class review/Q&A online Station #1 Station #2 online quiz quiz Three-station 10 min 10 min 40 min 40 min 40 min 10 min class review/Q&A online Station #1 Station #2 Station #3 online quiz (workshop) quizFigure 3. Class timeline (150 minutes)Learning Assistant Classroom SupportAn important part of the rotating station design was the availability of an undergraduate LearningAssistant (LA) provided by the University. Undergraduate students who qualify to become anLA have earned an A or B+ in the course they are an LA for, successfully
. Applied. Psychology, Henan Univ., Zhengzhou, Henan, 2010.[11] M. C. Díaz-García, J. Jiménez-Moreno, “Entrepreneurial Intention: The Role of Gender,” J. Int. Entre. & Manag., vol. ED-6, pp. 261-283, 2010.[12] C. Camelo-Ordaz C, J. P. Diánez-González, J. Ruiz-Navarro, “The Influence of Gender on Entrepreneurial Intention: The Mediating Role of Perceptual Factors,” BRQ Biz. Res. Q., vol. ED-10, pp. 260-276, May. 2016.[13] C. Jiang, Z. Huang, “The Research on Effect Factors of College Students’ Entrepreneurial Intention--Based on a Survey of Peking University Students,” High. Educ. Explor., vol. ED-1, pp. 120-123, 2018.[14] Q. Wu, “Investigation on Effect Factors of College Students’ Entrepreneurial Tendency,” Pioneer. Sci
. Significant interactions and/or maineffects were identified at a significance level of p < 0.05. Required assumptions were verified,including [19]: (1) There were no outliers, as assessed by examination of studentized residualsfor values greater than ±3; (2) Normalized self-efficacy scores were normally distributed, asassessed by Normal Q-Q Plots; (3) There was homogeneity of variances, as assessed by Levene'stest of homogeneity of variance (p > 0.05); and (4) There was homogeneity of covariances, asassessed by Box's test of equality of covariance matrices (p > 0.05).ResultsSelf-Efficacy and Gender: Math self-efficacy increased more for females, as compared to males,over their first academic semester. Indeed, we found a statistically
Gain Business Value,” MIS Q. Executive, 2010.[2] S. Jamison-Powell, C. Linehan, L. Daley, A. Garbett, and S. Lawson, “‘I can’t get no sleep’: discussing #insomnia on twitter,” in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Austin, Texas, USA, May 2012, pp. 1501–1510.[3] S. E. M. Abdelhamid, C. J. Kuhlman, G. Korkmaz, M. V. Marathe, and S. S. Ravi, “EDISON: a web application for computational health informatics at scale,” in Proceedings of the 6th ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Health Informatics, Atlanta, Georgia, Sep. 2015.[4] A. Johri, H. Karbasian, A. Malik, R. Handa, and H. Purohit, “How Diverse Users and Activities Trigger Connective Action via Social Media
Society for Engineering Education 7On the other hand in differential calculus, there is no concept of area. But the rate of change of avariable can be accumulated or integrated to provide the total change; e.g., say, we are interestedin accumulating the varying charge, Q(t), flowing into a capacitor. The rate of change of chargeis the current through the capacitor, i(t). The total accumulated charge between times t1 and t2 is tobtained by the classic integration process Q =∫t 2 i(t) dt . No harm is done interpreting the 1accumulated charge as the area under the graph of i(t), if it
ideas to fit what ATE will supportDay 0 Evening Assignment: Each college should appoint a spokesperson and prepare aone minute introduction of your team and your project for tomorrow morning.Day 1Monday, July 15, 20196:30-8:00AM Breakfast at hotel8:15 -8:30AM Bus pickup at hotel9:00 – 9:10AM Welcome9:10 – 9:30AM Introduction of Colleges9:30-10:00 Session 1: ATE Basics (brief session 30 minutes including Q&A) Components of ATE proposal Head’s up about submission process, Fastlane, grants.gov, research.gov What PIs and grants offices will have to do between now and submission day10:00-10:45AM Session 2: Rationale (45 minutes) Brief presentation on importance of rationale (10
. ., Huang, J. C. H. ., Huang, A. Y. Q. ., & Yang, S. J. H. . (2017). Applying learning analytics for improving students engagement and learning outcomes in an MOOCs enabled collaborative programming course. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(2), 220–234.Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., Altman, D., Antes, G., & Tugwell, P. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement (Chinese edition). Journal of Chinese Integrative Medicine, 7(9), 889–896. http://doi.org/10.3736/jcim20090918Sadhasivam, J. (2014). Educational paradigm shift: Are we ready to adopt MOOC? International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 9(4), 50–55
