durability of the optimal treatment at different temperatures. Applying thetreatment at different temperatures will assess the durability of it in natural environmentaltemperature conditions (extreme temperatures and day/night temperature changes).The impact that this project may have on whether or not students consider previous majorchoices and decide instead to pursue an engineering major has not yet been assessed.AcknowledgementsThanks are given to our students, colleagues, partners, and institution for their supportand for making this educational intervention possible. This work is supported by NSFgrant HRD-1832547 (STEM-CURE Program). Any conclusions or recommendationsstated in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect
engineering at the level of college algebra.Enrollment in the Introduction to Engineering Reasoning course occurred during the new studentorientation events that were scheduled during the summer months prior to the beginning of thefirst school semester. 3Metacognitive Intervention The metacognitive intervention was based on three major components: a conceptualintroduction to important concepts related to self-regulated learning, prompting of metacognitivemonitoring during problem-solving, and reflection-on-learning activities. The design andimplementation of the intervention work was based on Zimmerman’s self-regulated learningmodel and
. Sunghwan Lee1, and Dr. Daniel Leon-Salas1 1 Purdue University (West Lafayette, IN, USA) * Corresponding Author (lbosman@purdue.edu)1. IntroductionThe NSF REU Site program context was entrepreneurial development and applied energy researchwhere participants were introduced to a graduate school like experience by simultaneously gainingentrepreneurial training via customer discovery interviews, market analysis, and patent research,and at the same time conducting lab research within the energy field.Data collection methods included weekly photovoice reflections, retrospective surveys, and focusgroups. The focus of data collection was to assess student
Mathematics(STEM) fields, and developing a diverse, skilled workforce for STEM careers.Annually, the National Science Foundation (NSF) awards approximately 170-190REU grants. The funding for REU sites often reflects current trends in research.Our study aims to examine REU sites’ contributions in terms of scholarlypublications and student training over the past six years. Additionally, we explorethe research themes of these REU sites and compare them with those in the Webof Science (WoS) database.The NSF award database provides details about 3,500 REU awards, includingproject titles, abstracts, funding periods, and NSF directories. All REU awardinformation is reformatted into the WoS citation format for thorough analysisusing a literature analysis
about the students who were interviewed; note thatthe gender and race/ethnicity were free response questions in the application form, so thecategories chosen reflect participants’ self-designation. Participant Gender Race/Ethnicity 1 Female Hispanic 2 Female White 3 Male Hispanic 4 Male Asian 5 Female White 6 (Transgender) Female Caucasian 7 Male White
-efficacy and engineeringidentity, thereby facilitating the transition of LIAT undergraduates to graduate-level programs;and (3) it aspires to cultivate leaders proficient in technology, entrepreneurship, and innovation,who will contribute to and fortify the economy of the South Coast of New England—a regionnoted for its diversity and post-industrial economic challenges marked by significant poverty.ResultsIn its inaugural year, the AccEL program generated a large applicant pool, with 46% of eligiblestudents applying, the cohort included 8 eligible female students and a substantial number fromunderrepresented racial/ethnic backgrounds. Eight M.S. students were successfully recruited intothe first cohort of AccEL S-STEM scholars, reflecting
highlighted the increased sense of communitythey felt with their peers. Interviews highlighted how students reconsidered their professionalidentity within the major when they spoke about their feelings relating to imposter syndrome andhailed this as a unique opportunity in their engineering education to reflect on their engineeringidentity and purpose in the field. Students indicated it influenced their sense of belonging asthey talked about how participation in this workshop and story performance challengedstereotypes and broadened their perspective of what it means to be an engineer and whichtypes of people get to become engineers. Students experienced a boost in confidence in boththeir writing and public speaking abilities and a result of sharing
engineering education broadly andpedagogy specifically.This study presents an overview of ongoing efforts to integrate GAI as a pedagogical tool at aLand Grant R1 University on the East Coast of the United States. Also, we are hoping to collect awithin-case study of instructors who have successfully implemented artificial intelligence in theirclassrooms and course design. Data will be collected from the instructors through classroomobservations and interviews on their classroom implementation. These will be thematicallyanalyzed. Also, a deep exploration of students' learning experiences using the GAI will beconducted using focus group discussions and end-of-the-semester reflection. Other data sourcesthat will be thematically analyzed include the
