, Hisrich R D. Intrapreneurship : Construct refinement and cross-cultural validation[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2001, 16(5):495-527.[7] W Lan & Z Jingran., “Intrapreneurs: The new trend of entrepreneurship education in colleges and universities”, Jiangsu Higher Education, 2015(6):107-110. (in Chinese)[8] Jain R, Ali S W, Kamble S. Entrepreneurial and Intrapreneurial Attitudes: Conceptualization, Measure Development, Measure Test and Model Fit[J]. Management & Labour Studies, 2015, 40(1-2):1-21.[9] Levent Altinay. The intrapreneur role of the development directors in an international hotel group[J]. Service Industries Journal, 2005, 25(3):403-419.[10] Burgess, Cathy. Factors influencing middle managers' ability to
management program,” Journal of Information Technology in Construction (ITcon), 21(13), 188-203, 2016.[5] R. Palomera-Arias, R. and R. Liu, “Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Systems in Construction Management: A Literature Review of Existing MEP Textbooks,” in 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (pp. 26-1143).[6] S. Caudron, "Can Generation Xers be Trained?" Training and Development, 3, 20-24, 1997.[7] A.W. Chickering and Z.F. Gamson, “Applying the Seven Principle for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education”, AAHE bulletin 3, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, p7, 1987.[8] B. Swartz, S. Velegol, and J. Laman, “Three Approaches to Flipping CE Courses: Faculty Perspectives and Suggestions
instructor, performed well in their teams. A possible explanation for that is that in such teamsstudents feel an increased need to step up to their role. Shifting the power of team formationfrom the instructor to the students seems to increase the individual accountability and a sense ofresponsibility among the students towards their team. They are more likely to take ownership oftheir team tasks.Besides measuring the effectiveness in a quantitative way in the upcoming courses, other areas offuture work include improving the MATLAB simulator for testing the inter-robot collaboration.We want to make it simpler to use (less coding-intensive) and have better graphics and physicssimulation, similar to some recent work [7].References[1] A. R. Walsh, S. E
& Exposition, Indianapolis, 2014.[2] B. Batson, ""Other" Reasons to Invert a Class," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, 2016.[3] M. Murad and A. Rose, "Short And Long Term Influence Of Excellent Instructors On Graduates In Engineering Technology: A Case Study," in ASEE 2006 Annual Conference & Exposition, Chicago, 2006.[4] P. Seixas, "The Community of Inquiy as a Basis for Knowledge and Learning: The Case of History," American Educational Research Journal, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 305-324, 1993.[5] M. J. Pardales and M. Girod, "Community of Inquiry: Its past and present future," Educational Philosophy and Theory, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 299-309, 2006.[6] C. D. Richards, F. S. Meng, B. J. Van Wie, P. B
course.Related WorkCommonly used desktop computer tethered VR head mount [7], which makes it unpractical for mobileoperation unless the student uses it behind their computer desks. Additionally, tethered VR equipmentsuch as Oculus Rift S and HTC Vive are significantly more expensive compared to Oculus Quest.Moreover, Abtahi et al [8] discussed that the head mounted display, compared to desktop VR providesusers higher sense of spatial presence and immersion.Virtual reality interfaces provide intuitive immersive experiences for mapping a user’s motion actionsand observations, hence develop muscle memory. Additionally, non-expert users of robotic arms aremore efficient [9] with VR interface compared to the keyboards that are typically provided with
