for diversity,going the extra mile in and outside of class to assist with learning [8], [24], [25], [27], [37].Other student support was evidenced in the form of transfer fairs [25], campus visits, careercenter access, computer support, daycare, writing tutors, academic success workshops, and post-transfer information sessions [24]. It was also noted that often transfer support comes most in thepre-transfer phase but that student support should be provided across three points: pre-transfer,pre-enrollment, and first term post-transfer [6]. Similarly related to student support isengagement. Ways to improve student engagement to increase transfer student capital includedengaging with peers, role models, and peer mentors [6], [46]; developing
that enable them to work together [20]. By providing a groupenvironment, shared objective, and opportunity to work through unforeseen challenges,out-of-class activities offer conditions under which engineering students can develop as leaders.As an example, one recent study found design competition teams contributed to engineeringstudents leadership identity development through peer coaching, task management, anddecision-making [21]. Biomedical engineering students in a co-curricular design experience alsoreported the value of the out-of-class activities in providing exposure to leadership skills andpositions [22]. The present study contributes to the growing conversation around leadershipdevelopment in engineering education through student
Department of Education (NYCDOE) in partnership with the Department of Labor (DOL) on the Youth CareerConnect Mentoring Initiative (YCC).Chelsea Bouldin, I am a Black woman PhD fellow who delights in co-creating worlds that embrace expansive processes of being. ”How do us Black women, girls, and femmes know ourselves?” is my most persistent query. Flavorful food, Black sci-fi books, bound-less writing, impromptu exploration, and laughing endlessly fill my dreamiest days. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Inclusive Innovation: Reframing STEM Research in COVID-19 Over the past several years, there has been a consistent increase in the number of scienceand engineering (S
out how to operationalize them in theirclassrooms. Research has shown that faculty interested in pedagogical transformation areoften overwhelmed by the many tools, frameworks, and theories available [13]. One of theobjectives of this paper is to remove this burden on faculty and instructors by providing themwith an organized checklist of inclusive teaching practices stemming from variedframeworks, along with some easy-to-use resources, strategies, and examples, all in a singleresource. Further, our inclusive course design checklist is organized around the variouscomponents of teaching (e.g., writing the syllabus, selecting/training TAs, etc.) so it is (wehope) more pragmatic, accessible, and implementation-ready to educators, all the
facilitate large [7] discussion (4 min.), report out to large group report out. group (5 min.). Each student provides peer feedback An online survey tool (e.g., Google Peer on at least two other team Forms) is used to collect peer [9] feedback presentations. feedback.Beyond modifying existing course activities, the teaching team introduced new course activitiesspecific to the remote environment. Some activities were introduced to provide the sense ofcommunity and camaraderie that is cultivated in the class but often limited in remote settings.For
Virginia Tech university library portalpowered by Discovery Search using the keywords: “evidence-based”, AND instructionalpractices, AND “engineering OR physics OR sciences” AND “electrical OR circuits”, ANDundergraduate. The use of boolean operators in the keywords was based upon the steps inundertaking a literature review by Cronin et al. [16]. Google Scholar was also used to comparethe search results using the keywords set with Discovery Search and the search results turned outto be comparable. However, refining the search via Google Scholar was difficult, for instance,when showing the peer-reviewed articles only. So, to capture the most related and recent works,Discovery Advanced Search filter was used to refine the search based on
Grade Percentile mean of the completeobservations dataset was 56.2, indicating that participants with higher than average grades weremore likely to complete both the pre-and-post course surveys.Mechanics Self-Efficacy – This self-efficacy scale has been used in previous research 31 tomeasure student confidence in a range of mechanics-related activities. Items include draw afree-body diagram, write the equations of equilibrium for a system, carry out the problem-solving process to analyze a system and overall, the skill and knowledge needed to complete allof the above tasks. These items had a high Cronbach alpha (α = 0.90) so they were averaged intoa combined score creating a variable called Mechanics Self-Efficacy.Empathy – This measure is
