for their lack of success in school [14, 15]. IQ testing was put in place to“scientifically” demonstrate the inability of students to advance in educational settings, framingLatino/a/x students as mentally deficient, lazy, unhygienic, and culturally flawed [24]. Examplesof the manifestation of deficit ideologies include: (1) the assumption that home language (otherthan English) could be a barrier for learning [16-18]; (2) the presumed incompetency of studentsbased on race, gender, and other social identities [19, 20]; (3) the belief that community andhousehold practices lead to cultural aspects that are to blame for not adjusting to the project ofAmericanization through schooling [13, 21, 22]; and (4) an overall tendency to blame the victim
2019 Award for Excellence in Education Abroad Curriculum Design. He has also worked as a construction project engineer, consultant, and safety inspector. He be- lieves that educating the next generation of professionals will play a pivotal role in sustainability standard practices. In terms of engagement, Dr. Valdes-Vasquez has served as the USGBC student club’s adviser and the ASC Sustainability Team’s faculty coach since 2013. He is currently serving as a CSU President’s Sustainabil- ity Commission member, among multiple other committees. In addition, he is involved with various professional organizations at the national level, including the American Society for Engineering Educa- tion (ASEE), the
. Third, weassigned labels to the unlabeled remaining subset of 200 students’ assignments with the NLPapproach. Lastly, we read those (newly) labeled students’ responses to evaluate whether assignedcodes to those responses through the NLP approaches were accurate or not. Here, accuracymeans that the assigned code represented the idea expressed in student responses. We technicallyimplemented those four processes in Google Colab notebooks that were written using acombination of the R and Python programming languages. All code is presented in the GitHubrepository we have set up for this project at: https://github.com/andrewskatz.Data CollectionThe first-year engineering program (FYE) at Virginia Tech teaches students an ethics modulethat comprises a
researchers using open, emergent coding independently. Survey responses were analyzedline-by-line, focusing on the participants’ descriptions of their identities and their opinions on theterm Latinx. Researchers then met to determine consensus amongst the codes. This was followedby axial coding where the codes identified were compared to one another and relationships werehighlighted. The second stage was to determine themes that arose from the codes. Thecodes/relationships were used to identify themes and patterns across the data.LimitationsThe survey used to gather data for this project brought some limitations. Firstly, it was notspecified in the survey that students were expected to pick terms from the provided list. This ledto some students
transitionfrom undergraduate to graduate education can be a difficult transition regardless of gender.Significant differences exist between undergraduate and graduate engineering education in termsof the levels of technical expertise and independence expected of students. While it is part of mostundergraduate curricula to impart fundamental knowledge, teach problem-solving skills, anddevelop critical thinking, as soon as one enters a graduate program, these are assumed. First-yeargraduate students are expected to use their technical expertise and independence inadvanced-level courses and projects/scientific research, alongside older graduate students, withlittle mentoring or training to ease this transition. As a result, most students struggle to
that maternity leave may delaycompany projects and negatively affect firm operations [30], [38]. Furthermore, women engineersin the Arab world are also limited in their job opportunities because cultural norms prevent themfrom traveling offshore alone [30]. As a result, companies prefer to hire men over women [30]. In Palestine, women engineers face similar limitations due to cultural norms, includingfeeling disrespected and unsafe in the workplace and having limited access to site experience [38].Moreover, despite engineering firms in Palestine being willing to hire women, the majority stillprefer men, highlighting the role of gender bias as a significant barrier for Arab women [38].Discussion Women in STEM fields, particularly
newly developed scientific theories of the atom "emphasizedscience over practice while pushing the humanities and social sciences aside" [10]. Theseresearch-focused programs relied on educational approaches that were vastly different than theapprenticeship style programs established in the US throughout the nineteenth century. Theestablishment of formal Nuclear Science and Engineering (NSE) curricula started with theManhattan Project and evolved to primarily focus on power generation as the commercializationof the nuclear power industry began. By 1975, eighty nuclear engineering departments had beenestablished in US higher education institutions nationwide. Growing concerns about radiationand environmental impacts combined with the accidents at
