, students pitch proposalsfor a capstone lab project, projects are selected and then a list of them is presented to thefreshmen. Freshmen then rework their resume to apply to be part of the senior project they mostdesire. Senior teams then receive the resumes and choose four to eight freshmen they wish to“hire”. In weeks 10 through 12, freshmen arrange times to join senior teams to aid in thelaboratory tasks needed to complete the senior team’s final project.Homework: Individual students are required to turn in an initial resume, and a resumeincorporating the professor’s changes and tailored to the job they want. At the end of thecollaboration, freshmen teams compose a memo detailing their work with the seniors.Final Project (Weeks 12 - 14):Purpose
as 500 miles from the site of the pyramid. The base of thepyramid is aligned with the cardinal directions accurate to 0.067 degrees. The Romans built asystem of aqueducts that supported a city of over one million, supplying over 500,000 cubic metersof water daily2. The ancients also designed and built immense ships. The Syracusia3, 180 feet inlength, had a capacity of 1940 passengers and a crew of 200. It featured a library, gymnasium andbathroom, and could carry a cargo of 1,600 to 1,800 tons. These are achievements that modernengineers would be proud to have made.But the engineers of these early projects did not have the science, mathematics, computingcapabilities or machinery to simplify these tasks. Instead, they were trained as
Dynamics and Vibrations 4Mech. Design 1 3Mech.Design 2 3 Design Mfg 2 / Mach. Des. 4Mech. Measurements 1 3 Thermal-Fluids Exper. 4.0 Laboratory 1 4Mech. Measurements 2 3 Mechanical Systems Exper. 3.0 Laboratory 2 4Senior Design Project 3 Capstone Design Elective 4.0 Capstone Design 4Applied Thermodynamics 3Heat and Mass Transfer 3 Heat Transfer 3.3 Heat Transfer 3Applied Fluid Mechanics 3Departmental Seminar 0 MechE Seminar Elective 0.7ME Technical Elective 1 3 MechE Tech Elective
. Beyerlein, University of Idaho, Moscow Dr. Beyerlein has taught at the University of Idaho for the last 28 years. He is coordinator of the college of engineering inter-disciplinary capstone design course and currently serves as the Department Chair for Mechanical Engineering. Dr. Beyerlein has been active in research projects involving engine test- ing, engine heat release modeling, design of curricula for active , design pedagogy, and assessment of professional skills. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Using Solid Modeling to Enhance Learning in Mechanics of Materials and Machine Component DesignAbstractThis article reports on a classroom research study
, 2010.[15] Ochs, Lennon, Watkins, and Mitchell. A comprehensive model for integrating entrepreneurship education and capstone projects while exceeding abet requirements. In American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, 2006.[16] Sheri D Sheppard. Mechanical dissection: An experience in how things work. Proceedings of the Engineering Education: Curriculum Innovation & Integration, pages 6–10, 1992.[17] Sheri Sheppard and R Jennison. Freshman engineering design experiences and organizational framework. Inter- national Journal of Engineering Education, 13:190–197, 1997.[18] Otto and Wood. Product Design: Techniques in Reverse Engineering and New Product Development. Prentice Hall, 2001.[19] Abe Feuerstein
atechnical report documenting results of the design process; 5) managing design projects, developproject timelines and negotiate individual responsibilities and accountability in the teamenvironment; 6) applying strategies of ideation to develop novel and innovative solutions; and 7)prototyping solutions for purposes of design, testing and communication. Grouping strategiesdiffer based on the project during the semester. There are three projects, two mini and one mainproject (capstone) in the course during the course of the semester. The mini project aims to helpstudents explore their college major more deeply, so, students are teamed with peers that sharethe same or similar majors. The capstone project is situated within an Engineering
provides a strong educational experience via theorycombined with practice in a class/lab atmosphere. Dedicated faculty and staff are directlyinvolved in classes and labs, and each degree program culminates with a senior design or"Capstone" project, which is required for graduation. Capstone projects emphasize projectmanagement, technical deliverables, and multidisciplinary effort in team-oriented, long-termprojects. As a result of the heavy emphasis on practical, applied, and experiential learning,students who graduate from ISOE are well prepared for careers in all aspects of engineering. Theschool has more than 800 engineering students. In addition to modern classrooms and computerlabs, ISOE has fully equipped labs including a class 1000
Classics maydirectly or indirectly relate to Writing or Technical Writing. English III is a continuation ofEnglish II, but only for students who fail to pass the CET-4 test. CET-4 refers to College EnglishTest Band 4, which is the lowest English proficiency requirement for college students. The last course in the full course paths of those departments in SWJTU is GraduationDissertation course. It is the same as the senior capstone project design course in ODU. But it isnot a regular classroom class. It is done individually between a student and his or her projectadvisor and it doesn’t include any technical writing requirement, nor writing intensive training asdid in ECE 485W in Electrical Engineering or CEE 403W in Civil Engineering in
