Rubrics for ABET PC-A and PC-BIn the CET department, faculty members are usually free to develop their own approaches toevaluating the students' performance in their class, but they are required to show the evaluationstandards. We redesigned the assessment rubrics to cover the Program Specific Criteria ofABET/ETAC 2019-2020 specifications. The rubric's performance indicators map to studentoutcomes described in the Program Specific Criteria for Electromechanical EngineeringTechnology, criteria (a) and (b), namely, PC-A and PC-B. The rubric for PC-A contains only oneperformance indicator associated with it. The rubric for PC-B has two performance indicators. Therubrics' scoring scale is made up of four levels: excellent (level 4), good (level 3
Publications, https://peer.asee.org/28335. [Accessed February 27th, 2021].[14] W. J. Schell IV P.E., B. E. Hughes, B. Tallman P.E., E. Annand, R. M. Beigel, and M. B Kwapisz. "Exploring the Relationship Between Students’ Engineering Identity and Leadership Self-Efficacy". 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Tampa, Florida, June 2019. [Online]. Available: ASEE Conferences, https://peer.asee.org/32817. [Accessed February 22nd 2021][15] L. Fogg-Rogers and T. Moss, “Validating a scale to measure engineers’ perceived self-efficacy for engineering education outreach,” Plos One, vol. 14, no.10, p. 1–13, October 2019. [Online]. Available: Plos One Research Article, https://doi-org.ccc.idm.oclc.org
effective college teacher. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Institutional Data as Motivation for Course-Level Change in EngineeringIntroduction and BackgroundFor decades, studies have called for attention to recruiting and retaining a diverse studentpopulation in STEM fields and increasing the numbers of STEM graduates [1, 2]. Multiplestudies have documented an “achievement gap” in terms of success for under-representedminorities (URM) [3] and first-generation college students [4], and also provide a multitude ofsuggestions for better supporting these students at the institutional and classroom levels [3, 5].In 2019, ASEE
brand, strengths,values, identity, power, privilege, bias, and microaggressions. The focus extended beyond genderto include race, sexual orientation, physical ability, and other categories of social identity.Gender non-binary students had the opportunity to choose between either of the two courses. InAutumn 2019, the courses’ enrolled students were limited to new first year engineering studentswho self-selected to take part in a pilot “Inclusive Leadership Cohort”. Students in this cohorttook the Inclusive Leadership Course concurrently with the first two required engineeringcourses in their first two semesters at The Ohio State University. Due to COVID, in Autumn2020, the courses went back to being open to all undergraduate engineering
primecandidates for benchmarking purposes.In developing Sacramento State’s HLP program, an effort was undertaken to benchmarkestablished engineering leadership education programs of various sizes and scope beforedesigning a curriculum which fits our needs. Our primary goal was to take inventory ofbest practices regardless of their size and scope.Benchmarking Various Engineering Leadership Development ProgramsThe MIT-Gordon Leadership program [7], Northeastern-Gordon Leadership program [14],University of California, San Diego-Gordon Leadership Center [8], and the University ofKansas-Engineering Fellows Program [11] were considered for the in-depth benchmarkingstudy. The ASEE conference (LEAD Division, 2019) also enabled us to benchmark over 40
the midpoint in the semester. The project wasscaffolded with instruction and intermediate low stakes assignments so that teams graduallyaddress the components, rather than hurriedly complete it at the end of the semester. Theseelements are described later in this section.This biomimicry module with EML was implemented for two cohorts of students in twosequential years, which we term cohort 2018 (n=33) and cohort 2019 (n=23) here. As notedpreviously, the biomimicry project was included in a previous iteration of the course but did notinclude instruction on EM and was a shorter duration.Project RequirementsThe final deliverable is a team presentation describing a bioengineering device or design conceptthat draws inspiration from nature. The
the Materials Science andEngineering department at Iowa State University. She received her BS in Materials Science andEngineering from Cornell University in 2019.Dong Chen, Iowa State UniversityDong is a doctoral student in the Higher Education Division at Iowa State University. Shereceived her MS in Global Higher Education from University of Wisconsin-Madison in 2019. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2021 2021 ASEE Midwest Section ConferenceAppendix 1 © American Society for Engineering Education, 2021 2021 ASEE Midwest Section Conference© American Society for Engineering Education, 2021 2021 ASEE Midwest Section Conference© American Society for Engineering Education
