, pp. 140–149.[13] M. ElZomor, D. Garber, and P. Pradhananga, “Alternative Technical Concepts for Contract Delivery Methods in Accelerated Bridge Construction,” 2020. doi: 10.17226/22419.[14] D. Buenaño-Fernandez, W. Villegas-CH, and S. Luján-Mora, “The use of tools of data mining to decision making in engineering education—A systematic mapping study,” Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 744–758, 2019, doi: 10.1002/cae.22100.[15] P. Pradhananga, M. Elzomor, G. Santi, and A. M. Sadri, “Integrative pedagogical framework to support construction students’ professional skills and engagement,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2020, vol. 2020-June, doi
J.F., Bringle R.G. The effects of an intensive research experience on the careers oftalented undergraduates. J. Res. Dev. Educ. 1990;24:1–5.[17] Gregerman, S. (1999) Improving the Academic Success of Diverse Students ThroughUndergraduate Research." Council on Undergraduate Research Quarterlv, 20. 5459.[18] Lopatto, D. (2007). Undergraduate Research Experiences Support Science Career Decisionsand Active Learning. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 6(4), 297-306.[19] Marquez, E., Garcia Jr., S. (2019) Nurturing Brilliance in Engineering: Creating ResearchVenues for Undergraduate Underrepresented Minorities in Engineering as an Initiative fromFaculty Members that Foster Academic Inclusion, Development, and Post-graduation Instruction.2019 ASEE Annual
# 978-1-63487-265-2 • Recommended Practice for Daylighting Buildings, 2013 (co-author), IESNA, New York, USA, ISNB # 978-0-87995-281-5 • Design Guidelines for Sustainable Biological Stations, 2010, Oklahoma Academy of Sciences, Stillwater, Oklahoma, USA, ISBN # 978-0-9843264-1-9 (online book) Selected Conference Papers • Mansy, Challenging Conventional Wisdom in the Age of Computing, ASES National Solar Conference, 2018, Boulder, Colorado, August 5-8, 2018 • Mansy, Energy perfor- mance within integrative design, barriers in academia, ASES National Solar Conference, 2017, Denver, Colorado 9-12 October, 2017 • Mansy, Daylight rules-of-thumb experimentally examined, ASEE 2017, Midwest Section Conference, Stillwater
Paper ID #32839The Perception of Sustainable Design and Construction: Case Study ofConstruction Students at Two UniversitiesDr. Sanjeev Adhikari, Kennesaw State University Dr. Sanjeev Adhikari is faculty from Kennesaw State University. Previously he was faculty at Morehead State University from 2009 to 2016 and faculty at Purdue University – Indianapolis from 2016 to 2019. He has completed Ph.D. degree in civil engineering, focusing on construction management from Michigan Technological University in 2008. He has an extensive teaching background with a total of 18 years academic experience at five different universities. He
, and have developed and/or co-facilitated several faculty development workshops, including UBC’s three-day course design institute, and, under the guidance of Bill Oakes, the one-day ASEE Service Learning workshop. I am a trained peer reviewer of teaching, and have over 10 years experience providing both formative and summative peer reviews. Currently, in addition to being curious about how best to train engineering students to work effectively in transdisciplinary teams, I am working with the Municipal Natural Asset Initiative to embed natural asset management techniques into engineering education.Dr. Peter M Ostafichuk P.Eng., University of British Columbia, Vancouver Dr. Peter M. Ostafichuk is a professor of
Z. Wang, Challenges of Student Equity and Engagement in a HyFlex Course, in Blended Learning Designs in STEM Higher Education. 2019, Springer. p. 209- 230.2. Abdelmalak, M.M.M. and J.L. Parra, Case Study of HyFlex Course Design: Benefits and Challenges for Graduate Students, in Innovative Applications of Online Pedagogy and Course Design. 2018, IGI Global. p. 298-317.3. Beatty, B.J., Teaching a Hybrid-Flexible Course. Hybrid-Flexible Course Design, 2019.4. Miller, J.B. and M. Baham. Comparing the HyFlex (hybrid-flexible) model of course delivery in an introductory statistics course and a probability and statistics course for engineers and scientists. in International Conference on Teaching
-arounds. Thepurpose in sharing this experience is to inform other instructors of how easy this is to implementin these two solid mechanics courses and to inspire other instructors to create their own teachingtools. Because solid modeling is almost universally being taught to engineers in lieu of thetraditional drafting and 2D CAD and because 3D printers are common in maker-spaces anddesign labs, creating these or similar learning tools is easily done by instructors or students aspart of a class project. These pass-arounds and others like it can be used instead of expensiveinstructional aids from commercial vendors.II. ApproachBeginning just before the Fall semester of 2019, the author worked with a colleague withsignificant experience working
effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature," Teachers College Record, vol. 115, no. 3, pp. 1-47, 2013.[4] R. Bachnak, Rafic, S. S. Marikunte, and A. B. Shafaye, "Fundamentals of ABET accreditation with the newly approved changes." In Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Tampa, FL, USA, pp. 16-19. 2019.[5] V. Kaptelinin and B. A. Nardi, Acting with technology: Activity theory and interaction design. MIT press, 2006.[6] A. Blunden, "An interdisciplinary concept of activity," Outlines. Critical Practice Studies, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1-26, 2009.[7] B. Bligh and M. Flood, "Activity theory in empirical higher education research: choices, uses
University, 196, 2016.[11] A. Keune and K. Peppler, "Materials‐to‐develop‐with: The making of a makerspace," British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 280-293, 2019.[12] S. Mersand, "The State of Makerspace Research: a Review of the Literature," TechTrends, pp. 1-13, 2020.[13] S. L. Martinez and G. Stager, Invent to learn, 2nd ed. ed. (Making, Tinkering, and Engineering in the Classroom). Torrance, Canada: Construting Modern Knowledge, 2019.[14] F. Turner, "Millenarian tinkering: The puritan roots of the maker movement," Technology and culture, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. S160-S182, 2018.[15] I. Seidman, Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the
productive as well as create work-life balance.The typologies are statistically derived from cluster analyses on the parameters from the TTIreports of 251 undergraduate engineering students who took the assessment suite between 2017and 2019 as well as 93 graduate students from a selective professional master program. Clusteranalysis has been used in engineering education research over the last two decades [1] tounderstand the relationship between the future aspirations of engineering students and how theyconduct themselves while in college [2, 3] as well as to inform curriculum redesign [4, 5].These typologies are matched with generalized categories of engineering jobs to provide newinsights and techniques for strengthening the engineering talent
Studies, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 196–216, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.1080/19378629.2019.1663200.[2] K. H. Altman, “Cognition in Natural Settings: The Cultural Lens Model,” in Cultural Ergonomics, vol. 4, M. Kaplan, Ed. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2004, pp. 249–280. doi: 10.1016/S1479-3601(03)04009-8.[3] J. Z. Namenwirth, and R. Weber, Dynamics of Culture, 1st ed. Routledge, 1987. Accessed: Feb. 09, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.routledge.com/Dynamics-of- Culture/Namenwirth-Weber/p/book/9781138699489[4] P. Sharma, “Measuring personal cultural orientations: Scale development and validation,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 787–806, 2010.[5] J. Mahadevan, “Intercultural engineering beyond
-high-wage-ohio/?agreed=1[2] A. Carrick, “Series (1 of 7): Rankings of States by Industrial Sub-Sector Jobs – Manufacturing:”,January 2019, [Online] Available:https://canada.constructconnect.com/dcn/news/economic/2019/01/series-1-7-rankings-statesindustrial-sub-sector-jobs-weight-concentration-maps-manufacturing )Bureau of Economic Analysis, US Departmentof Commerce. www.bea.gov[3] Program Insights, Burning Glass Technologies, January 2020, [Online] Available:(https://www.burning-glass.com)[4] K. S. Rawat and G. H. Massiha, "A hands-on laboratory-based approach to undergraduate roboticseducation," IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA '04.2004, New Orleans, LA, USA, 2004, pp. 1370-1374 Vol.2.[5] M
Education and on the Advisory Board for the Journal of Engineering Education. He was selected as a Fellow of ASEE in 2008 and of ASME in 2012. He holds a B.S. in Nuclear Engineering from Penn State, an M.Eng. in Mechanical Engineering from RPI, and a Ph.D. in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering from Princeton. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Work-In-Progress: Impact of the Entrepreneurial Mindset for Innovative Teaching (EMIT) AcademyAbstractThis work-in-progress paper describes the development and evaluation of an innovative facultydevelopment initiative that incorporates entrepreneurial mindset (EM) and
., vol. 37, no. 3, p. 04021002, May 2021, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000889.[7] Y. Yang and D. W. Carroll, “Gendered Microaggressions in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics,” p. 18.[8] M. J. Lee, J. D. Collins, S. A. Harwood, R. Mendenhall, and M. B. Huntt, “‘If you aren’t White, Asian or Indian, you aren’t an engineer’: racial microaggressions in STEM education,” Int. J. STEM Educ., vol. 7, no. 1, p. 48, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1186/s40594-020- 00241-4.[9] C. Poleacovschi, S. Feinstein, S. Luster-Teasley, and M. Berger, “An Intersectional Perspective to Studying Microaggressions in Engineering Programs,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Proc., Jun. 2019, Accessed: Mar. 08, 2021. [Online]. Available: https
