/0950017020902968.[2] B. A. Schuelke-Leech, T. C. Leech, B. Barry, and S. Jordan-Mattingly, “Ethical Dilemmas for engineers in the development of autonomous systems,” International Symposium on Technology and Society, Proceedings, vol. 2018-Novem, pp. 49–54, 2019, doi: 10.1109/ISTAS.2018.8638282.[3] E. A. Cech and C. J. Finelli, “Learning to prioritize the public good: Does training in classes, workplaces, and professional societies shape engineers’ understanding of their public welfare responsibilities?,” Journal of Engineering Education, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1002/jee.20590.[4] D. Oliver, “Whistle-Blowing Engineer,” vol. 129, no. 4, pp. 246–256, 2004.[5] J. Metcalf, E. Moss, and danah boyd, “Owning Ethics
for theircontributions to this study's assessment components.This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.2141984. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.10. References[1] A. Vidak, I. Movre Šapić, and V. Mešić, "An augmented reality approach to learning about the force of gravity," Physics Education, vol. 56, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1361-6552/ac21a3.[2] R. A. Serway and J. W. Jewett, Physics for Scientists and Engineers, 10 ed. Cengage Learning, 2019, p. 1162.[3] A. Bedford and W. Fowler, Engineering Mechanics: Statics, 6th ed. Upper Saddle
3,296 1,146 Current Projected Openings Current Annual Completions Source: WSAC, WTECB, SBCTC joint analysis of Emsi Burning Glass projected job openings, 2024-2029, 2021 Washington ESD long-term employment forecast; Bureau of Labor Statistics Training Levels; IPEDS; 2019 Census PUMS data. Fig. 1. Projected openings vs. production of computer and engineering degreed professionals in Washington State from 2024-2029.When the Institute of
engineering students. 11 References[1] R. W. Bybee, “The BSCS 5E instructional model: Personal reflections and contemporary implications,” Sci. Child., vol. 51, no. 8, pp. 10–13, 2014.[2] S. Rodriguez, K. Allen, J. Harron, and S. A. Qadri, “Making and the 5E Learning Cycle,” Sci. Teach., vol. 86, no. 5, pp. 48–55, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.2505/4/tst18_086_05_48.[3] R. P. McCurdy, M. L. Nickels, and S. B. Bush, “Problem-based design thinking tasks: Engaging student empathy in STEM,” Electron. J. Res. Sci. Math. Educ., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 22–55, 2020, Accessed: Jan. 25, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://ejse.southwestern.edu
funding with smaller social science research grants. This compromise isboth pragmatic and unsustainable. Social science grants are considerably smaller than those inengineering, even without industry funding. This makes it difficult to build a research group thatcentres engineering culture as a topic of inquiry. If we really care about equity and social justicein engineering, we need to identify institutional strategies to fill the resource gap withoutdepending on corporate fundraising by individual faculty members.Lesson 4: Rapid-fire collective coding privileges experts over novices and practice over theoryIn 2019, I led a team of engineers and social scientists through the analysis of 29 career historyinterviews. After reading all 29
Effectively with PeopleWho Define Problems Differently,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 107–122, Apr. 2006, doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00883.x[13] Rockwell Franklin Clancy and Q. Zhu, “Global Engineering Ethics: What? Why? How?And When?,” 2021 ASEE Virtual Annu. Conf. Content Access, Jul. 2021.[14] B. Amadei, R. Sandekian, and E. Thomas, “A Model for Sustainable HumanitarianEngineering Projects,” Sustainability, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 1087–1105, Nov. 2009, doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su1041087[15] L. Tack, M. Simon, and R. J. Jiang, “The Role of Trust in Social Entrepreneurship: A CaseStudy of Global Brigades,” N. Engl. J. Entrepreneurship, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 46–59, Mar. 2017,doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/neje-20-01-2017-b004[16
engineering-focused teacher practitioner articles, chapters, and research articles, and presents her research regularly through the ASEE Pre-College Engineering Education Division, a division she has chaired. Her current research includes investigating how children plan, fail, and productively persist; how mixed-reality simulated classroom environments can be used to help pre-service and in-service teachers practice facilitating challenging discussions in science and engineering; and how undergraduate engineering design teaching assistants address (and may be able to practice addressing) team conflict within similar simulated environments. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024
the Institute of Industrial and Systems Engineers, and was awarded the 2019 and 2023 Faculty Advisor award for the North-Central region of IISE. Dr. Vogiatzis was awarded ASEE IL/IN Teacher of the Year in 2023.Prof. Lawrence Angrave, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Dr. Lawrence Angrave is an award-winning computer science Teaching Professor at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. He creates and researches new opportunities for accessible and inclusive equitable education.Dr. Hongye Liu, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Hongye Liu is a Teaching Assistant Professor in the Dept. of Computer Science in UIUC. She is interested in education research to help students with disability and
Julie P. Martin is the Director of the Engineering Education Transformations Institute at University of Georgia. Julie is a Fellow of ASEE, a member of ASEE’s Hall of Fame, and the editor-in-chief of Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering.Dr. Kerrie A. Douglas, Purdue University Dr. Douglas is an Associate Professor in the Purdue School of Engineering Education. Her research is focused on improving methods of assessment in engineering learning environments and supporting engineering students.Prof. Eric Holloway, Purdue University Prof. Eric Holloway currently serves as a Professor of Engineering Practice in the School of Mechanical Engineering at Purdue University. He also holds a courtesy faculty
