Asee peer logo
Displaying results 5491 - 5520 of 23681 in total
Conference Session
Computing and Information Technology Division (CIT) Technical Session 4
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Computing and Information Technology Division (CIT)
simulation is running in Tinkercad Circuits. However, the output in the serialmonitor will reflect whichever Arduino was selected at the beginning of the simulation start. Forexample, while interacting with the potentiometer, only the analog circuit (lower one in Fig. 2)will display output in the serial monitor. In contrast, if the student clicks on the upper arduinobefore clicking the StartSimulation button, s/he will notice the serial monitor starts displaying0 (the default digital output when push button is not pressed) on the serial monitor. As soon ass/he presses the push button, the serial monitor will print 1 and then go back to the default 0state.Graph Output: Tinkercad allows to visualize the circuit output data in graph format. Though
Conference Session
Environmental Engineering Division (ENVIRON) Technical Session 3
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Matthew Baideme P.E., United States Military Academy; Kathryn Blair Newhart; Cristian Robbins; Michael A. Butkus P.E., United States Military Academy; Andrew Ross Pfluger P.E., United States Military Academy
Tagged Divisions
Environmental Engineering Division (ENVIRON)
methodologies were examined within a large enrollmentcourse, it was concluded that students who selected their own teams earned grades that mirroredtheir overall course grade. Lower performing students who were randomly assigned, orpurposefully grouped with higher performing students based on previous performance, typicallyearned higher grades on the group assignment than other events in the course. However, theincreased grade in these cases did not consistently reflect improved individual performance.Keywords: team grading; team-based learning; team selection; group projects; assessment1. IntroductionGroup work, commonly referred to as cooperative learning [1], is an essential aspect of anundergraduate engineering experience because it is required to
Conference Session
Graduate Studies Division (GSD) Technical Session 5: Graduate Student Experience and Decision-Making
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Animesh Paul, University of Georgia; Deborah Moyaki, University of Georgia; John Ray Morelock, University of Georgia; Racheida S. Lewis, University of Georgia
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Graduate Studies Division (GSD)
other subjective measures like letters of recommendation and interviewsfor the admission process as the GRE quantitative score only measures a student’s ability whichaccounts for a fraction of graduate school success determinants. Rockinson-Szapkiw, Bray Jr,and Spaulding [6] in their study on the GRE score predictive validity in doctoral education alsodiscovered the GRE writing score to be a strong predictor for graduate students’ dissertationcompletion time.While these studies focused on various components of the GRE, evaluating their validity inpredicting factors postulated to reflect graduate school success, a more recent study by Newmanet al. [7] assessed issues with the GRE considering fairness for all demographic of applicants.They
Conference Session
Systems Engineering Division (SYS) Technical Session 1
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Julie Drzymalski, Temple University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Systems Engineering Division (SYS)
, equity and inclusion (DEI). Simple exposure to adiverse environment in the classroom does not fully prepare students to succeed in a similar real-world environment.In order to best prepare students for post-graduation roles, we must incorporate DEI into ourcurriculum. Education in these issues promotes their awareness of the topic and allows them toexplore their own implicit bias in a safe environment. Practicing our teaching with similarthought, we must assess the student outcomes in a manner which is reflective of our ownunderstanding of these issues and aims to minimize performance gaps due to disparities betweenstudents.Systems Engineering is an ideal platform to promote student awareness of global inequities inthe world as well as explore
Conference Session
Instrument Design and Development
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Clifton L. Kussmaul, Green Mango Associates, LLC; Patricia B. Campbell, Campbell-Kibler Associates; Maria Torres-Demas, Westminster College of Salt Lake City; Chris Mayfield, James Madison University; Helen Hu, Westminster College of Salt Lake City
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)