, 2013.[2] C. D. Troy, R. R. Essig, B. K. Jesiek, J. Boyd and N. M. Trellinger, "Writing to learn engineering: identifying effective techniques for the integration of written communication into engineering classes curricula," in 121st ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Indianapolis, 2014.[3] N. T. Buswell, B. K. Jesiek, C. S. Troy, R. R. Essig and J. Boyd, "Engineering instructors on writing: perceptions, practices, and needs," IEEE Transactions on professional communication, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 55-74, 2019.[4] Brown university catalog, “graduation requirements”, March 2021.[5] Duke university catalog, “graduation requirements”, March 2021.[6] Yale university catalog, “graduation requirements”, March 2021.[7] Harvard university
Paper ID #34563ABET’s Maverick Evaluators and the Limits of Accreditation as a Mode ofGovernance in Engineering EducationDr. Atsushi Akera, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Atsushi Akera is Associate Professor and Graduate Program Director in the Department of Science and Technology Studies at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (Troy, NY). He received his M.A. and Ph.D. in the History and Sociology of Science, University of Pennsylvania. His current research is on the history of engineering education reform in the United States (1945-present). He is a the current Chair of the ASEE Ad Hoc Committee on Interdivisional
En- gineering Design. Dr. McCullough has over 30 years’ experience in engineering practice and education, including industrial experience at the Tennessee Valley Authority and the US Army Space and Missile Defense Command. Her research interests include Image and Data Fusion, Automatic Target Recogni- tion, and Bioinformatics. She is a former member of the ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission, and is the delegate of the Women in Engineering Division of ASEE to the Committee on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion.Dr. Svetlana Chesser, Auburn University Svetlana Chesser is an Assistant Clinical Professor of Educational Psychology at Auburn University. She earned her Ph.D. in Educational Psychology from Auburn
seen double digit percent growth (2018: 27.1%, 2019: 15.8%, 2020: 19.5%). In fact, the engineering technology program enrollments currently represent 7.1% of the college’s undergraduate enrollment, the highest it has been in the past eleven years. In retrospect, it is clear that the move to General Engineering has increased the visibility of engineering technology in the college. More importantly, when students have an opportunity to experience the first-year math, science and engineering courses prior to choosing a discipline, they are able to make a more informed choice based on their interests, career goals, and natural abilities. 2) Impact on Pathways into Engineering Technology – Prior to 2014, the
. 28, no. 8, pp. 649– 660, 1991, doi: 10.1002/tea.3660280803.[4] M. T. H. Chi, R. D. Roscoe, J. D. Slotta, M. Roy, and C. C. Chase, “Misconceived Causal Explanations for Emergent Processes,” Cognitive Science, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 1–61, 2012, doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01207.x.[5] J. Z. Kelter, J. D. Emery, and U. Wilensky, “Learning About Diffusion at Two Levels: Micro-scale-computational to macro-scale-analytical,” presented at the 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, 2020.[6] U. Wilensky and M. Resnick, “Thinking in Levels: A Dynamic Systems Approach to Making Sense of the World,” Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 3–19, Mar. 1999, doi: 10.1023/A:1009421303064.[7] S. T. Levy and U
stakeholders, discovery, opportunity identification, and value creation into problem-based learning modules with examples and assessment specific to fluid mechanics,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2016, doi: 10.18260/p.26724.[7] J. Wheadon and N. Duval-Couetil, “Elements of Entrepreneurially Minded Learning: KEEN White Paper,” J. Eng. Entrep., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 17–25, 2016.[8] J. Blessing, K. Mekemson, and D. Pistrui, “Building an entrepreneurial engineering ecosystem for future generations: The Kern Entrepreneurship Education Network,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2008, doi: 10.18260/1-2--3488.[9] R. C. Schank, A. Fano, B. Bell
Professor in 2013 and Full Professor in 2019 . Dr. Chrysochoou’s general research area is environmental geochemistry, with a focus on site remediation, characterization and reuse of industrial waste and construction materials. Dr. Chrysochoou’s serves as the Principal Investigator of the project ”Beyond Accommodation: Leveraging Neurodiversity for Engineering Innovation”. Sponsored by the National Science Foundation Revolutionizing Engineering Department program, this 5-year project aims at transforming educational practices and cultivate the potential of neurodivergent individuals to contribute to engineering breakthroughsDr. Arash E. Zaghi, University of Connecticut Arash E. Zaghi is an Associate Professor in the
