and A. Pizano, "Work in progress: Developing an engineering community in a fablab," in 129th annual conference & exposition of the American Society Engineering Education, Minneapolis, MN., June, 2022. 7. B. M. Dewsbury, H. J. Swanson, S. Moseman-Valtierra, and J. Caulkins, "Inclusive and active pedagogies reduce academic outcome gaps and improve long-term performance." Plos, vol. 17, no. 6, 2022. 8. E. J. Theobald, M. J
., University of Florida Dennis Parnell Jr. is a Ph.D. student in the Department of Engineering Education at the University of Florida. His research focuses on understanding and improving underrepresented student retention and persistence in engineering. For his doctoral research, Dennis is leveraging emerging learning technolo- gies to broaden participation in engineering by exposing students to semiconductor fabrication processes. Much of his work involves designing and assessing interventions for extra- and co-curricular activities for students throughout the educational ecosystem. He is also a member of the ASEE CDEI Spotlight Team. Dennis holds a B.S. in mechanical engineering from The University of Alabama and a
/2018/nsb20187/nsb20187.pdf.[4] W. Markow, D. Hughes, and A. Bundy, “The new foundational skills of the digital economy,” Burning Glass Technologies, Boston, MA, USA, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.burning-glass.com/wp-content/uploads/New_Foundational_Skills.pdf.[5] Business-Higher Education Forum, “Reskilling America’s Workforce: Exploring the nation’s future STEM workforce needs,” National Science Foundation, Alexandria, VA, USA, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.bhef.com/sites/default/files/BHEF_NSF_2018_Workshop.pdf.[6] N. Henke, J. Bughin, M. Chui, J. Manyika, T. Saleh, B. Wiseman, and G. Sethupathy, “The Age of Analytics: Competing in a Data-Driven World,” McKinsey Global Institute
structural engineering. She conducts research on the inspection, management and renewal of existing structures, and on diversity, equity and diversity in engineering education.Dr. A.M. Aramati Casper, Colorado State University Dr. Aramati Casper is a STEM education researcher and ecologist. She is currently a research scientist at Colorado State University doing research on diversity, inclusion, and social justice in undergraduate engineering classrooms.Dr. Ronald R. DeLyser, University of Denver Ronald R. DeLyser is currently an Associate Professor Emeritus retired from the University of Denver where he was on the faculty from 1986 until 2019. He has received all of his degrees in Electrical Engi- neering: the B.S
is the advisor of OU’s FSAE team. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Neurocognitive Evidence on the Impact of Topical Familiarity in Creative OutcomesAbstractEngineering programs, in general, do not explicitly address the need to enhance divergentthinking. To a certain extent this is due to a lack in knowledge on the cognitive and neuralmechanisms underlying divergent thinking, and creative ideation more generally. Wehypothesize that we can help enhance our students’ divergent thinking and creative processingoutcomes by investigating the impacts of carefully selected methods and tools enabled bydevelopments in the robust analysis of engineering ideation
obtained her M.E. in Systems Engineering at the Pennsylvania State University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Understanding Ambiguity in Engineering Problem SolvingAbstractEngineers are often faced with complex, unique, and challenging problems. Although a coreactivity of engineering is being able to solve complex problems efficiently and effectively, mostengineering problems contain ambiguous elements. Engineers that are confident handlingambiguity are needed to solve real-world problems. Within the literature, engineering problemsare typically characterized as either well-structured or ill-structured. Ambiguity, if it ismentioned at all in the problem characterization, goes undefined
student engagement and retention in engineering and engineering technology education. Contact: talley@txstate.edu c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Work in Progress: Impact on Retention: Integrating Engineering Concepts into a Freshman University Seminar ExperienceAbstractA four-year study meant to analyze the effects of a modified introductory engineering course ontwo-year retention of women and minorities was conducted at Texas State University. Introductionto Engineering modules were integrated into a general freshman university seminar course. Twoexperimental tactics were followed. One section type, Early Career Intervention (ECI), focused ongiving students resources and
EngineeringEducation, June 2018, Salt Lake City, UT.[17] D. Blackwood, D. L. Peters, and E. A. Gross, “Disciplinary migration of engineeringmaster’s students: Why do some students change their majors and others do not?,” inProceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education, June 2019, Tampa, FL.[18] S. M. Lord, K. A. Kramer, R. T. Olson, M. Kasarda, D. Hayhurst, S. Rajal, R. Green, andD. Soldan, “Special session - attracting and supporting military veterans in engineeringprograms,” in 41st ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, October 2011, Rapid City,SD.[19] C. E. Brawner, C. Mobley, J. Main, S. M. Lord, and M. M. Camacho, “The institutionalenvironment for student veterans in engineering,” in IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference(FIE
