university?”The large southwestern university engineering leadership team chose to address the need forchange using a deliberate “re-building strategy” [1]. This choice involved invoking “a processoriented approach to the remaking of a curriculum…, involving external stakeholders. Thisapplies sound systems engineering principles to the engineering curriculum itself” [1].“The re-building strategy…is a fundamental change of academic view linking academia withsocietal context and needs…by emphasizing a shared set of values, identity and commitment. Itis about educating engineers who will become change agents after graduation, with anunderstanding of stakeholder needs and the wider societal impact of engineered systems withinthe innovation process’ [1
programming, which created barriers to learning insubsequent course work. To help remove these barriers, we revised the course for spring of 2020to incorporate teaching best practices, which included a change to tutorial- and video-basedinstruction instead of real-time note taking, improved alignment between course material andassessments, and a switch to mastery-based assessments. These types of changes have beenshown to improve student attitudes and reduce failure rates in introductory programming courses[1-3]. However, the link between course format, student performance, and student attitudestoward programming remained unclear. If we clarified this link, students could be betterequipped to solve engineering problems and perform engineering
maximum of 8 semesters.Program HighlightsThe DuSTEM program is designed to improved retention of students in STEM. Support isbroken into three areas: financial, academic, and community [1]. These ideas are predicated onthe nine key principles advanced by the non-profit “Building Engineering and Science Talent”which identifies nine qualities of programs that are successful in nurturing well-qualified STEMgraduates [2]. These principles are • Institutional leadership • Personal attention • Bridging to the next level • Targeted recruitment • Peer support • Financial assistance • Engaged faculty • Enriched research opportunities • Continuous evaluationThe DuSTEM program is designed support
principles undergird the course. This problem in thedynamics curriculum has been recognized for some time, as Ellis and Turner [1] considered theuse of concept maps as a remedy to this problem as early as 2003.However, the content of dynamics is not the only thing that can cause students to struggle toorganize its ideas. The way it is taught may also be a part of the problem. Most textbooks (andhence most courses) first use kinematics to describe motion and later use kinetics to relate forcesand accelerations. This organization makes perfect sense if you are designing a mechanism: adescription of the motion is needed first, followed by a calculation of the forces that will act ondifferent parts. However, little design work occurs in an introductory
Early Career Engineers’ Views of Ethics and Social Responsibility: Project OverviewIntroductionDespite recommendations from leading stakeholders for increased attention to ethics inengineering education [1, 2], a growing body of anecdotal and empirical evidence suggests acontinuing lack of serious attention to ethics, social responsibility, and related topics in mostengineering degree programs [3-5]. To address this, organizations like the National Academy ofEngineering have taken steps to identify best practices and exemplary programs as “a resourcefor those who seek to improve the ethical development of engineers at their own institutions” [6].Recent research in engineering ethics has also aimed to measure
IntroductionCybersecurity is critical to the economy, critical infrastructure, public safety, and nationalsecurity. Clearly, the demand for cybersecurity experts in the United States is high andcontinuing to grow. According to cyberseek.org, there are currently over 521,600 open positionsin the cybersecurity field (including 166,000 Information Security Analyst positions and 355,600other positions requiring cybersecurity-related skills) across the U.S., with around 1,000 withinthe state of West Virginia [1]. The Bureau of Labor Statistics has projected that the employmentof information security analysts will grow 31% from 2019 to 2029, which is much faster than theaverage growth of 3.7% for all occupations during that same time period [2]. The current lack
thesescientific solutions must be achieved in an economically viable way to be implemented and sustained,students are also exposed to courses focused on economic analysis and technology commercialization. Tofoster awareness of the value of diversity to interdisciplinary research and collaboration, they alsoparticipate in leadership and diversity training. The overarching goals of the NRT at the graduate studentlevel are the following:₋ Goal 1: Develop a program to equip students with an interdisciplinary mindset/skills₋ Goal 2: Train students to generate SFEWS solutions₋ Goal 3: Disseminate courses, modules, methods and tools for use among other institutionsThe objectives are to instill in graduate students the skills necessary to be a
that helped to seal the educational gap created by theunexpected and immediate closure of our institutions [1], [2]. Funds from our NSF ATE Grant#1902075 in collaboration with Drexel: Increasing the Number of Workforce-Ready EngineeringTechnicians in Southeastern Pennsylvania, helped Bucks to pave the way for innovation intechnician education through a formalized connection of our credit and non-credit sides of thecollege, and by enhancing the curriculum for technician education (Figure 1).Figure 1. The formalized collaboration of the Bucks credit and non-credit sides of the college. Within the goals of the grant to enhance the workforce readiness of our students, Bucksformally connected the engineering technology major to the Center for
