Page 26.753.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015International DivisionThree choices of session topics: 1. Global Research Opportunities in Engineering and Engineering-related fields 2. International Research Compliance- Guidelines and Rules of the Game 3. International Collaborations, Experiences, Partnerships, Service Learning Facilitating successful global research among Engineering and Technology scholars: The case study of agricultural supply chain Page 26.753.2 Facilitating successful global research among Engineering and Technology scholars: The case study
ethnic group, were the most certain of choosing engineering or CS as a major (79% were very certain or certain). Males were also more likely (p=.153) to transfer to ASU than females.The students were asked to rank several areas for which they wanted more information. Theareas in order of rank were: 1. Financing a Bachelor’s degree 2. Learn more about engineering 3. Where engineering jobs are located 4. Know more about the engineering majorsIn Fall 2012, we designed a survey for CC students to answer the question: “What about Page 26.550.4engineering attracts or does not attract you
the gender diversity of AfricanAmerican engineering BS degrees is shown in Figure 1, which also shows the initialdecline and slight recovery in gender diversity for all engineering BS degrees across thepast nine years. The female fraction of engineering BS degrees had reached its highestlevel in 2002 at 20.9%.6 Page 26.618.3 Figure 1 Female fraction of African American and all US BS engineering degrees.2African American male recipients of engineering BS degrees grew from 2398 in 2005 to2742 in 2013, an increase of approximately 14%.4 In contrast, the number of femaleAfrican American recipients of engineering BS degrees declined 23%, from 1144 in
board and controlling the frequency of a piezoelectric speaker. This previousresearch was presented in several papers 1. The idea has shown great promise in terms ofengaging students in learning programming.Recently, the technology began to offer the new tablet devices that incorporate the capability ofreading eBooks and run different application ranging from games to sophisticated scientificapplications. The major limitation for these devices to spread out quickly in the markets was tillnow the price. Prices have dropped rapidly due to several factors like the mass production,competition, cloning and fast pace of advances in the hardware and manufacturing technology.These devices are now in the hands of almost all college students and very
) for the 25th to the 75th percentile istypically 1850 to 2100. The breakdown by area of the exam per year is shown as Figure 1.Typically, 95% of the students enrolling ranked in the top 25% of their high schools with the lowof 91% occurring in 2009 and the high of 97% occurring in 2011. Nearly all of the studentsenrolled within the program are considered “traditional,” indicating that they are full-timestudents that enrolled in college immediately after graduating high school2. Page 26.1315.2 750 730 710 690 670 SAT Score
sanitation crisisAbstract:According to the WHO, 2.5 billion people lack access to proper sanitation resources.1 Integral tothis alarming statistic is the absence of sanitation technology. Current engineering initiativeshave responded to this challenge with toilet fairs and competitions showcasing cutting-edgetechnologies in the sanitation sector. That is, engineers have often approached this sanitationcrisis as well as other world problems from a technocentric perspective―the philosophy thatconsiders technology as capable of solving human problems.2 Technocentrism speaks to thecurrent outlook of engineering education. We as engineering students are trained to design andbuild technical solutions for world problems. Furthermore, this focus within
peers andgained the knowledge and skills to be applied in future Challenge-It sessions. Learning Blockswere broken down into sections with specific expectations as shown in Figure 1.Figure 1: Learning blocks used to guide camp activitiesThe learning blocks were divided into different categories, subjects and sections. Learn-Itsections were 10-minutes in duration and consisted of brief explanations of the theory,introduction and purpose of the activity, and expectations with facilitators providing fun andengaging presentations using videos and live examples. The emphasis here was to provide asummary of the key terms, topics and strategies without elaborating in regards to specificsolutions or challenges. This gave campers a basis for
engaged in engineer-esque activities, we hopeto further the conversation surrounding educating the engineer of the future.Broadening Engineering PathwaysA more inclusive vision of engineering crossed with making could build future engineeringcapacity as well as raise awareness to the general public of the work and impact such workoffers. Findings from the Center on the Advancement of Engineering Education’s AcademicPathways Study studying undergraduate persistence in engineering and students’ pathways byand through engineering studies, found two groups of students with different motivations forengagement.1 The first seeks financial security, overcoming barriers of foundational math andscience courses to continue, aiming for graduation. The second
