stress, pain, and illness, 15th anniversary ed. in Full catastrophe living: Using the wisdom of your body and mind to face stress, pain, and illness, 15th anniversary ed. New York, NY, US: Delta Trade Paperback/Bantam Dell, 2005, pp. xxxiii, 471.[5] R. Stevens, D. Amos, A. Jocuns, and L. Garrison, “Engineering As Lifestyle And A Meritocracy Of Difficulty: Two Pervasive Beliefs Among Engineering Students And Their Possible Effects,” in 2007 Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Honolulu, Hawaii: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2007, p. 12.618.1-12.618.17. doi: 10.18260/1-2--2791.[6] H. Dryburgh, “WORK HARD, PLAY HARD: Women and Professionalization in Engineering—Adapting to the Culture,” Gend. Soc., vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 664–682
[3] J. Canino and K. B. Teichert, “A Frankenstein-inspired Engineering Design Project,” inProceedings of the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference, USA, June 2019. [Online]. Available:https://peer.asee.org/a-frankenstein-inspired-engineering-design-project[4] S. Ambrose, M. Bridges, and M. Lovett, How Learning Works: Seven Research-BasedPrinciples for Smart Teaching, San Francisco, CA, USA: Jossey-Bass, 2010.[5] B. Lincoln, Theorizing Myth: Narrative, Ideology, and Scholarship, Chicago, IL, USA:University of Chicago Press, 1999.[6] H. Markus and P. Nurius, “Possible Selves,” American Psychologist, vol. 41, no. 9, pp.954-969, Sep. 1986.[7] P. Nagy, R. Wylie, J. Eschrich, and E. Finn. “Facing the Pariah of Science: TheFrankenstein Myth
cycle carbon emissions assessment on buildings,” Applied Energy, vol. 143, no. 1. Elsevier Ltd, pp. 395–413, 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.023.[2] W. Lu, V. W. Y. Tam, H. Chen, and L. Du, “A holistic review of research on carbon emissions of green building construction industry,” Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 1065–1092, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1108/ECAM-06-2019-0283.[3] United Nations Environment Programme, “Buildings and Climate Change: Summary for Decision Makers,” 2009. Accessed: Feb. 15, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://wedocs.unep.org/20.500.11822/32152[4] United Nations Environment Programme, “Common carbon metric for measuring energy
Computing on Rise of the Machines (learning), Chicago IL USA: ACM, Jul. 2019, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1145/3332186.3332218.[2] “About – carcc.org.” Accessed: Apr. 02, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://carcc.org/about/[3] H. Neeman et al., “The Advanced Cyberinfrastructure Research and Education Facilitators Virtual Residency: Toward a National Cyberinfrastructure Workforce,” in Proceedings of the XSEDE16 Conference on Diversity, Big Data, and Science at Scale, in XSEDE16. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2016, p. 57:1-57:8. doi: 10.1145/2949550.2949584.[4] A. Briliyanti, J. Rojewski, D. Colbry, and K. Colbry, “Training the Trainers: Preparing Facilitators to Provide Professional Development for Engineers and Scientists,” presented at the 2022 ASEE
Engineering and Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning (CETL) to enhance teaching and learning effectiveness of engineering courses. She is the winner of 2021 University Teaching Fellow award, 2019 Distinguished Engineering Educator Award, and recipient of 2016, 2017, and 2018 Klewin Excellence in teaching award.Miss Alexandra Hain, University of Connecticut Alexandra Hain is an Assistant Research Professor at the University of Connecticut in structural engineering. She received her PhD in Structural Engineering in 2019 from the University of Connecticut. She has an interest in engineering education and serv ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Optimizing Co-Teaching
CoreCurriculum: An Interdisciplinary Engineering Studies Degree Program. Paper presented at 2020ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Online, 2020. 10.18260/1-2--35373.[10] S. Farrell, A. Godwin, & D. M. Riley. A Sociocultural Learning Framework for InclusivePedagogy in Engineering. Chemical Engineering Education, 55(4), 2021.https://doi.org/10.18260/2-1-370.660-128660[11] D. S. Claussen, J. Y. Tsai, A. M. Boll, J. Blacklock, & K. Johnson. Pain and Gain: Barriersand Opportunities for Integrating Sociotechnical Thinking into Diverse Engineering Courses.Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference, 2019.[12] M. Azizi, M. Imad, S. M. Foote, J. Caulkins, & B. Wuetherick. Humanizing STEMeducation: an exploratory study of