commitment: Differences between posters and lurkers," Information &management, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 154-165, 2017. doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2016.05.003[6] N. Sun, P.P-l. Rau and L. Ma, “Understanding lurkers in online communities: A literaturereview,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol38, pp. 110-117, 2014.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.022[7] N. Johnson, “Zoom fatigue is real, Here’s how to deal with it,” Parents. May 28, 2020.Available: https://www.parents.com/parenting/better-parenting/zoom-fatigue-is-real-here-s-how-to-deal-with-it/[8] S. Garcia-Bulle, “What is Zoom fatigue and how to avoid it in students?,” Observatory ofEducational Innovation, October 15, 2020. Available: https://observatory.tec.mx/edu-news/zoom-fatigue-students[9] L. Heinrich
, vol. 2020-June, p. 7, doi: 10.18260/1-2--34301.[19] D. D. Burkey, D. D. Anastasio, C. Bodnar, and M. Cooper, “Collaborative Research: Experiential Process Safety Training for Chemical Engineers,” STEM for All Video Showcase, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://stemforall2020.videohall.com/presentations/1691.[20] B. W. F. Velicer, B. B. Hoeppner, and M. S. Goodwin, “Time-Series Study,” in Encylopedia of Research Design, N. J. Salkind, Ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc., 2012, pp. 1520–1528.[21] R. Sawyer, J. Rowe, R. Azevedo, and J. Lester, “Filtered time series analyses of student problem-solving behaviors in game-based learning,” Proc. 11th Int. Conf. Educ. Data Mining, EDM 2018, pp. 229
[1] Sorrell S. Reducing energy demand: A review of issues, challenges and approaches. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2015;47:74–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.03.002.[2] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Sources of Greenhouse Gas Emissions 2019:1–2. https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/sources-greenhouse-gas-emissions (accessed September 10, 2021).[3] Rapier R. The Load Following Power Plant: The New Peaker. Transform GE Power 2017. https://www.ge.com/power/transform/article.transform.articles.2017.jun.load-following- power-plant (accessed January 10, 2022).[4] Welch M, Pym A. Improving the flexibility and efficiency of gas turbine-based distributed power plants. Power Eng 2015;119. https
Education, 2nd ed: New York: MacMillan Reference, USA, 2003, pp. 1370-1373.[2] G. W. Ellis and Y. Yu, "Using Knowledge Building to Support Deep Learning and the Development of 21st Century Skills," presented at the 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia, 2013.[3] S. A. Ambrose, M. W. Bridges, M. DiPietro, M. C. Lovett, M. K. Norman, and R. E. Mayer, How Learning Works: Seven Research-Based Principles for Smart Teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2010.[4] P. C. Blumenfeld, T. M. Rogat, and J. S. Krajcik, "Motivation and Cognitive Engagement in Learning Environments," in The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences R. K. Sawyer, Ed., ed: Cambridge University Press, 2006
: ASEE Conferences, June 2008, https://peer.asee.org/3734.[2] B. H. F. M. A. Aldo A. Ferri, James I. Craig and B. Klein, “Development of team-based hands-on learning experiences,” in 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, no. 10.18260/1-2–34461. Virtual On line: ASEE Conferences, June 2020, https://peer.asee.org/34461.[3] D. W. Joe Stanley, Daryl Beetner and R. Dua, “Hands on projects and exercises to strengthen understanding of basic computer engineering concepts,” in 2005 Annual Conference, no. 10.18260/1-2–14397. Portland, Oregon: ASEE Conferences, June 2005, https://peer.asee.org/14397.[4] B. S. Bloom, M. D. Engelhart, E. J. Furst, H. Walker, and D. R. Krathwohl, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook 1
-2013.3. York College of Pennsylvania Mechanical Engineering Program, “York College of Pennsylvania Alumni Surveys”, 2008-2013.4. J. MacEntee, owner of Digital Mettle, Personal Interview, December 28, 2013.5. S. Kiefer, “Maching Experience in a Mechancial Engineering Curriculum”, presented at the 2014 ASEE Annual Conference, Indianapolis, IN, June 2014.6. A. Ownes, “Engineering Beyond the Classroom”, Engineer Blogs, November 15, 2011.7. S. Kiefer, Scott, S. Kuchnicki, “Project-Based Learning: Teaching Engineering Design Not Tinkering”, presented at the 2013 ASEE Annual Conference, Atlanta, GA, June 2013.