languages,and communicating with people from marketing and finance will be just as fundamental to thepractice of engineering as physics and calculus”.1 Bordogna similarly asserts that “[d]emands areincreasing for a holistic breed of engineers–graduates with the skill to work across intellectual,social, and cultural boundaries”,2 while Duderstadt has advocated for “fluency across boundaries”and “integration of knowledge across an increasingly broad intellectual span” (p. 45).3A growing body of scholarship adds further weight to such assertions. Studies by Lynn andSalzman, for instance, lead them to conclude that engineers urgently need “cross-boundary skills”to enable working “across disciplinary, organizational, cultural, and time/distance
their University Innovation Fellows initiative and mentored faculty teamsrepresenting 50 institutions through the Pathways to Innovation program (personalcommunication, VentureWell). While the NSF I-Corps program was specifically created to helpNSF funded scientists and engineers explore opportunities for their innovations beyond the lab, asecondary effect of the program has been the growth of university faculty exposed toentrepreneurship education, Lean Launch, who then incorporate these methods and pedagogiesinto their own classrooms and institutions. Currently, there are 18 research 1 (R-1) universitiesthat are involved in teaching the Lean Launch curriculum to NSF funded engineers and scientistsand 36 I-Corps sites8. The rapid rise
addressing itsproblems of social inequality.1-4 Riley, Slaton, and Pawley5 argue that we have framed theproblem poorly and failed to examine structural forces at work that maintain color lines andgender gaps in engineering. There is a need to look beyond the discipline of engineering (orengineering education) to develop a deeper understanding of these structural forces and effectivestrategies for resisting or dismantling them.On the occasion of ASEE’s meeting in New Orleans, where long term social inequalities wereexacerbated in the wake of Hurricane Katrina, it seems appropriate to examine the efforts torebuild New Orleans and what it can tell us about engineering and engineering education. Wechose to focus on the case of rebuilding the public
Page 26.616.2more as a metaphor for conveying students’ experience of disappointment than to insinuatemalicious intent.(i)In K-12 engineering programs, the overwhelming curricular emphasis is on engaging, design-based classroom activities: open-ended, hands-on projects requiring creative synthesis acrossmultiple domains of knowledge on the part of the student.1 In university engineering programs,students confront an educational philosophy that can be characterized as exclusionary and builtupon a “fundamentals first” approach to learning:2 analytically rigorous, rote learning of basicprinciples in math and science (e.g., calculus, chemistry, physics) followed by engineeringsciences (e.g. statics, fluid dynamics) followed by engineering analysis
negativity bias. While some of thesetopics may seem alien to teaching and studying engineering, they will be shown later inthe paper to have practical value. OverviewAbout the size of a small head of cauliflower, the human brain (Figure 1) weighs two tofour pounds or roughly three percent of the body’s weight. It is very soft, tan-gray on theoutside, has a surface resembling a walnut, and is yellow white on the inside. The braincontains 100 billion nerve cells, called neurons, which can receive and sendelectrochemical signals stimulated by neurotransmitters6. Figure 1. The human brain. (Source: pixabay)Various parts of the human brain: • Control body processes such as temperature, blood
effects of Chernobyl crystallized theimportance to the Germans of protecting one’s own and the significance that energy andenvironmentalism plays in their future and the future of their children.”4 Following theFukushima reactor disaster of 2011, the Energiewende was given even more precedence and apush forward with Chancellor Angela Merkel leading the shut down of 8 of Germany’s 17nuclear reactors (see Figure 1).Figure 1: Nuclear Plant Decommissioning in Germany 2000 – 2020From Energy Transition/Energiewende, Bolle Foundation [5]With this shuttering of nuclear plants, and an overarching goal for “80% of Germany’s electricpower to be generated from renewables by 2050”6, the Energiewende is well underway. In fact,the amount of electricity produced
“teacher-centered” instructional practices alreadyprevalent at the site. In the remainder of this paper we will 1) clarify how the analytic framework forlegitimate peripheral participation developed by Lave and Wenger informs theories of situatedcognition 2) describe the background, context and motivation for the larger research agenda motivating this work 3) explain the pressing need for the development of new assessmentinstruments and methods that are aligned with situated and participatory perspectives on learningthrough practice 4) explain how Lave and Wenger’s model of learning can also be used as ananalytic frameworks to develop such instruments 5) provide illustrative examples of the kinds ofdata that can be generated with the