antipatterns, once specified, have zerofalse positives or negatives across languages. Total coverage will be evaluated per languageby the reduction of language-specific regex use.AcknowledgementsThis work was funded by the National Science Foundation award #2142309. Any opinions,findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of theauthors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF.References[1] L. C. Ureel II and C. Wallace, “WebTA: Automated iterative critique of student programming assignments,” in 2015 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), pp. 1–9, IEEE, 2015.[2] L. C. Ureel and C. R. Wallace, “WebTA: Online Code Critique and Assignment Feedback,” in Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical
mentalrotation and spatial visualization, and the Purdue Spatial Visualization Test: Visualization ofRotations (PSVT:R) which measures mental rotation.Throughout recent years, a large number of new or adapted spatial ability instruments have beendeveloped to reflect more diverse populations involved in spatial ability research. Thissystematized literature review provides a synthesis of how valid and reliable spatial abilityinstruments measure specific constructs of spatial thinking. This work is guided by the followingresearch questions.1. How do existing spatial ability tests measure spatial thinking?2. How do spatial ability instruments available in the literature demonstrate validity andreliability?Positionality StatementThe first author is a
convey their values and goals. Meaningfulcollaboration between engineers and community partners can empower students, but superficialengagements may undermine their transformative potential. This research uses signaling theoryand the Fitzpatrick Skin Type Scale to assess whether local diversity is reflected on websites andunderscores the importance of diversity representation for credibility in environmental advocacy,offering a valuable approach for educators seeking authentic community partnerships.Key words: Diversity, representation, community partnershipsIntroductionAcross many fields of education, leveraging organizational websites proves instrumental incultivating connections and diversifying partnerships for faculty and students
, depending on the skillset of those participating in the course. Page 22.945.7AssessmentsThere currently is one assessment which will be incorporated into the research, reflecting studentfeedback of the course, provided by the Office of International Education. The synopsis providedis from students in the second year (2010). Assessments from the first year are in the process ofbeing extracted, as the assessment software provider has changed, and system support isunavailable. Content areas are: a. Academic Quality (overall mean: 4.0 out of 5.0) 1. Relevant content 2. Engagement with host country culture and people 3. Quality of
states thatalthough there were more than 56 million pre-K-12 students enrolled in U.S. public and privateschools in 2008, no more than 6 million students have had any kind of formal K-12 engineeringeducation since the early 1990s.2 The famous quote attributed to Albert Einstein, that thedefinition of insanity is doing the same thing repeatedly and expecting different results, appearsquite relevant to this problem. Continuing the status quo in developing America’s futuretechnical workforce will not result in the increased human resource talent pool that is needed tosustain and grow the U.S. economy and that reflects the diversity of the U.S. population.At CIESE, we have waged a multi-front campaign since 2004 to infuse engineering into
. 61 29 50 36Develop attitudes of self-direction 57 32 49 37and self-responsibility. * Numbers represents percentages of RPI participants who responded “Strongly Agree” or “Agree” on a 6-point Likert-type scale. Analysis of cognitive data19 evidence outcomes related to use; students who received integrated IO board instruction at higher levels of practice and knowledge generation presented greater long term learning. Student scores on final exams were greater for items that reflected use of the Mobile Studio as part of instruction than were their scores on items that reflected content covered in
. Everyonereceives the same credit for success or same penalty due to failure no matter how much their Page 22.1503.8responsibility and contributions are. The benefits of team work are to work with people withdifferent personalities and develop student’s interpersonal relationship management, a key skillto motivate people and receive support. Students learn how to create an environment and compelto them to work and think individually. Participants in a team can help leverage unique insights,foster collaboration, and build momentum for change. They may generate productivediscussions and thoughtful reflection, share guidelines for continuing the conversation