mentors and the overall scope of theorganization. Existing models of mentorship do not adequately describe the specific relationshipbetween the college and high schools students: (1) Due to the proximity in both age andexperience, the college students cannot be considered more experienced (traditional model ofmentorship) and (2) Due to the fact that both student populations are in different educationalsystems, the college students cannot be considered peer mentors. To help understand thisalternative mentoring relationship, this study was guided by two research questions:1) Whatmotivates PFP participants to become mentors to high school students? 2) What do theseundergraduate students learn by mentoring high school students? A survey of
morereasonable values. One fellow, apparently begrudging the decision to allow students to work in Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2001, American Society for Engineering Education Page 6.266.5his area of expertise, briefly refused to talk with the boys. Often, the most reliable data camefrom operators - a valuable lesson learned well and early.Interdependent learning requires that knowledge and attitudes be viewed in context andrecognition of the need to obtain information from a wide variety of sources (often non-technical) including peer groups1. The
another group of through breakout rooms. presentations until all teams have presented to every team. Self-reflection to a prompt (1 min.), Breakout rooms for each grouping paired discussion (2 min.), group 1-2-4-all and PollEv to help facilitate large [7] discussion (4 min.), report out to large group report out. group (5 min.). Each student provides peer feedback An online survey tool (e.g., Google
Paper ID #43129Design Iterations as Material Culture Artifacts: A Qualitative Methodologyfor Design Education ResearchDr. Grant Fore, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis Grant A. Fore, Ph.D. is the Assistant Director of Research and Evaluation in the STEM Education Innovation and Research Institute at IUPUI. As a trained anthropologist, he possesses expertise in qualitative methods and ethnographic writing. His primary research interest is in the teaching and learning of ethics in higher education through community-engaged and place-based pedagogies. ©American Society for
Engineering course combined project-based learning with variousfeedback methods, including feedback from instructors, outside experts, peer students, projecttools and artifacts, and self-assessment. The findings confirmed that incorporating feedbackwithin project-based learning effectively motivated students to complete their projects within theexpected timeframe.ChatGPT is becoming a crucial tool in education, offering a new way to enhance learning. Itassists students in improving their writing skills by providing feedback and suggestions forimprovement. Although not yet widely used in Project-Based Learning (PBL) 19,20 , ChatGPT canbe integrated into project-based learning, enhancing interactive and personalized learningexperiences. Additionally
% of all assistant engineering professors, which pales incomparison to even the tiny amount of Latine/Hispanic student representation in the field. Thereis a dire need to create parity in who is taught and who is teaching. Previous research (Bañuelos& Flores, 2020) supports the benefits of creating this parity and the current disparity's negativeeffects. While we are wary of relying on panethnic labels, as our population of TFF spans arange of identities, backgrounds, and immigration statuses, we do use the terms Latine andHispanic (not interchangeably). However, we write, analyze, and theorize with the understandingthat identities are not monolithic; rather, they are intersectional and complex. We create a dialogwith our research
shared thestudy with their own professional networks and peers. The initial inclusion criteria forparticipants to be interviewed were as follows: (1) they had to identify as Black, and (2) be agraduate student currently enrolled in a doctoral program in engineering at a predominatelywhite institution in the United States, and (3) have engaged in either NSBE and/or BGLOs as anundergraduate student. A total of 37 interviews were collected from Black graduate students across the nation.Interviews were initiated with a prompt asking participants to share their experiences navigatingengineering through undergraduate and graduate school. Participants were encouraged to reflecton how perceived facets of their identity and engagement with
Laboratories, where he led teams in reviews of projects and taught courses in design and creativity to newly forming teams. At NCR Corporation he was a manager and consulting analyst in software development projects. He has a PhD in Computer Science and Engineering from Wright State University, Dayton, OH and has attended HBDI workshops.Monika Lumsdaine, E&M Lumsdaine Solar Consultants, Inc. Monika Lumsdaine is management consultant for corporate behavior, with a B.S. degree in mathematics. She won a national design award for the design of a passive solar home from DOE/HUD. She has extensive technical writing experience in solar energy, product quality, and engineering design, including co
level ofpersonal and social development may exist because engineering students believe that the narrowfocus of engineering education on technical content has limited their opportunities for broaderpersonal development4. Other studies have provided evidence to support this contention.Smith and associates agreed that all engineering students throughout their undergraduateeducation require professional skill development in terms of talking through and listening toideas with peers, knowing how to build trust in a working relationship, and leadership of groupefforts5. Felder and Brent studied differences in terms of learning style, approaches to learning,and intellectual development throughout the entire college experience beyond academics