, and safer chemicals decision making.Mr. James P Ferguson, The George Washington University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Exploring the role of engineering judgment in engineering education through writing praxis in a 3rd year Systems Engineering Writing-in-the-Disciplines [WID] courseAbstractCritical thinking is central to the rationale of university education and engineering education. Criticalthinking does not have a single agreed operational definition in engineering education. One usefuldefinition described by Ahern et al (2019) quoting Facione (1990) is: “[critical thinking] is a ‘purposeful,self-regulatory judgment which results in interpretation, analysis
more authentic moral commitment than chicanery. Moreover, the strictmetrics for accomplishing good made clear sense of MacAskill’s claims that EA has alwaysrecruited most successfully in STEM fields [2], appealing to a small subset of philanthropicquants that he affectionately but self-consciously labels “moral weirdos” [3]. EA amounts to acutting-edge version of utilitarianism’s traditional appeal among those students. Nelson andPeterson’s 1982 title might overgeneralize—“If You’re an Engineer, You’re Probably aUtilitarian”—but it’s hard to argue with their assessment that the utilitarian’s methodical“quantification is attractive to engineers.” [4]For ASEE and LEES, that attraction is worth examining for several reasons. First, EA creates
generations of engineers to address sustainability challenges in theircommunities and beyond.AcknowledgementThe authors express their sincere appreciation to Samantha Bortz, Director of The MacoskeyCenter, for her unwavering support and guidance throughout the development andimplementation of the projects.Reference [1] M. L. Sattler, V. C. P. Chen, B. H. Dennis, S. P. Mattingly, K. Rogers, Y. Pearson Weatherton, M. Rani, and K. Kositkanawuth, "Integrating Sustainability across the Curriculum: Engineering Sustainable Engineers," in Proceedings of the 2012 ASEE Annual Conference, San Antonio, Texas, 2012. [2] J. Murray, "Student-Led Action for Sustainability in Higher Education: A Literature Review," International Journal of
Award from the Center for Women in Technology in 2022. She earned a virtual mobility Erasmus+ grant in 2023 to continue global engineering work and connection with University of Porto and Universidad Cat´olica Portuguesa where she was invited to serve on their advisory board. This work also expands to Germany where she is creating a Global Engineering Certificate in collaboration with Hochschule Bonn-Rhein-Sieg (H-BRS). She also received the Northern Maryland Technology Council Leader Award in STEM education in 2019. She has written curricula and published a number of works in engineering education in both higher education, P12 and international spaces. She is a co-founder and the Director of Innovation Programs and
. Nietfeld, “Using strategy instruction and confidence judgments toimprove metacognitive monitoring,” Metacognition and Learning, vol. 4, no. 2, 2009, pp. 161-176; DOI 10.1007/s11409-009-9042-8.22. G. Schraw, “Measuring metacognitive judgments,” Handbook of metacognition ineducation, Routledge, 2009, pp. 427-441.23. M.J. Zyphur and F.L. Oswald, “Bayesian probability and statistics in managementresearch: A new horizon,” Journal of Management, vol. 39, no. 1, 2013, pp. 5-13.24. L. Santiago, et al., “Board 137: Critical Thinking Skills in Non-calculus Ready First-yearEngineering Students,” Proc. 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.25. L. Santiago, et al., “Board# 129: Introducing first year engineering students toengineering
problem-solving in an academic hackathon.” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2018.[14] Trello.org, “Trello Software for Agile Method,” https://trello.com, Jan 2024.[15] C. Mart´ınez and M. Mu˜noz, “ADPT: An active learning method for a programming lab course.” Proceedings of the 10th International CDIO Conference, Universitat Polit`ecnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain,, 2014.[16] Jupyter.org, “Jupyter Notebook,” https://jupyter.org/index.html, June 2019.[17] Thonny.org, “Thonny Python IDE,” https://thonny.org, Jan 2024.[18] J. Larmer and J. Mergendoller, “The main course, not dessert,” Buck Institute (www.bie.org), 2011.
