22.1363.6respectively, and some 347, 25, and 17 peer-reviewed articles using Web of Science® [retrievedAugust 16, 2010].It should be noted that memory of past accidents and their lessons learned are not only encodedin education, but they are often “institutionalized”, in building codes for example orOccupational Health and Safety regulations. As a result, instilling the memory of past accidentsand their lessons learned in engineering students can be seen as serving the function of diversityin redundancy (where memory resides and who recalls and exercises it) to help to avoid a repeatof similar accidents. Teaching engineering students about accident causation and system safetycan serve to complement and reinforce institutionalized safety requirements, and it
definition of what (Roth, 1996, common materials. meanings for materials and writing). In order constitutes a good 1997, 2001) Learn: Stability, artifacts, (3) being for science design task; the shapes, forces. conscious of participation in learning to effectiveness of the Task: Build a design, (4) negotiating with occur, discourse design context machine that uses classmates, (5) using a must hold as depends on the simple machines. variety of tools in much weight as individual teacher. Learn: Physics of interesting
2: Phase 2 milestone scheduleMilestone Description of the Deliverable1: Problem A typed mini-report that describes the problem statement in paragraph form. The first fewStatement sentences should describe why the work is being done. The final sentence should begin with “Design a…” and include discussion of constraints and criteria necessary for achieving success. Be very mindful about writing this statement in your own words. Additionally, include lists of the “should criteria” and “must criteria”. Also include a list of constraints.2: Generate A typed mini-report with hand sketches describing multiple solutions, including the materialsConcepts for fabrication
career track. The study also examined the factors of support within the institution, withan emphasis on understanding the effectiveness of various programs and policies (i.e. family-friendly policies, mentoring programs, faculty diversity initiatives) designed to support womenfaculty in engineering.Background on the Problem Compared to their male peers in academic engineering programs, the female faculty isless likely to reach full professorships (Easterly and Ricard, 2011; Touchton, 2008). Rather,women are concentrated at the lower ranks of academia as assistant professors, lecturers andadjunct faculty (Fox, 2010). In 2006, women accounted for 30.5% of non-tenure track instructors, but only 11.9% of associate professors and 3.8% of full
isgiven to the class the first week of the semester. (See the example for Fall 2005 in theAppendix.) Each student has three weeks to write a formal proposal describing andevaluating at least two distinct concepts for a solution to one or more of the requiredfunctions of the project, e.g., concepts to satisfy the Initial Testing requirements.(Instruction in technical communications is provided with “just-in-time” workshopsgiven by the University Writing Center during the course “studio” time.) Normally, adraft is submitted, graded, and returned for resubmission. The draft and the resubmissionusually count equally, together representing about 10% of the individual course grade.Students self-select into teams of four (to the extent possible) in the
cognition. She created the synthesis and design studios in the environmental engineering program and is currently developing the professional and design spines for the upcoming mechanical engineering program. She is also interested in faculty development and recently co-organized the NSF-sponsored PEER workshop for tenure-track engineering education research faculty. Page 23.597.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Faculty Reflections on a STEAM-Inspired Interdisciplinary Studio CourseAbstractConcerns regarding America’s
toparticipate in community service. Through collaboration with the Community LearningCenter at the authors’ institution and instructors for the course University Success 100,students from selected sessions of the course were required to identify any problems that existand need to be solved at their community service site, and then propose innovative solutionsto the problems. They were also required to write a process journal and final project report todescribe their reflection on their self-regulated learning and creative problem solving processand their final solutions to the problems. They were also provided with the process model ofSelf-Regulated Learning and Creative Problem Solving [13, 14] and scaffolding throughquestion prompts to facilitate
