analysis on the value of oral exams as early diagnostic tool (Kim et al., ASEE 2022). Minju is interested in designing assessments that can capture and motivate students’ deep conceptual learning, such as oral exams and the usage of visual representations (e.g., diagrams and manual gestures).Dr. Carolyn L Sandoval, University of California, San Diego Dr. Sandoval is the Associate Director of the Teaching + Learning Commons at the University of Cali- fornia, San Diego. She earned a PhD in Adult Education-Human Resource Development. Her research interests include adult learning and development, faculty deZongnan Wang, University of California, San Diego Zongnan is currently a 2nd-year undergraduate student with a major in
transformative worldviews, which "holdsthat research inquiry needs to be intertwined with politics and a political change agenda toconfront social oppression at whatever levels it occurs" [16, p. 9]. The authors acknowledge thepotential detrimental effects that oppressive forms of communication can have on the subsequentdecisions and actions of marginalized and minoritized students in disciplines like, but not limitedto, engineering.Research Question: The research question that drove this study is: What are the emotions expressed bystudents about who should and shouldn’t become and belong in engineering and how are theyconnecting these to active or passive HC experiences?Research Design and Instrument: Between 2018 and 2019, a mixed-method
on-line communications, which aredistributed to the organization’s approximately 1,800 two-year college members, have routinelyincluded NSF ATE and Mentor-Connect program information along with success stories andhuman-interest articles to attract participants. A key factor in the success of this strategy has beencontracting with a professional writer who has in-depth knowledge of the NSF ATE Programalong with an existing working relationship with AACC for submission of articles for potentialpublication by the organization. In-person outreach augments print and online informationdissemination. Project personnel regularly speak at annual conferences that attract STEMfaculty; e.g., American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE), High Impact
with their time and expertise. The financialsupport of the USCGA Alumni Association is also gratefully appreciated!References[1] Miller, Paul, “Project-Based Coursework in a Naval Architecture Curriculum”, Proceedingsof the ASEE Conference, Nashville, TN, 2003[2] Wobbe, Kristin, and Stoddard, Elisabeth, eds., “Project-Based Learning In The First Year”,Stylus Publishing, Sterling, VA, 2019[3] www.teachingwithsmallboats.org, accessed 12Feb2022[4] Gougeon, Meade, “The Gougeon Brothers on Boat Construction – Wood and WEST SystemMaterials, 5th Edition”, Gougeon Brothers, Inc., Bay City, Michigan, 2005[5] Witt, Glen L, “Boatbuilding With Plywood”, Modified 3rd Edition, Glen-L Marine Designs,Bellflower, CA, 1989[6] www.thewoodenboatschool.com
. Sandra Brabb, Washington State University I have over 35 years of experience in higher education, primarily in student services program development. I am currently the Director of Internships and Career Services for the Voiland College of Engineering and Architecture at Washington State University and the chair-elect for the ASEE Cooperative and Experien- tial Education Division.Eleanor Dizon, Washington State University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Social Engagement of First-time Freshmen and Transfer Students One and Two Years Post-COVIDAbstractIn this research paper, we present results from a survey focused on student engagement withcollege, university
(RESPECT), Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2022, pp. 1–2.[5] A. Haverkamp, “The complexity of nonbinary gender inclusion in engineering culture,” presented at the 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, Jun. 23–27, 2018.[6] P. H. Collins and S. Bilge, Intersectionality. Cambridge, U.K.: Polity Press, 2016.[7] P. H. Collins, “Intersectionality’s definitional dilemmas,” Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2015.[8] T. J. Weston, W. M. Dubow and A. Kaminsky, “Predicting women’s persistence in computer science- and technology-related majors from high school to college,” ACM Transactions on Computing Education, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2019.[9] A. Munson, B. Moskal, A
dynamics for high performance teamwork,” Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 378–394, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.06.002.[4] M. C. Paretti, J. J. Pembridge, S. C. Brozina, B. D. Lutz, and J. N. Phanthanousy, “Mentoring team conflicts in capstone design: Problems and solutions,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., 2013, doi: 10.18260/1-2--22284.[5] M. C. Paretti, K. J. Cross, and H. M. Matusovich, “Match or Mismatch: Engineering Faculty Beliefs about Communication and Teamwork versus Published Criteria,” 2014.[6] G. A. Callanan and D. F. Perri, “Teaching Conflict Management Using a Scenario-Based Approach,” Httpsdoiorg103200JOEB813131-139, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 131–139, 2010, doi
Studies: Methodological Briefs - Impact Evaluation No.9,” UNICEF-IRC, 2014, Accessed: Apr. 07, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/754-comparative-case-studies-methodological-briefs-impact-evaluation-no-9.html[19] B. J. Beatty, Z. Merchant, and M. Albert, “Analysis of Student Use of Video in a FlippedClassroom,” TechTrends, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 376–385, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1007/s11528-017-0169-1.[20] B. K. Morris and S. Savadatti, “Analysis of Basic Video Metrics in a Flipped StaticsCourse,” in 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2018.[21] “ChatGPT.” OpenAI.
