Estimation in engineering Engineering ethics Force vectors Force resultants Moment of a force Equilibrium Tension, compression, and shear of materials Engineering materials Factors of safety Stress and strain Buoyancy Overview of fluids engineering Properties of fluids Fluid flow Drag and lift forceThe course culminates with a short final project in which students work in teams. Students areassigned teams using CATME
., 2016.[17] I. Brdar and T. B. Kashdan, "Character strengths and well-being in Croatia: An empirical investigation of structure and correlates," Journal of research in personality, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 151-154, 2010.[18] J. Heron, Co-operative inquiry: Research into the human condition. Sage, 1996.[19] N. W. Sochacka, J. Walther, and A. L. Pawley, "Ethical validation: Reframing research ethics in engineering education research to improve research quality," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 107, no. 3, pp. 362-379, 2018.[20] S. Brookfield, "Using critical incidents to explore learners’ assumptions," Fostering critical reflection in adulthood: A guide to transformative and emancipatory learning, pp
U.S.filled in 47% of all jobs but only 24% of the STEM jobs [6]. In other words, 76% of the STEMjobs are held by men. In community services, women had a volunteer rate of 27.8% in 2015compared to men 21.8%. Women volunteered at a higher rate than men and this was true acrossall age groups, educational levels, and major demographics characteristics (such as race andemployment status) [7].Influence is closely associated with leadership. A capable leader provides guidance at theworkplace, home, and/or community [8]. It follows that, those influencing are consideredefficient leaders that motivate their colleagues, family or community [9, 10]. Transformativeleadership idealizes influence which reflect standards of moral and ethical conduct; it
following section, we will first describe epistemic cognition andmetacognition separately. Next, we will discuss the construct of epistemic metacognition thatlooks at epistemic cognition and metacognition in combination. This discussion is followed by asection that discusses the value of studying epistemic metacognition in the context ofengineering.Epistemic cognitionEpistemic cognition concerns how people acquire, understand, justify, change, and useknowledge. It is distinct from cognition because the focus of epistemic cognition is on theconstruction and justification of knowledge, understanding, and/or true beliefs. The study ofepistemic cognition emerged with Perry’s [10] study into the cognitive and ethical developmentof male student at
Paper ID #25974Board 15: Understanding Ambiguity in Engineering Problem SolvingDr. Elliot P. Douglas, University of Florida Elliot P. Douglas is Professor of Environmental Engineering Sciences,Associate Director for Research of the Institute for Excellence in Engineering Education, and Distinguished Teaching Scholar at the Uni- versity of Florida. His research interests are in the areas of problem-solving, cultures of inclusion in engineering, engineering ethics, and environmental justice.Dr. David J Therriault, University of Florida Dr. Therriault, an Assistant Professor joined the College of Education at University
Paper ID #26409Board 39: The In/Authentic Experiences of Black EngineersDr. Elliot P. Douglas, University of Florida Elliot P. Douglas is Professor of Environmental Engineering Sciences, Associate Director for Research of the Institute for Excellence in Engineering Education, and Distinguished Teaching Scholar at the Uni- versity of Florida. His research interests are in the areas of problem-solving, cultures of inclusion in engineering, engineering ethics, and environmental justice.Erica D. McCray, University of Florida Dr. Erica D. McCray is an Associate Professor of Special Education at the University of Florida
engineering students to work at the overlap with public policy, business, law, ethics, human behavior, risk, and the arts, as well as medicine and the sciences Entrepreneurship • Preparing students to translate invention to innovation; to develop market ventures that scale to global solutions in the public interest Global Dimension • Developing the students’ global perspective necessary to address challenges that are inherently global as well as to lead innovation in a global economy Service Learning • Developing and deepening students’ social consciousness and their motivation to bring their technical expertise to bear on societal problems through mentored experiential
Project courses for all majors. The importance of understanding risk andliability, of continuous professional development including licensure, and of ethics inengineering practice, all of which are relevant concepts for an entrepreneurial approach toengineering, have been stressed. Historically, senior projects that have led to longer-termstudent-private sector collaborations or even student-initiated business have been rare.Recently, entrepreneurship at Pitt-Johnstown has experienced a revitalization. A renewed pushto create an Entrepreneurial Studies program came from Pitt-Johnstown President Jem Spectar in2011. This led first to an agreement with Johnstown Area Regional Industries (JARI) to supportentrepreneurial internships for Pitt-Johnstown