the literaturein pertinent capacities.BackgroundTo be effective, effort should be made to plan, deliver, and assess educational content [1]. Underthe best of circumstances, this can be a challenging endeavor. Education is something that ispracticed, as application can vary greatly between settings and population.The constraints of COVID-19 on education greatly upended much of the conventionalknowledge and practices used in education at all levels. Distance learning, alternative modalities,reduced class sizes, utilization of educational technology, and normalization of personalprotective equipment (PPE), are all examples of pedagogical changes that occurred at manyinstitutions.At Penn State Behrend, the Mechanical Engineering Technology (MET
Educational Opportunities for Technical Writing in Engineering EducationIntroductionStrong oral and written communication skills are imperative to assuring success in the workplace.Research suggests that oral and written communication skills are in high demand by employersregardless of degree field [1]. Additionally, the U.S. Department of Labor reported that oral andwritten communication skills along with critical thinking and teamwork skills are fundamental toevery employee’s ability to accomplish tasks in the workforce [2]. This being said, it becomesimperative for educational curriculums to include effective courses that stimulate oral and writtencommunication skills among students. The implementation of effective technical wiring coursesin
, by the American Society of CivilEngineers (ASCE) [1] and the National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine(NASEM) [2], converge in recognizing that Civil and Environmental Engineers require bothformal education and mentored experiences, where education should provide breadth in thescientific and engineering fundamentals and strength in the students’ specific areas of expertise.Relevant to this paper, among many other objectives, breadth in the fundamentals is envisionedto include engineering economics, systems analysis, data science, and understanding of risk anduncertainty. In addition, skills such as for effective communication, collaborative work,negotiation and conflict resolution are deemed essential [2] while it is explicitly
possible without proper comprehension of the concepts [1, 2] and will diminishover time without proper revision and review [3]. To ensure concept retention, a typicalengineering curriculum is divided into multiple sequences of courses. Each sequence covers asubfield and reinforces core concepts over several semesters. The structural mechanics’curriculum in mechanical engineering is a sequence of four courses: Statics, Mechanics ofMaterials, Mechanical Design, and Kinematic Design. Each course is focused on core conceptsthat are prerequisites to the following course, in order for students to develop a deep knowledgethrough the sequence. Assessing student comprehension levels and identifying gaps in students’knowledge can help educators plan and
, highly modified curriculum with at-home projects, and explicit directivesto stop teaching for this academic year. Further complications arose when some students andteachers were faced with the challenge of insufficient home technology and/or unreliable internetaccess, creating equity, access, and inclusion issues [1-3]. An anonymous social media post hadinteresting insight: “We gave educators almost no notice. We asked them to completely redesign what school looks like, and in about 24 hours, local teachers and administrations fixed it. No state or national agency did this, the local educators fixed it in HOURS. In the midst of a global crisis. In fact, state and national policies actually created roadblocks. Local schools figured
Award for Excellence in Service-Learning. Dr. Vernaza does research in engineering education (active learning techniques) and high-strain deformation of materials. Recently, she has focused on systemic strategies for the retention and advancement of STEM faculty and students, and academic in- terventions to improve student success. She is currently the Principal Investigator of a $1 million dollar National Science Foundation S-STEM award (2017-21), and she has secured over $2.5 million in grants during her tenure at Gannon University. She is currently the PI of an NSF S-STEM and ADVANCE-PAID grants.Dr. Saeed Tiari, Gannon University Dr. Saeed Tiari is an Associate Professor in the Biomedical, Industrial and Systems
instructional problem. That’s why this study provides a holistic pictureand approach to the problem.The study performed by Wiebe et al. [1] focused on the development of an online and face-to-face introductory engineering graphics course that presented analysis of student’s usage of onlineresources to augment the instructional support received in class. The study fell short of comingup with a design of a common course structure for engineering and STEM relatedcourses. Similarly, the study performed by He et al. [2] focused on investigating the flexiblehybrid format. The study was performed on a fundamental electrical engineering course. Thisstudy explored other factors such as class attendance impact as well as the study time spent andstudent
