learning, which they can use to make adjustments to their teaching.One definition of formative assessment is offered by Black and Wiliam (2009): Practice in a classroom is formative to the extent that evidence about student achievement is elicited, interpreted, and used by teachers, learners, or their peers, to make decisions about the next steps in instruction that are likely to be better, or better founded, than the decisions they would have taken in the absence of the evidence that was elicited. (p. 7)However, there are multiple viewpoints on the methods by which this evidence should beelicited. One view interprets formative assessment as a formal diagnostic test that produces ascore quantifying student achievement
desired performance level. At this point, students are self-regulated learners: they canset their own learning goals, determine how to best accomplish these goals, and monitor their progressin accomplishing them [1, Part II]. When self-regulated learners perceive deficits in their learning, they exhibit adaptive help-seeking:asking others for the resources necessary in order to learn independently [16], [17]. Students may engagein formal (approaching an instructor) or informal (approaching a peer or friend) help-seeking behavior.Students who use more metacognitive, cognitive, and resource management strategies are more likely toseek help when needed. Furthermore, students who exhibit high self-esteem appear more likely to seekhelp when needed
engineering educator might be expected to possess. This has profoundimplications for the design of future courses for beginning teachers of engineering and alliedsubjects.(b) Findings related to becoming a professional engineering educatorOne of us (John) was much affected by the fact that much of the discussion seemed to focus onthe personal problems of the teacher, in particular the teaching versus research conflict. Itseemed there were no lines of accountability and that everything was governed by a strongmotivation to write papers to be published in internationally peer reviewed journals. He alsonoted a similarity with the problems faced by the beginning schoolteacher and considered thatthe workshop should have begun with a discussion of
. (2003). Introduction to the SCALE-UP (Student-Centered Activities for Large Enrollment Undergraduate Programs) Project. Proceeding of the International School of Physics.17. Haller, C.R., Gallagher, V.J., Weldon, T.L., & Felder, R.M. (2000). Dynamics of peer education in cooperative learning groups. Journal of Engineering Education, 89(3), 285-293.18. Biggs, J. & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university (4th ed). Berkshire, England: Open University Press, McGraw-Hill Education (UK).19. Lopez, J.A., Love, C., & Watters, D. (2014). Clickers in biosciences: Do they improve academic performance? International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 22, 26-41.20. Felder, R.M. &
Alaska Native Science & Engineering Program (ANSEP) Deputy Direc- tor and managed its Summer Bridge, Academies of Engineering, and University Success components. I earned a BS in Civil Engineering from University of Alaska Anchorage (UAA) in 2005 and a MS in En- gineering Management from UAA in 2009. I have taught the Introduction to Engineering course at UAA 5 times. I have more than five years of construction and engineering professional experience in Alaska. I specialized in water and sewer projects in remote Alaskan villages. My responsibilities have included design assistance, technical report and permit writing, feasibility studies, and business plan preparations. Previous work includes conceptual design of
through writing, speech and engineering drawings. • Create a Community: Allow students to make connections with the Cal Poly Mechanical Engineering community and develop support systems that will help them succeed during their time as students. This includes getting to know the faculty, understanding department procedures, finding extra-curricular opportunities and gaining exposure to other academic opportunities such as study abroad.New Freshmen YearTo address these goals, several structural changes were made. First, all Mechanical Engineeringfreshmen were put in a lockstep program so that they took the same four core ME courses duringthe same quarter with block scheduling. This ensured that all ME freshmen would
(modified from [7] Figure G-1; dashed linesand elements in blue added by the author)The only explicit mention of listening in the BOK3 is in the discussion of communication, whichhas both cognitive and affective outcomes: In creating designs that benefit all, the civil engineer must be able to listen and convey information appropriately to diverse audiences. …When civil engineers communicate, they integrate multiple forms of communication appropriate for the audience, such as listening, observing, speaking, writing, as well as nonverbal, visual, and graphical communication. [7, p. 44]Despite the lack of explicit discussion of listening with respect to other outcomes within theBOK3, these connections are present. The professional
