career path trajectories. The often-obscured implications of career paths on professionaloutcomes, and in particular the ways in which race and gender can be associated with career pathstreaming, serve as the rationale for our current study. Our guiding research question is simple:How do race and gender intersectionally influence the career path trajectory, and by extensionthe sense of professional belonging and identity, of engineering graduates in Canada?Ample research has documented workplace marginalization, exclusion, discrimination, andmisogyny experienced by women in engineering [1], [2], [3]. Robust theoretical work, groundedin empirical findings, has demonstrated the way societal gender norms are entrenched in the wayengineering, a
comprehensive coverage ofpervasive computing cybersecurity allows students to learn state-of-the-art research findings, gainhands-on experiences with recent software, and engage with cutting-edge cybersecurity technol-ogy. Finally, we share the lessons we learned from our study, make ReScuE lab materials availableto the public, and aim to benefit the broader audience of cybersecurity education.1 IntroductionAs a growing computing paradigm, pervasive computing allows devices to interconnect and un-derstand their surroundings with minimal human intervention. With the empowerment of high-performance cloud infrastructure and low-cost network connectivity, pervasive computing canperform collaborative jobs by collecting and analyzing data and communicating
matching the instructionalapproach of the intervention. Research on implementation factors also adds to the fields inunderstanding how and why teachers in various settings and with various backgrounds makeadaptations as they implement curricula [1]. In their discussion of the importance of flexibilityand fit of interventions, Harn, Parisi, and Stoolmiller [12] argue that "one of the best ways tomatch contextual and intervention characteristics to optimize implementation with fidelity overtime may be to adapt evidence-based practices to better match school-level context." Although research explicitly examining factors influencing the implementation ofengineering curricula is scarce, studies on the enactment of engineering curricula
and diversity,equity, and inclusion (DEI). The authors described how these subcategories would need to becategorized properly in future revisions, but the idea is they heavily dictated a student’sconfidence and sense of belonging.Summarizing this listing, we concluded with a motivational category list of interventionsubcategories as follows: task-value interventions (e.g., utility-value, communal value), framinginterventions (e.g., self-efficacy, belonging), personal value interventions (e.g., valueaffirmations), mitigating stereotype threat, and changing attributions, as shown in Table 1.Donker et al (2014) conducted a meta-analysis on teaching strategies that help studentmetacognition and self-regulation to find which specific tactics
-generation category. Weanalyzed survey responses assessing sense of belonging, self-efficacy, and institutionalsupport. The survey explores three dimensions: 1) general belonging, 2) belonging ineducational interactions, and 3) self-efficacy, each with eight items. The survey coversvarious aspects of the institution's student services, including psychological support,academic planning, tutoring, health and well-being services, sports, and supplementary areaslike leadership, diversity, gender, and participatory meetings. It totals 29 items. Respondentsexpressed their views using a 5-point Likert scale, from "strongly agree" to "stronglydisagree." Our findings reveal that all surveyed students exhibit a strong sense of belonging(both in general and
subsequently completed his Ph.D. in Applied Physics at the University of Yaound´e 1, also in Cameroon. Currently, he holds the esteemed position of Associate Professor at the University of Cincinnati.Dr. So Yoon Yoon, University of Cincinnati Dr. So Yoon Yoon is an assistant professor in the Department of Engineering and Computing Education in the College of Engineering and Applied Science at the University of Cincinnati, OH, USA. Dr. Yoon received her Ph.D. in Gifted Education, and an M.S.Ed. in Research Methods and Measurement with a specialization in Educational Psychology, both from Purdue University, IN, USA. She also holds an M.S. in Astronomy and Astrophysics and a B.S. in Astronomy and Meteorology from Kyungpook
different between femaleand male students, except for black/white shading in the cartoon drawings. There were nosignificant differences between the AE scores for female versus male students. Our results do notsupport the existence of a correlation between multilingualism and travel with artistic creativityand innovation self-efficacy attributes. Overall, we did not find that the students’ artisticcreativity or life experiences revealed through the self-portrait activity provided insights intoinnovation attitudes.IntroductionCreativity and innovation are crucial skills for engineers, as they enable the development ofnovel solutions to complex problems and drive technological advancements [1-4]. The NationalAcademy of Engineering (NAE) in the United
electrical engineering coursesIntroductionIn this Work In Progress, we present a pilot study to investigate how instructors see the role ofemotions in their student's learning process and argue that instructors’ emotional connectionssubstantially impact teaching methods and practices, consequently influencing the students’learning process. Research conducted by educational psychologists and cognitive scientists hasdemonstrated the importance of emotional connections in the learning process. Wheninformation is tied to an emotional association for the student, it tends to be better retained andrecalled over an extended period [1]. In fact, the complex and dynamic processes associated withlearning cannot be dissociated