, "Interactive-engagement vs traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey ofmechanics test data for introductory physics courses," Am. J. Phys. vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 64- 74,1998. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809[2] F. J. García-Peñalvo, H. Alarcón, & A. Dominguez, “Active learning experiences inengineering education,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 305-309, 2019.[3] L. E. Lara Ramírez, M. I. Pérez Vega, P. T. Villalobos Gutiérrez, V. Villa-Cruz, J. O. OrozcoLópez, & L. J. López Reyes, “Uso de laboratorios virtuales como estrategia didáctica para elaprendizaje activo.” Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 4211-4223, 2022. https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v6i1.1794[4] D. R
physical prototyping and detailed design activities can mesh with this intervention.References:[1] National Academy of Engineering, U. S. (2004). The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineeringin the new century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.[2] Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked Problems in Design Thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5–21.https://doi.org/10.2307/1511637[3] Lönngren, J. (2017). Wicked problems in engineering education: preparing future engineers towork for sustainability. Chalmers University of Technology.[4] “Grand Challenges - 14 Grand Challenges for Engineering,” Engineeringchallenges.org, 2019.http://www.engineeringchallenges.org/challenges.aspx[5] De Graaff, E., & Kolmos, A. (2007). Management of change: implementation of
: 10.1080/09544828.2021.1887462.[7] J. W. Lee, S. R. Daly, A. Huang-Saad, G. Rodriguez, and C. M. Seifert, “Cognitive strategies in solution mapping: How engineering designers identify problems for technological solutions,” Des. Stud., vol. 71, p. 100967, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2020.100967.[8] J. W. Lee, Divergent Thinking in Front-End Design. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, 2019. Accessed: Jul. 01, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/149892[9] J. W. Lee, S. R. Daly, A. Huang-Saad, and C. M. Seifert, “Start With Problems or Solutions? Medical Device Design in Industry and Academia,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 208623–208642, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3035966.[10] B
. Professor Villani presented a paper entitled, Solving the Gender Disparity Puzzle in Computing Disciplines at a Commuter State College at ISECON virtual conference in October 2021 and co-moderated a Birds of a Feather session at SIGSCE 2022 virtually entitled: Mentoring a Women in Computing Club: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly. Dr. Villani presented a paper at ASEE 2022 in Minneapolis, MN entitled: Designed A (Re)Orientation Program for Women Computing Students at a Commuter College and Measuring its Effectiveness. Fall 2023 a paper entitled: An Early Measure of Women-Focused Initiatives in Gender-Imbalanced Computing programs were presented at CCSC Eastern Conference. Dr. Villani has been a Grace Hopper Scholarship
Universities Journal, vol. 17, pp. 41–51, 2006.[14] R. S. Moog and J. N. Spencer, Eds., Process-Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL). Oxford University Press, USA, 2008.[15] S. R. Simonson, Ed., POGIL: An Introduction to Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning for Those Who Wish to Empower Learners. Stylus Publishing, LLC, 2019.[16] S. M. Ruder and S. S. Hunnicutt, “POGIL in chemistry courses at a large urban university: A case study,” in Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL), vol. 994, 0 vols., American Chemical Society, 2008, pp. 133–147. doi: 10.1021/bk-2008-0994.ch012.[17] M. Geiger, “Implementing POGIL in allied health chemistry courses: Insights from process education,” International Journal of Process Education
Atienza for her contribution to developing the BEADLE curriculum. The authors alsothank Justine Bailey and Cinthya Rosales for thoroughly testing the curriculum.References[1] R. Hussein and D. Wilson, “Remote Versus In-hand Hardware Laboratory in Digital CircuitsCourses,” American Society for Engineering Education ASEE conference, Electrical andComputer Engineering Division, Jul. 2021. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/37662[2] R. Hussein, B. Chap, M. Inonan, M. Guo, F. Monroy, R. Maloney, S. Alves, and S. Kalisi,“Remote Hub Lab – RHL: Broadly Accessible Technologies for Education and Telehealth”, 20thAnnual International Conference on Remote Engineering and Virtual Instrumentation REV 2023[3] R. Harper and H. Thiry, “Advising from
