, anonymoustransactions and as an efficient money-laundering tool. Cryptography and blockchain technology usedto produce building blocks of cryptocurrencies – a process called mining – to verify and addtransaction records to a write-only database of all previous transactions. As an incentive to add a newblock to the blockchain, the network compensates miners’ efforts with cryptocurrency, and a newlyadded block protected by cryptographic techniques to ensure the integrity of the record. To add ablock to the blockchain, miners have to solve a cryptographic puzzle, and a valid block will contain asolution to such puzzle with a hash of a previous block, hash of the transactions in the current blockand an address for the miner’s wallet on which the reward will be
mechanical engineering coursework. The app needs to besimple yet effective and useful to comprehend complex models. So, the prototype app was testedto verify the requirements proposed and was evaluated by anonymous participants (that includedgraduate students and some faculty from the university peer survey system). Section 2 presentsthe related works in the field of AR for education, section 3 presents the features of thedeveloped app, the framework of the software, and the evaluation results. Section 4 presents thefuture direction for the app and section 5 provides the conclusion.2 Related LiteratureThe current use of AR in education is mainly focused on teaching for younger students as itprovides active interaction and engagement and can lower
complex engineering problems, as well aspresentations and intensive technical writing. We conducted comparative surveys of teachers andstudents at a medium-sized liberal arts university in the Midwestern U.S. The results showed thatsolving real-life problems and teamwork skills are the strongest motivators for students. Thesefindings aligned with teachers’ perceptions of what motivated their students in this course.Furthermore, we found some interesting differences in some of the motivations based on gender,race, and student GPA. We hope our results inform more effective design in first-yearengineering design courses in liberal arts universities and further improve student retention andgraduation rates. We also intend to use this pilot study for
classrooms. By teaching both educators and students, theimpact of this program can reach a larger audience and potentially increase student interest inSTEM through these educators and peers if not the program itself. OK Go Sandbox also attemptsto increase student interest in STEM subjects, as well as provides resources for both educatorsand students, hoping that by supporting both, student learning will be as successful as possible.Survey LogisticsOK Go Sandbox has an email list of educators who have expressed interest in their content, andthis population of individuals was presented with a survey regarding their use and opinions ofOK Go Sandbox. 88 participants responded to this survey and the data collected indicates theeffectiveness of OK Go
shift in recruitment highlighted thetension between keeping the program open to students with unfulfilled academic potential andadmitting students with the requisite skills to graduate with a bachelor’s degree from UM. Therewas a particular concern that some incoming freshman had not proven themselves with college-level classes and needed to be placed into remedial courses. This need for remediation is notunusual at PGCC, where many highly motivated students may arrive from disadvantagededucational backgrounds.Thus, a Provisional Status was created for promising, but unproven recent high school graduateswho are unable to pass PGCC’s entrance exams in reading, writing, and/or mathematics1. AtPGCC, students failing any of these exams are required
career so that they willbe more likely to persevere in majors and careers in science.41 Some of these programs addadditional components such as enhanced emphasis on mentoring, development of career plansand actual graduate applications, dealing with time management and work-life balance issues,and identifying a supportive peer group. Such programs have been described by Purdy et al.42and by Crosby et al.43 While many of these programs are highly effective, they do not alwayshave stable funding. .B. MentoringAs noted by Purdy and Wasburn2, "a continuing concern for all graduate students is how to findsufficient mentoring and role models. This need is not limited to academic subjects. Much morethan undergraduate students, graduate students are
byfollowing up with appropriate feedback instruments, on a regular basis, such as mid-term andend of term peer and self-evaluations.The paper discusses key elements of teamwork and how they relate to engineering design projectteams. Then a spreadsheet tool and results of its use is presented. The tool requires each studentto evaluate himself/herself and his/her teams mates covering 15 teamwork skills. The tool hasbeen implemented over the last year and a half in the senior design project course andincorporates advanced spreadsheet features including hot-linked graphics, protected macros,student identification numbers, passwords, hidden rows and hidden sheets.IntroductionAs we participate on engineering design projects we learn to appreciate how