Roccabianca, and Ricardo Mejia-Alvarez. "TheNeed for Holistic Implementation of SMART Assessment". 2020 ASEE North Central Sectionconference, Morgantown, West Virginia, 2020, March. ASEE Conferences, 2020.[2] Ronald C. Averill, Sara Roccabianca and Geoffrey Recktenwald. “A Multi-Instructor Studyof Assessment Techniques in Engineering Mechanics Courses.” Conference Proceedings ofASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida, June 16-19, 2019.[3] Hjelmstad, K. D., & Baisley, A., “A Novel Approach to Mastery-based Assessment inSophomore-level Mechanics Courses” 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, Virtual, Online,2020.[4] Recktenwald, G., & Grimm, M. J., & Averill, R., & Roccabianca, S., “Effects of a NewAssessment Model on
commitment to RT transformed into effective RT for communities 5 1.5 RT is not supported nor 2.5 Academic advisors can help students required by academic institutions circumvent institutional barriers to RTRT in Academic Research Program: Student Case Studies in HES @ MinesAs reported in our ASEE 2022 paper [1], graduate students’ journey to RT begins with an in-depth process of formation which includes a self-reflection of their perspectives as historical andsocial agents, extensive critical readings of the history of engineering, development, and the roleof engineers in development. Once they
studentlearning outcomes, teaching guides, grant funding in collaboration with partners like ASEE, andsupport for the EOP Network (EOPN), an impact-driven network of diverse stakeholderscommitted to integrating environmental and social sustainability into engineering. EOP’s effortshave proven successful in fueling hundreds of courses across disciplines to integratesustainability. While the EOP initiative has intentionally engaged students through a number ofavenues, faculty champions have been at the center of curricular change efforts. Thus, theapproach has not yet tapped the full potential of student changemakers to advocate for andsupport curricular change.This paper draws upon primary research conducted during a workshop at the Engineers for
Resolution Ability, and Cultural Self-Awareness in the Context of System Analysis and Design Teamwork,” in 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2022.[7] A. Jaiswal, T. Karabiyik, L. Jin, and K. Acheson-Clair, “Enhancing Team Communication Skills via Portable Intercultural Module in a Systems Thinking Class,” in 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2023.[8] O. K. Bee and T. S. Hie, “Employers’ emphasis on technical skills and soft skills in job advertisements,” Engl. Teach., vol. 44, no. 1, 2015, Accessed: Jan. 24, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://meltajournals.com/index.php/TET/article/view/87[9] S. Ibrahim, M. A. M. Yunus, and M. T. M. Khairi, “Teaching academic writing for engineering students
performance equationcan be described using Eq.1.ZXA = t A . ZT + iA ZI + eA . ZEA → (Eq.1)Where ZXA is the performance of ratee, ZT is the true ability, ZI are the environmental factors.And ZEA is random error, whereas, t A ,iA , and eA are the weights of the different components.References[1] R. J. Wherry and C. J. Bartlett, “THE CONTROL OF BIAS IN RATINGS: A THEORYOF RATING,” Personnel Psychology, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 521–551, Sep. 1982, doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1982.tb02208.x.[2] Y. Chuang, H. Chiang, and A. Lin, “Helping behaviors convert negative affect into jobsatisfaction and creative performance: The moderating role of work competence,” PR, vol. 48,no. 6, pp. 1530–1547, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.1108/PR-01-2018-0038.[3] M. Kilduff, A
, invisible challenges they faceduring promotion and tenure at their respective colleges of engineering. This paper is more thanjust information-sharing, it is a raw, complex look into the stifling that happens to academicmothers of color who are devalued and exploited for their motherhood, their service, empathy,and productivity outputs in systems of higher education that was never made for them.References[1] S. Amsler and S. C. Motta, "The marketised university and the politics of motherhood," Gender and education, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 82-99, 2019, doi: 10.1080/09540253.2017.1296116.[2] M. Baker, "Gendered families, academic work and the 'motherhood penalty'," Women's studies journal, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 11-24, 2012.[3] M
Technology and another in Education, alongside a professional teaching license from the Philippines, Araojo brings a distinct perspective to the challenges and opportunities present at the confluence of technology, education, and sociology. Currently, on the cusp of completing a Master’s degree in Sociology, Araojo is deeply committed to contributing to research that supports underrepresented students across various disciplines, not limited to engineering and technology but extending to other areas as well. Araojo’s academic endeavors are fueled by a steadfast dedication to enhancing educational experiences and outcomes for diverse student populations. At the forthcoming ASEE conference, Araojo eagerly anticipates the
.[2] T. R. Hinkin, "A Brief Tutorial on the Development of Measures for Use in Survey Questionnaires," Organizational Research Methods, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 104-121, 1998, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/109442819800100106.[3] T. R. Hinkin, "Scale Development Measures.," in Research in Organizations, R. A. Swanson and E. F. H. III Eds. San Francisco, California: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc, 2005, ch. 10.[4] A. Costello and J. Osborne, "Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis," Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, vol. 10, Article 7, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.7275/jyj1-4868.[5] K. Popper, The Logic of Scientific