Estadístico sobre la educación de Puerto Rico 2016-2017 (Databook): Tabla 9. Tasas de graduación (IPEDS Graduation Rate) en las instituciones de educación superior en Puerto Rico (año académico 2016-17)” [Online] Available: CEPR webpage, http://www2.pr.gov/agencias/cepr/inicio/estadisticas_e_investigacion/Pages/default.aspx [Accessed Mar. 21, 2018][17] Q. Jin, S. Purzer, and P.K. Imbrie, “Measuring first year engineering students' knowledge and interest in materials science and engineering”, In Proceedings of 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, TX, June 10-13, 2012[18] P.O. Garriott, L.Y. Flores, and M.P. Martens, “Predicting the math/science career goals of low-income prospective first
down until it touches the surface. Then zero out the surface. Drill to depth of 0.08”. Speed=30. 4. Install a 1” Forstner bit into chuck. Drill 0.42” deeper. Speed=30. 5. Flip the pump body (side B). Install a ½” Forstner bit. Drill 0.11” deep. Speed=40. 6. Turn the block base on its side and mark 5/16” from the bottom (big hole side) and 11/16” from the left side. Install a Q bit into chuck and drill 1” depth. Speed=40. 7. On side B of the block base mark two points 3/8” from the bottom and the top, and 1” from the side. Drill 0.25” deep
. In addition, acomment section was provided to the students. The first group of five questions focused on whatstudents should do to do well in the class. The results are summarized in Table 1.Table 1. Results of the survey “In order to do well in this class, students should …”1= strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3= neutral, 4 = agree, 5 = strongly agree Statement Ave 1 2 3 4 5 Q 1 do homework 4.9 0% 1% 0% 9% 90% 2 attend lectures 4.6 0% 1% 5% 28% 65% 3 watch recorded lectures 4.4 0% 3% 13% 31% 54% 4 read the textbook
attend, where we typically do a partial walkthrough of the currentassignment and answer questions. If students cannot attend the Q&A session, they are required towatch the recording. If the students have questions that the live Q&A does not answer, they canpost their questions to Piazza (an online Q&A forum), which both instructors check at least oncea day. Students are encouraged to make their posts public and answer other student questions.Posting code is discouraged.Model Project and Course ProjectWhen this course was first designed, the professor’s knowledge of web development waslimited, so he used an online tutorial – the NetBeans e-commerce tutorial [14] – as a basis for thecourse project. The tutorial was well-written, and it
8. Computing Projects Solutions 9. Posted Recitation 9. Posted Recitation Solutions 10. Exam Self-Assessment 10. Exam Self-Assessment 10. Exam Self-Assessment 11. Q&C 11. Q&C 11. Q&C 12. UGTAs 12. UGTAs 13. RE and MA Solutions 13.12
ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (UMI No. 3406386), 2010.[4] M. Borrego and J. Bernhard, "The emergence of engineering education research as an internationally connected field of inquiry," Journal of Engineering Education vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 14-47, 2011.[5] Q. Liu, "A snapshot methodological review of journal articles in engineering education research," in Proceedings of the annual Canadian Engineering Education Association conference, Ottawa: ON, 2019, June 8-12.[6] Advance CTE, "The state of career technical education: Improving data quality and effectiveness," Silver Spring, Maryland: Advance CTE, 2019, Available: https://careertech.org/resource/state-cte-improving-data-quality-effectiveness.[7] National
ch id pr po lr rc gu al h u nd of ar g ta n ea c q hy
thank Don Fowley of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. for supportingthe project.References[1] K. VanLehn, "The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems," Educat. Psychologist, vol. 46, pp. 197-221, 2011.[2] C. D. Whitlatch, Q. Wang, and B. J. Skromme, "Automated problem and solution generation software for computer-aided instruction in elementary linear circuit analysis,” in Proceedings of the 2012 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. Washington, D.C.: Amer. Soc. Engrg. Educat., 2012, pp. Paper 4437.[3] B. J. Skromme, C. D. Whitlatch, Q. Wang, P. M. Rayes, A. Barrus, J. M. Quick, R. K. Atkinson, and T. Frank
and non-value added steps in a manufacturing process. 6. Identify metrics to measure, improve, and control in a manufacturing process. 7. Utilize principles of lean and Six Sigma to improve productivity and quality of a manufacturing process. 8. Differentiate between a push system and a pull system for a sequential manufacturing process. 9. Evaluate manufacturing models for strengths and weaknesses in terms of quality, productivity, and communication. 10. Compare manufacturing models in terms of effectiveness and profitability. 11. Write a cohesive group lab report based on different information and observations from each group member.Materials and ResourcesThe Q&P lab uses the Mr. Potato Head toy for