theindividual layers takes a lot of time, material, and precision. However, the labor and maintenanceinvolved is minimal, making 3D printing a great cost effective option for manufacturing designmockups and other plastic parts [1-2]. 3D printing creates less waste because material is beingadded to manufacture the part instead of removed. In addition to increasing efficiency, manufacturing engineers must consider how toreduce manufacturing cost. Some ways to achieve this is by reducing the amount of materialneeded or by reducing the amount of labor time per part. Using an infill pattern instead ofprinting a solid part addresses both of these methods. The layers cover less area and thereforetakes up less time and material to complete each layer of
stories of engineers and programs that have had exemplarysocietal impacts. A particular emphasis is placed on individuals historically underrepresented inthe engineering profession, including people of color, women, and people with disabilities,bringing their experiences and achievements to the forefront. Slated to be released in mid-2024,the report’s findings, conclusions, and recommendations are not yet available. However, thisarticle aims to shed light on the various ways that the NSF and NAE have conceptualizedengineering’s impacts on society by 1) exploring the history of engineering at NSF, 2) analyzingfoundational material from the NSF/NAE that informed the work of the committee such asNSF’s Broader Impacts and NAE’s Grand Challenges in
institutions andstakeholders by providing them with strategies that could help motivate students and contributeto their academic success.Keywords: Academic Performance, Academic Success, Higher Education, Lack of Motivation,Retention, STEM Education, Students’ MotivationBackground and MotivationLow enrollment, inadequate academic performance, slow graduation rates, prolonged time-to-degree, poor retention rates, and high attrition among Science, Technology, Engineering, andMathematics (STEM) students are critical concerns for higher education institutions [1], [2], [3],[4], [5]. Furthermore, the need for STEM graduates is consistently rising at a relatively fast rate[6]. Consequently, promoting greater interest and engagement, fostering diversity
an engineering disciplineand a second language and spend their senior year abroad studying and interning as a mandatorypart of their program, then return to campus as part of their 5th and final year where they takecapstone courses in their respective engineering disciplines and the highest sequence of secondlanguage, culture, and literature courses.Research question 1: Which changes in students’ intercultural development were measured bythe IDI assessment?Research question 2: Which individual factors impacted changes in professional, personal andlife skills development during a year of studying and interning abroad?Literature review In previous influential scholarship, Byram [1], Deardorff [2] and Bennett [3] haveoutlined conceptual
New York Hasan Asif, is a graduate from the University at Buffalo in Data Science, possesses a keen interest in data transformation and gaining insights from data, includes expertise in setting up statistical tests, transforming data, and creating visualizations. He has demonstrated his skills by architecting systems to analyze the longitudinal participation of students throughout their studies. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Exploring Variance in Undergraduate Research Participation: A Quantitativeand Qualitative Investigation Among Students with Differing Levels ofInvolvementIntroductionThis research paper concerns undergraduate research, a high impact experience [1] that
our analysis, we present acomparison of engineering school results to that of campus-wide results to uncover similarities(or dissimilarities) in extra credit accumulation patterns. The results reveal that althoughengineering and campus-wide students accumulate a similar number of extra credits, theircomposition is different. We would like to note that the methods used in this analysis, althoughapplied to the data from a specific university, are generally useful for credit-hour analysis.1 IntroductionCredit hours are a metric of time spent by a student in the classroom [4]: one credit hour equalsone hour in class every week for one semester [21, 11]. As per the requirements of all the regionalaccrediting agencies in the US, a bachelor’s
Education]1 IntroductionEthics has been widely recognized as essential to effective engineering, highlighting theimportance of ethics education to engineering curricula [1], [2]. However, developing anddelivering effective engineering ethics education is difficult, given the increasingly globalenvironments of contemporary engineering.In contemporary engineering, people from different places and backgrounds are studying andworking together as never before [3]. National and cultural backgrounds can affectunderstandings of appropriate conduct within engineering [4]–[6], as well as conceptions of rightand wrong in general [7], [8]. Further, while much of the research on engineering ethicseducation in the US has focused on ethical reasoning and
