Page 25.262.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 BIM Teaching Strategy for Construction Engineering StudentsAbstractAfter the introduction of Building Information Modeling to construction industry in 1987, todaywe are facing an increasing demand for the new technology and the well trained professionalscapable of implementing it. Recently, the new idea of having a comprehensive 3D intelligentmodel with the ability of being extended to a 4D model has caught a lot of attention and forcedthe construction companies to move toward adopting the new knowledge and implementing it intheir projects. This is due to a variety of reasons such as 1) acquiring the new technology tooptimize project
the country.IntroductionBuilding Information Modeling (BIM) has been widely used by today’s architecture, engineering,and construction (AEC) industry to address energy conservation, sustainability, andenvironmental compliance of construction projects from inception to disposal [1]. Consequently,there is an increasing demand for ConE and Construction Management (CM) students who arecompetent in the BIM technology. Many institutes have already provided accessible trainings tomeet this need. A recent survey [2] regarding the current status of BIM within the AEC educationin the U.S. indicated that, among 101 respondent programs, 51% were Accreditation Board forEngineering and Technology (ABET) accredited engineering programs; 44% of
objective inthis case was to explore the use of and extensions facilitated by an integrated instrumentationplatform. This platform permits students to perform bioelectrical measurements using their ownbodies as the subject of laboratory instrumentation investigations, also known as active orproject-based learning 1, 2.The instrumentation platform utilized components from Biopac Systems, Inc., including: anamplifier module suitable to explore surface potential signals as low as micro-volts, surfaceelectrodes to pickup such signals, apparatus to quantify skin response, respiration efforttransducers, and software to facilitate signal visualization, guide the student(s) through aprocedure, ensure proper calibration, and provide a format to encourage
grading rubric allowed the professor to fairly and objectively evaluate the finalpresentations. The prototype BIT will be modified based on student assessment data andexperiences in the classroom.PurposeStudents can be empowered to learn by balancing academic and experiential educationalprocesses with a goal of work-integrated learning. Integrating work experiences with theeducational process can be facilitated by specific activities and intentional assessment. Intern, co-op and capstone experiences and preparation for professional certification provide learningexperiences and relevance in technical programs.1, 2 Through engagement in problem-basedlearning and experiences in the innovation process in the classroom, students may come toappreciate
. For example there are designers who concentrate heavily on Page 25.266.2microcontroller-based systems. These systems are characterized by small systems with kilobytesof memory, slow processors (tens of MHz or slower) and no operating system. There aremultiple books and authors addressing this community, for example [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8]. Thenthere are designers who tend to assume that an embedded system will have many of the featuresof conventional computers including large resources (tens to hundreds of megabytes of memory,fast processors (hundreds of Mhz) and operating systems with sophisticated resources such asnetwork connectivity
andmathematics over the next decade2.Like the rest of the country, Boise State University has implemented research projectsand initiatives to study and improve mathematics success among engineering students,with particular emphasis on freshman retention. An engineering professor who has ledseveral of these initiatives decided to experience freshman-level calculus firsthand by re-taking Calculus 1 nearly 30 years after her own freshman days. Her instructor was thechair of the mathematics department, a professor with whom she has collaborated onnumerous research projects. The evidence presented in this paper is based on the Page 25.267.2experiences of these two
attract and retain new high-tech industries. According to the U.S.Department of Commerce (Langdon, McKittrick, Beede, Knah, & Doms, 2011)1 over the past 10years, STEM jobs grew three times faster then non-STEM jobs. Between 2008 and 2018, STEM jobsare projected to grow by 17 percent compared to 9.8 percent growth for non-STEM jobs. Theconcern for the U.S. is being able to supply a well-educated technical workforce.Education provides individuals with the 21st Century knowledge, skills and competencies that areneeded to fully participate in the New Economy. By 2016, four out of every 10 new jobs (40percent) will require some advanced education or training (Dohm & Shniper, 2007) 2. Fifteen of