perpetuity by the IEEE on the Engineering andTechnology History Technology Wiki (http://www.ethw.org).IntroductionIt is well known that women “are more likely than men to ‘leak’ out of the pipeline in thesciences”1. Women earn 20.2% of physics degrees, 43.9% of mathematics degrees, 17.7% ofcomputer science degrees, and 17.5% of engineering degrees1. To encourage femaleundergraduate students to graduate with STEM degrees, and thereby increase femaleparticipation in STEM fields, this paper describes an Oral History project that provided femalestudents with unique mentorship with distinguished leaders whose careers align with thestudents’ intended careers.The project provided unique mentorship to the students so that the students are motivated
difficulties for a program offering distance learning revolve around one basic theme, getting students into the courses. 1) Conveying the program quality to the public: Distance learning has carried a stigma of poor educational value from the days of correspondence courses to today’s diploma mills. While the allure of a watered down program to get a quick buck is tempting for even traditionally strong academic institutions, especially in more trying economic times, it is becoming evident that a tradition of quality and value will stand the test of time. Students may complain about the amount, and rigor of work required to obtain a quality degree but they clearly value its significance. Programs these days need to beable to convey to the
adjoining machine shop, and adjacent meeting rooms. Storage for designed systems, supplies,and stock is incorporated into the space. The machine shop, which is connected to the workstudio, is only open during hours when the professional staff is on site, with those hoursexpanded at the end of the semester. This facility is a component of MIT’s Department ofMechanical Engineering and primarily serves that segment of the MIT student population. Figure 1. MIT: Pappalardo LabThe Pappalardo Lab can be characterized as a notable academic makerspace for its level ofstaffing and its training programs. The lab is staffed by six fulltime manufacturing educatorswho provide training and instruction in using the facility’s
InformationModels for the development of additional learning modules. The presented work illustrates howthe influence of instructional theories and design can support the generation of a new learningplatform for construction engineering and management.1. Introduction One of the main objectives of engineering education is to shape students that possess awide variety of knowledge, skills, and attitudes obtained as a result of education, experience, andachievement.[1] This holds true for construction engineering students, who are challenged withreal world problems during their education and after graduation. This educational objectiverequires educators to prepare their learners to solve real world problems, with which theArchitecture, Engineering and
most STEM departments reporting noactive faculty mentoring programs in place. The benefits of mentoring in the workplace havelong been documented in the literature, yet early and mid-career faculty at OU were generallyleft to fend for themselves unless they were fortunate enough to identify helpful faculty in theirdepartments on their own. So, it was thus not surprising that most faculty members indicated thatthey were not receiving assistance from their colleagues or department in the forms of careeradvice and development opportunities and that more mentoring, particularly as it pertains toresearch, was needed (Figure 1). As was seen in other studies, the percentage of women facultywho agreed or strongly agreed with the need for more
data indicates that JEE and EJEE have published a similarnumber of articles related to diversity till now, approximately 50 and 56 papers respectively.Itemization of publication data based on a historical timeline reveals the extent of diversity-related engineering education research during various time periods. The timeline data ispresented in Table 1. Table 1. Itemized timeline of diversity-related publications Time period Number of diversity related publications JEE EJEE 2010-2014 8 17 2005-2009 7 22 2000-2004
(NAE) and its 2007 publicationRising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter EconomicFuture [1] in which they urged a focus on developing, recruiting, and retaining engineers. Datasupporting this demand is documented in the National Science Foundation’s publication, Scienceand Engineering Indicators 2012 [2], using Bureau of Labor Statistics from 2002 to 2018 thatproject job openings from growth and needs replacement, which will top 160,000.There is an evermore urgent need for our higher education sector to graduate engineers whopossess the knowledge, skills, and abilities to respond to a 21st-century world with its technical,social, and ethical complexities. Indeed, engineers’ abilities to meet these needs
students who had shown significant dedication andinterest in the design activities.The assessment process for individual students is designed to customize the assessment processto each student and is modeled after an industry performance appraisal system. Studentsestablish goals and expectations for the semester with guidance from their faculty mentor. Oncethe goals have been determined, progress toward the goals is documented and evaluated.Expectations are communicated with rubrics. Table 1 shows an example of the individualevaluation rubric that students complete to identify and summarize their accomplishments andlearning. Students are assessed over five dimensions of accomplishments, process, criticalthinking, communication and leadership