Orleans, Louisiana, June, 2016.[5] N. Barendt, N. Sridhar, K. A. Loparo, “A New Course for Teaching Internet of Things: A Practical, Hands-on,and Systems-level Approach,” in Proc. 125st ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, June,2018.[6] J. P. Jones, “A Hands-on Introduction to Embedded Systems & IoT,” in Proc. 127th ASEE Annual Conference& Exposition, Virtual Conference, June, 2020.[7] S. Abraham, A. Miguel, “Creation of an Internet of Things (IoT)-Based Innovation Lab,” in Proc. 124st ASEEAnnual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio, June, 2017.[8] L. M. Laird, N. S. Bowen, “A New Software Engineering Undergraduate Program Supporting the Internet ofThings (IoT) and Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS),” in Proc
helpful for expanding this work to a more complete survey of faculty thatfit this category, including Hispanic faculty at Hispanic-serving institutions.References[1] C. Carrigan, Riskin, E. A., O'Leary, K., Yen, J., Mody-Pan, P.N., O'Donnell, M., "On- Ramping to Academia: Women’s Experiences of Transitioning from Nonacademic to Academic Careers," presented at the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2015, 11492.[2] S. Parks, Dietz, L., "Mid-Career Change: Benefits and challenges of leaving industry for academia," presented at the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2017, Conference Paper ID # 18302.[3] S. Fleishman, Braun, J., "Caution! Rough Road Ahead – the Transition from Industry Professional
has worked at the University of Wisconsin since 2010.Eric Loren Severson Eric L Severson (S'09-M'15) received the B.Sc. and PhD degrees in electrical engineering from the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA in 2008 and 2015, respectively where he also worked as a post doctoral associate through 2016. He is currently an assistant professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Dr. Severson is an associate director of the Wisconsin Electric Machines and Power Electronics Consortium (WEMPEC) and fellow of the Grainger Institute for Engineering. His research interests include design and control of electric machines and power electronics, with focus areas in magnetic bearings, bearingless motors, flywheel energy
Paper ID #36757Work In Progress: CodeCapture: A Tool to Attain Insightinto the Programming Development ProcessNaman GulatiAngy HiggyHamid S Timorabadi (Assistant Professor, Teaching Stream) Hamid Timorabadi received his BSc, MASc, and PhD degrees in Electrical Engineering from the University of Toronto. He has worked as a project, design, and test engineer as well as a consultant to industry. His research interests include the application of digital signal processing in energy systems and computer networks. He also has deep interest in engineering education and the use of technology to advance the learning
influences people’s ethicalbeliefs and considerations. Another interesting topic in ethics is human flourishing theories. Terrell Bynum first coined the termflourishing ethics in 2006. Since then, many researchers have been applying flourishing ethics as theirparadigm for AI ethics. In Stahl (2020) ’s book, he stated, ”The central thesis of this book is thatflourishing ethics can enlighten AI ethics and guide the development of practical interventions. Anotherexample is Reiss (2021), in his paper on the use of AI education, who argued that education shouldsupport human flourishing, which will widen to non-human surroundings since it benefits humans too.There are two general categories of Flourishing Ethics (FE) –1. Human-Centered Flourishing
, another can be optimized, and the third area is necessarily unbounded. Design Triad There is a further balance between engineering, design and product. The engineering considerations are about feasibility; is it possible to make, how is it built? The design part is focused on the customer experience. The product aspect is keyed to the need/s addressed. While many engineering courses in innovation and entrepreneurship focus on business (and in some cases, human) values, students should also be given opportunities to develop deep technical expertise. There is another balance between feasibility (engineering), viability (business) However
