) Engineering Project Management (3 credits) International Business Cultures in Engineering and Technology (3 credits) Engineering Leadership Capstone (3 Credits) Intergroup Dialogue (1 credit) Elective (with advisor approval) Notes: Maximum of 6 credits may also be taken
and/or roadmaps and milestones for deep learning. The second category of project based teaching/learning tools is represented by courses offeredlater in the curriculum, such as senior/capstone design, directed and independent study courses.These courses allow students to work individually or in groups on a particular project where theycan apply some of the skills acquired in classrooms to solve a particular problem. Similar to thefirst category, the emphasis in these courses is on the design process and application of skillsrather than targeting a specific one and deepening its understanding and improving its masteryby the student. The third category encompasses extra-curricular project-based learning activities in the formof national
the engineering profession, cultivating an innovative spirit from an early age can be aformidable task. Project Lead The Way (PLTW), a program dedicated to transformative STEMteaching for K-12 students, focuses on skills relevant to innovation and entrepreneurship such asproblem-solving and critical thinking. The PLTW program, however, has a limited focus on thehumanities which is presumed to turn women and minoritized populations away from STEM [2].In university-level engineering programs, with the heavy technical curricular demands, inclusionof coursework dedicated to innovation and creativity may not always be perceived as logisticallypossible. Allocating valuable course time that help engineers recognize opportunities and createvalue
point when students developed the feeling of autonomy. The most valuableaspects of the program were ranked to be international field trips, peers, and team projects. Forthe latter two aspects, defined in this work as the group dynamic, the most important factors forbuilding a sense of community are group pro-activity, cohesiveness, and attitude.IntroductionThe emerging call for future engineers with global-citizen mindsets asks for a re-evaluation ofcurrent educational experiences provided in higher education. In the U.S., participation in study-abroad programs for students majoring in engineering has increased more than 50% over the pastdecade [1]. Study-abroad programs represent the general interest of exposing students to othercultures or
AC 2011-1348: GLOBAL INTERESTS AND EXPERIENCE AMONG FIRST-YEAR CIVIL ENGINEERING STUDENTSAngela R Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder Angela Bielefeldt, PhD, PE, is an Associate Professor in the Department of Civil, Environmental, & Ar- chitectural Engineering at the University of Colorado - Boulder (CU). She is affiliated with the Mortenson Center in Engineering for Developing Communities at CU. She has taught the first-year Introduction to Civil Engineering course 13 times, starting in 1997. She also teaches a senior capstone Environmental En- gineering Design course, which included international water and sanitation projects in 2001, 2002, 2006, and 2010. Her research interests include ceramic water
. However, resources are limited for assessing students’ abilitiesto consider design from a broad perspective and to account for a design’s impact on itsstakeholders. The purpose of this paper is to introduce a rubric to assess how students perceiveand integrate stakeholders into the design of a complex system. Following a description of therubric and its development, this paper describes results from the initial application and evaluationof the rubric by a panel of faculty, graduate students, and research scientists, as they used therubric to assess aircraft design projects. This initial evaluation demonstrated the strengths of therubric (particularly with regards to validity) and how the reliability of the ratings among raterswas sensitive to the
have access to industry practitioners with the appropriate expertise to meet theirpractical course-support needs (e.g., site visits, guest lectures, and mentors for capstone projects).Researchers [20,21,22] have also argued that knowledge is distributed among people and theirCoP and that learning occurs by connecting with the CoP to aggregate information from thecommunity and participate in meaningful activities with the community.Despite the perceived benefits of integrating academia and practice, the education communitystill experiences marginal and unequal access to the CoP. Access is usually achieved via one-on-one contacts and relationships, leaving institutions or instructors, and consequentially students,without such connections or
project, severalstudents were very interested in the opportunity to be involved in a community outreachproject aimed towards researching and developing effective and appropriatedemonstrations of sound wave phenomena to 5th graders. The entire class was given oneresearch and writing assignment to search for helpful resources related to this Page 26.1713.6effort. When final projects were selected by the twelve enrolled in the course, two seniorfemale electrical engineering students chose to devote their entire capstone project ondeveloping outreach materials and demonstrations, and they became involved in ongoingmeetings held by the WAVES project