for supporting new media literacies practices in the elementary classroom and, most recently, drawing on queer and transgender theory for understanding the dominant discourses of engineering education and how those discourses marginalize and exclude people from traditionally vulnerable gender, sexual, and ethnic groups. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016Working in the Weeds: How do Instructors Sort Engineering Students from Non-Engineering Students in a First Year Pre-Calculus Course?1. IntroductionThe calculus sequence is widely recognized by engineering students and faculty and byengineering education researchers as one of the course sequences that “weed out”students who are
track, ● support networking of these and other members, ● development of a STEM pipeline of female STEM academics.SWE, like other professional societies, recognizes the significance of mentoring, relationships,and retention of like-minded engineers. In the case of this discussion, it has been recognized fordecades that female STEM faculty benefit from mentoring due to their unique position inacademia.1 Not only are there issues based on gender, but female STEM faculty are often part ofa non-traditional group, which may include older, minority, and disabled women. Due to thenature of this paper, we will consider these topics as appropriate, but will focus on retention ofwomen in academia, support from other professional societies, networking
Page 26.1724.3a process modified from the Stanford University design process that begins with whateach student personally cares for about the challenges faced by the underservedcommunity. This serves as the team’s point of view for the remainder of the designprocess. It becomes a method for balancing the need to provide immediate assistancewith the ability to thoughtfully create breakthrough-engineering solutions collaborativelywith the community that needs them.The GEE course has the following learning components: 1. An overview of conventional paradigms of development for addressing complex global problems, academia-led engineering initiatives in underserved communities, and challenges of finding sustainable solutions to
Sensor, (ii) ADXL237 Accelerometer, (iii) GT0950RP3 Speaker and ADMP504Microphone. The students are able to master the following laboratory skills: (i) read resistor valuesby using resistor color code, (ii) build electrical and electronic circuits using breadboard, (iii) useinstruments, such as arbitrary waveform generator, scope, power supply, voltmeter, networkanalyzer, and (iv) obtain Bode Plots by using a network analyzer. Two examples from the EEPracticum are shown in Figures 1 and 2. To learn basic laboratory skills and the use of LEDs, thestudents built the waveform polarity indicator circuit shown in Figure 1. Figure 2 shows the Bodeplot obtained from the RLC circuit by using the Network Analyzer of the Analog Discovery Board.Bode Plots
user.KeywordsEngineering Design Education, Design Methods, Empathetic Design, User CenteredDesign, Assistive Technology1. IntroductionEngineering is a continuously growing field with the advent of new technologies and increasingneed for products. The field of biomedical engineering, which encompasses multipleengineering disciplines, is growing at a faster rate than most other STEM disciplines, and thus itseducation is demanding greater attention 1. As most engineers in the biomedical field will gainemployment in a healthcare related field, it is important that they are able to empathize with theirtarget user – often handicapped and/or elderly individuals. This is further exacerbated by theincrease in the number of handicapped and elderly individuals in the United
programs.In order to achieve the survey goal, the sets of questions were developed toreveal the following: 1. The motivation of PhD students to set up their own business (from 0 to 100 points); 2. PhD student vision on the existing and possible barriers to set up their businesses; 3. Necessary knowledge to start entrepreneurial activities.150 PhD students participated in the survey prior and after attending the course‘Commercialization of Research: Foundations of Fundraising’. It demonstratedthe following statistics: 1. 36% of the survey participants with low level of interest in setting up their own business (0 to 60 points) did not change their mind after the course. 2. 41% of the survey participants had initial
University of Oklahoma. Her contribution to the multi-disciplinary team lies in qualitative methodologies, cultural theory and the belief that outliers offer great insight into the workings of power. Her research interests include cultural theory, the cultural/historical construction of women’s identities and roles in past and present societies, and most recently, equity issues surrounding gender and underrepresented populations in engineering education. She can be contacted at cynthia.e.foor-1@ou.edu.Dr. Randa L. Shehab, University of Oklahoma Dr. Randa L. Shehab is a professor and the Director of the School of Industrial and Systems Engineering at the University of Oklahoma. She was recently appointed as Director of the