” or “loose it” brain. Activities designed to engage the brain canhelp grow dendrites, which is the wiring that connects brain cells. The more ways we find toprocess information the stronger learning (i.e., neural connections between brain cells) becomes.Research is proving that to enhance learning, we should be involving students in lessons by Page 22.500.2providing a non-threatening environment which allows them time to ask questions, seek solutions,reflect, share thinking about a theme or topic, and respond to other's viewpoints.In short, as teachers, we need to be able to accomplish learning by doing. Action helps to growthe brain. The
instruction has grown as a strong and viable instructionalapproach. In higher education, on-line enrollments doubled from 2002 to 20071, and the 2007-08academic year saw 1.03 million K-12 public school students engaged in some form of on-lineclass.2 The phenomenal growth focused the attention of researchers and practitioners to theproblem of understanding issues that reflect quality in on-line education. Progress in the area ismarked by the emergence of quality frameworks, best practices, and benchmarks that have beenestablished to support quality assessment and improvement efforts for on-line education.3 Theframeworks provide guidelines that an institution can use to build their own quality managementsystem.Without a reference framework, localized
Page 22.515.2compromised output from the cell. In some cases, film uniformity flaws in the anti-reflectioncoating of the solar cell, such that the surface has a general blue reflection with light blue/purplediscontinuities is not only a cosmetic defect, but reduces solar cell performance. Other issuesinvolve electrical defects such as breaks in the contact lines which affect the current output of thesolar panel. Due to the production processes currently used, solar cells often show local defectsthat may affect their life time and efficiency. For this reason, there is a growing interest in solarcell quality control processes. Effective tools and methods are needed designed to assess andmeasure solar cells8-13, especially in line during
implement reflects themany ways engineer take designs from ideas to reality. Many engineers do build designs using abroad array of techniques. Perhaps one of the biggest differences between engineeringdisciplines is the specialized methods and technologies they use to implement designs. Howeversome engineers implement ideas through manipulation of information, such as designingcomputer software or producing plans. Here the real value is the information in the blueprint orcode, not the medium (paper or magnetic disk) that contains the information. Another option forimplementing a design is to contract another company to build it. In this case the engineer workswith the company to ensure the work is done properly.The fourth step of the engineering
, and to use this consideration to make moreinformed and reasoned decisions about their academic and professional future. Further, insteadof being a single assignment with an optional resubmit, the project was now broken into fivephases: 1. Creation of a homepage and a brief biography 2. Creation of the six pages for the Six Tools, with reflection on each tool’s meaning, personal goals, and self-assessment 3. Addition of electronic artifacts to each of the six pages and updated self-assessment 4. Creation of page specifically written for one’s academic advisor 5. Refinement of entire portfolio, discussion of progress toward goals, and further personalizationThe project statement for each of the five phases is given as
(cost less than one day‟s pay at minimum wage to create or maintain), and the purpose of theinnovative products is to improve customers‟ quality of life or enable a higher standard of livingfor targeted local communities. Teams develop an initial design for review and critique by therest of the organization as well as the client, and work with the client to see the product throughto completion and installation. Some of the professional skills EFAC members practice include:the ability to identify the needs of a community client, the ability to present ideas to a non-technical audience, and the ability to work with people who are not engineers.EFAC‟s core team reflects its multidisciplinary objective and currently consists of twelveundergraduate
learning materials and teaching strategies based on virtual laboratories: A. Enhance the Virtual CVD laboratory by including interactive reflection tools (e.g., interactive lab notebook, a virtual supervisor), improved treatment of variability and cost, non-radial symmetry, and a new module on statistical process control. B. Using an analogous instructional design, develop a virtual laboratory of a bioreactor, the Virtual Bioreactor laboratory, a process in a different industry. C. Develop level appropriate assignments to use at the high school and community college levels. 2. Develop faculty expertise and implement the virtual laboratories at the BS and graduate
. Page 22.326.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Civil engineering in a time of change: the response of the Institution of Civil Engineers LibraryAbstractRapid changes over the past decade in the UK public and academic library landscapes havebeen reflected in changes in special and learned society libraries. While the former sectorsbeen widely researched and reported on in the UK, the same is not true of the specialengineering sector. In a period characterised by the disappearance of traditional libraries andtheir partial replacement by knowledge management systems and a naïve belief in the powerof Google, engineering societies have considered alternative responses