University. Page 25.269.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Bridging the Valley of Death: A Preliminary Look at Faculty Views on Adoption of Innovations in Engineering EducationAbstractThere is a nationwide need to better translate engineering education research into the classroomsetting. Moving engineering education research into practice is a more complicated task than itmight initially seem. There are many significant barriers to hinder the transition from research toimplementation. These barriers can be categorized into two groups: (1) individual barriers, suchas
two required structurescourses, less than 30% say they would take the structures if it were not required. I havefound there is a wide range of preparedness amongst architecture students formathematical learning. A lack of understanding of fundamental structural ideas canstymie the creativity of architectural design. But an aversion to mathematics does notpreclude an understanding of, and an intuition for, how structures work. Plesums argued”knowledge of mathematical methods, however, does not assure a feeling for structuralbehavior.”1 Severud stated that it is more important for architects to have a sense of thebasic fundamentals of how structures work and that the figures can be left to theengineers.2 I further argue that it is this very
current progress andimplementation strategies on this course and discusses the future plan of the project in betteraligning the goal of the department to that of the sponsoring agent. Page 25.271.21. BackgroundIn the 2009 white paper on Human Capacity Development prepared by the Academic ProgramsSection of the Association of Public and Land Grant Universities [1], the authors identified thechallenges: the rate of investment in human capacity development in Food, Agriculture,Natural Resources, and Related Sciences (FANRRS) has lagged behind investment in thecreation of new knowledge, resulting in an increasing gap between discovery
subsequent investigationalhypotheses proposed and researched through the Engineering Design Models inElementary Schools project field test:Research Question 1 - Does the integrated full-day engineering design approach promotestudent learning in science and engineering and design? • Hypothesis 1 - There is no difference in student learning in science content knowledge before the onset of instruction and after participating in the integrated pedagogical approach. • Hypothesis 2 - There is no difference in student learning in engineering and design content knowledge before the onset of instruction and after participating in the integrated pedagogical approach.Research Question 2 - Does the integrated full-day engineering
successful completion of the course andexpress these as course learning outcomes in proper format.1 This step is also required as part of the ABET CQIprocess. If the course has already been taught, the course outcomes should already be included in the existingcourse syllabus and should be reviewed as part of your course preparation. I have always viewed this process asdeciding what will be covered on the final exam before I teach the first lesson. Keep in mind that your courseoutcomes are always a work in progress. In fact, it is a good idea to review and update them at the end of eachsemester, while everything is still fresh in your mind.Philosophy of TestingFrom my perspective, there are three purposes of a test: (1) the students learn what they
to the “Raise the Bar” initiative. These papers will be written from six different, yetrelated, perspectives including the (1) overall initiative, (2) civil engineering bodies ofknowledge, (3) changed university curricula, (4) experiential guidelines, (5) revised accreditationcriteria, and (6) modified licensure laws and rules. This paper addresses the sixth perspective: theprocess of modifying the educational standards for engineering licensure in the state laws andrules.Because ASCE considers “professional practice” to mean “licensed practice,” implementation ofthe “Raise the Bar” initiative must include the modification of the requirements for engineeringlicensure. Individual states and other U.S. jurisdictions regulate the practice of
include industry, academia, and others. Questions includeoverall opinions about the state of industry and education, as well as topical preferences.Respondent comments are provided as an appendix and provide some insights into themanufacturing community.1. IntroductionManufacturing engineering continues to be one of the most dynamic disciplines with constantchange driven by global competition and new technologies. Obviously education is a key forpreparing manufacturing professionals who have knowledge and skills that can supportcontemporary and emerging issues 8, 9. In the face of ongoing change it is necessary to assesswhat has been done, the current status, and a direction for the future. This work focuses onmanufacturing education in general
professional development.1. IntroductionThe automotive industry has been one of the largest and most important industries in the UnitedStates, employing more than 1.1 million Americans1, accounting for 4% of total gross domesticproduct, and representing the single largest U.S. export (nearly $121 billion) in 20082. The worldeconomy, however, has shifted over the past year. Today the automotive industry is engaged in atransformational change that incorporates a technological shift from the petroleum-poweredengine that drove the transportation economy of the 20th Century to the renewable resource-based electric powered motor that will sustain the dynamic global economy and environmentalassets of the 21st Century. In response to a shift in consumer