students want from TAs in engineering education settings.Prior Use of NLP in EducationThe use of NLP in education has been significant, particularly in the assessment andclassification of student learning. Assessment involves determining the quality and level ofstudent learning, while classification aims to comprehend student learning without evaluating it.Automated assessment is an attractive solution for large student populations, and one of the mostcommon applications of NLP in education is the assessment of student writing in the Test ofEnglish as a Foreign Language (TOEFL) [3]. NLP is used to evaluate grammar, mechanics, wordusage, complexity, style, and organization of student essays. NLP-based assessments havedemonstrated remarkable
development of these competencies at the college level. The student-centered pedagogy is an increasing trend in the STEM disciplines [14]. Itutilizes the approaches like active learning, collaborative learning, and project/problem-basedlearning, which require students to work in teams and extensively communicate with peers tocomplete assignments. While the extensive teamwork experience should create high proficiencyin student professional communication and collaboration skills, the primary focus of theassignments and the instructional support still remains on the core technical knowledge and skillsand often lacks direct instructor’s interventions with respect to the communication andcollaboration skills [14], [15]. However, the best results
thesematerials. It is primarily a call to consider how students engage in their college experience,and to search for proper tools that can be deployed to stimulate learning.In moving forward, there are numerous tools available to select from, including the modelspredicated on cooperation; i.e., working together to accomplish shared goals. Withincooperative activities, individuals seek outcomes that are beneficial to them and also benefitall other group members. (2, 3) Cooperative learning researchers and practitioners have shownthat positive peer relations are essential to success in college. The positive interpersonalrelationships promoted through cooperative learning are regarded by most as crucial totoday’s learning communities. They increase the
(for GSU Mission Annual Faculty Institutional Peer Review Merit Review Effectiveness of Faculty Review (Annual) COST Mission Every 3 years Success Faculty Review
with thesematerials. It is primarily a call to consider how students engage in their college experience,and to search for proper tools that can be deployed to stimulate learning.In moving forward, there are numerous tools available to select from, including the modelspredicated on cooperation; i.e., working together to accomplish shared goals. Withincooperative activities, individuals seek outcomes that are beneficial to them and also benefitall other group members. (2, 3) Cooperative learning researchers and practitioners have shownthat positive peer relations are essential to success in college. The positive interpersonalrelationships promoted through cooperative learning are regarded by most as crucial totoday’s learning communities. They
researchers in understanding andinvestigating the educational phenomenon. Throughout the project, we collected data frompublic, private and home schools as well as science center settings.a. Public and Private School Settings In order to capture the whole classroom dynamics and actions made by teacher andstudents (for instance, an interaction between students and teacher, students’ behaviors,collaborations, social interactions among their peers) videotaping with a high-quality audiorecording method is an effective and acceptable technique to collect the targeted data. In the firstyear, a single camera was often used to record the whole classroom for class-wide activities andto zoom in on a single randomly-chosen group (with complete consent
with thesematerials. It is primarily a call to consider how students engage in their college experience,and to search for proper tools that can be deployed to stimulate learning.In moving forward, there are numerous tools available to select from, including the modelspredicated on cooperation; i.e., working together to accomplish shared goals. Withincooperative activities, individuals seek outcomes that are beneficial to them and also benefitall other group members. (2, 3) Cooperative learning researchers and practitioners have shownthat positive peer relations are essential to success in college. The positive interpersonalrelationships promoted through cooperative learning are regarded by most as crucial totoday’s learning communities. They
with thesematerials. It is primarily a call to consider how students engage in their college experience,and to search for proper tools that can be deployed to stimulate learning.In moving forward, there are numerous tools available to select from, including the modelspredicated on cooperation; i.e., working together to accomplish shared goals. Withincooperative activities, individuals seek outcomes that are beneficial to them and also benefitall other group members. (2, 3) Cooperative learning researchers and practitioners have shownthat positive peer relations are essential to success in college. The positive interpersonalrelationships promoted through cooperative learning are regarded by most as crucial totoday’s learning communities. They