depending on the scope of the project. • Also, the design projects used in the first two courses are defined by the instructor and clear milestones are established for the students. The focus is as much on the design process as it is on the design project. In the upper-level design courses the student teams submit their own project proposals and set their own milestones.Syllabi for the first three design courses can be found at: (http://faculty.dwc.edu/bertozzi/ ). Themost recent design project descriptions and assessment milestones can also be found at this site.The two senior capstone design classes are still under discussion and development at this time
electricity and gasoline, seems to elicit disapproval of the price increasesbut little more. America has become indifferent to energy issues and continues to pay the higherprices without much thought. This paper will begin by examining the state of the general publicconcerning energy and its lack of energy literacy. Most people have not begun to understand thecomplex nature of the energy challenge. Poor energy literacy led the authors to submit aproposal to a local foundation in 2006 to develop an “Energy Room” at the Mayborn Museum onthe Baylor University campus. The Mayborn Museum is a facility that “provides a widespectrum of learning opportunities to engage all types of visitors.” Baylor Universityengineering students worked on several projects
and engineering literacy practices within K-12 science classroom and professional communities.Ms. Noreen Balos, University of California, Santa Barbara Noreen Balos is a doctoral student in the Learning, Culture & Technology program at the University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB). Prior to UCSB, she served as Student Affairs Officer for UCLA’s Biomedical Research minor program advising undergraduate researchers in their pursuit of MD or MD- PhD. At ASU’s School for Engineering of Matter, Transport, & Energy (SEMTE), she was a Project Manager, overseeing with CO-PIs, an NSF Innovation through Institutional Integration (Iˆ3) grant col- laborating with academic departments such as mathematics, physics
students with more design-decision making experience to enable them to be ready to engineer upon graduation. In thisresearch, third and fourth year undergraduate mechanical engineering students were guidedthrough the process of designing learning aid prototypes to be used in general engineeringeducation. Students were encouraged to use advanced technologies such as 3D printing and virtualsimulation to realize their concepts. This project assisted students in identifying their own andtypical misconceptions and devise tools which corrected those cognitive errors. A series of self-evaluation methods were used to identify the student’s perception of their decision-making skilllevels. Over the multiple categories of design decision-making skills
, Center for Electromagnetics Research (CER), Northeastern University. Pub- lications/Papers: Reenergizing and Reengaging Students Interest through CAPSULE; A Novel and Evolu- tionary Method on Educating Teachers to Promote STEM Careers Jessica Chin, Abe Zeid, Claire Duggan, Sagar Kamarthi (IEEE ISEC 2011); and ”Implementing the Capstone Experience Concept for Teacher Professional Development” Jessica Chin, Abe Zeid, Claire Duggan, Sagar Kamarthi (ASEE 2011). Rel- evant Presentations: ”K-12 Partnerships” (Department of Homeland Security/Centers of Excellence An- nual Meeting 2009); ”Building and Sustaining K-12 Educational Partnerships” (NSF ERC 2007 - 2010 National Meetings); ”Research Experience for Teachers
specificcriteria such as electrical or mechanical). The curriculum also includes nine hours ofunrestricted electives, which are often useful when a student transfers into the program sincecredits can count towards the degree where other engineering programs might have to reject thecredit. Page 23.116.2The primary focus area includes significant upper division project experience with six semesterhours of project-based credits in the 20 credit hours within the focus area. The 20 credits in thefocus area do not include eight hours of multidisciplinary capstone design, which are consideredcore content for the degree. The secondary focus requires 12 semester
industry, consists of all the necessary steps tobring a new or redesigned product to the market. Although the process is practiced in manydifferent ways, depending on, for instance, company size and customer requirements, there aremany common elements. These need to be covered by University teaching to prepare studentsfor jobs in industry. This paper considers how students can be supported to make open, creativeand well informed decisions in several stages of the product development process.A teaching approach suitable for the product development process is described and investigated.The pedagogic context of the approach is project based learning in small student groups withshort regular meetings with an instructor for consultation and supervision