platform Q# Statement with 5 ratings Expected Expected 1=strongly disagree 2=disagree 3=neutral 4=agree 5=strongly agree Rating Score Re Se Q1 FPGA class demos by the instructor have been helpful for my learning. 5 1 Q2 FPGA online lab exercises have been useful. 5 1 Q3 My FPGA interface is intuitive. 5 1 Q4 I cannot relate FPGA to real life. 1 -1 Q5 FPGA interface is confusing
at any time during the scheduledperiod to ask any question they had. If the Dean’s fellows did not have an immediate answer,experts would be contacted to address the question after the session in the chat box or attend thesession the following week. Questions ranged from technical challenges with platforms or tabletsto pedagogical questions involving course design or academic integrity in the remoteenvironment. The Office Hours were designed with short clips of information (~3 minutes) withimmediate Q&A opportunities for faculty.Results: Attendance at Office Hours has been consistent and high with no less than 20 facultyattending a session and representation from every department across campus. Discussions wereroutine and faculty
, sharing they’redesign ideas, gaining feedback from on if the concept developed thus far had hit the “target” of the community issue. Our community partners made two visits to our studio on campus andspent individual time with each student, and then I conducted a group Q&A where we all haddiscussions about the project in general and long-term impacts we were trying to make. Partnersgot to see study models (ex.1g, 1h, 1i, 1j, 1k) each student hand built to explain their conceptsand ideas, and students got firsthand experience of how important a study model can be onprojects where clients are themselves still in the ideation phase of a project
was accomplished during a college-wide poster presentation of all SeniorDesign projects. Overall, we find mostly positive evidence about relevance (though see thecomments below), with indeterminate confidence but appearance of satisfaction for the prospectof including ethical analyses into their engineering process.Survey ResponsesIt should be unsurprising to learn that responses from the courses (N=21 out of 23, N=10 out of15) to the anonymous survey reflected a wide variation of learned outcomes. The occasional gulfbetween responses provides substantive opportunity for us to see what influence the process had,and what we have to focus on to improve. Here are a few examples11 with our commentsfollowing each. Q: List and describe
. Hale, S. Freyne, Teaching Aids and Laboratory Experiments toEnhance Materials Learning, Proceedings of the 2007 Midwest Section Conference of theAmerican Society for Engineering Education, Wichita, KS, Sep. 19-21, 2007.[9] A. M. Barry, D. Berry, S. Cunningham, J. Newton, M. Schweppe, A. Spalter, W. Whiteley,R. Williams, Visual Learning for Science and Engineering. A visual Learning Campfire,Snowbird, Utah, June 1-4, 2002.[10] G.R. Chalageri, G.U, Raju, Teaching Reform through Model building in Theory of MachineCourse, Proceedings of the International Conference on Transformations in EngineeringEducation, ICTIEE, 2014.[11] S. Rasul, Q. Bukhsh, S. Batool, “A study to analyze the effectiveness of audio visual aids inteaching learning process at a
of more complextechnical topics to freshmen level students. The increase in less positive perceptions of confidencein programming ability among female learners warrants further study and is particularly interestingsince the instructors for the classes surveyed were both female.AcknowledgementWork described in this paper supports the goals of NSF INCLUDES 1649312.References[1] G. W. Skelton., Q. Pang, W. Zheng, and H. Shih. “Using robotics for teaching critical thinking, problems solving and self-regulated learning for freshmen engineering students,” In proceedings of the 2011 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2011.[2] Support K-12 Computer Science Education in Mississippi, 2019. Accessed on: Jan 20, 2020. [Online]. Available
reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References:[1] Q. Zhu and B. K. Jesiek,“A pragmatic approach to ethical decision-making in engineering practice: Characteristics, evaluation criteria, and implications for instruction and assessment,” Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 663-679, 2017.[2] D. Bairaktarova and A. Woodcock,“Engineering ethics education: Aligning practice and outcomes,” IEEE Communications Magazine, pp. 18-22, 2015.[3] D. Bairaktarova and A. Woodcock, "Engineering Student’s Ethical Awareness and Behavior: A New Motivational Model," Science and Engineering Ethics, pp. 1-29, 2016.[4] B. E. Barry and M. W. Ohland, "Applied ethics in the engineering, health, business