Page 26.1066.5importance of reflection in courses is demonstrated in Wong et al. who suggested that studentwriting can be used as evidence of reflective thinking and learning.14As previously stated, there are several ways to engage in critical reflection. Kavanagh listed endof course meta-learning, portfolio reflections, peer assisted learning sessions in their engineeringcourse,2 and as seen in O’Moore and Baldock,19 they discussed online reflections, and teamreflections. Each technique has strengths and weaknesses, but they provide a different approachto understanding of learning outcomes and experiences. Journal writing has also been seen in theliterature,13, 14, 17 and in these instances, reflection can occur in the journal entries and
-time research or scholarship[,]… [and it] is viewed as preparatory fora full-time academic and/or research career,” among others. Although this is what is typicallythought of regarding postdocs, a consistent definition of what a postdoc position actually is, isstill lacking, which makes studying the postdoc experience a challenge2.Possibly due to the lack of a consistent definition of what a postdoc appointment is, there can bemany different responsibilities that characterize postdoc positions. Akerlind3 writes that there is“substantial variation within postdoc roles and responsibilities, even within the same disciplinaryarea.” These responsibilities, as listed by Akerlind3 include: being completely in charge of aresearch project and all it
, National Association of Counties, and the United States Economic Development Administration. She is the author of Dealing with Deindus- trialization: Adaptive Resilience in American Midwestern Regions (Routledge 2014) and has published numerous peer-reviewed articles focused on economic resilience, economic restructuring, and economic development.Dr. Jennifer L. Irish, Virginia Tech Dr. Jennifer Irish, professor of coastal engineering at Virginia Tech, is an expert in storm surge dynamics, coastal hazard assessment, and nature-based infrastructure for coastal hazard mitigation. Since entering academia in 2006, as lead Principal Investigator (PI) or co-PI, Irish received research grants from agen- cies
Time management 4.50 Presentation Importance of Skills to Career Path Writing Teamwork Leadership 4.00 Research Teaching 3.50 3.00 2.50 2.00 2.00 2.50 3.00
interested in transferring to a bachelor’s program in engineering.The purpose of the course is to introduce potential Grove students to the practice of engineering Page 23.249.4research in the engineering disciplines the school offers. The course consists of a group researchassignment, lab and library visits, guest lectures on engineering ethics and statistics, groupreports and presentations, math tutoring, and writing exercises analyzing a research article andexploring a research problem. A program description is provided in appendix 2. The studentswere recruited by Grove’s office of student programs using its contacts in many communitycolleges and
) Time of Day D) Mobility A) Motivation B) Persistence 5. Psychological/Cognitive Processing C) Conformity/Responsibility A) Global D) Need for Structure Provided by Source B) Analytic C) Right or Left Hemisphericity 3. Sociological Work or Learning Choices D) Impulsive-Reflective A) Alone/Self B) With One Other Individual C) With Peers D) With an Adult E) Varied, Responds to Situation or Environment
novel electronic and optical materials, with a particular emphasis on rare earth dopants in semiconductors and laser produced single crystals in glass. He has authored or co-authored over 200 publications in peer-reviewed journals, and has been awarded several patents for his work.Himanshu Jain, Lehigh University Himanshu Jain is the T.L. Diamond Distinguished Chair Professor of Engineering and Applied Science, and the Director of Institute for Functional Materials and Devices at Lehigh University. He helped establish and served as the director of NSF’s International Materials Institute for New Functionality in Glass, which pioneered globalization of glass research and education, and led to multiple international
chain I really liked the gRATs, going over information with peers The cancer lectures were extremely interesting. Electron Transport Chain demonstration with proteins and electrons! The DNA technology lectures were really interesting. I liked the hands-on oxidative phosphorylation demonstration we did in class. I honestly enjoyed the TBL's, I really liked my group and I think that it was an effective way to learn about the content. My favorite activity was the optional paper assignment. I really care about the ongoing research world, and at times I thought some of the best ways to learn the MolCell content was to read research articles. It was a very fun assignment to write a mini review paper that was relevant to concepts in the class. I