historical innovators as provided in the CG suite.Originally, the historical innovator technique was introduced as part of the capstone designexperience at the United States Air Force Academy (USAFA), Department of EngineeringMechanics. We tested the evolved technique with the extended set of innovators at TheUniversity of Texas (UT) as part of freshman signature course and a multi-disciplinary seniordesign projects course. To introduce students to our idea of being inspired by historicalinnovators, we present an example about how other students have used this model for designideation. We prompt the discussion with paragon words of wisdom from Isaac Newton, “If Ihave seen farther than others, it is because I was standing on the shoulders of giants
. Additionally, she serves as the chair of the undergraduate subcommittee for the department’s Health, Equity, and Wellness committee and holds the position of president in the BMES student chapter at UC Davis.Saahil Sachdeva, University of California, Davis Saahil Sachdeva is a 4th-year undergraduate student in biomedical engineering at UC Davis. After completing his role as the 2024 Peer Mentor for the BME at the Health Campus program, he is now guiding the students to integrate their clinical immersion experience into their upcoming capstone projects. Saahil is also actively involved in research, including the development of a bone marrow microphysiological system under Dr. Steven George at UC Davis and an innovative
efforts and make appropriate use of available resources tocomplete their projects in a timely manner. They are also required to engage fellow students indiscussions about the techniques which they applied on a class discussion list. Studentsdocument their work in electronic project journals (in PDF format) that are submitted for reviewon a regular basis. In addition, students are required to answer a series of discussion questionsevery week, submit those answers, and participate in group discussion over the discussionquestions at regular intervals. There is no special open capstone project, but students are giventhe opportunity to demonstrate (through the virtual classroom environment) an example of aproblem solution which they feel is
discusses the lessons learned when operating in the hybrid mode and makesrecommendations for hybrid REU implementation, if needed in the future. Following the patternof prior analysis, a program model is also presented for potential use by other sites in the futurebefore concluding with a discussion of the broader impacts of REU site operations across thethree types of operation.2. BackgroundAn overview of prior work which lays the foundation for the analysis conducted herein ispresented in this section. Prior work related to project-based and experiential learning isreviewed as well as specific examples of prior work in cybersecurity.Undergraduate research programs are designed to immerse students in a research environment toallow them to see if
retention and success has been the subject of many studies. Forexample, Kuh’s multi-phased study identified high-impact practices including first-year seminarsand experiences, common intellectual experiences, learning communities, writing-intensivecourses, collaborative assignments and projects, undergraduate research, diversity/global learning,service learning/community-based learning, internships, and capstone courses and projects.4Another study published by the California State University Chancellor's Office shows that"Participation in high-impact practices has been shown to improve both learning and persistencefor all students, but especially for the historically underserved."5 This study also indicates thatparticipation in more than one high
an attempt to better align the curriculum and instruction with the practices ofprofessional engineers [1] - [4]. Within higher education, collaborative learning first manifestedas senior design capstone projects then expanded to include team-based design projects in first-year engineering courses and informal in-class collaborative activities. In each of theseclassroom interventions, students are expected to work together with a diverse group of theirpeers (e.g., cultural upbringings, race, gender, ability, and more) to solve a problem. Researchsuggest that students learning through collaborative engagement can result in positive influenceson student achievement [3], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [15], persistence [8], [9], [10], [11], [12
. These are advanced courses where knowledge of basic undergraduatematerial is required as a prerequisite. The capstone course for the program is a one year designstudio where students working in small teams to design a ship. The yearlong design includes acomprehensive structural design and analysis of the project ship.In the structural course sequence, students take general and advanced structural analysis (i.e.,structural mechanics, plates and shells) before taking the Ship Structural Analysis and Design(SSSAD) course. The SSAD course covers the complexity of ship structures: longitudinalstrength and hull primary stresses, design limit states including plate bending, column and panelbuckling, panel ultimate strength and plastic analysis. Matrix