, makers and inventors, vol. 4, pp. 1–21, 2013. [3] T. M. E. Foundation, “The maker mindset assessment,” 2015. [4] A. Bdeir, “Electronics as material: littlebits,” in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction, pp. 397–400, ACM. [5] T. Jenkins and I. Bogost, “Escaping the sandbox: Making and its future,” in Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction, pp. 29–32, 2015. [6] O. J. Okundaye Jr, M. Kuttolamadom, M. Natarajarathinam, S. L. Chu, and F. Quek, “Motivating stem participation through a’making as micro-manufacture (m3)’model,” in 2018 ASEE Annual Conference Exposition. [7] O. Okundaye, S. Chu, F. Quek, A. Berman, M
engagement in introductory stem courses,” Research in Higher Education, vol. 53, p. 229–261, 2012. [3] T. Tucker, S. Shehab, E. Mercier, and M. Silva, “Board 50: Wip: Evidence-based analysis of the design of collaborative problemsolving engineering tasks,” Proceedings of American Society for Engineering Education, 2019. [4] T. Nokes-Malach, J. Richey, and S. Gadgil, “When is it better to learn together? insights from research on collaborative learning,” Educational Psychology Review, vol. 27, p. 645–656, 2015. [5] E. Mercier and S. Higgins, “Collaborative learning with multi-touch technology: Developing adaptive expertise,” Learning and Instruction, vol. 25, p. 13–23, 2013. [6] L. Paquette, N. Bosch, E. Mercier, J. Jung, S
Aerospace Engineering.Dr. Bora Cetin, Michigan State University Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringDr. Andrea E Surovek, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology Dr. Andrea Surovek is a research scientist and faculty development coordinator at the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology. She is the recipient of the ASEE CE Division Seeley Fellowship and the Mechanics Division Beer and Johnston Outstanding New Mechanics Educator Award. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 A Qualitative Analysis of How a Student, Faculty, and Practicing Engineer Approach an Ill-Structured Engineering ProblemAbstract Solving open-ended
interview questions but also look at intersectionalityand combine the qualitative analysis with the findings of our ongoing quantitative studies.MethodsThe qualitative pilot study was designed to contribute to overarching project goals, by providingstudent voices and discovering the reasons behind disparities in representation. We piloted aninterview protocol with undergraduate students for qualitative data collection and analysis tocomplement the ongoing quantitative study. This paper/poster focuses on the portion of thequalitative analysis that answers the research questions in Section Introduction and Motivation.The interview protocol was IRB-approved in all participating institutions (IRB protocol numbers:1354049, 2019 SP 59-R, and 201331
a Graduate Assistant for the UBelong Collaborative.Anne-Ketura Elie, University of Pittsburgh Anne-Ketura Elie earned a BS degree in 2019 in psychology from the University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. She is currently a graduate student researcher at the University of Pittsburgh in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Her research interests are the factors that foster sense of belonging in academic settings, more specifi- cally teacher-student relationship factors that promote student’s sense of belonging and adaptive meaning making. Ms. Elie is also a member of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023
2016 recipient of the National Science Foundation’s Grad- uate Research Fellowship and an Honorable Mention for the Ford Foundation Fellowship Program. Her research interest focuses on changing the deficit base perspective of first-generation college students by providing asset-based approaches to understanding this population. Dina is interested in understanding how first-generation college students author their identities as engineers and negotiate their multiple iden- tities in the current culture of engineering. Dina has won several awards including the 2018 ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference Best Diversity Paper Award, 2019 College of Engineering Outstanding Graduate Student Research Award and the
analysis on the value of oral exams as early diagnostic tool (Kim et al., ASEE 2022). Minju is interested in designing assessments that can capture and motivate students’ deep conceptual learning, such as oral exams and the usage of visual representations (e.g., diagrams and manual gestures).Dr. Carolyn L Sandoval, University of California, San Diego Dr. Sandoval is the Associate Director of the Teaching + Learning Commons at the University of Cali- fornia, San Diego. She earned a PhD in Adult Education-Human Resource Development. Her research interests include adult learning and development, faculty deZongnan Wang, University of California, San Diego Zongnan is currently a 2nd-year undergraduate student with a major in