ASEE conference proceeding with the MULTI division was achieved through theASEE Peer database with the search for term “multidisciplinary” based on two inclusion criteria:1) the studywas published in MULTI division; 2) the study was published during 2006-2020. The search started from 2006because that was when the ASEE’s first ABET accreditation visits for multidisciplinary engineering programswere carried out and the ASEE MULTI division was formally recognized. In total, 488 records were foundusing these two criteria, among which 14 papers were also included in the “System Engineering” division (10in 2011 and 4 in 2016), 17 papers were also included in the “Liberal Education/Engineering & Society” division(12 in 2013 and 5 in 2019), and 4
Paper ID #35129Student Success in Themed-Learning CommunitiesMary Ann Frank, Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis Senior Lecturer, Interior Design TechnologyBrenda Morrow, IUPUI- School of Engineering and Technology Visiting Lecturer; RID - Registered Interior Designer of Indiana; IDEC; Board Member IDCI - Interior Design Coalition of Indiana American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 2021 ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section Conference Proceedings | Paper ID 35129 Student Success in Themed-Learning Communities Mary Ann Frank
] B.L. Howard and L. Sharpe, Jr., “The Summer Bridge Program: An Effective Agent in College Students’ Retention.” J. of Interdisciplinary Studies in Education 7 (2) p 20-30, 2019.[3] J. Gleason, K. Boykin, P. Johnson, L. Bowen, K.W. Whitaker, C. Micu, D. Raju, C. Slappey, ”Integrated engineering math-based summer bridge program for student retention.” Advances in Engineering Education, v2, n2, Summer 2010.[4] J. Van Dyken, L. Benson, P. Gerard,“Persistence in Engineering: Does Initial Mathematics Course Matter?”, Proceedings of 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington. 10.18260/p.24562
] H. B. Karayaka, A. C. Thompson, and C. W. Ferguson, “Project based learning program for nuclear workforce development Phase I: Outreach, recruiting and selection,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Proc., 2019, doi: 10.18260/1-2--33203.[16] F. Kragh, J. Reed, C. Dietrich, and D. Miller, “Education in software defined radio design engineering,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Proc., 2008, doi: 10.18260/1-2--4112.[17] A. Fuentes, S. Crown, and B. Freeman, “Human bone solid mechanics challenge: functionally graded material structure with complex geometry and loading,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Proc., 2008, doi: 10.18260/1-2--4163.[18] J. L. Davis, N. Smith, and M. McLeod, “Collaborating with industry partner within an undergraduate finite
Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 97-128, 2019.[4] N. Klingbeil, and T. Bourne, “The Wright State Model for Engineering Mathematics Education: A Longitudinal Study of Student Perception Data,” Proceedings of the 2014 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. Indianapolis, IN: American Society for Engineering Education, 2014.[5] J. Ahmad, J. Appleby, and P. Edwards, “Engineering mathematics should be taught by engineers!” In N. Gordon (Ed.), Proceedings of Undergraduate Mathematics Teaching Conference (pp. 32–40). Birmingham, Alabama: University of Birmingham, 2001.[6] L.L. Long III, L.M Abrams, L. Barclay, and J. Paulson, “Emulating the Wright State Model for
; Exposition , Salt Lake City, Utah. 10.18260/1-2— 298647. Harackiewicz, F., & Chevalier, L. R., & Elsanusi, O. S., & Renzaglia, K. S. (2019, June), Board 64: NSF S-STEM Southern Illinois Energy Scholarship Program Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Tampa, Florida. 10.18260/1- 2—323968. Morris, M. L., & Hensel, R. A. M., & Dygert, J. (2019, June), Board 109: Retention- focused, S-STEM Supported Program Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Tampa, Florida. 10.18260/1-2—321839. Atwood, S. A., & DeGoede, K. M. (2020, June), NSF S-STEM EPIC Scholarship Program Paper presented at 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference
has degrees from Swarthmore College, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, and the University of Florida. His research on the longitudinal study of engineering students, team assign- ment, peer evaluation, and active and collaborative teaching methods has been supported by the National Science Foundation and the Sloan Foundation and his team received for the best paper published in the Journal of Engineering Education in 2008, 2011, and 2019 and from the IEEE Transactions on Education in 2011 and 2015. Dr. Ohland is an ABET Program Evaluator for ASEE. He was the 2002–2006 President of Tau Beta Pi and is a Fellow of the ASEE, IEEE, and AAAS.Stephanie J. Lunn, Florida International University Stephanie J. Lunn is a Ph.D
Advancing Engineering Education and Research Outlook and Strategy for 2018 Miriam Quintal and Otto Katt Lewis-Burke Associates, LLC February 6, 2018Lewis-Burke and ASEE• Lewis-Burke began representing ASEE on October 1, 2017• As federal consultants, Lewis-Burke promotes the policy agenda of scientific organizations to a diverse set of audiences, including: – United States Congress – White House/Administration and the Federal Agencies – Like-minded organizations and the advocacy community in Washington, DC• 28 policy experts with range of expertise/backgrounds allow multi-layered issue teams with deep expertise in agencies and scientific/education areas• 40 clients exclusively composed of non-profit