and in non-POGIL classes was even greater (87% vs 46%). This patternstayed relatively constant across instructors and the three sets of observations and reflectsPOGIL principles, which might be an indicant to construct validity.These preliminary findings were reflected in the student ratings. While ratings of the difficultyand length of POGIL and non-POGIL classes were similar (3.8 vs 4.0 on a scale of 1 “too easy”to 7 “too hard”; 4.0 vs 4.1 on a scale of 1 “too long” to 7 “too short”), students were much moreapt to rate the POGIL classes as more collaborative (5.8 vs 4.9), another POGIL principle. Againthere weren’t major differences across the three sets of observations. While there were expecteddifferences by instructor, there were minimal
Conference Session
Entrepreneurship and Inventive Thinking & Student Beliefs
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ying Wang, Georgia Institute of Technology; Joy Harris; Karthik Ramachandran, Georgia Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)
which one’s self-efficacy belief is related to a specific situation or context.According to Bandura (1997), one’s self-efficacy is more accurately perceived when the contextis more specific. Accordingly, we adapted and created the ESE-E to reflect these threedimensions. In terms of the dimension of magnitude, the ESE-E scales included items that measuredentrepreneurial-related skills and activities at various difficulties, such as product ideation,business planning, and customer discovery. Furthermore, in terms of the dimension of generality,we adapted the items and created additional items based on the specific content topics taught inan entrepreneurship education course. In addition, in terms of the dimension of strength, eachESE-E
Conference Session
Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE) Technical Session 12: Resource Exchange
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Lucy Brizzolara; Elizabeth Ann McNeela; Thomas Tran; Holly M. Golecki, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign
Tagged Divisions
Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)
we draw inspiration from?or could not successfully leverage previously. • What can we do to personalize our actuator? • What are some steps we should take to test our brainstormed improvements?Materials needed• Bio-inspiration Worksheet (QR code)• Student actuators• Bio-Inspiration PresentationBefore• Gather photos/videos of animals and plants with useful features (ex: Giraffe tongue, crab claws, bird talons, webbed frog feet, elephant trunk)During• Display and discuss interesting features of plants and animals and how they allow for more mobility, grabbing, and strength.• Encourage students to reflect on the last
Conference Session
Computer Science Education and AI research
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Na Zhao, Nanyang Technological University; Ibrahim H. Yeter, Nanyang Technological University; Cristina Diordieva, Nanyang Technological University
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)
essential for developing an agile and adaptable mind in the 21st century, wheretechnology is ubiquitous. The importance of CT is reflected in the growing interest in exploringits potential role in various fields, including engineering. While CT in engineering education hasbeen discussed in previous research, there needs to be more understanding of how CT may differin the context of different engineering disciplines. Rich qualitative research on how studentsengage in CT and engineering can show how they can support each other [5]. Research has beenconducted to investigate the implementation of CT in middle school education internationally.The studies emphasize the importance of CT in interdisciplinary education to foster students'critical thinking
Collection
2022 Spring ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Conference
Authors
Paul J Marchese, City University of New York, Queensborough Community College; Deborah Hecht, Center for Advanced Studyin Education
asked to reflect on potential lessons learned from thesesome form of disability (Okoro, 2018). The National Center the impact the pandemic had on their education, as well as their education. On average students with disabilities felt experiencesfor Education Statistics reports that 19.4% of undergraduate how responsive their instructors were to their needs as a that the pandemic had affected their education more thanstudents have a disability, yet they make up only 15% of
Collection
2022 Spring ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Conference
Authors
Alexander John De Rosa, Stevens Institute of Technology (School of Engineering and Science); Frank T Fisher, Stevens Institute of Technology (School of Engineering and Science); Ashley Lytle
Tagged Topics
Diversity