Proceedings of the 40th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education, 2009, pp. 337-341.[3] J.-I. Choi and M. Hannafin, "Situated cognition and learning environments: Roles, structures, and implications for design," Educational technology research and development, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 53-69, 1995.[4] C. F. Quigley and D. Herro, An educator's guide to steam: Engaging students using real- world problems. Teachers College Press, 2019.[5] K. Cennamo and D. Kalk, Real world instructional design: An iterative approach to designing learning experiences. Routledge, 2019.[6] B. Giddens and C. Stasz, "Context Matters: Teaching and Learning Skills for Work," Centerpoint, 1999.[7] S. Avargil, O
(2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02579-x. [6] Oglensky, B. (2008). The Ambivalent Dynamics of Loyalty in Mentorship. Retrieved from SAGE Open Journal: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0018726708089000. [7] Eller, L. S., Lev, E. L., & Feurer, A. (2014). Key components of an effective mentoring relationship: a qualitative study. Nurse education today, 34(5), 815–820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.07.020. [8] Lunenburg, F. (2010) From Safe Spaces to Brave Spaces. Formal Communication Channels: Upward, Downward, Horizontal, and External. Retrieved from Focus on Colleges, Universities, and Schools: http://www.nationalforum.com/Electronic%20Journal%20Volumes/Lunenburg%2C%20Fre d%20C%2C
Exposition 2016: New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, 26-29 June 2016.[5] S. R. Burckhard and J. Kant, The PEEC experiment: Native Hawaiian and Native American Engineering Education. Brookings, SD: Jerome J. Lohr College of Engineering, South Dakota State University, 2016.[6] “The Mālama Honua Worldwide Voyage,” Hōkūleʻa, 20-Aug-2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.hokulea.com/worldwide-voyage/. [Accessed: 18-Feb-2022].[7] F. S. Allaire, “Navigating uncharted waters: First-generation Native Hawaiian College students in STEM,” Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 305–325, 2017.[8] T. T. Nguyen, O. Francis, S. Miller, D. Kuehu, K. McLean, J. L. Irvine, and N
. References [1] L.S. Vygotsky, L. Semenovich, and M. Cole, Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978. [2] Z. Aguirre-Muñoz and M. L. Pantoya, M. L. “Engineering Literacy and Engagement in Kindergarten Classrooms.” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 105, no. 4, pp. 630-654, 2016. [3] D. Bairaktarova, D. Evangelou, A. Bagiati, and S. Brophy. “Early Engineering in Young Children’s Exploratory Play with Tangible Materials.” Youth and Environments, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 212-235, 2011. [4] J. Blank and S. Lynch. “Growing in STEM. The Design Process
Students and Implications for Persistence and Well-Being,” J. High. Educ., vol. 89, no. 6, pp. 988– 1013, 2018.[8] J. Beckmann, “Gendered career expectations in context: the relevance of normative and comparative reference groups,” Br. J. Sociol. Educ., vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 968–988, 2021.[9] D. Bonner and M. C. Dorneich, “Increasing female middle school student interest in stem: Requirements for game-based learning applications,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 133–146, 2021.[10] S. L. Eddy and S. E. Brownell, “Beneath the numbers: A review of gender disparities in undergraduate education across science, technology, engineering, and math disciplines,” Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 1–20, 2016
and Instruction. Theauthors would like to thank all of the learning assistants who participated in the research.References[1] Y. Cao, C. Smith, B. D. Lutz, and M. Koretsky, “Cultivating the next generation: Outcomes from a Learning Assistant program in engineering,” presented at the 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2018. Accessed: Oct. 24, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/cultivating-the-next-generation-outcomes-from-a-learning-assistant- program-in-engineering[2] V. Otero, S. Pollock, and N. Finkelstein, “A physics department’s role in preparing physics teachers: The Colorado learning assistant model,” American Journal of Physics, vol. 78, no. 11, pp. 1218–1224, Oct. 2010, doi: 10.1119
, werecommend that the projection method be considered for adoption by instructors who teach fourbarlinkage analysis to undergraduate students.References[1] A. Cayley, "On Three-bar Motion," Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, vol. VII, pp. 136-166, 1876.[2] S. Roberts, "On Three-bar Motion in Plane Space," Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, vol. VII, pp. 14-23, 1875.[3] C. W. Wampler, "Solving the Kinematics of Planar Mechanisms," Journal of Mechanical Design, vol. 121, no. 3, pp. 387-391, 1999.[4] R. Norton, Design of Machinery. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2012.[5] K. J. Waldron and G. L. Kinzel, Kinematics, Dynamics and Design of Machinery. Wiley, 2004.[6] G. H. Martin, Kinematics and Dynamics