A – Model Introductory Infrastructure Course Outline# Module Topic Level1 Fundamentals What is infrastructure and why do we care?2 Fundamentals Basic infrastructure functions3 Fundamentals Systems/network analysis4 Fundamentals TBL/Sustainability5 Fundamentals Social Impacts of Infrastructure6 Fundamentals Teamwork7 Fundamentals Ethics I8 Fundamentals Ethics II9 Fundamentals Traits of effective written and oral communication10 Fundamentals Financing public works11 Fundamentals Safety/licensure12 Fundamentals Land Use and Planning/Growth/Forecasting13 Fundamentals Resilience and risk14 One
demographic attributes (e.g., gender and ethnicity)and incoming metrics (e.g., standardized test scores, high school grade point average). Althoughhigh school GPAs and standardized scores are considered as part of the application, the decisionfor acceptance into SB is a combination of a student’s expressed work ethic, letters ofrecommendations from high school counselors and teacher, and overall transcript courseevaluation. All incoming URM students are encouraged to apply for the program; however, withan average acceptance rate around 90%, not all applicants are accepted.Summer Bridge StructureThe SB program runs for five weeks and coincides with the second summer session. Students areadmitted into the program at no cost as part of the funding
, personnel, existing processes,stakeholders, mission, values and culture), as well as from outside the company (e.g. legal,regulatory, macroeconomic, ethical, and market dynamics). In using the Product ArchaeologyCanvas, students must “excavate” public information on all of these factors for an over-the-counter medical device. Like an archaeologist, they needed to create a plausible and coherentnarrative of the decisions the company made in moving that product idea to the customer. Withthis background they become forward-thinking intrapreneurs – proposing a way to increase thevalue of their product but in a way that balanced all of the various constraints and perspectives. Figure 3 – Product Archeology CanvasInnovation
#11 27-31 Loops, Arrays and 4 File I/O Ch 10: Pgs 275-280 Games Simulation and #12 3-7 Design, Project 5, File I/O, User Forms Ch 12: Pgs 299-338 Spring 2013 Project 5 Ethics, Business and Quiz #3 Workbook & Ch 12: Pgs 338-366 Project #5 November #13 10-14
geographic, disciplinary, and historical variations in engineering education and practice.Dr. Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette Carla B. Zoltowski, Ph.D., is Co-Director of the EPICS Program at Purdue University. She received her B.S. and M.S. in electrical engineering and Ph.D. in engineering education, all from Purdue University. She has served as a lecturer in Purdue’s School of Electrical and Computer Engineering. Dr. Zoltowski’s academic and research interests broadly include the professional formation of engineers and diversity and inclusion in engineering, with specific interests in human-centered design, engineering ethics, leadership, service-learning, assistive-technology, and
. Engineering Economics 7. Engineering Science 8. Engineering Tools 9. Experiments 10. Problem Recognition and Solving 11. Quality Control and Quality Assurance 12. Risk, Reliability, and Uncertainty 13. Safety 14. Societal Impact 15. Systems Engineering 16. Operations and Maintenance 17. Sustainability and Environmental Impact 18. Technical Breadth 19. Technical Depth Professional Practice Capabilities: 20. Business Aspects of Engineering 21. Communication 22. Ethical Responsibility 23. Global Knowledge and Awareness 24. Leadership 25. Legal Aspects of Engineering 26. Lifelong Learning 27. Professional Attitudes 28
and in STEM assessment. She chairs USC’s STEM Consortium.Prof. Jeffrey Miller, University of Southern California Dr. Miller is an Associate Professor of Engineering Practice in the Computer Science Department at the University of Southern California. He earned his BS, MS, and Ph.D. from the University of Southern California in 2002, 2002, and 2007, respectively. He has taught collegiate Computer Science for over 10 years at California State University, Los Angeles, the University of Alaska Anchorage, and now at USC. His research in two discrete areas - Computer Science education for K12, undergraduate, and graduate students and intelligent transportation systems, specifically related to vehicular networking and ethics
., Designing a Global Ethic for Engineers. 2003 ASEE Annual Conference, 2003.3. Walter, S. and D. Walden, Associate systems engineering professional (ASEP) Page 26.709.10 certification: A credential tailored for sstudents and junior engineers. 2010 ASEE Annual Conference, 2010. 94. Alungbe, G., et al., Professional certification in construction in USA. 2008 ASEE Annual Conference, 2008.5. Bush, T. and L.J. Genik, The importance of the disciplinary society in leadership skill development and advancement. 2013 ASEE Annual Conference, 2013.6. Hole, L.D., D.W. Radebaugh