collaborative training for construction education using real-world construction industry tools and software. This technology-based training can also inform the CMeducational sector about the opportunity for utilizing this or similar project-controlling software in theclassroom for semester projects to easily share the project information and communicate with studentswhile monitoring their progress.Keywords: Construction management education, Procore®, Real-world industry practices, Studentengagement, Construction lab. 1. IntroductionThe construction industry has been actively adopting new technologies to improve the collaboration andcommunication between the members involved in a project. Effective communication and project controlin the
EAS199: Engineering Principles. The course prioritizes the retention ofincoming engineering students at the university by providing students with the opportunity tostrengthen their academic skills such as time management and metacognition, while alsointroducing them to the engineering process. We have previously reported on the goals of thisiterative redesign, which was motivated by the goal of making the course a more equitable,accessible, and socially just learning environment as the mindset and profile of incoming first-year engineering students has changed with time [3]. Generation Z is known to be one of themost diverse populations with a growing desire to learn to lead and make positive changes intheir communities [1]. With this, we
,opportunities for economic mobility. However, there is a pressing need to attractunderrepresented minority and first-generation college students to STEM disciplines, as currentrepresentation from these groups remains low [1]. An obstacle to the production of STEMgraduates in the United States is the challenge to develop students' interest in math and science[2]. In many K–12 systems, there is a disconnect between math, science, and other disciplines, tothe real world and students often fail to recognize the links between their studies and potentialSTEM careers [2].One way to foster students' interest in math and science is to use informal learning to connectthese subjects to real-world contexts and careers [2]. By engaging students and teachers
Diverse Environments: A Work in ProgressIntroductionHistorically, engineering education has focused on technical skill development [1], where non-technical skills such as teamwork, communication, leadership, and social responsibility havebeen emphasized only recently to ensure engineers are being educated holistically [2].Furthermore, while historically marginalized groups remain underrepresented in engineering, thefield is starting to see growth in diversity [3]. Aligned with this newer focus on preparing holisticengineers for a professional engineering environment and the growth of diversity within thefield, ABET updated their student outcomes in 2019 to include an outcome specifically dedicatedto effectively
faculty positions. For the second phase, we invited surveyparticipants who indicated interest in answering follow up questions to participate in individualinterviews.Data CollectionIn this study, we focused on survey questions pertaining to applicant qualifications with andwithout DEI-related constructs. We were interested in examining those that centered aroundimportant aspects of faculty job responsibilities – teaching, research, and service. We askedparticipants: How would you rank the relative importance of each of the following applicantqualifications for an entry-level faculty position in your department? Consider 1 as mostimportant and 7 as least important, relative only to the items listed. We asked this questionseparately for when
. More summercamps should be hosted on various engineering topics, to broaden access to hands-on activitiesthat provide enriching learning experiences to diverse student populations and encourage studentinterest in engineering and related fields.Keywords - STEM engagement, Engineering Education, Women in Science and Engineering,Industrial Engineering, Human Factors EngineeringIntroduction In Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) education, fosteringdiversity and inclusion has been an important educational goal for institutions for many years[1]. Historically, women have been underrepresented in STEM disciplines, creating a lack ofrepresentation and overall diversity [2]. In 2019, the National Science Board (NSB
programs play a pivotal role in nurturing the personal and professional developmentof students. Initiatives such as the UMBC Meyerhoff Scholars [1], Louis Stokes Alliances forMinority Participation (LSAMP) [2], McNair Scholars [3], and GradTrack Scholars [4], [5],programs exist to prepare undergraduate students for graduate school. The GradTrack Scholarsprogram is a comparatively new initiative, and it has evolved over the past 3 years to establishitself as a strong virtual mentoring program committed to the preparation of undergraduate studentsfor graduate school [4]. While GradTrack has demonstrated positive impacts on participants’preparation for the graduate application process, the question remains: what impact doesGradTrack have on
’ responses across educational research interests of effectiveness, satisfaction, and qualityof education materials. The paper will present these results and discuss the implications of ourfindings and conclusions.IntroductionWhile open-ended questions in survey studies are very valuable in providing authentic andnuanced insights toward the respondents’ opinions, it’s often challenging to analyze suchquestions in large quantities. Not only the time and cost required in large open-ended questions’analysis make it difficult for researchers, but also the complexity of such free text posessignificant difficulties [1]. For example, qualitative analyses need to consider factors such asmultiple data formats, contextual requirement for interpretation
