project include fosteringindependent research skills, recruitment from underrepresented groups and/or schools withlimited research opportunities, and professional development particularly targetingentrepreneurship and innovation. Pre/post surveys and focus group interviews were conducted tocollect data from participants. Students strongly indicated that the program was an importantbridge between their undergraduate and graduate careers and that important knowledge, skills,and interests were developed as a result. One of the main self-perceived deficiencies of studentsentering the program was technical communication, and gains were achieved in this area bystructuring biweekly program-wide meetings around developing relevant skills. We found
students about their learning, these quizzes identify areasthat need extra emphasis in lecture 14,15. They are not intended to determine if students have metthe learning objectives of the course, so are not used in evaluating the course.Students perform a final project that focuses on synthesizing the material they learned in theclass and exploring their interests in this area more fully. These projects include definingengineering design criteria and constraints of current or proposed genetic sequencingtechnologies, or analysis of a chosen data set. Undergraduate students work in teams of 2-3 andgraduate students work alone. Graduate students present their project to the class. These projectsdemonstrate the skills gained by the students during the
technologies to support the 21st century classroom (online and face to face). He also has assisted both the campus as well as the local community in developing technology programs that highlight student skills development in ways that engage and attract individuals towards STEAM and STEM fields by showcasing how those skills impact the current project in real-world ways that people can understand and be involved in. As part of a university that is focused on supporting the 21st century student demographic he continues to innovate and research on how we can design new methods of learning to educate both our students and communities on how STEM and STEAM make up a large part of that vision and our future.Dr. Oscar Antonio
products Impact Goals • Enhanced energy productivity • Reduced life cycle energy consumption • Increased domestic production capacity • Job growth and economic development 5) Balanced Portfolio of ProjectsFrom Technology Roadmaps and Strategic Investment Plan, Each Institute managesa balanced portfolio of real projects for Industry Activity Result • Strengthen infrastructure capacity:1. First Projects - Materials and processing - Modeling and simulationIdentified in proposal to DOE
EDPPSR scorersConsider Construct The form of An Motivatepresentation e-portfolio Student for submission submissionsstudent work portal The Motivation for Engineering AP® – Parents and school systems view AP® as a pathway to college placement and acceptance. Weighted GPA – Honors, gifted and talented, and AP impact the weighted average. Inclusion – Level the ‘playing field’ and increase diversity. Align Project-based Activities – Recognize student achievements in both formal and informal education settings. Student learning trajectories – Research and document for: design process, problem-solving, team work, and creativity. The
Corporation, the creators of 3D CAD software PRO-Engineer. In 1999 she joined Kollmorgen, a motion control company based in Radford, where she held multiple roles of increasing responsibility dur- ing her nine years there. While at Kollmorgen Robin worked with Shingijutsu Global Consulting experts from Japan and earned black belts in the DBS kaizen areas of Standard Work and 5S and traveled globally to qualify suppliers in Asia and Europe. Most recently Robin worked as Senior Director of Project Man- agement for a small bio-tech company, Intrexon, located in the VT Corporate Research Center and had the opportunity to introduce manufacturing principles into a highly specialized DNA production facility. Since joining the
graduate students to thethought processes involved in human disease research and its translation into therapy byproviding an overview of disease processes, how they are treated, how basic biological science isused to develop those treatments, and the role of various stakeholders in the translationalresearch pipeline. At the end of this course, the student should understand the medical rationalefor studying basic pathomechanisms and how to utilize that rationale to design studies and grantproposals. For the final project of the course, students are provided with examples of recentdiscoveries based on a basic science article published within the past three years and asked todescribe how to take that discovery to clinical application.Elective courses