also fostergreater buy-in from the faculty, the majority of whom in the department were hired after theprevious assessment plan was developed. However, while the engineering programs in thedepartment decided to write all of their performance indicators from scratch, the computerscience program took a different approach.There were two “Aha!” moments that critically shaped the development of the CS assessmentplan. As mentioned earlier, the first occurred when examining the list of 52 eKSOs and realizingthat they were performance indicators, some with a noticeable degree of alignment to indicatorstypically used in assessing ABET Student Outcomes. By choosing those eKSOs that exhibitedsuch alignment, the program could form the nucleus of an
AC 2007-1234: SHOULD I STAY OR SHOULD I GO? ENGINEERING STUDENTS'PERSISTENCE IS BASED ON LITTLE EXPERIENCE OR DATAGary Lichtenstein, Stanford University Gary Lichtenstein, Ed.D., is a Consulting Associate Professor of Engineering at Stanford University, specializing in quantitative and qualitative research methods. His areas of intellectual interest include engineering education, community-based research, and education evaluation and policy. His extensive teaching experience includes courses on qualitative research methods (for graduate students), and on writing and critical thinking (for students ranging from high school to professionals). He lives in southeast Utah. He can be contacted at
describing mentoring relationships. Participants discussed their experiencesand expectations, which were compared to research findings on mentoring, and generated manysuggestions.Several grant-related workshops have also been held. ADVANCE collaborated with the URIResearch Office in sponsoring a series of Grant Development Workshops geared toward juniorfaculty; these included sessions on Securing Funding, Collaborative Proposals, and GrantFunding. A Post-Award Grant Management Workshop is planned in the near future to provideconcrete advice for navigating the university bureaucracy once a grant is received.Monthly Writing Workshops, facilitated by a member of the ADVANCE leadership team, arealso being held. These provide a defined time set aside for
improvement.Assessing student learning of the engineering design process is particularly challenging, andefforts to assess design competency are varied 5-6. Examples of using surveys include self-assessments of abilities and knowledge7-8 and peer-based instruments where students assess the Page 7.310.1competency of their peers9-10. Examples of performance-based assessments include: juries where Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering Education
Cooperative Writing and Oral Presentation as Peer Teaching – Evaluating the Effectivenessof Element of Inductive Teaching and Social Constructivism on Student Outcomes”, Proc. ASEE Frontiers inEducation Conference, 2009, Session T4D.4. Kitto, K. L., “Developing and Assessing Conceptual Information in Materials Engineering, Using WrittenResearch Papers and Oral Poster Presentations, “Proc. ASEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 2008, SessionF4A.5. Kitto, K. L., “The Sound of Materials: Creating Excitement for Materials Engineering and Science InEngineering Technology Programs, June 2007, Proc. ASEE Annual Conference, AC 2007-297.6. Kitto, K. L., “Analyzing What Students Write About Materials – Another Strategy for Developing ConceptualLearning in a
havecreated for our students.2. Schumacher’s Intermediate Technology as the Precursor to Appropriate Technology Appropriate technology is widely credited as an outgrowth of the ideas expressed by the“radical economist”1 Ernst Friedrich “Fritz” Schumacher in his book Small is Beautiful: A Studyof Economics as if People Mattered2, which is a compilation and synthesis of his writings andwork from the 1940s through 1960s in which he developed the concept of “IntermediateTechnology”. The origins of Intermediate Technology reside in Schumacher’s criticism ofconventional development practices, which assumed that the problems of the developing worldcould be solved by the transfer of capital-intensive, large-scale technologies from theindustrialized
of a scientist. Scientists aim to observe, infer,classify, predict, and hypothesize [14], [15]. In this sense the scientific method is based uponconsidering all of the different factors and data to form a conclusion. Another important aspect ofscience is that the “Scientific method does not insure the satisfactory solution of the problem...anymore than it insures the construction of an adequate hypothesis for the research problem” (p. 238)[16]. This statement suggests that a scientist’s mindset is primarily focused on the problemdefinition stage of problem solving.The problem-solving mindset is also evidenced in an expansive range of disciplines through theiracademic writing. It is apparent in social sciences, such as psychology, through
, social constructions and hierarchies, historical background, andsocioeconomic status among other social constructs. As Anzaldúa explored her ownupbringing and lived reality, she deconstructed those spaces she inhabited where she faceddiscrimination and ambiguity to imagine and (re)shape a third space where new realitiescould exist [16]. Through a process of self-reflexivity, Anzaldúa explains, Nepantla becomesa (re)imagined space rather than a dichotomy of worlds [16]. Anzaldúa claims that Nepantlasoften emerge through writing – the writing that comes from deep and critical reflection thateventually leads to a process that catalyzes transformation.Nepantla is also a way to explore the world through lived experience and engage indecolonial