reducing bias and enhancing academic integrity. The systemwas piloted in undergraduate chemical engineering courses, providing initial evidence of itsviability. Through a comprehensive analysis comparing student outcomes under traditional andanonymous grading methods, the study seeks to empirically validate the effectiveness ofanonymous grading in improving student performance and psychological well-being,contributing to the development of more equitable educational practices.IntroductionAcademic evaluation has traditionally been dominated by exams and quizzes. While widelyused, these conventional approaches have come under scrutiny for their potential to perpetuateimplicit biases. Among these, the halo and horn effects [1][2] stand out, where an
undergraduatesfrom marginalized groups in engineering and to undergraduates who may not have the resourcesduring the academic year to participate in research at their institutions. Students are selectedusing holistic measures by each of the sites. The curriculum for the summer program aims tofoster self-efficacy in research through (1) participation in authentic research work, (2) facultyand experienced graduate student researcher mentoring, and (3) community building across thenatural hazards engineering and research communities.Students meet weekly through virtual means to discuss their research progress, address anychallenges, and discuss the rhetoric of scholarly publications and other activities. REU studentsalso participate in career development
Organizations in Higher Education through a Critical LensAbstractIn this critical theory review paper, the researcher seeks to 1) reveal the current landscape of theresearch literature on science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and medicine (STEMM)mentorship that occurs within student organizations at institutions of higher education, 2)determine if the mentorship described in these articles exemplify critical mentorship as defined inthe literature, and 3) determine if the addition of critical mentorship components adds value,defined here as a synergistic effect, for STEMM students who serve as mentors or mentees throughtheir student organizations. As the intersection of STEMM mentorship and student organizationsat institutions
also to identify key differences between machinist traineeswho exhibit no underlying hearing problems and ones who are deaf/hard of hearing. The findingsof this work provide valuable takeaways concerning machinists with hearing loss, revealing littleto no effect of hearing impairment on trainee performance, alleviating concerns about potentialperformance weaknesses. The outcomes from this study have shown that trainee experience seemsto relate directly to machining proficiency, regardless of hearing impairment.2. Introduction2.1 Background Estimates from the Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP) indicate that fewerthan 1 in 20 Americans are currently deaf or hard of hearing [1]. However, Only 53.3% of deafpeople ages 25-64
marginalizedarchitecture/engineering/construction (AEC) students about incorporating equity considerationswhile developing sustainable and resilient infrastructures. For this study, the relevantunderrepresented populations are African American, Hispanic American, and Native American. Itis imperative to investigate how engineering graduate students including students frommarginalized communities understand the connections between social justice and theinfrastructure systems, given the growing importance of these concerns in our society. The studyaims to address the following research objectives: (1) Understand the level of awareness of AECmarginalized students about societal inequalities within resilient infrastructure systems; (2)Highlight the perceptions
ofexperiential learning empowers students to apply theoretical knowledge in real-world scenarios,thereby deepening their comprehension of complex engineering concepts [1]. This approacheffectively bridges the gap between theory and practice.To cater to diverse learning preferences, facilitate visualization, promote real-world applications,and implement experiential learning, a variety of methods have been integrated over the pastdecade in this course. These methods include augmented reality (AR), discussions using real-world example pictures, and interactions with physical models—both through studentengagement and instructor demonstrations.Research has indicated that some students may not fully demonstrate their learning within theconstraints of
Assistance Migrant Program (CAMP), which is a federally funded program that assistschildren of migratory families during their first year of college. The survey was created from twoprior validated instruments on funds of knowledge and community cultural wealth. A total of 108undergraduate migratory students in STEM fields who were either previously or currentlyassociated with CAMP responded to the survey. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyseswere used to confirm the underlying theoretical relationships between the survey items and thepredicted constructs. Results supported a two latent construct model with six items that make upthe instrument: 1.) knowledge/experience outside of school and 2.) social networks in the form ofneighborhood