Program (ETPP) which has been implemented at sixuniversities across the nation. The program is set up as a multipart workshop in whichparticipants will complete a draft teaching portfolio, draft teaching materials, and a teachingphilosophy. Other activities of the ETPP include a forum to discuss teaching issues as well as adeveloped peer network.6Previously mentioned graduate level programs have been formal course offerings or workshops,often with an audience that were self-selected and highly interested in higher education.7 This,however, is not the only scenario for graduate students interested in pursuing a professorship inSTEM fields. The opportunity for graduate students to develop teaching philosophy andpedagogy outside of coursework is
theacademy’s goal and mission. While pursuing a four-year college degree, the students thatattend the academy are also training to serve as officers in the United States Army andare therefore known as cadets. The complete student body is referred to as the Corps ofCadets and includes representation from every state in the nation as well as numerousforeign countries.West Point’s Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering offers an AccreditationBoard for Engineering and Technology (ABET) accredited degree in mechanicalengineering (ME). Cadets enrolled in ME must successfully complete a course of studyvery similar to that required by their peers at civilian institutions. Each year,approximately 75 cadets select mechanical engineering as a major. All
visuallyimpaired, but these techniques are still in-progress and there is no complete or commercial optionfor effective accessibility. Similarly, there is no defined standard for communication of equations,graphics and low-accessibility legacy charts and graphs. Thus, universities currently working withthe visually impaired must develop their own teaching techniques. USC’s AME department began the process of creating accessible content for laboratoryinstruction well in advance of the semester. The goal of this project was to implement accessiblesolutions in the laboratory, which would allow visually impaired students to conduct the same labsas their sighted peers and retain the unique and necessary education that comes from hands-onlearning.b
by not only my Black peers, but myself included. This led me topivot to pursuing Engineering Education for my PhD, in hopes that it would be a betterexperience and I could make a change in the field.Immediately coming into graduate school, I soon realized that graduate engineering educationcan be incredibly isolating as a Black woman and full of multifaceted challenges, which can be abarrier for students who want to make changes in higher education. In my first year, I wasinvolved in writing a white paper that led to the restructuring of my department’s Equity andInclusion committee, and served as a graduate representative for the subsequent year. Afterserving on the Equity and Inclusion committee, I became involved in other roles that
Computer Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. She received her B.Eng. and Ph.D in Computer Engineering and Informatics from the Polytechnic School, University of Patras, Greece. She has extensive experience on building data management and database solutions for large-scale systems in collaboration with industrial and governmental agencies, and academic partners. She has published her work in peer-reviewed international conferences and journals. Her current research interests include data management, data valuation and AI and engineering education. Her teaching/mentoring activities focus on developing and offering classes in project-based learning environments as well as, advising and
Academic Integrity ViolationsThe vast majority of actionable academic integrity reports can be grouped into two categories; (1)using a cell phone or smartwatch during an exam or (2) bringing course material into the lab eitherin the form of a cheat sheet or written on their body. However, we have also seen other studentbehaviors develop which have required us to institute new exam policies. Restrictions regardingwhen students could begin writing on their scratch paper is a good example of a policy changethat occurred in response to student behavior. Until recently, students were allowed to write ontheir scratch paper as soon as they were seated in the lab, a policy based on the assumption thatonce in the lab any information that was written on the
academia. On-the-jobinformation needs move at a more rapid pace and employers provide less specific guidance thanacademic instructors, making it difficult for new university graduates to solve informationproblems [1]. For engineering and technology students, workplace information use involves lessof the sources that are traditionally emphasized in academia (e.g., peer reviewed journal articles,books) and more of the resources heavily relied upon in industry, such as technical standards [2],[3], [4], [5]. Additionally, workplace projects require a high degree of interpersonal informationgathering and communication with colleagues [6], [7].Recent research from American Association of Colleges and Universities (AAC&U) indicatesthat employers view