evolves.Teaching cyber-focused concepts in an interdisciplinary manner is critical to the properunderstanding of cyber in the 21st century. Developing cyber professionals must have a well-grounded technical understanding of the cyber and then utilize and extend this knowledge tobroader, nonlinear, and risk-infused environments. We hope this paper helps the reader examinehow to implement this in an academic environment in order to graduate the next generation ofwell-balanced cyber professionals.Works Cited[1] "Maritime Risk Symposium," [Online]. Available: https://www.maritimerisksymposium.org/. [Accessed 22 January 2023].[2] Department of Defense, "Cybersecurity," 7 October 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54
acquisition on undergraduate project teams,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 149–155, 1998.[13] E. Pfaff and P. Huddleston, “Does it matter if I hate teamwork? What impacts student attitudes toward teamwork,” J. Mark. Educ., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 37–45, 2003.[14] S. Takai and M. Esterman, “A review of team effectiveness models and possible instruments for measuring design-team inputs, processes, and outputs,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 1684–1697, 2019
project-based learning in civil engineering courses,” in 2018 IEEE Global Engineering EducationConference (EDUCON), Apr. 2018, pp. 243–250. doi: 10.1109/EDUCON.2018.8363235.[7] J. M. Coronado, A. Moyano, V. Romero, R. Ruiz, and J. Rodríguez, “Student Long-TermPerception of Project-Based Learning in Civil Engineering Education: An 18-Year Ex-PostAssessment,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 4, Art. no. 4, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13041949.[8] B. Wambeke, “Building Bridges – Spanning the gap between the classroom and professionalpractice,” presented at the 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Jun. 2020.Accessed: Feb. 16, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/building-bridges-spanning-the-gap-between-the-classroom-and
engineering curriculum using practice architectures," European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 44, no. 1/2, pp. 71-84, 2019.[5] P. M. Davies, R. J. Passonneau, S. Muresan and Y. Gao, "Analytical Techniques for Developing Argumentative Writing in STEM: A Pilot Study," IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 65, no. 3, p. 373–383, 2022.[6] M. Biango-Daniels and M. Sarvary, "A challenge in teaching scientific communication: academic experience does not improve undergraduates’ ability to assess their or their peers’ writing," Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 46, no. 5, p. 809–820, 2021.[7] J. T. Kramer, J. Zeccardi, C. A. Emhoff, C. Williams, Dunn, R. J., & Rose, J. , R. J. Dunn and J. Rose, "How Timing and
programming based on the surveys, with a push in 2019 for awareness of Diversity,Equity, and Inclusion (DEI), with a symposium and new DEI Task Group, eventually adding aRacial Equity Task Group. Programming in the 2021-2022 year included a long-term mentoringprogram, a racial equity book club, and a DEI training for firm leaders. SE3 published resultsfrom a study of pressure points for people of color studying structural engineering by analyzingdata from programs in California. From early 2022, SE3 increasingly focused programming onequity in design as well.Hierarchy of knowledge – ‘real’ engineeringThe consequences of perceived boundaries of ‘real’ engineering, which limit engineering totechnical work, are evidenced in the accounts of the work and
Towards Seeing Themselves as Scholars," The Review of Higher Education, vol. 42, pp. 1527-1547, 01/01 2019, doi: 10.1353/rhe.2019.0074.[13] J. P. Azevedo, M. Gutierrez, R. de Hoyos, and J. Saavedra, "The unequal impacts of COVID-19 on student learning," Primary and secondary education during Covid-19: Disruptions to educational opportunity during a pandemic, pp. 421-459, 2022.[14] E. CAMP. "Students lost one-third of a school year of learning during the pandemic." https://reason.com/2023/02/03/children-lost-one-third-of-a-year-of-learning-during-the- pandemic-analysis-finds/ (accessed Feb 3, 2023.[15] K. A. Bird, B. L. Castleman, and G. Lohner, "Negative impacts from the shift to online learning
., vol. 11, no. 1s, pp. 127–135, 2014.[2] A. R. Peterfreund, E. Costache, H. L. Chen, S. K. Gilmartin, and S. Sheppard, “Infusing innovation and entrepreneurship into engineering education: Looking for change as seen by ASEE Members, 2012 to 2015,” in American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2016, vol. 2016-June.[3] KEEN, “The Framework for Entrepreneurially Minded Learning,” Engineering Unleashed, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://engineeringunleashed.com/framework.[4] C. Q. Li, R. S. Harichandran, M. I. Carnasciali, N. O. Erdil, and J. Nocito-Gobel, “Development of an instrument to measure the entrepreneurial mindset of engineering students,” in American Society