them to positive careeroutcomes.Building from synergistic resources we developed and presented at the ASEE annual meeting in2023, we seek to connect these findings to continued resource development for engineeringstudents and faculty. With tools and worksheets created on the basis of this and related research,our aim is to equip soon-to-be-professionals, and their mentors and teachers, with insights toadvocate for better and more equitable workplace practice.2.0 Background of the Study2.1 Stretch assignments: Definition and dimensionsIn a larger employment context where workers, especially technical knowledge workers, areexpected to manage their own ‘portfolio careers’ and are increasingly commodified as the sum oftheir projects, developmental
of the National Science Foundation.Bibliography[1] A. Akera, “Setting the Standards for Engineering Education: A History [Scanning Our Past],” Proc. IEEE, vol. 105, no. 9, pp. 1834–1843, Sep. 2017, doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2017.2729406.[2] B. Seely, “‘Patterns in the History of Engineering Education Reform: A Brief Essay,’” in Educating the engineer of 2020: Adapting engineering education to the new century, Washington D.C.: National Academcy Press, 2005, pp. 114–130.[3] R. A. Cheville, “A Century of Defining Engineering Education,” in 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, 2014.[4] C. R. Mann and M. Press, “A Study of Engineering Education,” Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of
of Rural and Small-Town Students: Opportunities to Learn, Aspirations, Preparation, and College Enrollment,” Educational Researcher, vol. 50, no. 9, p. 0013189X2110275, Jun. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x211027528.[6] L. Bjerke and Charlotta Mellander, “Mover Stayer Winner Loser - A study of income effects from rural migration,” RePEc: Research Papers in Economics, vol. 130, Feb. 2019.[7] K. P. S. Goodpaster, O. A. Adedokun, and G. C. Weaver, “Teachers’ Perceptions of Rural STEM Teaching: Implications for Rural Teacher Retention,” The Rural Educator, vol. 33, no. 3, Nov. 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.35608/ruraled.v33i3.408.[8] L. F. Hutchison, “Addressing the STEM Teacher Shortage in American
Learning Analytics,” Learning Analytics, pp. 61–75, 2014, doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-3305-7_4.[7] N. Kardam, S. Misra, and D. Wilson, "Is Natural Language Processing Effective in Education Research? A case study in student perceptions of TA support," presented at the 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/43887[8] Katz, M. Norris, A. M. Alsharif, M. D. Klopfer, D. B. Knight, and J. R. Grohs, “Using Natural Language Processing to Facilitate Student Feedback Analysis,” in 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference. Content Access, July 26-29, 2021. [online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/using-natural-language-processing-to-facilitate-student-feedback
context of MSFW students in STEM fields?A. Construct GenerationThe survey instrument in this study was a combination of two existing validated instruments onCommunity Cultural Wealth (CCW) and Funds of Knowledge (FofK). One of the instruments isfrom a conference proceeding on ASEE titled Critically Quantitative: Measuring CommunityCultural Wealth on Surveys [33], which was developed by looking at underrepresented groups inSTEM fields. While the instrument in the study is consistent with Yosso’s [15] framework andgoes deeper in detail about the type of constructs for CCW. For this study, only the social construct(10 items) was used and renamed as social networks. The second instrument comes from a journalpaper titled Recognizing the funds of
Paper ID #41360Aligning Engineering Curricula with Energy Industry Demands—The 3PModel of Policy, Pedagogy, and PracticeMr. Hua Chai, University of New South Wales Hua Chai received his B.E. Degree in Electrical Engineering from North China Electric Power University, China, in 2014. He received his M.Phil. Degree in Electrical Engineering at the University of New South Wales (UNSW), Australia, in 2019. He is currently a Ph.D. student in the Energy Systems group, School of Electrical Engineering and Telecommunications, UNSW. His research interests include curriculum design and development in power engineering. As one of
student outcomes by supporting autonomy: Implications for practice and policy,” Policy Insights Behav. Brain Sci., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 115–122, 2019.[22] A. Agrawal, J. Carroll, J. M. Case, and N. P. Pitterson, “A comparative study of curricular differences and their influence on students’ formation as engineers,” in 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, 2020.[23] P. Pausigere, “On Bernstein’s sociology of pedagogy and how it can inform the pedagogic realisation of poor and working-class children in South African primary maths education,” Educ. Res. Soc. Change, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 41–53, 2016.[24] D. H. Jonassen, “Engineers as problem solvers,” in Cambridge handbook of engineering education research, A. Johri and
-institutional perspectives, thecommunity also brings together teams that are at different stages of the change process, withdifferent levels of experience with changemaking. The inter-cohort aspect of the communityallows us to examine the diffusion of knowledge and practices in the network.Data Collection & AnalysisWe leverage our access to the exhaustive set of meetings to systematically address howtransformative learning, development and exercise of change agency take place in a cross-institutional, cross-cohort community of transformation. To that end, we analyzed the totalpopulation of the monthly CoT sessions (N=31) from 2017-18, 2018-19, and 2019-20 academicyears. All teams that were funded at the time (N=21) from the first four cohorts of