support services to increase the retention of first-year engineeringstudents 7, 9. In addition, particular high attrition rate of underrepresented groups in engineering,e.g., female and minorities demand the exploration of alternative support options in transition 10,11 . In the transition process of their first year at college of engineering, new engineering studentsare influenced by academic performance (GPA), social interactions with peers and faculties aswell as family, support programs, pre-college characteristics, innate personalities, and perceptiontoward engineering. 7, 10-15.The purpose of this study is to identify and understand the effects of support programs toacademic performance and retention in the first year. The study also
fall. Changes to theobjectives and outcomes are agreed to by consensus of the faculty. Changes are then reviewedby the industrial advisory committee at the next regularly scheduled meeting—the IAC typicallymeets once per academic year. Major changes are now reported to the administration afterreview typically via the Institutional Effectiveness Report and Program Review. Page 11.248.3 GSU Mission Annual Faculty Institutional Peer Review
to focus the attention ofthe ethnographer on topics of interest, shown in appendix A. To achieve this goal, one researcherwas assigned to collect data in all of the three core classes for a semester as a participantobserver. The researcher writing the literature review did not collect observational data, in orderto maintain a quality of cognitive distance between the theory and data collection (calledbracketing) that improves trustworthiness32. Once the class was informed of the observations, and consent was obtained fromstudents, the observer began attending classes, collecting observational data in the form of notestyped on a laptop and digital photographs. The observing researcher would also write reflectivememos after each
Paper ID #18680Learning Physics in the Millennial AgeDr. Teresa L. Larkin, American University Teresa L. Larkin is an Associate Professor of Physics Education and Director and Faculty Liaison to the Dual-degree engineering Program at American University. She received her Ph.D. in Curriculum and Instruction with emphasis in Physics and Science Education from Kansas State University. Dr. Larkin is involved with Physics Education Research (PER) and has published widely on topics related to the assess- ment of student learning in introductory physics and engineering courses. Noteworthy is her work with student writing as
part of the course, students formed groups to lead specific HODA forthe other students. The HODA are peer-to-peer interactions where the roles of specific studentschange between participant and leader throughout the semester. To lead the discovery activitiesin class, the student teams were instructed to follow the five steps shown in Figure 1. In addition,the students developed and agreed to a simple list of rules for participating in all the HODA; theprimary rule is to listen to the leaders and play the game. Each of the five steps is expanded inthe next sections of the paper. Assessment of student learning was primarily through the studentreflections presented in the student written feedback and student leader report
students still do not yet experience full access to information inpostsecondary education that is equal to that of their hearing peers. Many existing anddeveloping technologies have significant potential to serve as effective “access technologies” forDHH people.Access technologies refer to technologies or devices that can be utilized by DHH students toassist them in acquiring or sharing information, communicating, or otherwise participating ineducational opportunities, including classroom, online learning, and laboratory experiences, aswell as educational experiences taking place outside of the classroom. To address the uniquechallenges of utilizing or adapting new technologies for use in postsecondary educationalsettings, Rochester Institute of
summer internship position or taking summer courses to ensure their timelytransfer.The ASPIRES Summer Group Internship Program is a ten-week program for sophomorestudents who have no previous research experience and have at least one more year of courses tocomplete at Cañada College before transferring to a four-year university. In addition to allowingstudents to participate in the program as part-time interns, the group setting wherein studentswork with their peers and faculty they know will give students the supportive learningenvironment needed to succeed in their first internship experience. A collaborative learningenvironment has been shown to positively impact minority students—improving cognitivedevelopment2 and reducing students’ feeling
; fasten stringers to the skin 16. Weigh each completed panel for comparison to the predicted weight 17. Cut and mount loading caps on each panel for testing 18. Test each panel using a servo-hydraulic testing machine and record data 19. Compare measured data for various events (e.g., local buckling, failure) to the predicted values 20. Write and submit a group technical report following the specified format 21. Give an oral presentation of the project to the class Figure 5. Sequence of activities associated with the panel projectUltimately, the quantity and size of stringers for each concept that provides the optimum overallpanel design are identified. With the availability of this information, each team