that should be fostered in students if they are to meetthese criteria [4], [5].The term “expertise” is often used to define a person with the deep content knowledge necessaryto operate effectively in a given field [6]. Experts typically have: (1) knowledge that is greaterthan memorized facts or operations related to the field; (2) an ability to notice important patternsand features that is obscure to novices; (3) an organized knowledge structure reflecting their deepunderstanding, and (4) the ability to quickly and accurately retrieve their knowledge with lowcognitive effort. It is understood, however, that experts in the same discipline may exhibit thesecharacteristics to different degrees or differ in the manner in which they are able to
Collection
2022 Spring ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Conference
Authors
Sarah E Zappe, Pennsylvania State University; Stephanie Cutler, Pennsylvania State University
materials 4. Application: Beginning to plan to flip your course a. Participants will consider one unit of their course b. Write objectives for that unit c. What activities will be ideal for doing in-class? d. What activities will be ideal for doing as homework? e. Participants will make their plan and then share in small break-out groups 5. Challenges of classroom flip and potential solutions 6. Question and answer time 7. Reflection: What will you take away from this workshop to use in your class?The workshop will be facilitated by Drs. Sarah Zappe and Stephanie Cutler from Penn State, bothof whom have led multiple previous workshops on classroom flip at various institutions
Collection
ASEE-NE 2022
Authors
Yiannis A. Levendis, Northeastern University
Source of Learning and Development, David A. Kolb states that “learning isthe process whereby knowledge is created through the transformation of experience” [11]. Heproposed an Experiential Learning Cycle (ELC) consisting of the following four processes: (i)active experimentation (planning and trying out what is learned); (ii) concrete experience (doingand having the experience); (iii) reflective observation (reviewing and reflecting on theexperience); (iv) abstract conceptualization (concluding and learning from the experience).Abdulwahed and Nagy applied this cycle directly to learning in a laboratory setting [12]. Theytested the effectiveness of the ELC by adding various elements to their educational laboratorythat corresponded with each
Collection
ASEE-NE 2022
Authors
Sarira Motaref P.E., University of Connecticut
strongly agreed with thisquestion. Students expressed that participating in strengths-based projects enabled them tocontribute something towards the classroom, as well as apply academic principles to real-lifesituations. Knowing that their projects will be used in future courses for demonstration purposesmake them feel even more important and enhance their feeling of belonging within theengineering field. Students reflected in their feedback that they were more creative with theirideas because they could choose projects which were aligned with their interests. One of thestudents mentioned“I think the SBP projects made me think deeper about the concepts we learned in class andapplying them to real life principles. It also made me more interested in
Collection
ASEE-NE 2022
Authors
Brian M Golliher, US Coast Guard Academy; Luke Henry Monaco, U.S. Coast Guard Academy; David Mazurek P.E., US Coast Guard Academy
these same loads, Table I shows theresults of the structural analysis for the members of panels 8 and 9; also included are the memberforces as documented by the original designers. As this table reflects, the outcome of the presentanalysis agrees rather closely with that of the bridge’s designers, with deviations well under 5%. Table I. Member Forces Due to O&W Specification Loads. Orig. Design Present Analysis Deviation Member (kips) (kips) (%) U7-U8 172.9 (comp.) 174.8 (comp.) +1.10
Conference Session
Technical Session M5C
Collection
2022 First-Year Engineering Experience
Authors
Surupa Shaw, Texas A&M University
Tagged Topics
Full Papers
] outlined the essential requirement of the application-based projects in complex tasksand learnings, as it requires scaffolding to help students engage in sense-making, managing their investigation& problem-solving processes, and encouraging them to articulate their thinking, while reflecting on theirlearning. However, a completely different perspective in terms of fighting social stigmatization amongstudents, using application-based projects was presented by K. Koutrouba et al. [6]. They held the application-based projects responsible for the successful acquisition of skills such as persistence, willingness,cooperativeness, creativity and self-starters, while the student’s personal experiences, traits, needs, interestsand objectives were
Conference Session
Industrial Engineering Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Dimantha Kottawa Gamage, Montana State University - Bozeman; Durward Sobek, Montana State University - Bozeman