educational and engineering-focused platforms. These platforms were peer-reviewed focused-based databases in EBSCOhost,JSTOR, ProQuest, Web of Science, SpringerLink, and ASTS. The purpose of the SLR is toanalyze as many databases as possible, to enhance the search done in the previous work. Thesummary of the review protocol is shown in Figure 3. Knowing the platforms to be used, and the search phrase, the missing step from the firstphase comprised calculating the capture rate for the platforms selected (Figure 3), using thescoping set. The capture rate is a percentage that represents the ability to retrieve publicationsthat actually exist on the platforms, using the search terms19 (Figure 3) That is, it provides onemeasure of the quality of
SQL-Tutor and esql have been developed to provide interactiveand personalized learning experiences, focusing on individualized instruction and semanticfeedback [2, 23]. These systems address common SQL misconceptions and anti-patterns byoffering dynamic feedback and visual step-by-step explanations of query execution, distinct fromtraditional teaching methods [24, 25]. The proposed Generative AI model aims to extend theseapproaches by providing nuanced semantic error feedback without revealing solutions,encouraging deeper exploration and self-guided learning, representing a novel direction in SQLeducation [26, 27].[28] investigates the effectiveness of peer correction in SQL and NoSQL learning, suggesting it asa viable alternative to
performance. However, it was the second language for students inboth institutions. Students were tasked to write a blog and to provide constant feedback and editinguntil producing a final product. Constant feedback and interactions confirmed that the onlinelearning activity was beneficial from a linguistic and cross-cultural perspective. Ultimately,students developed autonomy, teamwork, and critical thinking skills. Note that this study showspossibilities for non-technical COIL activities with Engineering students, particularly those whohave a passion for learning new languages.Sustainability aspects and project-based learning (PBL) components can also be incorporated intoCOIL activities. For example, a virtual exchange (VE) was developed between
Director of the online Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering Program at Penn State. Her research interests include graduate-and postdoctoral-level engineering education; attrition and persistence mechanisms, metrics, policy, and amelioration; engineering writing and communication; and methodological development for nontraditional data. Her NSF CAREER award studies master’s-level departure from the engineering doctorate as a mechanism of attrition. Catherine earned her B.S. in Chemistry from The University of South Dakota, her M.S. in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering from Purdue University, and Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University. © American Society for Engineering
title and abstract were carefully reviewed to find studies pertaining to theexperiences of racially minoritized populations in STEM entrepreneurship. For exclusioncriteria, all results were limited to peer-reviewed journals published in English if they fit all otherrequirements and studied underrepresented populations’ experiences or perceptions in STEMentrepreneurship. There was no time period specified in the exclusion criteria due to the limitedamount of literature published in STEM entrepreneurship so all research regardless of thepublication date was considered. Once all inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to thisliterature review search and all duplicates were removed there were eight articles remaining to befurther explored
paper, asks students to put away their books, and writes amath problem on the blackboard, learners may expect that they are required to complete theproblem on their papers in silence and that they will be evaluated on their work. The gamelearners would assume themselves to be playing is the “test” game. By contrast, if an instructorintroduces a visitor from a nearby engineering firm and asks that visitor to present a dilemmafaced by her organization, learners may assume a very different kind of game – one in which thegoal is to solve a problem so that they can offer advice on how to overcome a real-life challenge.When novice elementary teachers are asked to complete an engineering design task, we mightexpect stability in an “engineering game
every five minutes, at the initiation of a given interval. First, the number of studentsexhibiting disengaged behavior were tabulated, which could include, but was not limited to,unrelated electronic device usage, off-topic discussion with peers, or physical disengagement.Second, the class activity was categorized according to the nature of the instructional activity(i.e. content-oriented lecture, storytelling, group work, challenge problem solving, studentpresentations, routine example solving, instructional transition) and any relevant teaching-toolsemployed (i.e. board writing, electronic media). Regression analysis of observation data,collected for the accelerated abroad course only, provided insight into the impact of in-classactivities