with theimportance of student leadership development, many faculty in the workshop expressed barrierssurrounding their ability to actively support that development. Figure 4 shows that the workshopreduced all but one of those identified barriers. After the workshop, faculty concerns wereprimarily focused on student resistance and not having enough time as opposed to not knowinghow to support student leadership development which was the most frequently cited barrieralong with not enough time in the pre-workshop survey. When you think about fostering student leadership development, which factor(s) make engaging with this process feel uncomfortable or too challenging
., Predicting the Effects of Dimensional and Material PropertyVariations in Micro Compliant Mechanisms, M.S., Brigham Young University, 2001.[3] Subaşı, Levent. Synthesis of compliant bistable four-link mechanisms for two positions. MSthesis. 2005.[4] Howell, Larry L., Compliant Mechanisms, John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2001[5] Farhadi Machekposhti, D., Tolou, N., & Herder, J. L. (2015). A review on compliant jointsand rigid-body constant velocity universal joints toward the design of compliant homokineticcouplings. Journal of Mechanical Design, 137(3), 032301.[6] Pham, M. T., Teo, T. J., & Yeo, S. H. (2016). Investigation of the Mechanical Properties of3D Printed Compliant Mechanisms. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference onProgress
continuous improvement efforts in the Spring 2022 semester. Surveysare deployed after each assignment and will be evaluated in a similar manner to the work inprogress presented here. We will also evaluate for statistical differences in the groups based onthe changes made to the course in Spring 2022. We will continue to identify ways to improvestudents' learning experience in the experiential CNC course. The team plans to submit a fullpaper to the Manufacturing Division in 2023.References [1] S. A. Ambrose, M. W. Brideges, M. DiPietro, M. C. Lovett, M. K. Norman, How Learning Works, Jossey-Bass: Wiley, 2010, [E-book] https://firstliteracy.org/wp- content/uploads/2015/07/How-Learning-Works.pdf [2] J. D. Vermunt, “The regulation of
they: gained both greater understanding ofsmart cities and appreciation for the relevance of coding, sensing, and data analysis to Civil andEnvironmental Engineering contexts; and they improved their abilities to analyze data, integratesensing, and make data-informed decisions.Works CitedAkhter, F., Khadivizand, S., Siddiquei, H. R., Alahi, M. E. E., & Mukhopadhyay, S. (2019). IoT Enabled Intelligent Sensor Node for Smart City: Pedestrian Counting and Ambient Monitoring. Sensors 2019, Vol. 19, Page 3374, 19(15), 3374. https://doi.org/10.3390/S19153374Albino, V., Berardi, U., & Dangelico, R. M. (2015). Smart Cities: Definitions, Dimensions, Performance, and Initiatives. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/10630732.2014.942092, 22(1), 3
explain their thought process [4,5]. In utilizing the “think aloud''method, students have the opportunity to demonstrate their knowledge of the topic or concept.Their ability to answer the question(s) in a complete manner is assessed using a predeterminedrubric. Examiners may provide hints, delve deeper into a particular aspect, and dynamicallyadjust questions to facilitate further discussion. This is in stark contrast to the traditional writtenexamination in which students are given fixed questions on a written test in which they wouldread thoroughly and write their answers on paper [5]. While oral examinations have been widelyadopted as an alternative form of assessment to traditional written examinations, they are notcommonly implemented in
Director of Engineering) Dr.Timothy J. Kennedy P.E., is the Executive Director of Engineering and an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering and Physics at Abilene Christian University. His professional experience has focused on water reuse, water and wastewater treatment. Additionally, he has an interest in point of use treatment technologies for developing regions and how to better prepare students to immediately contribute to the engineering industry.Jody Jones (Assistant Professor of Finance) Jody L Jones, EdD. is an assistant professor of finance at Abilene Christian University. His teaching area(s) are financial institutions and theory. His research interests are gender equity in finance and student