Derive Meaning from Open Text Using Student Reflections ofEngineering Activities,” American Journal of Evaluation, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 559–576, Dec. 2021, doi:10.1177/1098214020962576.[22] S. M. Ruder, C. Stanford, and A. Gandhi, “Scaffolding STEM Classrooms to Integrate KeyWorkplace Skills: Development of Resources for Active Learning Environments,” Journal of CollegeScience Teaching, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 29–35, May 2018, doi: 10.2505/4/jcst18_047_05_29.[23] S. Sangelkar, B. E. Mertz, A. Bernal, and P. Cunningham, “Benchmarking teaming instruction acrossa curriculum,” presented at the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2019.[24] D. W. Shaffer and M. Resnick, “‘Thick’ Authenticity: New Media and Authentic Learning
. (Professor Beta)A related exploratory study involving semi-structured interviews of the pilot cohort students,being presented as a Work in Progress paper at ASEE 2024, confirms that the faculty perceptionswere consistent with the students’ experiences.Reframing failure as an opportunity to learn: Before starting at Greenway, my definition of failure was that I’m dumb or I can't achieve something. But here my definition of failure is I'm not there yet. And the key word is yet. It kind of allows me to see that progress is like steps. It's not like a dead end road. Just because you made it halfway up the steps you still don't see the top doesn't mean that you should stop. And so it's definitely changed my view to where I
Colleges and Universities, p. 57, 2005.[2] J. Milem, M. Chang, and A. Antonio, “Making Diversity Work on Campus: AResearch- Based Perspective,” May 2012.[3] M. Ong, N. Jaumot-Pascual, and L. T. Ko, “Research literature on women of color in undergraduate engineering education: A systematic thematic synthesis,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 581–615, 2020, doi: 10.1002/jee.20345.[4] H. Hartman et al., “Strategies for Improving Diversity and Inclusion in an Engineering Department,” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, vol. 145, no. 2, p. 04018016, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000404.[5] J. Mills and M. Ayre, “Implementing an Inclusive Curriculum for Women
proposes a more responsible and sustainable approach to forestmanagement. One of its applications is a market-oriented approach where companies can becertified if they follow the responsible forest management standards and guidelinesestablished by the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) [26]. The FSC is an international non-profit organization that advocates for sustainable forestry. FSC certifies companies as “foreststewards” [27] when they demonstrate zero deforestation, protection of animals and plants,fair compensation for workers, and respect for local communities’ rights. As of 2019, theCanadian province of British Columbia was the region with the most forest stewardsworldwide [28].Stewardship in Indigenous ContextsIn a variety of Indigenous
White/Caucasian 2018 5 Leah Woman White/Caucasian 2018 5 Liam Man White/Caucasian 2018 4 Anthony Man White/Caucasian 2019 3 COVID-19-Related Change Began Dan Man White/Caucasian 2020 3.5 Will Man White/Caucasian 2020 3 Abby Woman White/Caucasian 2021 2.5 White/Caucasian, Isabella Woman 2021 2.5
within engineering spaces. This can facilitate the cultivation of anenvironment where seeking help for mental health concerns is normalized, destigmatized, andreadily accessible to all students.AcknowledgmentsThis study was supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation. (NSF Award2024394).References[1] M. E. Duffy, J. M. Twenge, and T. E. Joiner, "Trends in mood and anxiety symptoms and suicide-related outcomes among US undergraduates, 2007–2018: Evidence from two national surveys," Journal of Adolescent Health, vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 590-598, 2019.[2] S. K. Lipson, E. G. Lattie, and D. Eisenberg, "Increased Rates of Mental Health Service Utilization by U.S. College Students: 10-Year Population-Level Trends (2007
, 2018, doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6732a3.[2] S. K. Kapp, Autistic Community and the Neurodiversity Movement. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2020. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-8437-0.[3] J. Halpern, M. Arral, and J. Gesun, “Work-in-Progress: Inclusive Mentoring Strategies for Neurodivergent Undergraduate Researchers in STEM,” in 2022 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition, 2022.[4] M. L. Arral, “10 Tips to Make Your Course More Accessible and Inclusive to Disabled Students,” in American Society for Engineering Education, 2022, Aug. 2022. Accessed: Apr. 15, 2023. [Online]. Available: www.slayte.com[5] “Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2019 | NSF - National Science Foundation.” Accessed: Jan. 27