focused on in undergraduate education. Makerspaces cansupplement this deficit to a degree, but often only provide the equipment and spatial resourcesfor the students and may lack the technical expertise and training of dedicated staff [1]. Bygiving early access to specialized pieces of equipment and hands on training early inundergraduate education, allows them to develop innovative ideas that utilize the equipment fortheir projects. Training also allows students to quickly become comfortable with the tools thatelectrical engineering depends on, instead of having to develop their proficiency in the first fiveyears of being in the workforce or graduate school.Introduction:Back in the fifties and sixties there was a significant push for engineering
course is the OLS Senior Capstone Project, which represents the culmination of work forthe baccalaureate degree in Organizational Leadership and Supervision (OLS). The SeniorCapstone Project represents one of the final deliverables that a student will develop as an OLSmajor. As such, students are strongly encouraged to allocate sufficient time for editing,rewriting, and/or proofreading the final documents. Students are expected to both submit andpresent at a poster session, a professionally-developed, final research report that demonstratestheir seriousness of purpose as a senior-level, college-educated student of leadership.This capstone course is designed to be integrative in nature and will use overlap from previouscoursework and signature
project, but separate from the certificate program, we are developing aseries of experiments that will be introduced in the first-year engineering program at a large,research-intensive university. The goal of the experiments is to help students determine howdifferences in concentrations of nano-sized particles, which are added to common materials, canchange physical properties. In this exercise, student teams will fabricate composite films filledwith different concentrations of carbon black in two different types of polymers: 1. latex-basedcomposite with poly (vinyl acetate), and 2. solution-based composite with poly(vinylpyrrolidone). The concentrations vary from about 2 wt% to 15 wt%. For mechanicalproperties, the students will determine the
and holistic approach to engineering education.In addition to active learning approaches, it is equally important to develop methods for studentsto assess their own learning and, through survey and interview tools, to evaluate the impact ofthese courses and projects in enhancing student confidence in their ability to learn. The basis ofevaluation is the degree to which students feel these courses enhance their views of lifelonglearning, including providing them with the tools and self-efficacy to teach themselves, as wellas the degree to which students understand how specific coursework contributes to acomprehensive approach to engineering problem solving. Hence, improved assessment,including self-assessment, better enables courses and
ComputerEngineering Technology. The lab consists of ten different exercises and culminates in a finalproject in which the students build and test a superheterodyne receiver. At this time, students areallowed to choose their partners, generally considered to be based on friendship and pastexperience. The goal of this project is to understand if the learning styles combination of labpartners can predict the success of the partnership. Each student was asked to complete theIndex of Learning Styles (ILS) questionnaire developed by Felder and Soloman1. The partnersILS reports were than paired and reviewed for commonalities and differences. The success ofthe lab partners were based on the overall lab scores and functionality of the receiver project.Factors such as
permanently integrate new understanding, particularly associated with math and science, within their cognitive framework. In his eight years as a high school teacher, Mr. Kirsch has often utilized the context of engineering and its focus upon problem solving to engage students in community-based projects. Page 14.539.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009Engaging High School Students in Engineering, Science and Technology using Virtual LaboratoriesAbstractThe Virtual Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD) Laboratory was originally developed forcapstone projects in experimental design to be
, Economic Analysis, Recommendation for Action Tools: EES.Powerpoint ME 391 – Mechanical Engineering Analysis ME 412 – Heat Transfer Reading, thinking, and teamwork Design Project Documentation: Tools: Matlab Formal Report (1 @ 10 pp. + App., Individual) Memo Reports ( X @ 2 - 5 pages App., Individual) Tools: MS Word
. That is, students in EGR120 are not seen again in the engineering programuntil their second year.The ET department lies within the College of Science and Technology, yet EGR120 drawsstudents from around the university who are interested in engineering, technology, or just afun design project. The course is offered both semesters and has no prerequisites, although itrecommends Intermediate Algebra or higher. The syllabus covers introductory material suchas the engineering profession, problem solving, measurement and units, ethics, economics,and basic mechanical and electrical concepts. Traditionally, the course includes one largegroup design project of either a cardboard boat race in the fall semester or a robot King-of-the-Hill competition in