interested in partnering with EngineeringMomentum to offer summer internships to both university students and early-stage communitycollege students interested in engineering.Engineering Momentum valued a collaboration with SPUR—benefitting from its expertise andtrack record of opening new pathways for qualified interns—which would allow communitycollege students to enter the program. Engineering Momentum placed 20 community collegestudents in 2023 through SPUR. Another 10 students interned at the University of ColoradoDenver, and five community college students interned at Lockheed Martin.Engineering Momentum research internships included mentoring from the professor, graduatestudents, and peer-to-peer collaboration between two- and four-year
of the student team and their communication materials is neat and professional. Style: The team focuses its communication on its intended audience and can maintain audience attention and interest. The presentation is clean, clear, and aesthetically pleasing. If it is a presentation, dress and attire is appropriate. Prescribed Length and Format: The team does not provide an over-abundance of information to the intended audience while addressing the most pressing concerns and interest of that audience. Technical documents will follow a prescribed and expected format.There are several taxonomies of “audience” in technical writing style manuals [6]. We have useda simplified definition of “a
, modeling and system design for cyber-physical systems and the Internet of Things. She has published in several peer-reviewed conferences and journals and has been a program committee member at several conferences. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Challenges and Experiences in Implementing a Specifications Grading System in an Upper Division Undergraduate Computer Networks CourseAbstractComputer Networks is an important course in most undergraduate curricula in computingdisciplines. The course learning objectives cover a broad range of topics and skills. The studentsare expected to acquire knowledge about the basic functionality of the layered
projects.Course Learning ObjectivesThe following are the course learning objectives as defined by the college for the capstone course: Form a formal project proposal, create a functional prototype to solve the given problem. Utilize a software scheduling package to plan and track the progress of a project. Weigh design alternatives for customer requirements, efficiency, reliability, and cost. Formulate and apply formal test procedures to the developed prototype. Analyze the data acquired during testing of the prototype. Present the prototype design orally to a specific audience. Write a technical report including conclusions and recommendations for further work.Course GoalsThis course emphasizes aspects of
to all STEM Coreparticipants across the network. The series incorporates multiple workshops focusing on STEMresume writing (plus follow-up 1-on-1 resume writing sessions), LinkedIn workshops forstudents to create and update resumes and profiles specifically for STEM employers.Additionally, students participate in sessions with a STEM Diversity Specialist around DEIcareer readiness strategies. Using research and insight from top employers, the STEM Coreprogram works to dismantle career readiness challenges that impact diverse students frompursuing and/or persisting in STEM-based careers and to excel while job searching.Overall, the STEM Core Internship Development Series works to equip staff and students withspecific techniques and tips to be
urban environment. Thecomposition of the university is diverse, serving a higher percentage of underrepresented groupson average among its peer institutions. The total student population of the department is ~200students with about a 10:1 ratio of students-to-faculty and staff. Most classes are taught bytenure-track faculty. The engineering program has a four-year, project-based learningcurriculum, where all engineering majors take team-based project courses with external clientsfor three years. The students’ first-year experience revolves around team-based labs and lectureswith a second semester of the first year devoted to learning fundamentals of Design for SixSigma and Agile with a client internal to the department. In the second year they
Paper ID #37092Student Responses to a Gender-Neutral Engineering EthicsCase StudyCharles Riley (Professor) Professor and Graduate Program Director Civil Engineering Department Oregon Institute of Technology I conduct research in diverse areas of engineering education from professional skills, to writing, to gender and ethics. I also maintain a structures laboratory to conduct full-scale structural component testing and field investigations of highway bridges.Franny Technology Howes (Assistant Professor) Franny Howes (e/em/eirs) is an associate professor in the Communication Department at the Oregon Institute of
space to explore their passions. To support career readiness, theschool personalizes student learning and focuses on enhancing student problem-solving skillsthrough hands-on projects. Learning is integrated into projects to support students in acquiringskills and knowledge in math, science, technology, social sciences, etc.Students' relationships with teachers are fundamental to their success in school [5], [6], [7]. Asupportive and strong relationship with teachers allows students to feel more competent, makemore positive connections with peers, and achieve greater academic gains [2]. Teachers’personal values drive their goals and behaviors at school [3]. Furthermore, motivation isimportant for teachers to persists and succeed in the