acquisition on undergraduate project teams,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 149–155, 1998.[13] E. Pfaff and P. Huddleston, “Does it matter if I hate teamwork? What impacts student attitudes toward teamwork,” J. Mark. Educ., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 37–45, 2003.[14] S. Takai and M. Esterman, “A review of team effectiveness models and possible instruments for measuring design-team inputs, processes, and outputs,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 1684–1697, 2019
of General Chemistry at Purdue University. She is a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement, a Fellow of the American Chemical Society (ACS), a Fellow of the Royal Society of Chemistry. In 2019 she received the Nyholm Prize in Education from the Royal Society of Chemistry. She received the 2017 ACS Award for Achievement in Research for the Teaching and Learning of Chemistry and the 2017 James Flack Norris Award for Outstanding Achievement in the Teaching of Chemistry from the Northeast Section of the ACS. She has been recognized with Purdue University’s most prestigious honors for teaching. Her research has focused undergraduate chemistry laboratory including the development and implementation
, mechanical robustness, and environmental sustainability, such as carbides, sol-gel coatings, high temper- ature oxides, and several polymers. Her research is interdisciplinary in nature and fosters collaborations with Chemical and Biomedical, Mechanical, and Environmental Engineering, Physics, Chemistry, Public Health, Medicine, and the Nanotechnology Research and Education Center (NREC). c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 RET in Functional Materials and ManufacturingWe describe the development, implementation and assessment of a Research Experiences forTeachers (RET) site in Functional Materials and Manufacturing. Between 2014 to 2018,twenty-seven high school science and math
about teaching and learning. He serves as the Publications Chair for the ASEE Educational Research and Methods Division. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Visual representations guide students’ use of conceptual knowledge and problem-solving strategiesIntroductionOne of the key findings from the expert-novice transition literature is that experts and novicesinterpret information from visual representations in different ways [1]. This suggests that what ismeaningful to each of these groups is different, and it is so ingrained that experts are able tonotice differences between two diagrams shown for 200 ms but only if the differences wouldchange the underlying science
facilitate engineers’ consideration of bothtechnical and contextual aspects of systems thinking in their work. References1. Hayden, N. J., Rizzo, D. M., Dewoolkar, M. M., Oka, L., & Neumann, M. (2010). Incorporating systems thinking and sustainability within civil and environmental engineering curricula at UVM. ASEE Northeast Regional Conference Proceedings (Vol. 26), Rochester, NY.2. National Academy of Engineering (2004). The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.3. Rebovich, G. (2006). Systems Thinking for the Enterprise: New and Emerging Perspectives. 2006 IEEE/SMC International Conference on System of Systems Engineering
Wenderoth.References[1] Z. S. Wilson, S. S. Iyengar, S.-S. Pang, I. M. Warner, and C. A. Luces, “Increasing Access for Economically Disadvantaged Students: The NSF/CSEM & S-STEM Programs at Louisiana State University,” J. Sci. Educ. Technol., vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 581–587, Oct. 2012, doi: 10.1007/s10956-011-9348-6.[2] M. Walpole, “Socioeconomic Status and College: How SES Affects College Experiences and Outcomes,” Rev. High. Educ., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 45–73, 2003, doi: 10.1353/rhe.2003.0044.[3] M. L. Strutz and M. W. Ohland, “Low-SES First-generation Students’ Decision to Pursue Engineering,” presented at the 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2012, p. 25.907.1-25.907.15. Accessed: Feb. 12, 2023. [Online]. Available
Engineering students.Second, the Penn State College of Engineering strives to meet the national benchmark fordiversity in Engineering set by the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) byawarding baccalaureate Engineering degrees to at least 130 African American and Hispanicstudents annually. In 2013, Penn State awarded 74 baccalaureate Engineering degrees to raciallyunderrepresented students. Therefore, our long-term goal is to achieve a net gain of at least 56Engineering degrees to racially underrepresented undergraduates. If we can improve our junior-year retention for University Park racially underrepresented Engineering students from 43% to63% (net gain of 86 students, from Table 1: 429 x .63) and our junior-year retention forAbington