these spaces through a mixed-method study. A quantitative longitudinal studyof students in a mechanical engineering program collected data on design self-efficacy,makerspace involvement, and user demographics through surveys conducted on freshmen,sophomores, and seniors. In this paper, the student responses from three semesters of freshmenlevel design classes are evaluated for involvement and self-efficacy based on whether or not a 3Dmodeling project requires the use of makerspace equipment. The study finds that students requiredto use the makerspace for the project were significantly more likely to become involved in themakerspace.These results inspired us to integrate a qualitative approach to examine how student involvementand exposure to
the benefits inuniformity of education and professional qualification are obvious, the adverse effects are notbeing attended to. Students are learning because they are required to learn and not because theyare willing to learn.I am so refreshed to see the implementation of this course into our program. The course has theimmediate scholastic benefits similar to a capstone design course where students pool theirknowledge of simple engineering components to solve complex engineering problems. The keydifference being that these are real projects and real problems. There is now an outside drive ofcompassion and satisfactions which motivates students to learn. The structuring of the course isalso crucial to its success. For students to have any
more comfortable formatfor some students but less immersion in the culture.Partner Sub-contractThe home university partners with an abroad university and contracts for courses to be taught tostudents of the home university (usually in English). Students may live on-campus. Unlike anexchange program, parity of exchange does not have to be maintained.Project-based Learning/Service LearningStudents travel abroad and are immersed in another culture via a project that connects technologywith the abroad society. Worcester Polytechnic Institute (WPI) is perhaps the leader in this typeof format. There has also been growing interest in programs such as Engineers Without Borders,which provide service learning via humanitarian projects.Research AbroadA
Operations Laboratory that has begun during the 2000-2001academic year. A newly created Endowed Chair, the Linus Pauling Engineer, was hired fromindustry to identify and incorporate the highest priority professional practices to senior lab. Sheserves as “project director” for this class to help new graduates become immediately prepared forindustrial practice. Thus the unit operations lab provides students with the array of skills theywill need to perform effectively in industry. The ChE Unit Operations Laboratory inMicroelectronics Processing is targeted at undergraduate students who are interested in careers asprocess engineers in microelectronics and related industries. The students will both develop anin-depth understanding of the underlying
frequently attend ME classes during project times and converselyME students would attend the IE sessions since the identical material and assignments werecovered in both classes.Prior to the semester start, we realized that the logistics challenge would be significant. Butbased on experience with our senior capstone design course, a multidisciplinary course involvingindustrial and mechanical engineering students as well as technical communications majors fromthe Department of English, we knew what to expect from this challenge. Also, since this was apilot test for the course and the lead-time necessary for changing university-scheduling systemswas prohibitively long, we were willing to go ahead and attempt this first collaboration. If wedeemed the
usinghydrogen fuel, quantifying the economic opportunities in the Carbon Market. Sophomores inresearch Special Problems were tasked with extending the freshman experience to supersonicairliners, as part of a team including senior students. These students explored radical concepts forsuch airliners. An upper level aerodynamics course was used to develop technical figures ofmerit for supersonic hydrogen airliners from basic aerodynamics knowledge. The processidentified numerous gaps in the comprehension of the students from their courses. Theintegration challenge of this project enabled iterative refinement of their understanding. Theconcepts and analysis approaches taught at each level are seen to have become useful only whensubjected to integrated use
UniversityDr. Jason Barrett, Lawrence Technological University Assoc Prof of History and Humanities Dept Chair; Grand Challenge Scholars Program DirectorMs. Sarah Aileen Brownell, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE) Sarah Brownell is the Director of the Grand Challenges Scholars Program and a Lecturer in Design, De- velopment and Manufacturing for the Kate Gleason College of Engineering at the Rochester Institute of Technology. She works extensively with students in the multidisciplinary engineering capstone design course and other project based elective courses, incorporating human centered design, participatory devel- opment, and design for development themes. She was a co-founder of the non-profit Sustainable Organic