to Failure," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 108, no. 4, pp. 547-573, 2019.[3] B. A. Camburn, "Design Prototyping Methods," Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering Dissertation, Mechanical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA, 2015.[4] B. A. Camburn, D. Jensen, R. Crawford, K. Otto, and K. Wood, "Evaluation of a Strategic Method to Improve Prototype Performance with Reduced Cost and Fabrication Time," in DS 80-4 Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 15), Milan, Italy, July 27 - July 30 2015, vol. 4: The Design Society, pp. 333-342.[5] S. P. Dow, K. Heddleston, and S. R. Klemmer, "The Efficacy of Prototyping Under Time
education,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 99, no. 1, Art. no. 1, 2010, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168- 9830.2010.tb01038.x.[2] E. A. Cech and H. M. Sherick, “Depoliticization as a mechanism of gender inequality among engineering faculty,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, Tampa, FL, 2019, pp. 1–12, doi: https://peer.asee.org/32586.[3] G. Lichtenstein, H. L. Chen, K. A. Smith, and T. A. Maldonado, “Retention and persistence of women and minorities along the engineering pathway in the United States,” in Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, A. Johri and B. M. Olds, Eds. Cambridge University Press, 2015, pp. 311–334.[4] E. A. Cech and W. R. Rothwell, “LGBTQ inequality in engineering
Paper ID #32358Learning from the Voices of Faculty: An Analysis of the Impact ofShelter-in-Place on Faculty at San Jose State University in Spring 2020Dr. Maria Chierichetti, San Jose State University Maria Chierichetti joined the department of Aerospace Engineering as a full-time assistant professor in Fall 2019. Her interests lie in the field of aerospace structural design and vibrations, with particular emphasis on developing methodologies for combining finite element analysis and machine/deep learning for structural health monitoring and unmanned Structural inspections in the context of urban air mobility. Maria is
, “Bridging the Research-to-Practice Gap: Designing an Institutional Change Plan Using Local Evidence: Designing an Institutional Change Plan Using Local Evidence”, J. Eng. Educ., vol. 103, no 2, pp. 331-361, apr. 2014, doi: 10.1002/jee.20042.[2] G. Zavala, M. Truyol, and A. Dominguez, “Professional Development Program on Active Learning for Engineering Faculty in Chile: First Stage”, in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, Columbus, Ohio, jun. 2017, p. 28761, doi: 10.18260/1-2--28761.[3] D. Rodríguez-Oroz, R. Gómez-Espina, M. J. Bravo Pérez, and M. E. Truyol, “Aprendizaje basado en un proyecto de gamificación: vinculando la educación universitaria con la divulgación de la
the University of Washington Center for Evaluation and Re- search for STEM Equity (UW CERSE) and an affiliate assistant professor of sociology. She has been at American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Paper ID #32715UW working on STEM Equity issues for more than 17 years. Dr. Litzler is a member of ASEE, 2020-2021chair of the ASEE Commission on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, and a former board member of theWomen in Engineering ProActive Network (WEPAN). Her research interests include the educational cli-mate for students, faculty, and staff in science and engineering
hoursConclusions:This paper presents an effort attempting to prepare College of Engineering and Technology faculty for allthe uncertainties and changes they had to face as the result of the COVID-19 pandemic. The series ofdiscussions organized by faculty across different departments certainly have helped many facultymembers facing the enormous challenges in multiple facets. The ideas collected from these sessionsparticularly assisted in transitioning essential experiential learning to appropriate contexts in order tocomply with capacity limitations, PPE requirements, and social distancing. Experiential learning wasunderstandably one of the most impacted areas of teaching and learning given all of the constraints.The authors wish such a discussion at an ASEE
her an in-depth understanding of the developmental nature of students participatingDr. Krishna Bista, Krishna Bista is an Associate Professor at Morgan State University, Maryland (USA).Ms. Sotonye Ikiriko, Morgan State University Ms. Sotonye Ikiriko is currently a Doctoral student and Research Associate in the Department of Civil Engineering, Morgan State University (MSU) in Baltimore Maryland. Prior to joining the department in January of 2019, Ms. Sotonye Ikiriko was a Graduate Research Assistant (GRA) at Tennessee State American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021