resources available for instruction and assessment of these topics contributes to thechallenges in addressing these outcomes. Safety, teamwork, and communication have becomemore of a focus in the ChE laboratories in recent years, and thus the resources to teach and assessthem have emerged. A similar effort to develop projects and materials that focus on topics thatare harder to assess may be required if they will be prioritized as important learning outcomes forthe ChE laboratory courses.Only 8 of the 73 faculty respondents provided an answer to the last survey question, addressingChE lab course objectives not covered in the list provided. Only two of the answers were unique,addressing outcomes not covered in the list. This indicates that from the
five years have really refined me as a person and I just want to finally communicate that...like I feel pretty confident of who I am. (italics added for emphasis)For Amelia, the course allowed her to step out of herself and see how she had grown, that is, howshe developed her identity, as she listened to younger students. The benefit of the course to her,then, was not only having furthered her understanding of her identity development, but feelingready to share that with the world. Taken together, these data suggest the course was able to helpstudents progress in their self-concept clarity and the projection of that clarity, regardless of thelevel of self-concept clarity with which they entered.With these findings from the inductive
of Market- ing Education, and the Association for Consumer Research (ACR) Film Festival. An American Marketing Association (AMA) - Sheth Consortium Fellow, Professor Saint Clair has been recognized for academic excellence by the Ph.D. Project, AMA Foundation, and National Black MBA Association. In 2020, Saint Clair and his co-authors received the ACR Best Working Paper award for their study of diversity market- ing. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Insights gleaned from the GAIN peer-mentoring program pilotAbstractThere is a growing collection of literature that documents the persistence problem in Science,Technology, Engineering
. Breckon. “Using QSR‐NVivo to facilitate the development of a grounded theory project: An account of a worked example.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology, vol. 13(4), pp. 283- 302, 2010.[22] J. McCabe. “Racial and gender microaggressions on a predominantly-White campus: Experiences of Black, Latina/o and White undergraduates.” Race, Gender & Class, vol. 16 (1-2), pp. 133-151, 2009.[23] M.M. Camacho & S.M. Lord. " Microaggressions" in engineering education: Climate for Asian, Latina and White women. In 2011 Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Rapid City, SD, USA, October 12 – 15, 2011, pp. S3H-1, IEEE, 2011[24] J. Minikel-Lacocque. “Racism, college, and the power of
grades and stress over thechallenge of connecting with faculty members remotely. Some items were motivated byobserved differences in student work, which faculty surmised was due to the added challengesstudents faced in working collaboratively on homework, projects, and in study groups.The survey prompts were preceded by the following statement: The current coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak is causing extra stress for many people, including families with children of all ages. We would like to know how things are going for you and your family related to this situation. Please answer the following questions about your experiences and feelings over the last few weeks, using the following scale. 1
– Students indicated which, if any, of the onboarding programs they participated in. • Demographics – Students provided demographic information including race, ethnicity, gender identity, sexual orientation, age, admission status, citizenship, education level of parent(s)/guardians(s), and major.The long-term plan for this project is to longitudinally track students’ academic progress to assessretention and progress through degree completion in Clark School and at the University of Maryland.Finally, the outcomes of future TerrapinSTRONG initiatives will be evaluated, which will allow for acomparison of the efficacy of virtual and in-person programming.ProcedureThe survey was sent out electronically by email to 1154 new
. He was among the 25 outstanding faculty design team, from 14 States, of the nationwide initiatives: Global Skills for College Completion (GSCC) and Taking College Teaching Seriously (TCTS). He developed and led several faculty professional development and curriculum development seminars and workshops in STEM pedagogy, locally and nationwide. He co-led Project Quantum Leap - Advanced Leadership and Curriculum (PQL-ALeC) a year-long seminar that promoting leadership and mentoring skills, curriculum development, and teaching math in compelling contexts at LaGCC. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Work in Progress: A Model to Improve
© American Society for Engineering Education, 2021 2021 ASEE Conferencetools. Interactions with friends, classes, projects, and other staff and instructors have also beenshown to aid in student involvement within the space [6]. Reoccurring tools such as the 3Dprinter and computer stations were also often identified as "gateway" tools that could aid in theearly introduction of the students into the space [11]. Knowing the importance of tools and theirinteractions can help create a pathway for students to enter the space and become morecomfortable with tools in the future [11, 12]. The approach taken here, which looks for ways tobetter engage students within the makerspace by understanding their interactions with