engineering culture? To answer this research question, we look at the engineeringteaming experiences of African American females in a diverse range of engineering disciplines.BackgroundTeams are a necessary and vital aspect of the engineering profession, and the process of teaminghas been studied widely in engineering education research (EER) and beyond [21]–[26]. Thereal-world problems engineers face are interdisciplinary and complex, requiring a group ofindividuals offering different backgrounds and areas of expertise to solve them. As a result,group projects requiring teams have become a staple in engineering curriculum [21]. Examplesof engineering team projects include freshmen design projects to capstone senior design projects,including
areexamples of service-learning that have been effectively integrated and used in engineeringcontexts 18. Examples include first-year introductory courses 17, 19, capstone senior designcourses 20, multidisciplinary approaches 21,22 and integration of co-curricular activities 23. There have been, however, few studies that have looked at the experiences and impacts ofservice-learning on engineering students. In order to provide a voice and to create a model ofexperiences and impacts of service-learning on the first-year engineering student; this studyreports the findings of a qualitative investigation of the students involved in the first-yearservice-learning engineering program..First-Year Engineering Service-Learning Program Service
Powered by www.slayte.comBringing it down from the ivory tower: Translating Engineering- for-Community-Development (ECD) graduate student researchinto community engagement and undergraduate student learningAbstractThe goal of this paper is to show how graduate engineering students working on Engineering-for-Community-Development (ECD) projects and theses 1) acquire socio-technical educationthat prepares them to critically engage with community development (formation); 2) propose totranslate their academic scholarship into formats and language that lead to effective engagementand appropriation by the communities they want to serve (translation); and, from this translation,3) extend their scholarship into curricular opportunities for undergraduate
Technology from the Technical University of Munich, with specializations in Mechanical Engineering, Innovation, Entrepreneurship, and Finance. She is also an alumna scholar of the entrepreneurial qualification program at Munich’s Center for Innovation and Business Creation (UnternehmerTUM). Professionally, Nada currently works as a Senior Corporate Strategy Manager at a SaaS company. Her student practical experiences include roles as venture capital investment analyst, startup strategy consultant and entrepreneurial coach, alongside being team lead for innovation projects in the automotive industry.Dr. Helen L. Chen, Stanford University Helen L. Chen is a Research Scientist in the Designing Education Lab in Mechanical
. For over 14 years prior to join- ing TCNJ, he was engaged in medical device technology and product development for the Biosurgery and Regenerative Medicine markets. He coordinates the BME Capstone Senior Project course, wherein stu- dents design and prototype novel medical devices within the Design Control framework, preparing them for development careers in the medical device industry. He earned a BS degree in Chemical Engineering with Certificates in Biomedical Engineering and Personnel Management from the University of Rochester, followed by a Doctorate in Chemical Engineering from Rice University for research investigating fluid dynamic shear force effects on platelet activation and genetic regulation of
over $3.6 million in external research funding from several companies, governmental agencies, and National Science Foundation. Dr. Natarajarathinam has written 22 peer-reviewed journal articles, a business case with a teaching note, 63 peer-reviewed conference proceedings, and was the keynote speaker at the food banks Conference. She works with the Texas Education Agency (TEA) in developing innovative Career and Technical Education (CTE) courses in logistics and distribution. Dr. Natarajarathinam has chaired 91 graduate capstone projects, and several undergraduate capstone projects, and has served on two master’s committees. Dr. Natarajarathinam was chosen as of the “40 under 40” faculty by the American Society of
Infras- tructure: An Introduction to Civil and Environmental Engineering.Dr. Rodolfo Valdes-Vasquez, Colorado State University Rodolfo Valdes-Vasquez is an Associate Professor in the Department of Construction Management at Colorado State University. He is committed to advancing research and teaching in the sustainability of infrastructure projects. He believes that educating the next generation of professionals will play a pivotal role in making sustainability a standard practice.Dr. Frederick Paige, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Frederick (”Freddy”) Paige is the Assistant Director of the Virginia Center for Housing Research and an Assistant Professor at Virginia Tech in the Vecellio
as an exam question, project, or report, and correlate toa particular outcome. Courses that are more relevant to a particular outcome, such as shown inTable 2, are better choices for utilizing embedded indicators. It is important for the score of theactivity to directly correlate to a specific outcome. This may take a little time on the part of thefaculty member to directly associate test questions or weekly activities to a particular outcome.In addition, the management and statistical summary of results can be overwhelming for facultyand/or staff members but can be automated with a spreadsheet program to provide ease inobtaining results over time once developed.7,8 While embedded indicators can be found in anycourse, a senior capstone