program, students will have a concentration in engineering leadership notedon their transcript.Formal coursework is designed specifically for undergraduate engineering students. The coursesexplore topics including: self-awareness and emotional intelligence, leadership styles andtheories, servant leadership, team dynamics, motivating and guiding others, diversity in theworkplace (cultural, gender, etc.), communication, conflict management, ethical leadership,leading change, leading technology and innovation, market analysis, product development,entrepreneurship, and strategic and financial planning.A variety of assessment methods were employed in the first year. A pre- and post-testleadership inventory was administered to students to during the
program's various constituencies in which theobjectives are determined and periodically evaluated (Criterion #2);2. The students in the program must attain “an ability to design a system, component, orprocess to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic,environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, andsustainability” (Criterion #3); and3. The overall competence of the faculty may be judged by such factors as education,diversity of backgrounds, engineering experience, teaching experience, ability tocommunicate, enthusiasm for developing more effective programs, level of scholarship,participation in professional societies, and licensure as professional engineers (Criterion#5).Teaching
the protection of the health, safety, and welfare of the public. Professional Practice Courses—Any content relative to the professional practice of engineering; examples would be business, communications, contract law, management, ethics, public policy, and quality control.Due to the nature of technical societies and/or industries and consulting firms who might offerthese courses, most of them could be one-day to one-week-long workshops and could includecourse content that is proprietary in nature. Page 26.3.6In addition, the societies could collaborate to develop course requirements that must meet thefollowing
, problem-solving, communication, knowledge of business processes, teamwork, and agood work ethic, that can leverage the technical skills for greater impact for both the companyand the worker. Likewise, through their survey of 200 companies (2006), the metro-DenverWIRED Initiative discovered a need for technical workers with a broader-than-expected range ofskills, i.e. a call for technical workers to have solid writing, marketing, leadership, or sales skills.When evaluating job applicants, businesses surveyed indicated they value experience and skills,most, and find that applicants do not have the required written and verbal communication skillsthey need to be viable candidates. Based on a 2007 study, the Indiana Business Research Centerpredicted
design beyond just the technical solutions. In her book: The 21st Century Engineer,Patricia D. Galloway states:1 If engineers are relegated to the role of technician, they will no longer command the level of responsibility that will enable them to successfully compete in the global economy or assume the leadership roles that will enable them to elevate standards of living worldwide and provide enhanced protection of the environment.Similarly the National Academy of Engineers states:2 Thus, within the context of professional engineering practice, one must consider a system that includes … the economic, political, ethical, and social constraints as boundary conditions that define the possible range of solutions for
Center for Professional &Research Ethics. An in-person session is conducted to discuss with the students the importanceof ethics and why responsible conduct of research is important to all - not only to researchers. Page 26.511.6Networking SocialsThe community of ASPIRE scholars have the opportunity to meet once each semester withfaculty, alums and other local industry professionals. Alumni can provide valuable insight andmotivation to the students to persist to degree completion. Direct networking with local industryprofessionals can supplement career placement services to enhance employment opportunitiesfor ASPIRE scholars.Graduate School
engineering leaders should not only take action, butthat they should have the “energy and drive”11 to achieve a “personal vision”15. Anyone who hasworked on an engineering project understands this need for leaders to strive for the best and bethe champion for the implementation of innovations3. This theme relates to the concept of self-management, where engineering leaders must be able to work efficiently, manage their time, andhave a strong work ethic in order to achieve their personal vision2.Teamwork. Regardless of one’s role, engineers are almost always required to work in a teamsetting. It is therefore logical that teamwork would be an essential part of engineering leadership.Competencies within this theme were phrased both as “teamwork with