principles and practices for mineral and energy resource projects at the graduate and undergraduate levels.Rennie B. Kaunda , Colorado School of Mines Dr. Rennie Kaunda is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Mining Engineering at Colorado School of Mines, and a licensed Professional Engineer in the State of Colorado. Prior to joining academia, Dr. Kaunda spend 7 years in the mining industry where he worked on more than 50 global projects through- out Africa, Asia, South America and North America. Dr. Kaunda’s areas of expertise are surface and underground rock mechanics, geotechnical engineering, numerical modeling and artificial neural network modeling. He has published/coauthored more than 13 peer-reviewed
isn’t always easy. Female faculty in particular find that having fewwomen colleagues, unwelcoming search processes, and lack of development opportunities, to beinhibiting factors that influence the desire to pursue and enter tenure-track positions. Addressingthese issues calls for institutional transformation which requires senior administrative support, Page 26.756.4collaborative leadership, flexible vision, and visible action.3 External agencies, such as theNational Science Foundation (NSF), and a network of peer institutions can also influenceinstitutional transformation.3 Research suggests that females make career choices based upontheir
formative feedback students’ needs and issuesare the defining framework of learning issues, impediments, and barriers that an instructor canaddress for more effective teaching. Thus, students are empowered to play a role in their learningwhen they provide input about their instruction. Instructors in the JTF project have created avariety of web-enabled tools and resources to address issues revealed by student feedbackacquired by using Concept Warehouse or Blackboard survey tools. One tool is "pencasts" inwhich a smart pen captures a person's writing and/or drawing on a notepad along with audioinput to make a "pencast" recording as an audio PDF. These tutorial problem pencasts have beenmade into videos for the YouTube on the channel MSEASUproblems
studentcomments about feeling disconnected from their peers dropped significantly. 10Results and Findings: Faculty Advisor ResponsesThe faculty advisors’ responses to the student research experiences in the program are alsogenerally favorable each year. Faculty advisors write that the students were motivated and thattheir students produced results that will be published in journals and reports and that will bepresented at briefings and conferences. The faculty advisors reported that their studentsperformed a literature survey; collected data; operated hardware, performed data collection;performed data analysis; assisted graduate students; wrote code; learned how
instructionaltechnologies with alternative modes of delivery embracing active learning [8] and otherpathways identified herein.At the other extreme, Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) exclusively utilize onlinedelivery methods with a high reliance on self-paced learning via an asynchronous deliverymechanism and often at the expense of reduced engagement [9]. Strengths of MOOCs includevery high instructor productivity, which can reach thousands of students and some peer-assessment is feasible albeit via asynchronous discussion mechanisms [10]. Challenges ofMOOCs for teaching STEM include reduced retention [11], few opportunities for activeengagement, and challenges with assessment arising from the lack of authentication whereinonline-only grading may be difficult
apparent from focus group data. First,holistic relationship-based learning was just as important to faculty as it was to students.However, faculty perspectives on student-faculty relationships were different than theperspectives of students, and limitations and qualifications to relationship-based learning werenoted. Faculty also noted the importance of peer relationships for STEM student success.Second, faculty were aware of and tried to accommodate and intentionally include students ofdiverse social identities, particularly low income and transfer students. Social identity was notnoted as a barrier to students’ success; rather as something to be taken into account in terms ofteaching and learning. Third, practical money-saving strategies were
ofquality. Lastly, students interact with this service, greatly affecting the quality of the servicethey receive.Given the above factors, it may be very hard to close some gaps. Gaps may exist simply because Page 11.105.12student perceptions and expectations of the Learning Communities, the faculty, the mentors,their peers, or perceptions given to them by their parents, friends or other students. The toolincludes, in the survey, places for students to write in their comments. Focus group sessions areused to verify student survey responses, and also provide opportunities to probe for theunderlying causes of the gaps.Faculty should create an action
for all STEMstudents, a center for teaching and learning (faculty and student assistant professionaldevelopment), an academic support center for STEM students, research and peer teachingexperiences for STEM undergraduates, and support for evaluation and assessment of MIEproject activities.In this paper we describe the design of the model for entering students and the findings of thefive-year longitudinal evaluation study of student retention in STEM and at the university.Student and institutional outcomes are linked to project activities through the use of an input-activities-output-outcomes program logic map of the entering students program. First, webriefly describe the entering students program. Secondly, we describe how the program logic