community college women in engineering and computer science. Theresearch will explore if (1) such networking interventions increase community college women’smotivation, self-efficacy, and confidence in engineering & computer science and (2) thenetworking interventions result in greater retention of community college women in engineering& computer science programs. The project was launched in Western Massachusetts with anevent co-sponsored by PVWIS and SWE called “Unleash Your Inner STEM” in February, 2021.Similar events will be piloted in Los Angeles and Houston. SWE will target multiple hightransfer community colleges in each regional area.Activities and EventsPVWIS events support community college women in STEM by providing a peer group
/skillslearned were highlighted. These new code definitions offered nuanced information, which wereneeded to characterize the six interviews in the current study. During the analysis process, thecode definitions and final code designation was negotiated among research group members toproduce intercoder reliability. The full codebook for the overall project can be found in anupcoming manuscript (Cross et al., 2021).ResultsThe results of this study are consistent with previous research suggesting that a system ofoppression called the double standard exists in engineering education. The double standard inengineering education is defined in this study as a set of principles produced by the chilly climateof engineering that serve to benefit the majority
assignment. Based on the survey responses, the sample for the study was 125undergraduate engineering students in a single technical research university.Data Collection and Survey InstrumentData for this study were collected through an electronically administered survey in Qualtricsbased on Sharma’s [9] instrument of cultural orientations. The survey was administered toengineering students from different engineering disciplines as part of the larger project approvedby the Institutional Review Board (IRB), which focuses on Hofstede’s original four culturaldimensions [1], [3]. However, we focused on the power distance and uncertainty avoidanceconstructs in this study.We found both constructs consistent and relevant to measure the perceptions of
are introduced to success strategies, including time management, study skills, learning styles, and test-taking strategies. There are engineering projects designed to motivate students to become active learners, responsible students, and ethical engineering professionals. Each student will learn what to expect from his/her studies as an engineering major. All Engineering LLC scholars are enrolled in the same section that includes students in the general FAMU and FSU population. From 2015-2018, the students were enrolled in the faculty liaison’s section of the course. This allowed students to interact with the faculty in a formal academic setting, as well as the informal academic setting during the
interviewtranscripts, the interview responses were shared with a small group of engineering and scienceeducation graduate researchers for help with coding. Descriptive and in vivo coding methodswere used for first cycle coding, and pattern coding was used for second cycle coding. Thisproject was conducted with approval of the institution’s IRB, project #IRB2020-375.The graduate perspective on the role of GLAs in the lab Before any change in roles could be commented on, the initial self-perception of a GLA’srole and responsibilities in the laboratory classroom had to be assessed to provide a baseline for a“normal” in-person semester. Perhaps not surprisingly, all GLAs surveyed indicated that theynoticed a change in their role and responsibilities since
thedismay of this group of students, the professor had not allowed them to self-select project groupsand instead used group formation software to create heterogeneous groups. As their conversationprogressed, it became apparent that several of these male students had not previously been in agroup with a female classmate, and were not happy that they had to be now. In reference to thegirls in their class, they callously used names such as “annoying girl”, “space cadet” and “coffeebitch”. Their annoyance with the assigned groups was obvious except for one student whom theothers dubbed “lucky”; he was in a group with Nicki. Their conversation continued as follows:“Lucky” student: But he made it so most of the groups have a girl in themStudent 1: Yeah
Institutions to Four-Year Completions,” Snapshot Report 17, Spring 2015. 2. Carlos Lopez and Stephanie J. Jones. "Examination of factors that predict academic adjustment and success of community college transfer students in STEM at 4-year institutions." Community College Journal of Research and Practice 41, no. 3, pp. 168- 182, 2017.3. Benjamin W. Cowan and Nathan Tefft, “College Access and Adult Health”, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 26685, released January 2020.4. J. Beaumont, T. Lang, S. Leather, C. Mucklow, Report from the policy sub-group to the Nutrition Task Force Low Income Project Team of the Department of Health, Radlett, Hertfordshire: Institute of Grocery Distribution; 1995.5. J. Beaulac