Colorado Conference; SUNY Online Learning Summit (SOL) (DOODLE;, Teaching and Learning with Technology Conference (TLT), and the Conference on Instructional Technologies. All of these presentations focused upon the various topics that support my mission for student success and efficient class management. SUNY has recognized me as an Open SUNY Fellow Expert Online Instructional Designer. In addition, I am a member of the MERLOT Teacher Education Editorial Board as well as a MERLOT Peer Reviewer Extraordinaire several years running. And as a certified Quality Matters Master Reviewer and peer reviewer in general, I have reviewed hundreds of online and blended course using various checklists including the OSCQR.Erin
of research.17In the next section, each author was asked to share the story of their experience with SOI in theirown words, with the aim of providing readers an opportunity to “‘experience’ a set of key ideaswhile also coming ‘into contact with...different languages, modes of communication, and forms ofinquiry”17 (p.51). The authors were provided with guidance for the structure of these accounts,specifically (1) authors should aim to write approximately 1500 words or less about their case, (2)accounts should be written in first person, (3) accounts should include a brief history of the projectand a basic description to provide readers with context, and (4) accounts should close with a briefdiscussion highlighting what the author found
, especially, the importance of communication and planning with my peers. The collaborationand participation among my group had to be structured, planned, and dynamic when we researched aboutbio-inspired professional reports. I learned the importance of proactive planning ahead of deadlines andconsistently communicating what my progress was on my research.”“Another skilled learned was teamwork. Teamwork in the project was needed to collaborate all of onesideas to make the best possible outcome. Overall this class taught us all the skills needed to perform bestas an engineer in the field.”“It helped me engage in critical thinking and learn more about how to effectively write summaries afterreading various articles. My approach to problems have changed
Technology I conduct research in diverse areas of engineering education from professional skills, to writing, to gender and ethics. I also maintain a structures laboratory to conduct full-scale structural component testing and field investigations of highway bridges.David A Saftner (Associate Professor) Dr. David Saftner is an Associate Professor in the Department of Civil Engineering. He earned a BS from the United States Military Academy and an MS and PhD from the University of Michigan. Prior to pursuing a career in academics, Dr. Saftner spent five years as an engineer officer in the US Army and serving in Missouri, Colorado, Kuwait, and Iraq. His areas of research include beneficial reuse of waste soil material
ledger’s cryptographic hashing of the received data. Withsufficient cloud resources, the availability of the data can increase as more nodes can store thedata with its integrity assured. Confidentiality shall be maintained by using a private blockchain.The team selected and used the Ethereum General Purpose Blockchain [11]. For the edgeserver, the team implemented a client to write GPS telemetry received from the GCS to theblockchain, to retrieve data on the blockchain, or to append to current blockchain files. Theedge server writes the blockchain recorded data elements to the cloud via Web3J [12] and JSP[13] to an AWS cloud instance running Lambda [14]. The team successfully demonstrated thearchitecture transmitting UAS telemetry from a simulated
. • Write on 8.5 in. 11 in., gridded engineering paper. • Use a straight edge, compass, and/or protractor to draw figures. • Consider acquiring engineering tools: https://rb.gy/xm4eqp• Presentation • Include no more than one problem per page. • Number pages per problem if more than one page is needed. • Write on only one side of each sheet. • Each problem should have a neatly drawn figure(s). • Figures should be large enough to be easily read. • Variables should appear on figures. • Variables should be described using words and symbols. • Write legibly, in clear, easy-to-read print. • Completely erase any extraneous material. • No crossed-out material should appear on the solutions
their individual course redesign efforts. It alsofunctioned as a platform for the participants to share their findings, outcomes, andrecommendations with their peers, with the goal of improving the teaching and learningexperience across the institution in a variety of ways. This learning community was instrumentalin leading to the development of the climate change learning module in CCE 1100.In Fall 2022, the instructor of CCE 1100 added the climate change module into the course. Themodule includes two lectures and the associated readings and homework assignments. The firstlecture mainly covers climate science and literacy, and the second lecture covers the relatedASCE policy statements on climate change, and civil engineers’ role in climate