and projects are created by the teaching faculty and critiqued at weekly meetings where all aspects of the course are discussed. A recent change which has brought another dimension to our uniformity discussions is the creation of an alternative course utilizing C rather than FORTRAN as the programming language. This course is identical in all aspects except syntax. The same projects are used; the same exams, with some modifications to programming questions are used; and the same schedule is kept. In fact, the weekly faculty meetings are held jointly. Page 1.458.1 $iiia-’ ‘Jll&
Session 3151 ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION FOR ALL ENGINEERS Dr. Wayne E. Wells University of Texas-Pan American Project Description The educational initiative described in this paper is based on three premises. The first is that the impactof manufacturing and manufacturing decisions on the environment can be profound; profoundly positive ornegative. The fate of efforts toward systematic elimination of pollution in the environment rests to a greatextent upon decisions made in manufacturing
. The objectives of there-introduction of engineering courses were: 1. to introduce freshman to engineering concepts, problem solving, design concepts, and the engineering culture. 2. to increase the motivation of engineering students by hands on projects. 3. to increase the retention of freshman engineering students. 4. to introduce the foundations for manufacturing across the engineering curricula. COURSE DEVELOPMENT A three credit pilot course was introduced in the Fall of 1994. All chemical engineering students were signed up for the course. The course involved one weekly presentation and two hands-on laboratories. The laboratory
front in your lecture can give clarification for the following lecture material ?&ii’-’ ) 1996 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings ‘.,.,RYRL.? . 1particularly to the visual learner. When working problems on the chalk board always work the problem coldand do not copy directly from your notes. You may tend to leave “details” out that in later study couldconfuse the learner.Project work I believe project work needs to be “hands on” in engineering technology courses. This is particularlyuseful
AC 2009-687: IMPROVING TOOLS AND TECHNIQUES OF TEACHINGGRADUATE ENGINEERING COURSES BASED ON STUDENTS’ LEARNINGSTYLES AND MULTIPLE INTELLIGENCESBuket Barkana, University of Bridgeport Buket D. Barkana received the B.S. degree from Anatolia University, in 1994, and the M.S.E. and Ph.D. degrees from Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Turkey, in 1997 and 2005, respectively. She is now Assistant Professor of Electrical Engineering at the University of Bridgeport, CT. Dr. Barkana’s current research projects include: voice/audio signal processing, speech disorders, and innovations in engineering education.Navarun Gupta, University of Bridgeport Dr. Navarun Gupta is an Assistant Professor of Electrical
AC 2009-162: INTRODUCING ROBOTSRyan Meuth, Missouri University of Science and Technology Ryan Meuth received his Bachelors and Masters degrees in Computer Engineering from the University of Missouri –Rolla in 2005 and 2007 respectively. He is currently a Computer Engineering PhD student at Missouri University of Science and Technology (formerly the University of Missouri – Rolla). He works as a research assistant in the Applied Computational Intelligence Laboratory, contributing to research projects on optimizing the behavior of robot swarms, large scale optimization problems such as computer Go, and high performance computing methods utilizing video game consoles and graphics processing units. His
relation to each other as well as their ideas onhow to best learn chemistry. The survey was given to both faculty and undergraduate students atall levels. The authors found their hypothesized difference between faculty and entry-levelstudents, although students in upper level courses had more realistic ideas about the process oflearning chemistry [4].The current project involved the development, testing and validation of the engineering versionsof the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) and its faculty version, the FacultySurvey of Student Engagement (FSSE). These engineering versions (E-NSSE and E-FSSE)assess the extent to which engineering students are being engaged by identified “bestinstructional practices” and are achieving certain
best focused in the coursework. The researchshould be guided with a looser rein.Intellectual Character of Graduate Study: Increasingly, engineering work in both industryand in academic preparation is undertaken in project form, most often through multi-disciplinaryteams. In the graduate education context, engineering students are traditionally expected toundertake, complete and document an independent project of significant scope. The ‘significantscope’ dimension often clashes with ‘independence’, as many of the relevant problems incurrent-day engineering are multi-disciplinary, or at least multi-dimensional, and are bestaddressed by teams.The graduate disquisition is intended to be a substantive intellectual product. The project nature,as