underrepresented1,2 reveal howcentral difference is to our explanations. For example, women’s lack of self-confidence or self-efficacy (or math anxiety) is understood relative to men.3-5 Women are seen to lack female rolemodels and peers relative to their male counterparts.6,7 A “chilly climate” that is hostile orcompetitive toward women drives women out,8-15 while men are more likely to stay. Stereotype Page 22.356.2threat, a reflection of perceived difference in ability, is seen to affect women and minoritystudents.16-17 Calls to alter curriculum and pedagogy focus on attracting women and minoritieswho are viewed to be more motivated by altruistic and
in service in the community and reflect ontheir involvement in such a way as to gain further understanding of course content and of thediscipline and its relationship to social needs and an enhanced sense of civic responsibility8. Thepedagogy of service-learning is has four key characteristics: service to underserved communities;academic content; reciprocal partnerships with the community, university and students; andreflection or metacognitive activities that enhance student learning of course content, thecommunity and themselves9.When design is taught through service-learning, it moves to a human-centered approach.Students must understand the users, stakeholders and the issues impacting the need and potentialsolutions to develop an
context of the stirring and mixing of reactive species. One of my primary concerns is with the effect of turbulent mixing on ecosystem health. My interest in understanding in- teractions between biological systems and the physical environment emerges from an interdisciplinary background in engineering, hydrology, and environmental science. I am also interested in pedagogy, specifically student learning styles. My goal is to engage all students in my classes by presenting mate- rial in such a way as to stimulate students with different learning styles (e.g. active learners, reflective observers, outcome-focused learners).J. Alexander Maxwell, Clarkson University J. Alex Maxwell is a graduate student at Clarkson
learning outcomes and hypothesize how ourfocus on each may result in an improved educational environment.To date, five engineering schools have gone through the pilot Engineering Criteria (EC) 2000reviews; twelve more have undergone EC-2000 reviews (fall 1998) and are waiting for finaldecisions. ABET had anticipated that 16 to 18 additional engineering schools would select thenew criteria next year [6], but apparently almost 40 institutions have elected this option. Clearly,it is time to reflect about the foundations of these learning outcomes before too many moreinstitutions proceed through EC-2000. No doubt, the new ABET criteria together with NSFsponsored engineering education projects (including the coalitions) have served as majorcatalysts
personal and professional lives. Relating myexperiences allows any lessons I learned to be available to this audience2. In addition, anycommon experiences shared by other faculty members may be realized and more greatlyappreciated. Using the first-person point-of-view in relating my experiences allows me toinclude personal reflections and provides a deeper meaning to the actions and events presented inthe paper.Narration requires that a series of related events be organized in some sort of sequence and thatthe significance or meaning of these events be revealed to the reader. In order for the narrativeto be effective, the writer must present the events and actions, as they want the readers to seethem. If the characters and action are real, the
example,an initial understanding of the problem is not static, but rather reflects the currentunderstanding at that point in time. As a designer searches for and clarifies information aboutthe problem, the designer gains insight that informs the previous conception of the problem.This new understanding may help in the generation or refinement of possible solutions.Therefore, our research was guided by two goals: 1) to develop a model for operationalizingiterative behaviors based on what we know about transition behaviors, and 2) to utilize thismodel to analyze how iterative behaviors may contribute to performance.III. Operationalizing IterationIn an earlier paper we described a model for operationalizing iterative behaviors in cognitiveterms11
Farmingdale, the Committee developed a model of nine core areas and requested eachdepartment to indicate which if any of these areas were addressed in each course offered by theirdepartment or through support courses required of their students. A task force was formed in theFall of 1996 to do a thorough review of the responses received in order to develop a matrix thatidentifies those courses which may fulfill specific requirements. ConclusionFarmingdale is fundamentally a teaching institution, and focuses on the learning process in allprograms. The college seeks to serve a diverse student population reflecting an increasinglypluralistic society. Farmingdale is a campus where the technologies are not