% Level III Complete achievement of Learning Objective Score >=75%Students of cohorts B and C reflected upon their experience and gave feedback using a criticalincident questionnaire (CIQ) administered through the online learning management system at theend of each case study. The CIQ is an effective qualitative tool to assess student critical thinkingduring the process of learning and reflect on these findings as a source of professionaldevelopment [8]. Each CIQ consisted of five open-ended, qualitative questions. These questionsprompted students to reflect on a “critical event” that occurred, i.e., the case study. The CIQresponses were useful for understanding challenges students faced and the benefits they accruedduring the
Conference Session
Pre-College Engineering Education Division Poster Session
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ibrahim H. Yeter, Nanyang Technological University; Jeffrey Radloff; Cristina Diordieva, Nanyang Technological University
www.slayte.com Exploring the Presence of Engineering Indices in the Singaporean High School Physics Standards: A Content Analysis (work-in-progress) Abstract Singapore is one of the leading countries globally in industry indicators, ranking secondin the 2018 World Economic Forum’s Readiness for the Future of Production Report and firstout of 120 nations in the 2017 Danish Institute of Industry Global Industry 4.0 Readiness Index.This reflects Singapore’s robust and diversified industrial capacity, as well as its leadership insectors such as avionics, computing, biological engineering, and microelectronics. Underlyingthis global competitiveness is the Singaporean education system, which hinges on fosteringstudents’ engineering
Collection
ASEE Zone 1 Conference - Spring 2023
Authors
Mohammad-Reza Tofighi, Pennsylvania State University, Harrisburg
titled High Frequency Circuit Design (EET 402). It isoften offered along with a companion course Communication System Design (EET 408). EET402 provides students with concepts/specifications/terminology specific to RF/Microwave (highfrequency). They also learn the operation of related test equipment and computer aided design(CAD) tools/approaches. A non-exhaustive list of RF/microwave concepts/terminology/topicsincludes transmission lines, reflection coefficient, standing wave, impedance matching, SmithChart, insertion loss, return loss, coupling, scattering (S) parameters, path loss (antenna),microstrip, etc. In a typical EET or EE program, circuits and electronics courses are limited tolow frequency (Hz to low MHz), where students would see
Collection
ASEE Zone 1 Conference - Spring 2023
Authors
Elizabeth Marie Starkey, Pennsylvania State University; Sarah C Ritter, Pennsylvania State University; Jessica Dolores Menold, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Jacquelyn Huff, Pennsylvania State University
parts in CAD, instructors make connections between the dimensions needed tobuild the part in the shop and the dimensions needed to fully define their parts in CAD. Aftercreating the parts in CAD, they then create digital dimensioned multiview drawings to be usedduring the shop build. After building the parts from wood in the shop, students then complete a3D printing activity using CAD to design a 3D printed component that must attach to theirwooden character without the use of any adhesives, emphasizing the importance of propertolerancing. Using both the wood shop and 3D printing for this activity is intended to showFigure 1: outline of two-week maker project activitiesstudents the value of CAD for different manufacturing methods – reflecting
Conference Session
Military and Veterans Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Robert Rabb, The Citadel; Ronald Welch, The Citadel; Alyson Eggleston, The Citadel
instruction (pre-COVID) as the baseline (100% effective). None of the studentssurveyed specified what ‘Other’ instructional delivery they experienced, and very few answeredthis question. Only five students used a percentage over 100%, and these five data points wereacross all the instructional modalities, so no single delivery method was biased with ratings over100%. Active Duty and veterans did not quantify this mode. Additional survey questions focusedon four areas concerning the SWIVL-Hyflex instruction: initial reflection, distractors, reducingdistractions, and recording availability. A standard 5-point Likert scale was used to assess theirlevel of disagreement (1) to agreement (5). Active duty and veteran (ADV) students tended toagree with the
Conference Session
Civil Engineering Division - Integration of Engineering and/or Technical Rigor with Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Justice (DEIJ)
