, only eight(28%) had ever considered teaching in a K-12 setting (see Table 3, in green). Table 3. Few newcomer students had considered K-12 teaching. Q: Have you considered teaching in a K-12 setting? never thought about it rarely thought about it thought about it a little bit thought about it a lot thought about it with certainty 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 # of RespondentsThe survey also included an open-ended probe into the reasoning around their answers, withseveral responses provided below. Students who were not interested in an E+T
of technology. IEEE Technology and Society, 25(4), 15- 25.13. Martin, M. W . (2002). Personal meaning and ethics in engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics, 8(4), 545-560.14. McLuhan, M., & Fiore, Q. (1967). The medium is the massage: An inventory of effects. New York: Bantam Books.15. Postman, N. (1985). Amusing ourselves to death: Public discourse in the age of show business. New York: Penguin.16. W inner, L. (1990, W inter). Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus, 109(1), 121-136.17. Sentesy, M. (2011). Is technology ethically neutral? Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/836936/Is_ Technology_Ethically_Neutral18. Postman, N. (1992). Technopoly: The surrender of culture to technology. New York
, no. 6, pp. 735–753, Dec. 2013.[28] K. A. Ericsson and H. A. Simon, “Verbal reports as data.,” Psychol. Rev., vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 215–251, 1980.[29] A. Sassaroli and S. Fantini, “Comment on the modified Beer–Lambert law for scattering media,” Phys. Med. Biol., vol. 49, no. 14, p. N255, 2004.[30] Q. Chen, J. Zhao, C. H. Fang, and D. Wang, “Feasibility study on identification of green, black and Oolong teas using near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy based on support vector machine (SVM),” Spectrochim. Acta. A. Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc., vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 568– 574, Mar. 2007.[31] S. Tak and J. C. Ye, “Statistical analysis of fNIRS data: A comprehensive review
of engineering education. In G. L. Downey & K. Beddoes (Eds.), What is global engineering education for?: The making of international educators (pp. 45-76). San Rafael, CA.: Morgan and Claypool.Jesiek, B. K., Zhu, Q., Woo, S. E., Hompson, J., & Mazzurco, A. (2014). Global engineering competency in context: Situations and behaviors. Online Journal for Global Engineering Education, 8(1), Article 1, 3. Available at: http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/ojgee/vol8/iss1/1Knight, D., & Sullivan, J., & Louie, B. (2007, June), Expanding Understanding of First Year Engineering Student Retention and Team Effectiveness Through Social Styles Assessment Paper presented at 2007 Annual
students with disabilities in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (stem),” Atlanta, GA: Center for Assistive Technology and Environmental Access, Georgia Institute of Technology, 2012. [9] M. Q. Patton, “Two decades of developments in qualitative inquiry: A personal, experiential perspective,” Qualitative social work, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 261–283, 2002.[10] S. B. Merriam, Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education. Revised and Expanded from” Case Study Research in Education.”. ERIC, 1998.[11] L. M. Smith, “8: An evolving logic of participant observation, educational ethnography, and other case studies,” Review of research in education, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 316–377, 1978.[12] M. B. Miles, A. M
. basic science in a veterinary medicine setting,” Med. Ref. Serv. Q., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 21–37, 2002.[2] M. Hepworth, “A framework for understanding user requirements for an information service: Defining the needs of informal carers,” J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol., vol. 55, no. 8, pp. 695–708, 2004.[3] N. K. Sheeja, “Science vs social science: A study of information-seeking behavior and user perceptions of academic researchers",” Libr. Rev., vol. 59, no. 7, pp. 522–531, 2010.[4] E. Herman, “End-users in academia: meeting the information needs of university researchers in an electronic age,” Aslib Proc., vol. 53, no. 10, pp. 431–457, 2001.[5] B. M. Hemminger, D. Lu, K. T. L. Vaughan, and S. J. Adams, “Information seeking
design.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank Rex Hartson and Doug Bowman for their influence in theoriginal course design and guidance throughout. We also express our appreciation to thestudents who contributed to the development of this research study. Finally, many thanks toLindsay Wheeler for her guidance and reviewing of this work.References[1] J. Pirker, M. Riffnaller-Schiefer, and C. Gütl, “Motivational active learning - Engaging university students in computer science education,” in ITICSE 2014 - Proceedings of the 2014 Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education Conference, 2014, pp. 297–302.[2] B. Simon, S. Esper, L. Porter, and Q. Cutts, “Student experience in a student-centered peer instruction
and collaborator-reported communicationand teamwork skills. The data on teamwork and communication is augmented with and comparedto Slack data.Timeline: Table 1 gives a list of codes for the time-line illustrated in Fig. 1. The time-line listswhen questionnaires were administered, when the ME students had exams, when there wereinterprofessional meetings, and when deliverables were assigned or submitted. Additionally,since two of the ME students were part of a school athletics team, the time-line also lists athleticevents that required travel as well as the end of the season. Table 1: Codes for timeline in Fig. 1 Code Description Q Administration of a questionnaire X1 Midterm exam X2 Final exam
by periodic impromptu concept presentations, plus groupand individual reflections on stakeholder needs, design criteria, etc. When the students reportedback to the PDE class, it consisted of a poster presentation with supporting evidence anddemonstration of a physical artefact. Through a rigorous Q&A session the visiting studentscommunicated and defended their design choices. Since the local students had not met as a classsince day one, the expectation was that the visitor presentations would help the local studentsprogress their own designs, and perhaps rethink their impressions of important contextual issues.The intensive investigation activities around the Jakarta project was interspersed with shorttechnical visits and workshops, one
Raton: CNC Press, 2011. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.com/books?id=DiFMPmXSsLUC&pg=SA2- PA1#v=onepage&q&f=false [2] R. P. Feynman, “There’s Plenty of Room at the Bottom,” Science and Engineering, pp. 22–36, 1960. [Online]. Available: http://calteches.library.caltech.edu/47/2/1960Bottom.pdf [3] M. Ruivenkamp and A. Rip, “Entanglement of Imaging and Imagining of Nanotechnology,” Nanoethics; Dordrecht, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 185–193, 2011. [Online]. Available: https://search-proquest- com.ezproxy.uvu.edu/docview/887465026/3ADDD4C0F5D0457BPQ/1?accountid=14779 [4] A. D. Derjaguin, B. V. and Titijevskaia, A. S. and Abricossova, I. I. and Malkina, “Investigations of the forces of interaction of
to think about the topic and assess their learning of thatconcept. In the second step, the students got the chance to communicate their findings or theconfusions with other students. Also, during the second step, the instructor joined the students'conversations, and it provided the opportunity for all of the students to interact with theirprofessor in the format of a discussion rather than a formal Q and A practiced in the standardlecture classes. The students were asked to explain their solutions or their approach to solving theproblems to each other so they would exchange ideas and get exposed to different ways ofsolving a problem. The instructor asked the students to find another student who came up with adifferent answer and challenge
contrarian view of accepted (i.e., typical) solutions. g. Identify an unexpected opportunity for your design. h. Create extraordinary value for a customer or stakeholder. i. Integrate information from many sources to gain insight. j. Assess and manage risk. k. Persist through failure. l. Apply creative thinking to ambiguous problems. m. Apply systems thinking to complex problems. n. Evaluate economic drivers. o. Examine a customer’s or stakeholder’s needs. p. Understand the motivations and perspectives of others. q. Convey engineering solutions in economic terms. r. Substantiate claims with data and facts.The answers were provided in five scales: 1. None at all 2. Slightly 3. On some occasions 4. Many times 5