instructions.MethodsResearch QuestionsThis research is guided by the following research questions: 1. Does performing origami-based tasks and/or orthographic projections-based tasks positively impact spatial perception, mental rotation, and/or spatial visualization abilities? If so: • What proportion of origami/CAD activities generates the greatest increase in PSVT scores? • What proportion of origami/CAD activities provides a quicker increase in PSVT scores? 2. Does the level of previous experience in origami/CAD impact PSVT scores?Workshop DesignFour 12-week workshops utilizing origami and/or CAD exercises were developed. Workshop Aconsisted of four origami modules followed by eight CAD modules; workshop B is the reverse
investigating the role of professional organizations(NSBE and BLGOs) in the success of Black engineering students. Professional organizationshave long served as spaces of support for the Black community. The larger project focused onthese two specific types of entities to understand how organizations centered on the professionaland civic commitment might differentially support engineers with a shared racial identity.However, there are many different types of spaces that students can engage in for support andcommunity, this study was designed to uncover the various spaces the Black engineeringstudents describe as counterspaces. This work sought to address the following researchquestions: RQ1: Through their stories, what are identified as
and math (STEM) fields have increased inoverall importance from a variety of perspectives during the past few decades. In terms ofindividual employment opportunities and overall quality of life, STEM occupations have higherthan average job growth projections and higher than average wage rates [1] . STEM occupationsare also closely linked to high prestige and economic prosperity from a national standpoint [2] .In terms of practical application, STEM fields are responsible for identification of solutions tomyriad challenges in multiple business sectors, government, entertainment, and everyday life.It is widely acknowledged that the United States must increase its production of individualsskilled in various STEM fields in order to maintain and
and testing overtechnical terms and formulas fills one part of the repertoire; it does not complete it. Our previousresearch revealed that students stock their repertoires in a number of ways, one of which washands-on learning.4 For example, in that study, a student noted: In this case we were given a list of materials we could use for our project. The problem is feeling a list doesn’t really help me. I need to feel and see the materials in order to fully understand their capabilities as well as their limitations.4Stocking a sufficient repertoire is based on all the students’ experiences in the domain, whichincludes coursework, past experience, extracurricular design experience, and so forth.Thus, effective verbal
specifically for job search skills,required a full year senior design project of all students, and the career center is too general --more specific information is needed, Graduates were also asked if they had any issues with theengineering technology degree vs. engineering degree. The results indicate that five of thegraduates did have an issue, while 19 did not. Comments to support answers provided indicatedthat ET grads are hired at lower levels than their engineering counterparts, they have to workharder to show their capability, potential employers have preconceived notions that ET degreeswere inferior and were at times thought to be two-year degrees or certificates. One respondentindicated that their resume presents their experience prior to
., number of filter slices [n]).We illustrate these methodological decisions as well as the results of TDA and its usefulness forengineering education using data from a project investigating first-year engineering students’underlying attitudes, beliefs, and mindsets to characterize the latent diversity of these students. Apaper-and-pencil survey was administered to 3,855 students at 32 ABET accredited institutionsacross the U.S. in Fall 2017. After cleaning the data using attention checks within the survey, 3,711student responses were examined for validity evidence. Exploratory factor analysis (for newlydeveloped scales) and confirmatory factor analysis (for existing scales) were conducted. Theresulting factors with strong validity evidence and
. Theselimitations project on young women an inability to envision oneself as an IT specialist inthe future, and as a result form an unwillingness to pursue further development in IT.H. Input from stakeholdersDuring the study we have also shared7 the graph from Figure 1 and interview severalstakeholders from academia, government and general public. “Women are just not gifted enough to be accepter in IT University” “They have realized that IT is above the level of girls competence. The requirement for IT at school and at University differ” “Women got married and start a family instead of IT profession” “IT is respectable and highly compensated job. Women got washed out in competition with males in our society” “If IT won’t be such desirable