one of the follow-up spring courses. In the BSE track, students havethe opportunity to work on more complex design-build projects and a capstone senior designproject.Electronic portfolioElectronic portfolios were added to the curriculum as a tool to enhance student learning throughreflection. The Virginia Tech Electronic Portfolio system (VTeP), available to all students at theuniversity, is based on software from the Open Source Portfolio Initiative. As part of theirsemester grade EngE1024 students were required to enter specific information and assignmentsinto their ePortfolio and to create a presentation within their portfolio to share with theirinstructor. The instructor evaluated the presentation twice during the semester, for both
and measurable, and the most significant causes of poorquality and productivity are controlled or eliminated.The first CMM model developed was the Capability Maturity Model for Software (SW-CMM).Its use enhances the capabilities of the software development organization to deliver software ontime, within cost, and meeting the objectives of the system and the customer. This documentedsuccess resulted in the proliferation of CMM-based models to improve engineering processes, Page 9.1316.1which in 1998, prompted industry, the US government, and the SEI to begin the CapabilityMaturity Model Integration6 (CMMI) project to provide a single
Project-Oriented Capstone Courses, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 19-24.JIUNN-CHI WUJiunn-Chi Wu is Associate Professor of the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the National Central University in Taiwan, ROC.PEI-FEN CHANG Page 9.508.11Pei-Fen Chang is Assistant Professor of the Graduate Institute of Teaching and Instruction at theNational Central University in Taiwan, ROC.Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for EngineeringEducation Annual Conference & ExpositionCopyright 2004, American Society for Engineering Education
provideseparate technical writing or speaking courses, which may run concurrently with certain requiredtechnical courses. Another way to provide communication instruction in the technical classroomarises when student projects are sponsored by industry. Here, the industrial sponsor receiveswritten and oral reports and suggests modifications to the students based on experience with thenorms of communication in a particular field 6,7,8. Unfortunately, these approaches to communication instruction do not solve theintegration problem so much as they reproduce it. When technical students are sent to consultwith writing center tutors, for example, that tutor may be placed at an information disadvantageand may deliver writing instructions that are colored
studios face a challenge more to establishthe basic atmosphere of PDI than to proceed with the ‘messy work’ of integration.THE DESIGN STUDIO SEQUENCEThe eight PDI design studios can be divided into two halves. The first half consists of 3 newdesign studios and the required second year engineering design course, Introduction toEngineering Design. The second half begins with PDI V, an introduction to industrial design,and ends with a year long multidisciplinary capstone design experience. The specific PDI studiosare discussed below.PDI 1The central concerns of this semester were to open up ways of being in the world - throughsensory awareness, through experimentation and physical engagement with artifact, site andprogram and through working methods
Regulations • Safety, Health, and Loss Prevention • Principles of Design • Power and Energy Systems • Supply Chain Management • Systems Engineering • Creative Design • Disasters and Modern Society • Cities and Technology in the Industrial Age • Bioethics • Business & Engineering Ethics • Nature & ReligionC-Tier Courses: • Introduction to Design • Senior Capstone Design • Material Science and Engineering • Design for Manufacturing • Technical Communication • Software Project Management • Six Sigma • Computing in a Global Society • Computational Modeling • Product DesignD-Tier Courses: • Engineering Statistics • Biomaterials • Entrepreneurship and Leadership • Polymer
classes, and with other non-engineering communities at on-campusevents that promoted environmental sustainability and awareness of California water challenges.Impacts beyond the piloted classroom: 1) The videos produced by the engineering students have been used to teach younger engineering students and other Cal Poly Pomona non-engineering students about different water-related topics identified as a right-to-know. 2) Motivated by this pilot laboratory project, a Kellogg Honors College engineering student decided to work on a campus wide CPP water education research project that included 600 subjects. The project was completed as an Honor’s capstone project. Results are in preparation for publication.Challenges
basis. A common example of thisformat in the engineering curriculum is the assignment of teams to Capstone Design Projects [6],[7], [8]. Common issues include team formation, mentoring, feedback and evaluation,milestones, assessment, leadership, individual accountability, and team dysfunction.In contrast to larger team projects, the Problem Solving Studio (PSS) implemented at GeorgiaTech and Emory University [9], [10] has students working in pairs to solve “well-structured butsomewhat complex” problems during class time. A similar approach is found in “Process-Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning” (POGIL) [11], [12]. POGIL also uses instructor facilitatedteaming during class times. Typical POGIL groups consist of 3-4 students, each with anassigned