, A. Ng, “ROS: An Open-Source Robot Operating System”, ICRA Workshop on Open Source Software, 2009 13. M. Labbé, F. Michaud, “RTAB-Map as an Open-Source Lidar and Visual SLAM Library for Large-Scale and Long-Term Online Operation,” in Journal of Field Robotics, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 416–446, 2019 14. Labelbox (2020), Labelbox, Retrieved from the Labelbox, Inc. website, https://www. labelbox. com 15. A. Howard, M. Sandler, G. Chu, L. Chen, B. Chen, M. Tan, W. Wang, Y. Zhu, R. Pang, V. Vasudevan, Q. Le, H. Adam, “Searching for MobileNetV3”, International Conference on Computer Vision, 2019 16. M. Tan, Q. Le, “EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networks”, International
, an adaptation of student-formed teams that leaves the final team- forming decision in the hands of the instructorsAll of these team-forming approaches start before the first term begins by providing studentswith project proposal descriptions, sponsor contact information, and guidelines on what toconsider when looking at potential projects (e.g. personal interest, career goals, prior experience,special skills, anticipated workload). This material allows students to start thinking about thetype of the project before classes begin. At the first class meeting, after discussing courselogistics, explaining the team-forming process, and answering questions, students attend a‘Sponsor Q&A Expo’ where they meet with sponsors of projects
. Hardy D, Puaut I. WCET Analysis of Multi-level Non-inclusive Set-Associative Instruction Caches. IEEE, December, 200810. Srikantaiah S, Kultursay E, Zhang T, Kandemir M, Irwin M.J, Xie Y. MorphCache: A Reconfigurable Adaptive Multi-level Cache hierarchy. IEEE, February, 201111. Kecheng Ji, Ling M, Wang Q, Shi L., Pan J., AFEC An Analytical Framework for Evaluating Cache performance in out of order processors. In 2017 Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conf. & Expo.12. Yavits L., Morad A., Ginosar, Cache Hierarchy Optimization. In IEEE COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE LETTERS, VOL.13, NO. 2, 2014.13. Waldspurger C, Saemundson T., Ahmad I. and Park N., Cache Modeling and Optimization using Miniature Simulations. In 2017 USENIX
, High School Learning, and Postsecondary Context of Support,” 2012.[9] R. W. Auger, A. E. Blackhurst, and K. Herting Wahl, “The Development of Elementary-Aged Children’s Career Aspirations and Expectations on JSTOR.” [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/42732626?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents. [Accessed: 27- Feb-2019].[10] L. S. Gottfredson and R. T. Lapan, “Assessing Gender-Based Circumscription of Occupational Aspirations,” J. Career Assess., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 419–441, Sep. 1997.[11] D. A. Jepsen and G. L. Dickson, “Continuity in life-span career development: Career exploration as a precursor to career establishment,” Career Dev. Q., vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 217–233, 2003.[12] “Women Who
N 22 M inimum 0.0000 1st Q uartile 0.5000 M edian 1.0000 3rd Q uartile 1.1250 M aximum 5.0000 95% C onfidence Interv al for M ean
, K.T. Nguyen, and D. Hui, Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods, applications and challenges. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2018. 143: p. 172-196.9. M. Abshirini, M. Charara, P. Marashizadeh, M.C. Saha, M.C. Altan, and Y. Liu, Functional nanocomposites for 3D printing of stretchable and wearable sensors. Applied Nanoscience, 2019. 9(8): p. 2071-2083.10. L.A. Chavez, B.R. Wilburn, P. Ibave, L.C. Delfin, S. Vargas, H. Diaz, C. Fulgentes, A. Renteria, J. Regis, and Y. Liu, Fabrication and characterization of 3D printing induced orthotropic functional ceramics. Smart Materials and Structures, 2019. 28(12): p. 125007.11. Q. Gao, H. Gu, P. Zhao, C. Zhang, M. Cao, J. Fu, and Y. He
Proceedings of ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition,Salt Lake City, UT, 2018.[13] D. Milesko-Pytel, “With a dose of morality,” American Education, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 31-36, 1979.[14] P. C. Wankat and F. S. Oreovicz, Teaching Engineering, Purdue: Purdue UniversityPress, 2015.[15] Q. Zhu, “Toward a globalized engineering education: Comparing dominant images ofengineering education in the United States and China,” presented at 2019 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, Tampa, FL, 2019.[16] Infusing Ethics Selection Committee, Infusing Ethics into the Development of Engineers:Exemplary Education Activities and Programs, Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press,2016.[17] K. Riley, M. Davis, A. C. Jackson, and J. Maciukenas, “‘Ethics in the details