, professional behavior) were successfullycoded and compared between groups of students19. In a different student fourth and fifth yearmedical students reflected on two interactive video cases and were assigned a reflection score bytheir peers based on a specially developed rubric20. Kember’s most recent rubric for determininglevels of reflection from student writing comes from nursing education5,7,21. Though reflective practice has been shown to be instrumental in promoting deeperunderstanding of educational material, and allows students to evaluate their mode of thinking andtheir actions, and is considered by some to be a necessary aspect of design, we are onlybeginning to study the relationship between engineering student’s learning and
funding participation from external sources. He has been directing/co-directing an NSF/Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU) Site on interdisciplinary water sciences and engineering at VT since 2007. This site has 95 alumni to date. He also leads an NSF/Research Experiences for Teachers (RET) site on interdisciplinary water research and have 10 alumni. He also leads an NSF-funded cybersecurity education project and serves as a co-PI on two International Research Experiences for Students (IRES) projects funded by the NSF. He has published over 90 papers in peer-reviewed journals and conferences. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 An Interdisciplinary RET Program
of stipend provided,comparing research topics at the different institutions and by the dates that they receive theiroffers on.All REU sites provide students with hands-on research opportunities with faculty mentorship [1].Most sites offer a variety of research training programs and technical seminars (e.g., [2]) andtraining in technical writing (e.g., [5]). Sites are also required to offer training in research ethics[1]. Many sites also provide training about how to select and apply to graduate school (e.g., [5]),for students who choose to pursue further education. However, even with all of these programs(some of which may be offered outside of normal work hours), the bulk of student time at REUsites is spent on research activities.2.2
materials based solution or answer relatedquestions. Students then summarized their professional interactions and findings in memo stylereports addressed to their respective instructors.The second assignment addressed the learning objective that students "demonstrate anunderstanding of laboratory techniques used in biomaterials and biomechanical engineering".This assignment asked groups of students at institute B to execute an experimental protocolrelated to materials tensile testing and then write up their findings in the style of an academicjournal article. Students at university A received these written reports and were instructed to usethem to generate a step by step protocol that they could use to replicate the original results. Thesestudents
students bring to the learning situation are recognized.Students are encouraged to share their initial ideas about the problems and to examine theseideas in light of new information and activities introduced by their peers, teacher, andexperiences. The pedagogical methods emphasized throughout the course include:Learning Cycle: EiE uses the five “E” learning cycle 23: In engagement, the students are drawn tothe challenge because it is interesting to them. The read-aloud stories that commence each unitare designed to capture students’ imaginations. Students share their ideas about the problemsraised in the story. In exploration, the students begin to explore related science and engineeringprinciples in brief activities. During this phase they
establishing project needs • Establishing, developing and writing design specifications • Developing design concepts • Testing the validity design concepts with physical and mathematical models • Feasibility: physical, economic and design team compatibility Page 8.189.4"Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Education" • Human factors • Intellectual Property (patents, copyrights, trademarks, service marks, etc.) • Engineering Design Methodologies • Project Planning
created important connections forstudents, encouraging development of meaningful relationships with faculty and peers. Inaddition, the program helped develop self-confidence in those students who were possiblystruggling with a fundamental obstacle of low self-esteem perhaps promoted by the lack of rolemodels in their families or lack of confidence in their academic abilities. Workshops and campustours prepared students for the rigors of university life by introducing them to campus resourcesthat offered support and encouraged success and that reinforced strategies to help students withstudy skills; critical reading skills, including annotation, summarization, and engagement withthe text; time management; money management focusing on obtaining