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.New Orleans, LA.16. Faulkner, W. (2007). Nuts and Bolts and People' Gender-Troubled Engineering Identities.Social studies of science, 37(3), 331-356.17. Trevelyan, J. (2010). Mind the gaps: Engineering education and practice. In Proceedings ofthe 21st Annual Conference for the Australasian Association for Engineering Education (p. 383).Engineers Australia.18. Secules, S. (2019). Making the Familiar Strange: An Ethnographic Scholarship of IntegrationContextualizing Engineering Educational Culture as Masculine and Competitive. EngineeringStudies, 11(3), 196-216.19. Milanovic, B. (2019). Capitalism, alone: The future of the system that rules the world.Harvard University Press.20. Eastman, M. G., Miles
arecourse-specific. They will be subject of future papers. References1. Blackboard eLearning: https://www.blackboard.com/2. Microsoft Stream: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/microsoft-stream3. Fadda, D. and Rios, O., 2019, “Online Computer Aided Design Class,” 126th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 15 - 19, 2019, Tampa, Florida, USA4. Fadda, D. and Vinay, R., 2019, “Teaching Computer Aided Design Online,” Proceedings of the ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference, The University of Texas at Tyler, March 10-12, Tyler, Texas, USA.5. V. M. Ray and J. Tabas, "Developing Improved Methodology for Online Delivery of Coursework Providing a Framework for Quality Online
. Striker, and E. Swartz, “Federal Funding Opportunity Announcements as a Catalyst of Students’ Projects in MOOC Environments,” Milwaukee, WI, USA, Oct. 2019.[6] E. K. Van Beurden, A. M. Kia, A. Zask, U. Dietrich, and L. Rose, “Making sense in a complex landscape: how the Cynefin Framework from Complex Adaptive Systems Theory can inform health promotion practice,” Health Promotion International, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 73–83, Mar. 2013, doi: 10.1093/heapro/dar089.[7] J. Karlin, L. James, R. Bates, E. Siverling, and J. Nelson, “The Missing Third: The Vital Role of Two-Year Colleges in Shrinking Engineering Education Deserts,” in 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access Proceedings, Virtual On line, Jun. 2020
taxonomy on which our work in thispaper is based. We would also like to thank Dr. Chelsea Andrews at the Tufts Center forEngineering Education and Outreach (CEEO) who helped co-create the disability and designdiscussion exercise with Dr. Desen Ozkan, one of the authors of this paper. Additionally, wethank Dr. Ethan Danahy and Dr. Jenn Cross for implementing this discussion exercise in theirfirst-year engineering computation classes.ReferencesAmerican Society for Engineering Education (ASEE). (2016). Engineering by the Numbers: ASEE Retention and Time-to-Graduation Benchmarks for Undergraduate EngineeringAndrews, C., & Upadhya, R., K. (2019). Lessons from the Long Sixties for Organizing in Tech. Science for the People. 22(1). https
2021 ASEE Midwest Section Conference The Order of the Engineer: A Recognition of an Engineer’s Obligation to Society Judy L. Cezeaux College of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Arkansas Tech University Board of Governors, Order of the EngineerAbstractThe Order of the Engineer is an organization whose express purpose is to promoteprofessionalism in engineering practice by instilling in its members an obligation to the ethicalpractice of engineering. This paper will describe the history of the Order of the Engineer, itsgovernance structure and membership requirements, and components
, D.J. Corbin, A.R. Nassar, (2019). ‘Effect of processing conditions on the microstructure, porosity, and mechanical properties of Ti-6Al-4V repair fabricated by directed energy deposition’, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, volume 264, pages 172-181, DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.08.041 Proceedings of the 2021 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference Baylor University, Waco, TX Copyright © 2021, American Society for Engineering Education 11 11. Vickers Hardness Testing. (n.d.). Retrieved January 18, 2021, from https://www.struers.com/en/Knowledge/Hardness-testing/Vickers#application 12
paperaccepted by the Minorities in Engineering Division of the 2021 ASEE annual conference (areference with the title and author details will be provided). For this specific project, theretention rate of the participants was 100%, higher than that of all freshman and sophomorestudents in CBAS, which is 69.1% from Fall 2019 to Fall 2020. As the delivery method of mostcourses offered by MTSU switched to Remote, Online, or Web-assisted in Fall 2020, manystudents had financial difficulties, mental health related issues, and difficulty adjusting to thenew learning methods. As a result, there was a significant negative impact to the students’ GPAin Fall 2020, caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, we did not see an improvementover the participants’ GPA