1) the pros and cons of such a project as an SLP, 2) the effectiveness ofteamwork in a partly virtual environment, 3) student awareness of environmental monitoring in areal-world situation, and 4) student perception on significance of the GUI development SLPcompared to traditional service-learning projects. We also assess the use of self-regulated learning(SRL) skills under the current circumstances and compare them with the assessment resultspreviously reported in the literature.2. Description and Justification of Methodology 2.1. FYSE Course Setup for SLP The overall course set-up for this study is similar to that described in [1] as the SLP frameworkin 20/FA was adopted for the same course. While the work in [1] was focused on
as Brightspace, Cengage,Explain Everything, Tophat, and zyBooks, just to name a few, provide platforms for interactivelearning in the classroom, and for individual study. Whether it be online or in person, theseplatforms are being assessed for student motivational purposes [1], class preparedness [2],increasing students’ reading abilities [3], and overall student outcomes [4]. While onlineresources help educators to be more systematic, organized [5], and provide digital interactiveplatforms for learning, the question we address in a concrete outcomes based way, and fromstudents’ perspectives is, “Does the online, interactive, digital content help the student learn andapply knowledge more effectively than traditional methods?”The digital
Program Chairs in the School. We were careful to avoid questions that would elicitstudent responses about specific instructors or specific disciplines. Other than the student’s classstanding, the survey asked for no personally identifying information so students could beconfident that their feedback was anonymous. For this reason and because students take coursestaught by faculty in different disciplines across the School, we did not track students’ majors.Analysis of Numerical ResultsWe received 48 responses, a response rate of approximately 7% of the 720 students in the Schoolof Engineering and Computer Science. Fig. 1 shows the class standing of the surveyrespondents. Students in freshman and sophomore classes represent about 19% of
Engineering Education, 2021 Effects of Different Team Formation Strategies on Performance in an Undergraduate Introductory Mechanical Engineering CourseAbstractDuring the spring semester of 2020, four different team formation strategies were employed toassign student working groups in four otherwise identical sections of an undergraduateintroductory mechanical engineering course. The four team formation strategies were 1)random, 2) by merit, with teams based on similar performance on previous exams, 3) student-selected, and 4) geographical proximity of student housing. Students were supposed to completethree team assignments during the semester, but due to COVID-19, they completed only oneteam assignment before being sent home. The
, and student engagement [1], [2]. Kuh [1] found that improvement in persistence,performance, and graduation for students in college were correlated to students’ level ofparticipation in particular activities known as high impact educational practices (HIEP). HIEPinclude, among others, culminating experiences, learning communities, service learning, studyabroad, and undergraduate research; Kuh [1] concluded that these activities may be effective atpromoting overall student success. Kuh [1] and others [3] further hypothesized that participationin HIEP may especially benefit students from non-majority groups. Whether and how engineering and computer science students benefit from participatingin HIEP and whether students from non-majority
determine if changes in the course affected the studentexperience.1 IntroductionLike many of their peers in other engineering disciplines and at other universities, IndustrialEngineering students at the University of Pittsburgh culminate their undergraduate experiencewith a Capstone Design Course (IE1090). The course provides students with a hands-on learningexperience in a relatively unstructured environment as they prepare to enter the workforce aspracticing engineers. Course outcomes and curriculum align with Criterion 3 and Criterion 5 ofthe ABET Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs [1]. Students enrolled in the class,which is traditionally offered each Spring and Fall term, are matched in teams consisting of 4-6students and tasked
or society will share similar characteristics,worldviews, and perceptions [1], [2]. Hence, understanding cultural aspects shared by studentscan provide a better understanding of how to create classrooms that consider those culturalsimilarities and differences to have a positive impact on learning.Hofstede 1980 [1], developed one of the most widely recognized theories to understand culturaldifferences [3]–[5]. His work proposed four cultural dimensions to understand a differentcultural context. These include individualism-collectivism, power distance, masculinity-femininity, and uncertainty avoidance. In this study, we are focused on two of the dimensions(power distance and uncertainty avoidance) because we consider these to be the ones that
suggests “public” should be replaced with “identified integral community.”This nuance prompts engineers to examine more closely who and what they are working to helpand protect [9].Understanding ethics is important for engineering students to appreciate complex social issues.Practicing civil engineers and engineering students use the ASCE Code of Ethics as an ethicallens through which to practice. However, failure to understand macro ethics produces “broad,negative social impacts, such as systemic social inequities, environmental degradation, or otherexternalized costs on unwitting stakeholder groups” [1]. Practicing civil engineers should beeducated on the complex social systems in which their infrastructure solutions are used.Integration of such