and motivation of the first year engineeringstudents were measured in relation to gender. Furthermore, because it was hypothesized thatboth aforementioned characteristics have an influence on the academic achievement2,3, thestudents’ study time and grades were compared with the gathered data.2. Materials and methodsSubjectsFor this study, data was gathered during two subsequent academic years: 2009 – 2010 and2010 – 2011. All participants were first year engineering students. Table 1 gives an overviewof the number of students that participated and their gender distribution. Table 1: Overview of the number of participants and their gender. Academic year Total number of Number of female Percentage of
curriculum.Engineering ModelingThe central activity of the engineering profession involves creative design of new systems inresponse to given needs. Design is a process of problem-solving, consisting of many stages Page 25.1279.5between the development of a new concept and the implementation of a concrete solution. It isabout bringing ideas to life. A structured engineering design process is commonly taught andused to help clarify and reduce the complexity of engineering design work. A typical prescriptiveflow chart for this process, taken from a popular first-year engineering design textbook, is shownin Figure 1.xiiiThe modeling/analysis/evaluation stage of
, quality engi-neering/assurance, customer satisfaction, design/development, engineering education, and project man-agement. Sweets has successfully project managed more than 100 worldwide projects/programs thatresulted in meeting customer requirements, industry announcements, more than $100 million in savings,and more than $1 billion in revenue. He matrix managed a team of more than 200 engineers in ninedifferent countries. He has excellent interpersonal skills and is highly motivated, flexible, an effectivecommunicator, goal oriented, and skilled in team building. Page 25.1280.2 c American Society for Engineering
not have a suitable hands-on laboratory experience.Apart from that, Coowar3 describes an advanced course that may benefit with the use of adevelopment board. Likewise, Weng, Zhu, and Cheng6 as well as Amaral, Berube, andMehta5 each describe a logic circuits course for computer science majors involving PLDdevelopment boards.We started the Fall 2011 semester with several clearly defined, achievable goals for ourintroductory logic circuits class that our electrical and computer engineering students take. Page 25.1281.3 1. Largely replace the use of TTL chips in laboratory with CPLD devices, revising or developing entirely new laboratory
microcontroller, electronicsensor, and drive motors. They determined that their system was a flexible tracking system withlow maintenance, and ease of installation and operation. They also found that by using computersoftware instead of mechanical parts their solar tracker would be more flexible for futuredevelopment.In the current research, the main objectives are:1. Design the computer software to control the solar tracker (or multiple solar trackers) remotely via the Internet using the User Datagram Packets (UDP) protocol.2. Design the communication protocol that will be used to send commands from the master controller computer to the remote controller computer.3. Implement a secure encryption and decryption standard so that the communications
AC 2012-4322: THE DESIGN COMPETITION AS A TOOL FOR TEACH-ING STATICSDr. Sinead C. Mac Namara, Syracuse University Page 25.1283.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 The Design Competition as a Tool for Teaching Statics.1. IntroductionThis paper describes ongoing efforts at Syracuse University to re-engineer the traditionalstatics course. This course forms part of a larger NSF funded project aimed at increasinginnovation and creativity in engineering curricula. The principal aim of the overallproject is to find strategies to foster and reward creativity in engineering students.This study examines a design
Fundamentals(EIF) course was initiated by the Center for Energy Workforce CourseDevelopment (CEWD)1. CEWD is a non-profit consortium of Analysiselectrical, natural gas, and nuclear utilities and their associationsand was formed to help utilities work together to develop solutions Intervention Technology Design Selectionto the coming workforce shortage in the utility industry. The EIFcourse provides a broad understanding of the electric and natural
development of DfE suggest five distinct steps that occurred as the DfEguidelines formed. The steps are described as: (1) A Push, (2) A Brave Step Forward, (3) ASimple Set of Rules, (4) A Recipe for the Implementation, and (5) A Measure of Success.Separate from the core 5 steps, we suggest a sixth outlying step that can occur as the first or laststep in the development of a DfX. We have described this step as (6) A Push or Pull. Identifyingthese stages in the development of DfE suggests that similar stages could apply to understandingor developing other DfXs.We hypothesize that understanding and generalizing how a DfX emerges has three main values:(1) Identifying emerging DfXs could provide engineering designers with a competitiveadvantage; (2