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Shinae Jang, University of Connecticut
posture and actions whilemuted. The lecture was roughly structured with an active recitation (15-25 minutes) and activeproblem solving (60-70 minutes). Frequent stretch breaks and screen breaks are used about every10 - 15 minutes throughout the class – based on the course flow, and a one-time 3-minutetransition break was used between concept recitation and problem solving during onlinemeetings. In addition to this, students had opportunities to reflect on their efforts andperformance in class using self-reflection surveys (after two midterm exams). Smaller studenttutor sessions were provided for under-performing students based on their choices. Table 1. UD Principles and Implementation in the Statics course [14] UD Principles
Conference Session
DEED Technical Session 8 - Design Methodologies
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Robert Simon, Georgia Institute of Technology; Lauren Stewart, Georgia Institute of Technology; Wayne Li, Georgia Institute of Technology; Larissa Simoes Novelino, Georgia Institute of Technology
desire for increased focus on origami, while another four students suggestedimproved organization. The latter was understood by course instructors, and given it was thefirst time teaching the new approach, expected. In one instance, a lecture had to be completed inthe following session, resulting in an extension of one homework deadline. This was largely dueto the team formation activity running a few minutes over the budgeted time.Teaching Assistant FeedbackThe authors acknowledge their initial curiosity on how three disparate thrusts would marrytogether and were inspired by Daniello & Acquaviva’s [13] work on faculty-teaching assistantpartnerships in reflecting on courses delivered in a teaching education program. In their work,Daniello
Conference Session
Faculty Development Division Technical Session 8
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Malini Natarajarathinam, Texas A&M University; Michael Johnson, Texas A&M University; Lance White, Texas A&M University; Sara Amani, Texas A&M University; Samantha Ray, Texas A&M University; Larry Powell, Texas A&M University; Tracy Hammond, Texas A&M University; Shawna Thomas, Texas A&M University; Robert Lightfoot, Texas A&M University; Rachelle Pedersen, Texas A&M University; John Moore, Texas A&M University
million in research funding from NSF, DARPA, Google, Microsoft, etc. Hammond mentored 17 UG theses, 29 M.S. theses, and 9 Ph.D. dissertations. Hammond is an ACM Distinguished Member, has received numerous best paper awards, and is the recipient of the 2022 TAMU Distinguished Achievement Award for Teaching, the 2021 ASEE Chester F. Carlson Award, the 2020 TEES Faculty Fellows Award, and the 2011 Charles H. Barclay, Jr. '45 Faculty Fellow Award. Hammond has been featured on the Discovery Channel and other news sources. Hammond is dedicated to diversity and equity, reflected in her publications, research, teaching, service, and mentoring. She has also been recently appointed as the Speaker-Elect of the Faculty Senate
Conference Session
Civil Engineering Division - The New Normal: Enduring Technology Improvements in the Classroom
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Alyson Eggleston, The Citadel; Robert Rabb, The Citadel; Ronald Welch, The Citadel
face & Remote Civil 3.024 3.169 +0.145 3.019 3.113 +0.094 Electrical 2.891 3.071 +0.180 2.720 2.961 +0.241 Mechanical 3.113 3.086 - 0.027 3.091 3.190 +0.099In a subsequent Likert-scaled survey of faculty, many faculty members rated specific features ofthe Swivl offering comparatively low (overall average, 3.6), which likely reflects frustrationswith the documented increase in classroom management needs, time investment, and fluencywith technology to successfully run a Swivl classroom [1]. This initial investment is well knownin the literature, and many faculty across institutions respond similarly to initial
Conference Session
Disability, Neurodivergence, and Sense of Belonging in STEM: Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division Technical Session 5
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Joseph Holles, University of Wyoming
. Options include establishing (if not already existing) anoffice of some combination of Inclusion, Diversity, Community Engagement, Equity,Accessibility etc. This office often comes with a Vice President, Dean, or Chief X Officer typeof title.[3] Another approach (separate or under the above office) is developing committees toaddress these issues, perhaps under an “Inclusive Physical and Virtual Campus” initiative.[4] AtColorado State University for example, their initiative includes: • Universal Design and Physical Accessibility (sidewalk ramps, curb cuts, etc.) • All Gender Restrooms (including ADA, changing tables, etc.) • Electronic and Information Technology (digital content accessibility) • Lactation Rooms • Reflection