transmission of basicinformation. The flipped course design also allows for strategies like active learning that help allstudents to succeed.4 Thus, students encounter foundational information in structured, guidedwork done while they are away from the professor. When they are in the group learning spacewith access to peers and the instructor, students engage in activities that require them to engagein higher-order cognitive processes, like application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation.Because the instructor is present during the most difficult parts, students get help moving pastdisciplinary bottlenecks, support and structure when they are frustrated or unmotivated, andtimely guidance and feedback to help them avoid developing bad habits or
the ever-increasing diversity in the U.S., expected large-scaleretirements from the STEM disciplines, and the need to ensure a stable future STEM workforceto maintain U.S. competitiveness in science and engineering. Nelson and Rogers write, “Ifsignificant progress is to be made within the next couple of decades, new and totally differentapproaches to solving problems facing women and minority faculty will be needed.13”This paper presents a comprehensive multi-dimensional approach to addressing the above three-body pipeline problem that result in low production of URM PhD and under-representation ofURM faculty in STEM. The model premise is that multi-campus recruiting pipeline, graduatementoring, retention system, and institutional receptivity
which aligns “with contextual knowingand with synthetic and evaluative tasks. (p. 4)” 31 Another tool, originally termed the curriculardebrief and now termed the Engineering Professional Skills Assessment (EPSA), was developedat Washington State University to measure all of the ABET professional skills criteriasimultaneously 32, 33. This assessment places students on teams and tasks them with a complex,real-world scenario, giving them merely 45 minutes to “determine the most important problem/sand to discuss stakeholders, impacts, unknowns, and possible solutions. (p. 2)” 33 Other morecommonly used tools such as performance reviews and peer assessments have also beenreported.In order to help engineering students acquire proficiency in
approach and avoidance achievement motivation.,” J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., vol. 76, no. 4, pp. 628–644, 1999, doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.76.4.628.[37] S. Purzer, T. J. Moore, and E. Dringenberg, “Engineering cognition: A process of knowledge acquisition and application,” in Cognition, Metacognition, and Culture in STEM Education. Innovations in Science Education and Technology, Y. J. Dori, Z. R. Mevarech, and D. R. Baker, Eds. Springer, 2018, pp. 167–190.[38] R. Ferrari, “Writing narrative style literature reviews,” Med. Writ., vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 230– 235, 2015, doi: 10.1179/2047480615z.000000000329.[39] J. A. Byrne, “Improving the peer review of narrative literature reviews,” Res. Integr. Peer Rev., vol
level is not, in and of itself novel. A simple Google Scholar search willgenerate over 24,000 citations elaborating upon such efforts. Peer-reviewed research on thistopic can be summarized into categories of innovation and specialized project development -including industry involvement (Goldberg, Cariapa, Corliss, et. al., 2014); professionalpreparation, and attribute/competency development (Hotaling, Fasse, Bost, et. al., 2012); andcapstone best-practices, pedagogy and assessment approaches (Newell, Doty, & Klein, 1990;Behdinan, Pop-Iliev, & Foster, 2014). Noticeably, however, the presence of recent innovativescholarship in this area appears scant.Looking back however to 1990, Newell, Doty, and Klein suggested that anecdotally, there
requiredcommunication from the university to the students to ensure a safe and successful transition [1,2, 3, 4]. This shift required a rethinking of infrastructure to accommodate remote instruction [2,5, 6, 7, 8, 9]. Students were required to adapt their learning, networks, and how they accessedtheir peers and instructors [1, 2, 3, 6]. As a member of this community, I, the first author,personally resonate with this; working in person with others was normal. This normalcy endedwith the onset of the pandemic. Working remotely and individually required students to balancework and leisure in a way many students had not experienced previously during in-personlearning [6]. Students have noted assignments feeling like they built up faster than they did within-person
site (Polling Everywhere) was utilized for studentteams to submit responses to questions directed to them by the facilitators. For individuals whofelt more comfortable sharing thoughts anonymously, the polling platform allowed any studentsto interact in the activity at their own desired comfort level. It was imperative to the facilitatorsthat the students felt safe when: adding their perspective, posing questions back at facilitators, andchallenging responses from their peers. The workshop ended with a discussion on the majortakeaways from the module and workshop. Students were provided with a link to a follow-upsurvey where they could share their perceptions of ESJ and feedback regarding the activity