professionalism it inherited from theAAE and other engineering professional societies. Perhaps most notoriously, engineer-managerleadership of the five Founder Societies (AIChE, AIME, ASCE, ASME, and IEEE), NSPE,ASEE, and a representative of the Engineering Joint Council presented to the House LaborCommittee draft language for federal legislation that would become the Professional Provision ofthe 1947 Taft-Hartley Act [20]. NSPE hired a lobbyist who, alongside Executive Director Paul H.Robbins, “worked feverishly with Senator John Ball (MN) to lobby the entire US Senate” for thepassage of the Taft-Hartley Act and the Professional Provision [19]. Robbins testified before theHouse Labor Committee in 1946 in favor of the Professional Provision [20].The Taft
CEO in 2021. He is also a co-founder of New Jersey Community Capital and the NJ Housing and Community Development Network. For the past 9 years, he has taught Social Entrepreneurship at Princeton University (2015-2019) and served as Entrepreneur and Innovator In Residence at Lafayette College, where he co-founded the Dyer Fellowship (2019-present). ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Design Your Own Entrepreneurial Roadmap: A Four Year Cohort Fellowship Model to Develop the Next Generation of InnovatorsAbstractSolving todays’ challenges requires engineers to find new ways of thinking – and acting. Agrowing number of engineering programs and students across the U.S. look to
. [Online]. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1076098[6] A. Kononov et al., “Computational curriculum for MatSE undergraduates,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, Jun. 2017. Accessed: Nov. 04, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://experts.illinois.edu/en/publications/computational- curriculum-for-matse-undergraduates[7] L. (Samantha) Li, “Integrating Computational Modeling Modules into Undergraduate Materials Science and Engineering Education,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://scholarworks.boisestate.edu/mse_facpubs/276[8] A. J. Magana, M. L. Falk, and M. J. Reese Jr., “Introducing Discipline-Based Computing in
Paper ID #42148Understanding the Influence of a Week-Long Electrical and Computer EngineeringSummer Camp on Middle School Students’ Interests in STEM (RTP)Joshua E. Katz, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Joshua E. Katz is a Ph.D. student in the Department of Curriculum and Instruction, DELTA program, at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, where his research centers on collaborative learning in engineering education and other STEM disciplines. He obtained his B.S. in Technology and Engineering Education in 2019 and his M.S. in STEM Education and Leadership in 2021, both from Illinois State University
Riddle Aeronautical UniversityKatrina Robertson, Embry Riddle Aeronautical UniversityTrey Talko, Embry Riddle Aeronautical University Small Shifts: New Methods for Improving Communication Experiences for Women in Early Engineering Courses Abstract: This paper outlines methods and initial data from an educational intervention based on previous research published at ASEE. Students in introductory engineering courses face challenges communicating and integrating their ideas in team projects. Often these challenges with team communication fall along gendered lines, where women students experience marginalization in team settings. This paper builds from previous research in the field of engineering education which integrated
ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2022.[9] T. Anderson and C. Leachman, “Strategies for Supporting OER Adoption through Faculty and Instructor Use of a Federated Search Tool,” J. Librariansh. Sch. Commun., vol. 7, no. 1, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.7710/2162-3309.2279.[10] C. Leachman and T. Anderson, “Open Educational Engineering Resources: Adoption and Development by Faculty and Instructors,” in 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Columbus, Ohio: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2017, p. 28725. doi: 10.18260/1-2--28725.[11] C. D. Czajka and D. McConnell, “The adoption of student-centered teaching materials as a professional development experience for college faculty,” Int. J. Sci. Educ., vol. 41, no. 5
program level, there aremajor and minor degree programs, such as International Design Business Management, andCreative Sustainability, a minor program in product development, tailored for undergraduatestudents. For the studied programs, we collected data from student participants in four Master’sprograms. These programs are interdisciplinary, with a focus on either engineering or design,thus we had a diverse group of student participants from both fields.Data Collection and ParticipantsStudy Site 1: A United States UniversityThis study used secondary semi-structured interview data that was collected as part of theNational Science Foundation NRT Grant supporting the IDR program. Each year of the IDRProgram’s NRT Grant (5 years in total from 2019