"failure" is an option. In Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Conference & Exposition. New Orleans, LA.Carr, R. L., Bennett, L. D., & Strobel, J. (2012). Engineering in the K-12 STEM standards of the 50 US states: An analysis of presence and extent. Journal of Engineering Education, 101 (3), 539-564.Diordieva, C., Yeter, I.H., & Smith, W. (2019). Middle school STEM teachers’ understandings of computational thinking: A case study of Brazil and the USA. In Proceeding of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Conference & Exposition, Tampa, FL.Diordieva, C., Yeter, I.H., Smith, W. (2018). Cross-case analysis: K-12 international teachers
Professor of the Year Award, 2008 Excellence in Teaching Award for College of Engineering, and 2004- 2005 Mechanical Engineering Instructor of the year award, 1999 ASEE-GSW Outstanding New Faculty Award. Dr. Manteufel is a Fellow of ASME with teaching and research interests in the thermal sciences. In 2015-2016, he chaired the American Society for Engineering Education Gulf Southwest section and in 2018-2019 he chaired the Academy of Distinguished Teaching Scholars at UTSA. He is a registered Professional Engineer in Texas.Dr. Amir Karimi P.E., The University of Texas at San Antonio Amir Karimi, University of Texas, San Antonio Amir Karimi is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at The University of Texas at San Antonio
engineering education. Using the ASEE Annual Conference proceedings as an example [24],the number of papers identified that included the term “social justice” increased steadily from 49in 2015 (2.7% of the papers) to 117 in 2019 (6.6% of the papers), with a drop to 82 in 2020(4.6% of the papers, perhaps due in part to the ~20 SJ papers presented at the ASEE CoNECDconference in 2018 and 2019). The divisions publishing the most papers that included SJ wereLiberal Education / Engineering & Society (n=91; 30%), Educational Research & Methods(n=53; 7%), Engineering Ethics (n=45; 26%), Community Engagement (n=30; 19%), andMinorities in Engineering (n=29; 14%). In the majority of the conference papers, SJ was not thefocus but rather mentioned in
c Society for Engineering Education, 2021Creating a Diverse Next Generation of Technically- and Community-Minded STEM Professionals Purdue UniversityAbstractIn 2019, the National Science Foundation Engineering Research Center, CISTAR, partnered withthe National Society of Black Engineer’s Summer Engineering Experience for Kids, NSBESEEK, to develop a summer program like no other! Through an NSF Research Experience andMentoring (REM) summer program, CISTAR was able to give students and teachers anopportunity to do 6-weeks of cutting-edge research at CISTAR and then “give back” bymentoring kids for 4-weeks at NSBE SEEK—all in one summer. In this paper, we elaborate onthe rationale for the program, namely
, "Impact of a modeling intervention in an introductory programming course," presented at the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Tampa, Florida, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/32918.14. K. J. Rodgers, M. A. Verleger, and F. Marbouti. " Comparing Students’ Solutions to an Open-ended Problem in an Introductory Programming Course with and without Explicit Modeling Interventions. " In American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) 127th Annual Conference and Exposition. 2020.15. J. P. A. Omer Farook, A. Kulatunga, A. Ahmed P.E., W. Yu, Y. Lee, H. A. Alibrahim, "Freshman experience course in electrical and computer engineering technology emphasizing computation, simulation, mathematical modeling
Proceedings of the 2019 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration, ASEE 2019.Dr. Jumanah A. Hajjat, Texas A&M University A highly energic and dedicated Ph.D. civil engineering woman with strong teaching skills, research, and project management. An expert in geotechnical/structural analysis and design. I am committed and responsible for offering students my expertise to help them in their academic and professional goals. I have excellent experience working in a diverse cultural environment. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Face-to-Face and E-Learning Styles for Undergraduate Engineering Technology Students During
test and interpreting the results.Importantly, the course is delivered virtually, which makes the implementation very differentfrom that in an in-person classroom setting. This paper provides a detailed discussion of the virtual laboratory modules added to‘Nondestructive Evaluation of Flaws’. In addition, we report how the changes impacted thestudent learning in Fall 2020 compared to Fall 2019, when the delivery was strictly lecture-based. Finally, we discuss ‘lessons learned’ and modifications planned for the next offerings ofthis class. Our overall assessment results indicate a positive impact of the virtual laboratories on