2006-1232: MARKETING ENGINEERING THROUGH OPEN MENTORING® - AWEB-BASED PILOT PROGRAMTricia Berry, University of Texas-Austin Tricia Berry is the Director of the Women in Engineering Program at The University of Texas at Austin, responsible for leading the efforts on recruitment and retention of women in the College of Engineering. She came to UT in July 1999 after six years at The Dow Chemical Company in Freeport, Texas where she worked as a Process Engineer leading design and expansion projects and a Product Development Engineer assisting in the commercialization of a new epoxy thermoplastic and leading the customer plant start-up efforts. Tricia holds both a BS Chemical Engineering
Paper ID #36013An Application Driven Framework for Delivering System and ProductLife-Cycle Management Concepts in Engineering EducationMiss Vacharaporn Paradorn An Electrical Engineering graduate student at University of Massachusetts LowellSunita Rajni Virk Singh PomaMr. Nathan Agyeman Nathan is a fourth-year student at the University of Massachusetts Lowell’s Francis College of Engineer- ing, where he is pursuing a degree in Computer Engineering (BS). He’s highly involved with various organizations on campus. He’s currently working in two research groups where he’s a lead facilitator in the Exclusive Teamwork project where
test section and actively with a recirculation valve. The total cost for this projectwas approximately $3500 and required 3 months of part-time work to construct. Flow velocitymeasurements in the test section were made by simple flow visualization and found velocityranged from 0.32-0.65 ft/s within a 6”x12”x12” test section. The water flume was subsequentlyused by a senior capstone project for testing of their water turbine. Student self-evaluations wereused to assess whether their experiences reinforced fluid mechanics concepts and developed theirskills in experimental fluid mechanics. The results show that the students believed their workwith the water tunnel strongly met the learning objectives in the area of experimental methodsand
lab called Learning Enhanced Watershed Assessment System (LEWAS) at VT. He received a Ph.D. in civil engineering from VT. His research interests are in the areas of computer-supported research and learning systems, hydrology, engineering education, and international collaboration. He has led several interdisciplinary research and curriculum reform projects, funded by the National Science Foundation, and has participated in research and curriculum development projects with $6.4 million funding from external sources. He has been directing/co-directing an NSF/Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU) Site on interdisciplinary water sciences and engineering at VT since 2007. This site has 85 alumni to date. He also
approach which included teaching fundamental concepts of FEA theory,teaching its commercial software and implementation of it in class design projects. Althoughsome students complained about the complexity of fundamental concepts of FEA theory andtedious theoretical calculations, 92.3% of students agreed that teaching the fundamental conceptsof FEA theory helped them to have a better understanding of the FEA commercial software.92.3% of students agreed that teaching the fundamental concepts of FEA theory should be keptas part of the course. At the end of the course, we asked students to take the CSWA-SCertification, 60% of students in the section with the proposed approach passed the certificationexam while other sections had an average 35.9% of
manufacturing-focused courses. Sarah’s research interests include aspects of project-based learning and enhancing 21st century skills in undergraduate engineering students.Kate Youmans, Utah State University Kate Youmans is a PhD student in the Department of Engineering Education at Utah State University. Kate earned her bachelor’s degree in Mechanical Engineering from Worcester Polytechnic Institute and worked in the medical device industry designing surgical instruments before focusing on engineering out- reach in MIT’s Office of Engineering Outreach Programs. After receiving her master’s degree in Science Education from Boston University, Kate helped open the American International School of Utah, a K-12 charter school in
touches upon the existing attempts at buildingsuch a near-world lab for academic research and teaching purposes and their challenges. TheSCADA laboratory we designed and the research findings we present will be either used todevelop new courses or supplement the existing courses in the undergraduate and graduatecurriculum with fairly enough number of hands-on activities. Moreover, our paper highlights thechallenges, limitations and the methodologies in the project to achieve these goals. Thecross-disciplinary design of the lab allows students from various programs with specific goals touse the lab for their studies.Related WorkThe SCADA systems have been target of attacks particularly in the last two decades with theadvancements in technology. As