c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 The Development of a Spanish Version of the Statics Concept Inventory (CATS)IntroductionConcept inventories (CIs) are criterion-referenced tests designed to evaluate whether a studenthas an accurate working knowledge of a specific set of concepts.1 Typically, CIs are organizedin a multiple-choice format that addresses a single idea in order to ensure that they are scored ina reproducible manner. The purpose of CIs includes ascertaining (a) the range of whatindividuals think a particular question is asking and (b) the most common responses andmisconceptions to the questions. In its final form, each question includes one correct answer andseveral
alternativedelivery methods that have been recently adopted in the course. These methods are: 1) providingopportunities for students to build residential assemblies outside the classroom in collaborationwith industry professionals on full-scale projects by applying knowledge learned in class, and 2)new interactive electronic reading. This information may assist educators with developing theappropriate mix of delivery methods.IntroductionThe core subjects in construction management are scheduling, estimating and contracts, whichare typically delivered in a lecture, format in standalone classes [1]. “The traditional segmented,topic-based approach to construction management curricula clearly has been successful atfacilitating the attainment of specialized
AC 2012-5259: THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN INTERDISCIPLINARY BACH-ELOR’S DEGREE COMPLETION PROGRAM IN THE STEM FIELDSDr. Sara Hooshangi, George Washington University Page 25.1288.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 The Development of an Interdisciplinary Bachelor’s Degree Completion Program in the STEM FieldsIntroduction:Much of the economic growth of the twentieth century has been driven by the advancements inthe scientific arena, the applications of engineering principles, and the spirit of entrepreneurshipand innovation.1 As we move forward in the twenty-first century, every aspect of our lives
University Norfolk State University, Purdue University, and CornellUniversity. Interdisciplinary technical training occurs in four areas: (1) Physics andNanotechnology of Metamaterials, (2) Magnetic Multilayer Nanostructures, (3) NanoscaleMagnetic Systems, and (4) Engineering Education Research. Graduate Trainees at participatinginstitutions will participate in research under one of these four areas. A primary goal within theengineering education research component is to identify ways to transfer graduate programelements and the technical theory behind nanoscience and nanotechnology to multipleeducational stakeholders (e.g., K-12 students, undergraduate students, graduate students, andindustry professionals) via curricula, workshops etc.This paper
efforts promote and encourage undergraduate students topursue a degree in Homeland Security-related Science, Technology, Engineering, andMathematics (HS-STEM) as well as ensure that they will have the skills needed to manage acrisis, to help prevent the worst, and to improve outcomes in all types of disasters. This paperdiscusses the program development and experiences in the first year of operation of EMTprogram.1. I TRODUCTIOOn the morning of September 11, 2001, four American airliners were hijacked by nineteen menarmed with box cutters and knives. Two airplanes crashed into the World Trade Center, one intothe Pentagon, and the last 80 miles southeast of Pittsburgh. In 2005, Hurricane Katrina1,2devastated the Mississippi coastal area. The need
teams, and distance education tools and environments. He has been a long-time promoter of stronger social networks as a way of improving student retention and success in engineering disciplines. Exploring and evaluating innovative ideas in this area has become a central focus for him since serving as Department Chair. Page 25.1291.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 The Digital Carnival: Leveraging Gaming for Recruiting and Retention in Computer Science 1 IntroductionAs computer technology becomes anever more integral part of modernsociety
to the conversation by studying institutional and state differences inthe effect of college costs and financial aid on access. This study particularly focuses onengineering students to explore access of an important underrepresented group in engineering—students of low socioeconomic status. Therefore, this study aims to answer the followingresearch questions: 1) To what extent do college costs and financial aid (especially merit-based scholarships) interact to affect the fraction of in-state students and access to engineering? 2) To what extent do merit-based scholarships affect the demographics of first-time in- state engineering students? 3) How do these effects vary by state and by institution?To answer these