morphological changes to increase surface of an interface as well as using still higher fluence to induce shock waves for mechanical bonding. Steven has also been very interested in educational pedagogies since 1996 when he was the first person at UM to use clickers. He was also the first person at UM to reject clickers. Almost 20 years later, he has, once again, embraced clicker technology now that he has eliminated lectures and has time in class for peer instruction.Dr. Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan Page 24.469.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014
66 24 task. Completing the 0 0 0 0 96 4 lab write-ups.*Numbers represent the percent of students who selected the decision-maker for each activity on the post-survey N=68.Student data indicated that the majority of decisions pertaining to group work were made as acollaborative group. Only the overall content of the lab assignment, including what the finalproduct was and what was to be handed in to the instructor, was decided by the instructor. As agroup, the students assumed all decisions for activities (e.g., establishing goals for theirassignments, figuring out how to divide the tasks, documenting the progress
-baccalaureate preparation has drawn close attention. Women, racial/ethnicminorities, and low income students are well-represented in communitycolleges, but only a small number of these populations graduate withassociate’s degrees in engineering and engineering technologies. Researchhas shown that an interest in engineering as a career impacts persistence.Yet women and other underrepresented students are less likely than theirwhite male peers to have been socialized to do hands-on activities orencouraged to use toys, tools, or gadgets that might promote their interest inengineering. First generation and low income community college students areunderrepresented in engineering because they face barriers to entering andcompleting an engineering
, andproficiency in Greek and Latin . . .” [5]. Some institutions also used German and/or French forlanguage proficiency. Furthermore, the German institutions emphasized the research component whilethe English placed emphasis on teaching.By the end of the nineteenth century the prior requirements were strengthened and the thesis whichhad been adopted from the German practice embodied “ . . . the results of original research bearingthe written acceptance of the professor or department in charge.” [6]. In general, obtaining a Ph.D involves 20 or more increasingly specialized courses (may include master degree level courses), conducting research on a very narrow subject, and writing a dissertation that describes the research and its
ABET-TAC Accreditation in 2006. We spent much time inthe preceding years deciding on what direct measures of assessment we should do in whichcourses in the curriculum. After our process was set up, we wanted to do what Moskalrecommends, which is after an initial assessment process is set up, “greater attention can be paidto concerns of validity, trustworthiness, triangulation, and the completeness of the plan”6.In Borrego’s review of engineering research including such topics as assessment, it was foundthat the reliability and validity of the tests and homework assignments developed by programsare usually not established7. This is certainly the case for our EET program. We write all ourown tests, quizzes, etc., with no peer review, pre-test
the U.S. Senate committee of the Judiciary on security issues associated with peer-to-peer networking. Page 22.1379.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Teaching Computer Security Literacy to Students from Non- Computing DisciplinesAbstractGone are the days when cyber security education was only a concern for computer and Internetexperts. In today’s world of pervasive computing, everyone is a target. The volume,sophistication, and
offers frequent networkingopportunities among the teachers (peer support) and a regularly scheduled direct link touniversity program managers (programmatic support). Most instances of HSE function asafterschool programs, and teacher-coaches are paid for their coaching and mentorship just asthose who direct afterschool athletics. Students on HSE teams work on projects that are selected Page 22.539.2by the coach and team and that have local significance for the students and their community.These projects can continue from one academic year to the next. In the course of their HSEexperience, the students write business plans, solve real-world
featureis modeled after popular social networking sites so that students, educators, and industryprofessionals already familiar with social media applications can quickly learn how to usethis application. The goal of the my.careerme space is to provide a separate web area soteachers and manufacturing organizations can be comfortable about networking withstudents. The students and teachers control who, what, where, when, etc. communicationbetween their classmates, peers at other schools, or other professionally sponsored groupsfor example. Just like manufacturing companies need to stay up to date with the latesttechnologies that impact their products and processes, this new media networking areaprovides an opportunity for company mentors to get