learning, and faculty experiences in teaching online courses. He has published papers at several engineering education research conferences and journals. Particularly, his work is published in the International Conference on Transformations in Engineering Education (ICTIEE), American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), Computer Applications in Engineering Education (CAEE), International Journal of Engineering Education (IJEE), Journal of Engineering Education Transformations (JEET), and IEEE Transactions on Education. He is also serving as a reviewer for a number of conferences and journals focused on engineering education research.Tahrima Rouf, University of Oklahoma Dr. Tahrima Rouf is a visiting assistant
generation to the next, there is nosubstitute for blending, practical application with theory learned in the classroom” [1]. In recentyears there has been a significant effort to create multi-use spaces that function as both aclassroom and a laboratory. Most of the existing literature speaks about new construction andsignificant renovations in the creation of these multi-use spaces. This case study paper will focuson how examples of minor renovations and deliberate leadership decisions allowed alreadyexisting spaces to maximize available space and foster a more active learning environment.Literature ReviewTo improve educational facilities by making them more flexible is not a new concept. In a 1996American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE
results? Or, can a little discomfort in teamcohesion actually challenge and motivate a team to achieve better results? An alternativequestion to consider is whether teams with better cohesiveness can achieve the same quality ofwork in less time?AcknowledgementsThe author wishes to thank Richard Mangum, capstone co-instructor, for his support inimplementing the team formation activities documented in this paper.References [1] M. Haslam and A. Beck, “Bridging the Gap: Teamwork and Leadership in Engineering Capstone Courses,” in American Society for Engineering Education, Pacific Southwest Section Meeting, California State University, Los Angeles, California, 2019. [2] R. M. Felder and R. Brent, “Effective
the study were distributed through email solicitations to ASEE regional chapters,through postings on engineering faculty focused social media sites, and through universityengineering faculty lists at four universities. The survey was conducted using the Qualtricssoftware package (Seattle, WA).The survey consisted of four categories of questions: 1. Demographics, 2. Changes in TeachingPractices, 3. Changes in Students, and 4. Changes in Faculty. Following the questions,participants were asked if they would be willing to share a syllabus from before the pandemicand one from the last year for the same or similar courses.Demographics questions focused on understanding participants’ engineering teaching experienceand the environment in which they
Paper ID #43714Board 103: Developing a User Experience Study (Work in Progress)James M. Cox, The University of Iowa James M. Cox has been a member of the University of Iowa Lichtenberger Engineering Library Staff since August 2014. In his current role as the Public Services and Emerging Technologies Librarian, since 2019, he oversees a team of 12 student employees at the Service Desk. Additionally, James manages the library’s technology resources, including the prototyping equipment available in the Creative Space/Makerspace and the extensive Tool Library containing over 275 pieces of equipment. James is interested in
faculty to implementinstructional changes. This includes embedding EM into their curriculum.MethodsA CoP was established by the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering Learning and Teaching Hubto provide a space for faculty members with a shared interest in the Scholarship of Teaching andLearning (SoTL) and the integration of EM to meet regularly, discuss implementation andresearch around EM in their classrooms, with the ultimate goal to submit research contributionsto the 2024 American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) annual conference. The CoPmeetings were held virtually via Zoom throughout the fall 2023 and spring 2024 semesters atArizona State University. Meetings centered on providing resources related to scholarship, EMactivities and
Student Retention in Engineering," ASEE Annual Conference, 2020.[18] B. Przestrzelski and C. A. Roberts, "The industry scholars mentorship program: A professional industry connection experience for engineering undergraduates," 126th ASEE Annual Conference, https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--33401, 2019.