Museum” [20]. The time in Mexicoincludes living with host families and collaborating with students at Mexican universities ineducational and research undertakings. Fall commitments for the participants are “an onlinelearning community and writ[ing] a research proposal on the research problem identified while[the student was] in Yucatan” [20] and presenting their proposal as a research poster. Theseactivities were offered through the ELCIR project from 2015 to 2019 with marked success forparticipants by exposing them to research and international contexts early in their academiccareers [11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 20]. Therefore, outcomes for students similar to those reported in [11,12, 13, 14, 15] were expected for the summer 2022 IRAP cohort.2.2
, 2023).[24] S. Donohue, “Student Water Scholars and Broader Impact Outreach: Motivations and Hindrances toParticipation,” University of New Mexico Shared Knowledge Conference, 2022.https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/skc/2022/posters/25/ (accessed Feb. 14, 2023).[25] Lee, Y., Kothuis, B. B., Sebastian, A., & Brody, S. Design of transformative education and authenticlearning projects: Experiences and lessons learned from an international multidisciplinary research andeducation program on flood risk reduction. In 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.AppendixDetails concerning the FNI flood studyFreese and Nichols (FNI) requested interviews to be conducted with residents using two onlineinstruments–an online survey that allows
apply feminist theories to engineering education.Ms. Elizabeth Ann Strehl, University of Michigan Elizabeth is a graduate student at the University of Michigan studying Engineering Education Research under doctoral advisor Aaron Johnson. Her research focuses on weaving macro ethics into existing aerospace engineering curricula and institutional support methods for working class engineering students. Elizabeth earned her undergraduate degree from the University of Michigan in 2019 with foci in Biomed- ical Engineering and Applied Mathematics.Dr. Aaron W. Johnson, University of Michigan Aaron W. Johnson is an Assistant Professor in the Aerospace Engineering Department and a Core Fac- ulty member of the Engineering
Wenderoth.References[1] Z. S. Wilson, S. S. Iyengar, S.-S. Pang, I. M. Warner, and C. A. Luces, “Increasing Access for Economically Disadvantaged Students: The NSF/CSEM & S-STEM Programs at Louisiana State University,” J. Sci. Educ. Technol., vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 581–587, Oct. 2012, doi: 10.1007/s10956-011-9348-6.[2] M. Walpole, “Socioeconomic Status and College: How SES Affects College Experiences and Outcomes,” Rev. High. Educ., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 45–73, 2003, doi: 10.1353/rhe.2003.0044.[3] M. L. Strutz and M. W. Ohland, “Low-SES First-generation Students’ Decision to Pursue Engineering,” presented at the 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2012, p. 25.907.1-25.907.15. Accessed: Feb. 12, 2023. [Online]. Available
, practices,facility characteristics, inspections, and engineering controls [3,4]. For example, national studiesin 2002 and 2022 found that only 81% and 83% of educators respectively had the appropriateeye protection for all students engaged in science and engineering activities in their courses [4].Furthermore, a national study published in 2022 by the International Technology andEngineering Educators Association (ITEEA) in collaboration with the American Society forEngineering Education (ASEE) and the National Science Education Leadership Association(NSELA), discovered a number of alarming safety deficiencies among P-12 programs andeducators providing engineering instruction in the United States (U.S.) [3]. Further analysesfound that teachers who
traditional LIWC analysis with the standard dictionarygives a psychologically verified and impartial look at the language, while with the customdictionary it gives a measure of the known signposts for a topic. The MEM analysis gives theemergent themes within the topic. When these two a priori and in vivo thematic computationalmethods arrive at similar landmarks, researchers can be confident that although this took lesstime, the adventure has not only been worth the computations, but it has also arrived in thecorrect place.6 References[1] ASEE, “Engineering by the Numbers, 2010,” American Society for Engineering Education, Washington, DC, Profiles of Engineering and Engineering Technology Colleges, 2011.[2] ASEE, “Engineering &