engineering research) from start to finish, pushing them out of their comfort zones whilelearning new professional skills and knowledge. When asked to reflect upon their summer researchexperience, students fondly described their experience. Their eyes opened up to the many diversebackgrounds of their peers and professionals. During the outreach project, many students feltuncomfortable interacting with strangers and networking. However, participating in this outreachproject served to encourage many students to continue pursuing their chosen career path. Thispaper describes the outreach project and its impact on REU students in more detail.The purposes of the paper are as follows:1. To provide detailed information on the integration of the outreach
branding strategy can achieve to promote thegrowth of the business.IP is considered an ‘asset’ of the organization and can have real value. The form of that valuevaries from the type of IP and the increase in freedom to operate that it affords. For patents,particularly in technology-driven companies, patents represent legitimacy to prospectiveinvestors. Like peer-reviewed papers, issued patents present to the world that an idea, indeeddoes have merit according to a separate panel of experts that do not have a vested interest in thecompany. This translates to many investors as a due diligence checkmark toward investability.Similarly, crowdfunding platforms that invest in consumer product-based companies may havean easier time raising capital than
between Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) to deliver outcomes that integrate sustainability in their results. In addition, the SSC builds community by holding social events, such as potlucks, incubation expos, and workshops. Collaborating with a peer, he assisted the school in achieving AASHE Gold by leveraging the SSC’s network to draft and disburse the Sus- tainability Literacy Assessment (SLA). He aspires to give instructors and students a deeper meaning of sustainable development: by using the principles of sustainability management, e.g. lifecycle assessment (LCA), the 3-P paradigm.Mr. Viraj Vasudev Rokade, Stevens Institute of Technology American c Society
across a wide range of disciplines including two representatives from engineering (onebeing the author of this paper), and one from each of the following disciplines:anthropology/sociology, architecture/art, communication, creative writing, history, and legalwriting.3. Challenges to Modifying the Existing Engineering CurriculumPreliminary DIF meetings brought to light an important issue with regard to achieving the DIFprogram’s purpose of “social justice and inclusion in the classroom.” Specifically, it becameapparent during early discussions that the civil engineering representatives believed there wasconsiderably less room to adjust curriculum and teaching methods to include issues of diversityin the classroom and to teach in a manner that was
, even if those needs do not appear todirectly relate to the library.In 2018, UB was one of fourteen U.S. academic institutions that participated in the Ithaka S+R-led multi-site research study investigating the teaching practices of faculty providingundergraduate level instruction in business. The author was the sole researcher from UB andprovided de-identified interview transcripts to Ithaka S+R for their self-published report,“Teaching Business: Looking at the Support Needs of Instructors [3].” Findings specific to UBwere provided in the non-peer-reviewed report, “Examining the Undergraduate TeachingPractices of Faculty in the School of Management,” and made available on the UB institutionalrepository (UBIR).The study of UB business school
morecourse specific. One use of technology was an online collaboration assessment. Students, insmall groups, were requested to use Google Docs, an online tool which allows students tointeractively respond to the evaluations. All students were able to view each other’s commentsand respond to the comments. Google Docs is familiar to many students and requires nosoftware purchase [13]. This study was successful with many students. Despite this successusing Google Docs, there remains questions of anonymity and the willingness of some studentsto share information when peers have visible access to their responses.Many studies [12] [14] recognize the importance of teaching center or facilitator intervention inthe mid-semester evaluative process. Diamond’s
to write, submit and present aconference paper for the annual Freshman Sustainability Conference held at the end of the springsemester. The paper is graded by a member of the university’s writing center and counts for20% of their course grade. To incorporate the same writing component in the freshman honorsservice learning course, we have each team submit a paper to the same conference. The servicelearning papers include a summary of the community organization and the project, a review of anaspect of technology involved with the project, and reflection on their experience with thespecific project as well as the concept of service learning. The paper evolves in components andis also graded by the writing center. The first component is an