was developed incrementally to address several challenges thatvarious academic departments encountered during a period from roughly 2016-2017. Becausethe institution is both an academic and military one, it encountered several obstacles to UASoperations. Some were unique to the military status and will not be addressed in as much detail,but all of the obstacles could apply to any academic institution.During the time period in question, there were four primary academic departments attempting touse sUAS for research, capstone projects, or to directly support classroom instruction. Asobstacles to operations surfaced, each department had a representative attempting to navigate thevarious requirements. This was an inefficient approach that led to
Laboratory Experiment Written Reports (2 Reports (2 Formal Reports, Formal Reports, Individual); Abstract, Individual); Abstract, Nomenclature, Nomenclature, Introduction, Analysis, Results, Introduction, Analysis, Results, Discussion, and Conclusions – Teamwork (3-5 Discussion, and Conclusions – students/team), 9 short form reports, individual Teamwork (3-5 students/team), 9 Tools: MS Word, Excel, Matlab short form reports, individual Tools: MS Word ME – 471 Machine Design II ME 481 – Senior Capstone Design Design Project Documentation: Problem Definition, Progress report, Formal Design Reports
Paper ID #11341Development of Student Competencies Overtime in an Authentic ImmersiveDesign ExperienceProf. Zahed Siddique, University of Oklahoma Zahed Siddique is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the School of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering of University of Oklahoma. His research interest include product family design, advanced material and engineering education. He is interested in motivation of engineering students, peer-to-peer learning, flat learning environments, technology assisted engineering education and experiential learning. He is the coordinator of the industry sponsored capstone from at his
meeting, assume professional society leadership positions, etc. Students must fulfill specified outreach requirements during their college career before they can graduate. 5. Place more emphasis on professionalism and ethics in a senior capstone class: Two full lectures of the senior design project are devoted to these topics. One of the lectures (in the context of engineering standards) is devoted to the role of professional societies in the development and maintenance of standards. The students are made aware of the need to become involved with the professional societies, and the importance of their service in standard-setting committees. Another lecture is devoted to the topic of ethics in
addressed here (although this study does not even support this practice).However, for other less homogeneous academic situations, it appears that teams can be helpedmost by providing them with more assistance in scheduling and meeting arrangements.References1. Richard Bannerot, “Characteristics of Good Team Players,” Proceedings of the 2004 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition of the ASEE, June 20-23, 2004, Salt Lake City, UT.2. Alan J. Dutson, Robert H. Todd, Spencer Magleby, and Carl Sorensen, “A Review of Literature on Teaching Engineering Design Through Project-Oriented Capstone Courses,” Journal of Engineering Education, January 1997, pp. 17-25.3. James L. Brickell, David B. Porter, Michael R. Reynolds and Richard D
goal of the reform effort is to have students take at least one such course each semesterduring the junior year and first semester of the senior year; the second semester of the senior yearis when most students take the industry-driven capstone course, which already uses the IDEALSapproach.The core of the IDEALS courses is collaborative, problem-based learning; however, critical tothe approach are explicit objectives related to communication, team skills, consideration of andapplication of engineering fundamentals in design, experimentation, or computer modeling. Inthe design of the courses, the various assignments were specifically chosen to draw upon priorknowledge and to have students use it along with their newly acquired knowledge in
), and the community at all levels (k12, undergraduate, graduate, post-graduate and internationally). A few of these key areas include engineering identity and mindsets, global competencies, failure culture, first year experiences in engineering, capstone design thinking, integrating service and authentic learning into the engineering classroom, implementing new instructional methodologies, and design optimization using traditional and non-traditional manufacturing. She seeks to identify best practices and develop assessments methods that assist in optimizing computing and engineering learning. Dr. Gurganus was one the inaugural award winners of the Diane M. Lee teaching award in 2021 and received an Exemplary Mentor