the United States. John has published on engineering-communication ped- agogy for many years, including papers on engineering ethics and communication; active-learning ped- agogies; and the intersection of engineering and theatre. He has also held multiple leadership roles at the section and national levels, including President of the Southeastern Section and the national Zone II Chair, and he presently serves as the ASEE Campus Representative for the University of Georgia. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 The Bioengineering Professional Persona: A New Communication-Intensive Course for a New Program in a New- ish College of
been rec- ognized as a Diggs Teaching Scholar, a Graduate Academy for Teaching Excellence Fellow, a Global Perspectives Fellow, a Diversity Scholar, a Fulbright Scholar, a recipient of the NSF CAREER award, and was inducted into the Bouchet Honor Society. Homero serves as the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Chair for the Commission on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (CDEI), the Program Chair for the ASEE Faculty Development Division, and the Vice Chair for the Research in Engineering Education Network (REEN). He holds degrees in Industrial Engineering (BS, MS) from the National Experimental University of T´achira, Master of Business Administration (MBA) from Temple University, and Engineering
federal commissions strive todefine rigor in the past 70 years”. New Directions for Higher Education, Vol. 181, pp. 25-34,2018.[2] Roig M, Caso M. “Lying and cheating: Fraudulent excuse making, cheating, and plagiarism.”The Journal of Psychology. Vol. 139, No. 6, pp.485-94. 2005.[3] Singham M. “Away from the authoritarian classroom”. Change: The Magazine of HigherLearning. Vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 50-7, 2005.[4] Warner J. “Deadlines in the ‘Real World’”. Inside Higher Ed. October 7, 2019.[5] Nickels KM, Uddin M. “The impact on student learning of resubmission of work and flexibledeadlines”. Proceedings of the 2003 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference. Arlington, TX2003[6] Becker K. “Death to Deadlines: A 21st-Century Look at the Use of Deadlines and
College of Engineering.” Darcie holds a Master of Engineering degree in Environmental Engineering (2019) and Bachelor of Science degree in Biological Engineering (2017), both from Utah State University. She is passionate about student success and support, both inside and outside of the classroom.Alexander Steven Victor KrummiArynn J. Lorentz, Iron Range Engineering Arynn Lorentz is a facilitator at the Iron Range Engineering Program, a part of the Integrated Engineering Department at Minnesota State University, Mankato, on the Minnesota North-Mesabi Range College Campus in Virginia, MN. Arynn received her Bachelor of Science in Engineering with a focus in Mechanical Engineering from Minnesota State University, Mankato
-231. 2. Beheshti, B.D., “Strategies for Effective Delivery of Online Engineering Courses: Best Practices, Tips and Toolkits”, IEEE webinar, May 2020. 3. “What is POGIL?”, The POGIL Project, https://www.pogil.org/what-is-pogil (accessed December 16, 2023). 4. Simonson, S.R., editor, POGIL, Stylus Publishing, 2019. 5. Douglas, E.P., “Materials Science and Engineering: A Guided Inquiry”, Pearson, 2014. 6. Phillips, J.N., “Use of POGIL Methodology in Undergraduate Mechanical Engineering Courses”, ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section Conference, 2022. 7. Phillips, J.N, Google Shared Folder with Course-Specific Guided Inquiries, https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1MU3y9ZLUmLuYCXcnq7Y6HQGMWeahVebZ ?usp=sharing, 2024
, April). Integrating teamsin multidisciplinary project based learning in mechanical engineering. In IEEE EDUCON 2010Conference, (pp. 709-715). IEEE.11. Brunhaver, S. R., Sheppard, S., & Eris, O. (2011, June). Looking at engineering studentsthrough a motivation/confidence framework. In 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.12. Parsons, S., Croft, T., & Harrison, M. (2011). Engineering students’ self-confidence inmathematics mapped onto Bandura’s self-efficacy. Engineering Education, 6(1), 52-61.13. Mohammed, S., Okudan, G., & Ogot, M. (2006, June). Tolerance for ambiguity: Aninvestigation on its effect on student design performance. ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, Chicago, IL14. Saarikoski, L., & Rybushkina, S
Paper ID #41992Putting Affect in Context: Meta-Affect, Beliefs, and Engineering IdentityAlyndra Mary Plagge, Trinity University Alyndra Plagge is an undergraduate Psychology student at Trinity University. She is majoring in Psychology and minoring in Education and set to graduate in May 2025. After graduation she plans to pursue her master’s degree.Dr. Emma Treadway, Trinity University Emma Treadway received the B.S. degree in Engineering Science from Trinity University in 2011, and her M.S.E. and Ph.D. degrees in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor in 2017 and 2019, respectively. She
. 2022.[18] D. M. Sparks and K. Pole. "“Do we teach subjects or students?” Analyzing science and mathematics teacher conversations about issues of equity in the classroom." School Science and Mathematics 119, no. 7 (2019): 405-416.[19] C. Rottmann and D. Reeve. "Equity as rebar: Bridging the micro/macro divide in engineering ethics education." Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education 20 (2020): 146-165.[20] A. H. Mehdiabadi and R. Atadero. "How are Issues of Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Justice Reflected in Engineering Societies’ Written Communications? A Review." In 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. 2022.[21] American Society of Civil Engineers. Code of Ethics. 26 October 2020