Conference Session
Understanding Inclusivity and Equity in STEM Contexts: Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division Technical Session 7
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Grenmarie Agresar, University of Michigan; John Callewaert, University of Michigan; Steve Skerlos, University of Michigan; Joanna Millunchick, University of Michigan
-centered teaching framework in engineering. These featuresinclude: ● Encouraging reflexivity: continuous and critical reflection about the broader social consequences of one’s practice. This requires the ability to become increasingly aware of biases, and to be willing to investigate the ways internal perspectives inform our interactions, relationships and behaviors [27] [28]. ● Critically analyzing past educational injustice[7]. ● Dismantling assumptions that STEM is an apolitical, unbiased meritocracy[1]. ● Recognizing intersectionality, or the fact that individuals may hold multiple identities simultaneously, and how that plays into educational success[8]. ● Learning about multicultural group dynamics
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Cory Brozina, Youngstown State University - Rayen School of Engineering
and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References[1] Bok, D. (2015). Higher education in America. Princeton University Press.[2] National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2014). Profile of undergraduate students:2011-12. Washington, DC.[3] Newbold, J.J., Mehta, S.S., & Forbes, P. (2011). Commuter students: Involvement andidentification with an institution of higher education. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal,15(2), 141-153.[4] Gefen, D.R., & Fish, M.C. (2013). Adjustments to college in nonresidential first-year students:The role of stress, family, and coping. Journal of the First-Year Experience and Students inTransition, 25(2), 95-115. [5] Krause, K.L. (2007). Social involvement
Conference Session
Faculty Development Division Technical Session 9
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Grace Panther, University of Nebraska - Lincoln; Heidi Diefes-Dux, University of Nebraska - Lincoln; Lucy Atkinson, Swarthmore College
College of Engineering at UNL. Her research focuses on the development, implementation, and assessment of modeling and design activities with authentic engineering contexts. She also focuses on the implementation of learning objective-based grading and reflection. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Behavioral Adaptability of Engineering Instructors Engaging in Emergency Remote Teaching During Three Semesters of the COVID-19 PandemicAbstractThe crisis-induced changes in instruction during the pandemic presented a unique opportunity tostudy instructor adaptability, a possible contributor
Conference Session
Civil Engineering Division - The New Normal: Enduring Technology Improvements in the Classroom
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Reza Abolhelm, University of Waterloo; Trevor Hrynyk; Rania Al-Hammoud, University of Waterloo
the bridge construction and testing stages, students must demonstrate communication skills asthey work together to build a scaled bridge model. After testing, students are asked to reflect ontheir designs and identify areas of improvement. Historically, all stages of the project werecompleted by in-person student teams, working in a design shop.In 2020, obstacles arose due to the COVID-19 pandemic, which made gathering students for in-person events impossible. As a result, an online version of the CivE Design Days was developedwith the primary goal being to achieve the same learning objectives in the online environment. In2021, subsequent changes were made and a hybrid version of the design project was introduced,with in-person and remote
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jinghua Zhang, Winston-Salem State University; Jinsheng Xu, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University (CoE); Xiaohong Yuan, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University (CoE)
opinions,findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of theauthor(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of NSF.References[1] J. Zhang, X. Yuan, J. Johnson, J. Xu, M. Vanamala (2020), “Developing and Assessing a Web-Based Interactive Visualization Tool to Teach Buffer Overflow Concepts”, Proceedings of IEEE Frontier in Education Conference (FIE'20), Virtual Event, Uppsala, Sweden, October 21-24, 2020.[2] P. Weanquoi, J. Zhang, X. Yuan, J. Xu, and E. J. Jones (2021), “Learn Access Control Concepts in a Game”, Proceedings of IEEE Frontier in Education Conference (FIE'21), Lincoln, NE, October 13-16, 2021.