. Wieman, “The Classroom Observation Protocol for Undergraduate STEM (COPUS): A New Instrument to Characterize University STEM Classroom Practices,” CBE—Life Sci. Educ., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 618–627, Dec. 2013, doi: 10.1187/cbe.13-08-0154.[10] J. Echevarria, M. Vogt, and D. J. Short, Making Content Comprehensible for English Learners: The SIOP Model. Pearson Education, 2016.[11] E. R. Howard, J. Sugarman, and C. Coburn, “Adapting the Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol (SIOP) for Two-Way Immersion Education: An Introduction to the TWIOP”.[12] D. Schönthal, The Cambridge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics, 1st ed. Cambridge University Press, 2019. doi: 10.1017/9781316337936.[13] J. Kelly, S. Krause, and D
award by IEEE ASEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 2022 Apprentice Faculty Grant award by the ERM Division, ASEE, and 2020 outstanding researcher award by the School of Engineering Education, Purdue University. Dr. Anwar has over 20 years of teaching experience at various national and international universities, including the Texas A and M University - USA, University of Florida - USA, and Forman Christian College University - Pakistan. She also received outstanding teacher awards in 2013 and 2006. Also, she received the ”President of Pakistan Merit and Talent Scholarship” for her undergraduate studies. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Utilizing Natural Language
ofknowledge, EML fosters a holistic and integrated approach to problem-solving while workingsuccessfully as a team. EML also focuses on developing other vital skills such as resilience andcreativity.EM pedagogy emphasizes active learning, engaging students in hands-on, interdisciplinaryexperiences such as creating and developing innovative business ideas, solving complexproblems, and collaboration. Numerous ASEE presentations and conference proceedings havedetailed the unique ways that faculty have incorporated EM into their engineering classroomsand their methods for assessing effectiveness. Some EM learning activities have utilizedsynchronous or online asynchronous e-modules [6], [7] others utilized global design challenges[8], yet others developed
success,” Innovation Showcase, vol. 10, no. 6, 2015.[5] V. Bocsi et al., “The discovery of the possible reasons for delayed graduation and dropout in the light of a qualitative research study,” Journal of Adult Learning, Knowledge and Innovation, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 27–38, 2019.[6] E. J. Whitt, J. H. Schuh, J. Kinzie, and G. D. Kuh, Student success in college: Creating conditions that matter. Jossey-Bass, 2013.[7] V. Tinto, “Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition University of Chicago Press, 5801 S Ellis Avenue,” Chicago, IL, vol. 60637, 1987.[8] G. L. Heileman, M. Hickman, A. Slim, and C. T. Abdallah, “Characterizing the complexity of curricular patterns in engineering programs,” in 2017 ASEE
.2643-9115.0000054. [12] S. Weedon, “The Role of Rhetoric in Engineering Judgment,”IEEE Trans. Profess. Commun., vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 165–177, Jun. 2019, doi:10.1109/TPC.2019.2900824. [13] ABET, “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2022 – 2023.” ABET [Online], Available:http://www.abet.org/ [14] D. Chadha and K. Hellgardt, “A case of conceptualisation: using a grounded theory approach to further explore how professionals define engineering judgement for use in engineering education
Thermal-Fluid Canons Paper presented at 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus,Ohio. 10.18260/1-2--28007[8] ABET, “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2022 – 2023,” ABET, [Online].Available: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2022-2023/ [Accessed 12 January 2024].[9] Chopra, A. (2019) Dynamics of Structures 4th Edition, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.[10] Newmark, N. M. (1959) A method of computation for structural dynamics. Journal of theengineering mechanics division, 85(3), 67-94.[11] PhyPhox, Physical Phone Experiments [Online]. Available: https://phyphox.org/ [Accessed12 January 2024].
. Boston, MA: NortheasternUniversity. 2015 [8 1/2" X 11" comic. 1-8] Retrieved from: http://bit.ly/PIDControl Accessed 30Jan. 2024.(9) Shepherd, D. * (w) and Lubchansky, M. (p). Recycle and Purge Streams. Boston, MA:Northeastern University. 2016 [8 1/2" X 11" comic. 1-6] Retrieved from:http://bit.ly/RecyclePurgeComic Accessed 30 Jan. 2024(10) Landherr, L.J.T. “Integrating Comics Into Engineering Education To Promote StudentInterest, Confidence, and Understanding”. Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, 2019.(11) R.M. Felder and R. Brent, “Understanding Student Differences.” J. Engr. Education, 94(1),57-72 (2005).(12) Iyer, N. (w+p), ed. by Landherr, L. Chocolate is Chemical Engineering!. AIChEFoundation. 2022 [8 1/2" X 11" comic.] Retrieved