, and teamwork skills. Students are also presented the opportunity to improve theirprofessionalism and ethical values through these simulations. In Industrial Engineering (IE)teachings, where a variety of tools are used to design, improve, and manage integrated systems,simulation-based approaches become an important piece in the learning environment.There are a number of publications in literature that analyze the impact of simulation-basedteaching environments. A vast majority supports the experiential learning theory proposed byKolb [2]. In Umble & Umble [3], researchers utilize in-class simulation exercises for supply chainand inventory management principles. These exercises provide opportunities for in-class studentdiscussions that
competent field. The National Academy of Engineering, for example,have stated in their vision of “The Engineer of 2020” that engineering activities should beframed in the context of rapidly moving technological changes, global interconnection ofresources, and an increasingly diverse and multidisciplinary population of individuals involvedin or affected by engineering developments. Among the NAE aspirations for the engineeringfield is “a future where engineers are prepared to adapt to changes in global forces and trendsand to ethically assist the world in creating a balance in the standard of living for developing anddeveloped countries alike”3. This vision reflects the need to embrace global competencies framedwithin ethical considerations, where
the socio-economic dynamicsand business culture globally even to succeed locally. Recognizing the need, many engineeringschools in the U.S. have started offering ethics and study abroad programs to their undergraduatestudents. Our research shows that selection of countries for study abroad programs have widenedsignificantly in the recent years. For example, in the nineties, the US Universities were offeringstudy abroad programs mostly in European and few other developed countries in the Asia pacificregion. In recent years, that list has grown significantly including many other countries aroundthe world like South Africa, Brazil, Russia, China, Chile, and India to name a few. This paperpresents a survey of select U.S. engineering schools
underserved communities globally.Prior research shows that difficulties often arise as students arrive unprepared to addressthe cultural and technical challenges international work entails. For example, oneparticular case study in Gary Downey’s book highlighted the challenges inimplementation of a program to connect student engineers with underserved communitiesin an international setting. Differences in culture and language coupled with thegeographical distance compounded made the project untenable and it had to stop. Someof the reasons she cited included that “the large body of knowledge in the developmentarea was not readily accessible or available to engineers,” and students did not activelyseek out the ethical and social understanding necessary
engineering (e.g., teamwork, communication, ethics, inclusiveness anddiversity, new ideas/business development). The development of these professional skills arealso integrated into all courses within the curriculum.Curriculum Design Approach We are using a combination of instructional systems and the “Backwards Approach (BA)”to design GalvanizeU/UNH curricula. As a field, instructional design is historically andtraditionally rooted in cognitive and behavioral psychology, though recently constructivism(learning theory) has influenced thinking in the field. Instructional Systems Design (ISD) orsimply instructional design8 is the practice of creating "instructional experiences which make theacquisition of knowledge and skill more efficient
Engineering Design Service Projects various Public Policy Professional Organizations various Ethical Responsibility Engineer Interactions various Lifelong Learning“Students-Teach-Students,” These lectures place responsibility on students to teach new coursematerial to their peers. Students are assigned a course topic, which necessitates considerablepreparation and understanding in order to teach their peers. Student presenters are encouraged toprovide handouts, notes, and/or PowerPoint presentations, plus use approaches to keep theirclassmates engaged. The professor is on-hand to assist students through lecture material, ifnecessary
questions and essays, and if that can be available to the students from the first day, the iterations to conceptualize the subjects as well as the skills to solve problems will be much more meaningful. It may sound that we are teaching for a test, but if the problems are conceptual with applications in mind that is fine. 5. Teaching engineering needs to be connected to the philosophical basis of engineering and reflect on this connection. We need to teach within the pragmatic and ethical framework of engineering . The instructor needs to have strong connection to historical events and 13 relevant applications and encourage reflection on these aspects. The concepts specifications, what is a good