educators,administrators and decision makers by providing insight into what steps can be taken in order toaddress these issues and create academic environments that are inclusive and supportive forHispanic students at rural colleges. Literature Review Most rural HSIs face significant challenges as they strive to improve the educationaloutcomes of their Hispanic STEM students. Some of these challenges are uncommon among 2their peer institutions in metropolitan settings and others, while shared by urban colleges, areexacerbated by rural isolation and poverty. In a study of the challenges facing rural
from China. Fan received her MS in Elementary Education Science and a graduate certificate in Curriculum Instruction.Dr. Lisa Y. Flores, University of Missouri, Columbia Lisa Y. Flores, Ph.D. is a Professor of Counseling Psychology at the University of Missouri. She has expertise in the career development of Latino/as and Latino/a immigrant issues and has 80 peer reviewed journal publications, 19 book chapters, and 1 co-e ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Student perceptions of confidence in learning and teaching before and after teaching improvementsAs part of an overall research program investigating the impact of changes in teachingstrategies on
the product owner. • Weekly sub-goals are based on the software requirements document, but minor changes can be made as issues are encountered during implementation. • Written assignments (beyond the design specification) are technical and non-technical, such as broad reflection essays.Assessment is based on performance on presentations and writing activities, and the deliverableis a final project presentation. Providing a complete product is expected but not a majority oftheir grade. The following changes are suggested for a more inquiry-based experience forstudents: • The premise of the project is a vague question or obstacle to the state of the art. • Students are required to have an authentic project by
following the tours to give the students additionalnetworking opportunities with the alumni professionals.The program finished with the students writing their reports and giving their final presentations.Reports varied in length between approximately 5 to 20 pages depending on the types of data © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 2022 ASEE Midwest Section ConferenceFigure 1. Example of Quad slidescollected. All reports followed a specific template designed to aid the program managers incollecting important information necessary for post reporting requirements. Rough drafts were dueone week in advance to both the program managers and the student’s advisor. This allowed
in the junior/senior design clinic as well as teaches graduate-level engineering communication courses. Her research involves engineering commu- nication, technical communication pedagogy, and knowledge transfer. She has published and presented widely including work in the Journal of Engineering Education, the Journal of STEM Education: Innova- tions and Research, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, the Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, Technical Communication and Technical Communication Quarterly. Julie has a PhD in Rhetoric and Professional Communication from New Mexico State University, an MA in English with Technical Writing Emphasis from the University of North Carolina at Charlotte
may be associated with tenure promotion aspectssuch as grant writing, publication demands, travel, or establishing collaborative efforts acrossacademia. Additional factors are based on personal experiences, attitudes, and perceptions thatlimit awareness of the value and need to engage in responsive forms of mentorship.II. PROPOSED WORKTherefore, having a greater impact on undergraduate student success demands for engineeringfaculty members to engage in [quality] mentorship roles rather than advising roles. In this study,the authors have developed a mentorship model which allows faculty members to establish aconsistent rapport to become an instrumental and psychosocial support to shape student outcomes.The proposed model identifies four key
. Kapon, M. Schvartzer, and T. Peer, “Forms of participation in an engineering maker-based inquiry in physics,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 249–281, 2021.[13] L. Atkins Elliott, K. Jaxon, and I. Salter, Composing science: A facilitator’s guide to writing in the science classroom. Teachers College Press, 2016.[14] I. Salter and L. Atkins, “Student-generated scientific inquiry for elementary education undergraduates: Course development, outcomes and implications,” Journal of Science Teacher Education, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 157–177, 2013.[15] N. R. Council et al., National science education standards. National Academies Press, 1996.[16] L. Atkins and I. Salter, “Engaging future teachers in having