negatively affected bythe COVID-19 pandemic.Introduction As of late March 2020, in response to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)pandemic, hundreds of colleges and universities in the United States (and across the globe)suspended face-to-face classes, closed campuses, and only allowed essential activities and corefacilities to continue. The pandemic disrupted engineering graduate students’ regular learningroutines, which typically include in-person laboratory research and mentoring activities. As aresult, engineering students during the COVID-19 pandemic may particularly experiencechallenges to their academic progress, career preparation, financial security, and physical/mentalhealth [1]–[6]. During school closures, faculty were
by this type of learning, a zoom-conference based class consistingof three second grade children was created. Each day Monday through Thursday the childrenwere presented a hands-on engineering design challenge that utilized materials found in theirhomes. The children had not been previously exposed to the engineering design process (EDP).The theoretical framework for this study lies in the areas of engineering identity as well asteamwork and feedback through engineering discourse. The research questions for this studywere the following: 1) What are the impacts of teaching the engineering design process onlinevia zoom conference on development of children’s ability to use engineering discourse? Arestudents able to master the steps of the
insight into how to support all students to equitablyengage in interdisciplinary STEM+CS instruction. Specifically, this paper addresses thefollowing research questions: (1) In what ways do elementary teachers verbally support theintegration of science and computer science into engineering lessons and to what extent are thesesupports planned in curricular materials or added in-the-moment? (2) To what extent do teachers’verbal supports for integration differ between two different classroom contexts?BackgroundEngineering in elementary classrooms National frameworks call for K-12 students to engage in engineering projects thatintegrate science, mathematics, and computer science (American Society for EngineeringEducation (ASEE), 2020; NRC
Experience and Training Coordination Core),engaging with affected communities (Community Engagement Core), administering the grantand disseminating discoveries (Administrative Core), and the Data Management and AnalysisCore [1].In addition, there are two Research Support Cores. The Synthesis Core synthesizes andauthenticates chemical compounds and analytical standards, and the Analytical Core provideschemical analyses services and support.The Data Management and Analysis Core (DMAC) is a new core required for all proposals tothe most recent funding opportunity announcement for this program. The NIEHS added this coreto formalize and enhance each program’s capacity to support data management and sharing, anddata analysis. The DMAC has two sets of
strongertechnical communication skills. In the early 2000s, engineering professional societies reportedunderdeveloped writing and presentation skills in entry-level job candidates while, at the sametime, stressing the time spent in a typical engineer’s day on communication tasks [1, 2]. At thesame time, ABET adopted new criteria for evaluating and accrediting engineering programs [3].The criteria focused on developing “soft skills” including teamwork, ethics, and effectivecommunication, among others. The importance of soft skills has only grown in the interveningyears. Among ABET’s student outcomes as listed in 2019-2020 is “an ability to apply written,oral, and graphical communication in broadly-defined technical and non-technical environments;and an
AmericanSociety for Engineering Education (ASEE) sets as its vision, “Excellent and broadly accessibleeducation empowering students and engineering professionals to create a better world” [1]. Yet,often, the better world we are working to create as engineering educators is not modeled in ourclassrooms. Marginalized groups describe the “chilly” and unwelcoming atmosphere ofengineering spaces [2], [3], [4]. This unwelcoming culture is characterized by ineffectivepedagogical approaches, microagressions, and competitiveness [5], [6], [7]. Faculty withprivileged/majority identities are generally unaware of the issues minoritized populations face aswell as the training available to build awareness [6].The vision to create a better world must startwith how we
are outcomes of the mixed-methods analysis of student datawith discussion of results.Background “Engineering design is a process of devising a system, component, or process to meet desiredneeds and specifications within constraints” [1]. To help meet these goals, developingopportunities for students to experience engineering design prior to their capstone projects hasbeen identified as a priority [2], [3]. The development of communication and teamwork skills inengineering undergraduates is also important [4], [5], and previous researchers have noted thatengineering design and communication share essential features, allowing their co-incorporationinto curriculum to provide a valuable learning experience.The ENG 003 engineering design and