financial burdens. Second, the work can remain a livingdocument, which will create less friction as the course is updated over the years.Finally, to serve the stated course goals even better, the author wants to update the class model toone of ungrading [13, 14], specifically standards-based grading [15]. As the top goal is forstudents to fully engage with the laboratory work and to become independent makers, givingthem multiple chances to make a functional product, along with formative feedback to push themtoward mastery, makes a lot of sense. The current class structure is already amenable to thisapproach, so it will be the next experiment that is attempted.References [1] James W Bales, “A project-based introduction to electronics,” in 2011 ASEE
remote learning classes,” in Proc. 2022 ASEE Ann. Conf. and Expo., Minneapolis, MN, USA, June 26-29, 2022. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--41421[5] F. T. M. Ayasrah, K. Alarabi, M. Al Mansouri, H. A. A. Fattah and K. Al-Said. “Enhancing secondary school students' attitudes toward physics by using computer simulations,” Int. J. of Data and Network Science, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 369–380, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2023.9.017[6] D. R., Sokoloff, and R. K. Thornton, “Using interactive lecture demonstrations to create an active learning environment,” AIP Conf. Proc., vol. 399, no. 1, pp. 1061–1074, Mar. 1997. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2344715[7] D. B. Lopez-Tavares and J. Orozco
industry," Education + Training, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 532-559, 2015. doi: 10.1108/ET-07-2014-0076.[6] A. García-Aracil, R. Isusi-Fagoaga, and I. Navarro-Milla, "Employers’ perceptions of young higher education graduates’ employability in Belarus," Research in Comparative and International Education, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 104–122, 2023. doi: 10.1177/17454999221145545.[7] E. Forcael, G. Garcés, E. Bastías, and M. Friz, "Theory of Teaching Techniques Used in Civil Engineering Programs," Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, vol. 145, no. 2, p. 04018010, 2019. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943- 5541.0000401.[8] J. Daley and B. Baruah, "Leadership skills development among
Grant Nos.2024301 and 2130924. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressedin these materials are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of theNational Science Foundation.References[1] D. MacMillan and M. Laris, “After midair failure, critics ask: Did Boeing learn from Max crashes?,” Washington Post, Jan. 12, 2024. Accessed: Feb. 07, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2024/01/12/boeing-max-safety-crashes/[2] N. Kallioinen et al., “Moral Judgements on the Actions of Self-Driving Cars and Human Drivers in Dilemma Situations From Different Perspectives,” Front. Psychol., vol. 10, p. 2415, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02415.[3] W. T. Lynch and R
Authors:The first task in surveying OER authors in engineering was to compile a list of contacts to reachout to. Locating OER has thankfully become easier as lists and databases of these resources havebecome more common, but this also presented our first choice as there are multiple lists of OERin engineering, some with more than a hundred resources. Because we were submitting the paperto the ASEE Libraries Division, we decided it would be appropriate to use the ASEE EngineeringLibraries Division Open Textbooks for Engineering list [12] as our central resource foridentifying authors. This list contains over a hundred resources and is consistently updated toinclude the most recently published OER. In addition to this database, the authors added a
families from traditionally underrepresented populations in engineering are able to develop engineering interest, skills, knowledge, and ways of thinking as a result of engaging in authentic engineering activities within a wide range of learning contexts.Catherine Wagner, University of Notre Dame Catherine Wagner is a research staff member at the Center for STEM Education at the University of Notre Dame. She earned her Master of Education degree from Notre Dame in 2019 while teaching middle school science. She has collaborated with faculty in the Center for STEM on engineering research for several years, most recently leading an undergraduate research lab on early childhood engineering research. In the Center, she also
, curricula materials,professional learning, management, and research.References 1. B. Nelson, “Biologically inspired design: A unique multidisciplinary design model,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2008. 2. M. Eggermont and R. Paul, “Developing holistic engineering competencies in a bio- inspired design course,” Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA), 2020. 3. S. Vattam, M. Helms and A. Goel, “Compound analogical design: Interaction between problem decomposition and analogical transfer in biologically inspired design,” Third International Conference on Design Computing and Cognition, June 2008. 4. K. Fu, D. Moreno, M. Yang, and K. L. Wood, "Bio
versions of this analysis and paper with members of the FIU Equity Research Group, FIUSTEM Transformation Institute UMD engineering education research group, Austin Peters. We thankthese individuals and the reviewers for their helpful feedback.References[1] D. Riley, “Inclusivity in Engineering Education,” in The Routledge Handbook of Feminist Philosophy of Science, Routledge, 2020, pp. 409–420.[2] Secules, S., Kali, M. B., & McCall, C. (2022, August). Audio Dissemination for Qualitative and Broadening Participation Research: Lessons Learned and Future Possibilities. In 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.[3] Secules, S., & McCall, C. (2023). What Research Can DO: Rethinking Qualitative Research