much more apparent. We require the student teams to meet once per week outside of class but we find that they often voluntarily meet more frequently. Certainly the leadership team (CTO and team leads) meets even though it is not required. • Students get taste of being a mid-level manager (the “CTO” role). They are elected to this position by their peers and not allowed to write any code while they are in the role. Even so, they quickly realize that it’s a lot of work. This is much more of a true leadership position than just a team lead. The CTO selects sprint goals and team composition. “I was class CTO” looks good on a resume too. • Progress is faster. Having one team of 20 isn’t four-times faster
computational problem into manageable sub-problems. • Write an algorithm to solve a specific problem, and then translate that algorithm into a program in a specific programming language (Python). • Reason about solution’s performance and measure its efficiency. • Write clear, concise documentation for their code and develop tests to verify proper program operation.The second aim is to explore the breadth of Computer Science as a discipline and how it exists inthe world: • Reason how computational tools, and computational thinking, are used to solve problems in a diverse set of application areas. • Explain the basic theory and organization of a computer system, basic operation of modern software tools (e.g
more or less formulated by Kolb the experientiallearning [8], Schön the reflective practitioner [9], and Cowan the reflective learner [10].The Aalborg (AAU) PBL model i ba ed on he idea ha den mo i a ion and engagemen isupported when students get an active role in the acquisition and creation of knowledge. Furthermore he eache ole in he lea ning oce ha o be ini ia o and facili a o in a collabo a i e oce ofknowledge development and knowledge transfer. The organization of the students learning process isbased on group work which means that peer-learning is becoming vital in the shared educationalprocess of the project group [8].The characteristics in PBL at Aalborg University, faculty of Engineering and Science are described
results in active participationduring the lecture with students seeing results in real time. In addition to working in parallelduring the lecture phase, immediately following the lecture the students try in-class exercisesdesigned to reinforce the concepts from the lecture. The hands-on in-class exercises havereceived very positive feedback from the students. Often the material seems to make sense whileI’m lecturing and giving examples, but when the students have to write the code themselves, theyoften realize they do not know the material as well as they thought they did. Students can askquestions and get one on one help during the in-class exercise portion of the class. The greatestimpact of the in-class exercises is a higher level of retention
testing skills), Learning Specialist (including anymeetings over phone, email, or in person with learning specialists), Tutoring (for any particular topic orsubject), Math and Science Lab (for drop-in tutoring of math and science subjects), Writing Lab (fordrop-in tutoring on writing and editing), and Tech Coaching (for help in utilizing tech resources) . Inaddition, we collected specific information on the majors of engineering students and courses for whichstudents were seeking academic support.ResultsResource Availability We found 34 webpages offering resources for students with disabilities on the arizona.eduwebsite through a simple internet search. Of these webpages, 15 pages were DRC materials ranging from‘FAQ’ and disability
PrinciplesFigure 1. Components 11 of implementing meaningful, consequential learning in studios in CBEE at OSU.To this end, we have focused on: Instructional Design Principles. We have convened a set of six core instructors to write an initial draft of Instructional Design Principles for studios. These include: Practice First; Group Worthy Problems, Looping, Cooperative Learning; Assessment; and Manageable Change. These will next be taken to the larger set of studio instructors for further development and consideration. New Studio Activities. We have developed and implemented seven new studios to date over the sophomore-level sequence. Two of these are based on virtual process simulations
multiple choice style questions. Most clicker systems alsorequire additional technology to be purchased. Of the systems mentioned in this paper, clickerquestions are perhaps the most useful for students to see how they are performing in relation totheir peers as frequency of collected responses is often revealed to the class.While there are many options available to aid professors in simplifying grading assessments, mostsystems are limited to one style of question (multiple choice) and are not in the naturalpaper-based format of traditional assessments and problem solving exercises. Most attempts tocreate paper-based automated grading systems work effectively, but tend to be tightly customizedto a single professor’s preference or for single
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. His areas of research include simplifying the outcomes assessment process, user interface design, and the pedagogical aspects of writing computer games. Dr. Estell is a Senior Member of IEEE, and a member of ACM, ASEE, Tau Beta Pi, Eta Kappa Nu, and Upsilon Pi Epsilon. Page 12.1122.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 One-Minute Engineer, Nth Generation: Expansion to a Small Private UniversityAbstractThe concept of having first-year students conduct ‘One Minute Engineer’ (OME) presentationswas presented at the 2006