bring in from their home environments/cultures to recognizing thesystemic ways in which classroom mathematics activities can hinder this “home” mathematicalthinking from becoming integrated into the “school math” students are learning. 5Third, these studies suggest an entanglement between teachers’ noticing of the substance (notjust the correctness) of students’ reasoning and their noticing of equity-related issues ofparticipation and positioning. McDuffie et al. (2014) documented how growth in teachers’attention to the substance of student reasoning was accompanied by growth in their noticing of(in)equitable participation patterns and power
persistence and fulfillment.Neha Kardam, University of Washington Neha Kardam is a third-year Ph.D. student in Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Washington, Seattle. She is an interdisciplinary researcher with experience in statistics, predictive analytics, mixed methods research, and machine learning techniques in data-driven research. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 How should Teaching Assistants Teach? Differences in Student Perspectives by Gender, Race/Ethnicity, and Country of OriginAbstractTeaching Assistants (TAs) are a critical part of many engineering programs, particularly at largerinstitutions
graduate courses in teacher action research and gender and culture in science education. Her research interests include girls’ participation in science and engineering; teacher’s engagement in action research; and science teachers’ integration of the engineering design process to improve science learning.Jeffrey D. Radloff, Purdue University, West Lafayette Jeff Radloff is a graduate student in the Department of Curriculum and Instruction at Purdue University. His research interests include the examination of K-12 teachers’ enactment of engineering design. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018Exploring the Use of Approximations of Practice in the Context of Elementary Teachers’ Attempts
. He is also active in course and curriculum development. He is a Fellow of the ASME.Dr. James I. Craig, Georgia Institute of Technology Prof. Craig has been on the faculty at Georgia Tech for more than fifty years and continues to teach as an emeritus professor and to develop classroom engagement methods and tools. His past research is in the general area of experimental structural mechanics, dynamics and structural control with applications to aerospace and earthquake engineering. He is coauthor of a textbook on structural analysis with application to aerospace structures.Dr. Bonnie H. Ferri, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Bonnie Ferri is a Professor in the School of Electrical and Computer Engineering as
characterization techniques and laboratory apparatus for advancement of novel electronic devices, in addi- tion to curriculum development for inquiry-based learning and facilitation of interdisciplinary, student-led project design. She emphasizes engineering sustainable solutions from a holistic perspective, incorporat- ing analysis of the full technological life cycle and socioeconomic impact.Prof. Bryan M. Jenkins, University of California, Davis, Dept. of Biological and Agricultural Engineering Prof. Bryan Jenkins teaches and conducts research in the areas of energy and power, with emphasis on biomass and other renewable resources. Dr. Jenkins has more than thirty years of experience work- ing in the area of biomass
Engineering by Incorporating Novel Desalination Technology Based Hands-On Laboratory AssignmentsAbstractUndergraduate students were exposed to hands-on novel desalination laboratory experimentsin an attempt to generate interest towards research in the broad field of environmentalengineering and specifically in the field of water desalination. The laboratory exercises weredesigned to introduce desalination techniques, enhance their learning experiences, generateinterest among them, and prepare them as potential researchers in laboratory settings. Thehands-on experience of capacitive deionization (CDI) based laboratory experiments providedfoundational and working knowledge of the CDI concept and allowed
other funding from Purdue University’s Visual Analytics for Command, Control, and Interoperability Environments (VACCINE), a DHS Center of Excellence. Dr. Nyarko has also worked as an independent Software Engineer with contracts involving computa- tional engineering, scientific/engineering simulation & visualization, visual analytics, complex computer algorithm development, computer network theory, machine learning, mobile software development, and avionic system software development.Dr. Sacharia Albin, Norfolk State University Dr. Sacharia Albin joined Norfolk State University in July 2011 as the Chair of the Engineering Depart- ment. He received his BS and MS degrees from the University of Kerala, and Ph.D
workforce depends on attractinggreater numbers of scientists and engineers: the current workforce is aging at the same time thatjob skills are becoming increasingly technical3. The shortfall of women in SME fields has at leasttwo implications for this productivity. First, they represent an untapped reservoir of potentialemployees, and second, they may bring new perspectives and ideas to meeting new challenges4-6.Beyond the economic and productivity implications are social and ethical motivations. Scientificliteracy is increasingly important to health and environmental issues. But the understanding ofSME fundamentals by most Americans—particularly women due to their under-representation inSME—is inadequate to fully participate in these issues7
Research Experience for Teachers Site in Mechatronics and Entrepreneurship, a DR K-12 research project, and an ITEST re- search project, all funded by NSF. He has held visiting positions with the Air Force Research Laboratories in Dayton, OH. His research interests include K-12 STEM education, mechatronics, robotics, and con- trol system technology. Under a Research Experience for Teachers Site, a DR K-12 project, and GK-12 Fellows programs, funded by NSF, and the Central Brooklyn STEM Initiative (CBSI), funded by six phil- anthropic foundations, he has conducted significant K-12 education, training, mentoring, and outreach activities to integrate engineering concepts in science classrooms and labs of dozens of New York
procedures forreviews changed: neither tutors nor students were present in-person, review sheets were sent tostudents in the Zoom chat, and tutors worked through homework questions on whiteboards overvideo. To ask questions, participants could unmute their microphones or post them in the chat.Through the College of Engineering (COE) Tutoring Office, students also had the option toreceive one-on-one drop-in peer tutoring for most courses taken in the first two years of theengineering curriculum. This office was staffed by undergraduate peer tutors. Prior to theCOVID-19 pandemic, peer tutoring was offered in person, which allowed students to “drop-in”during operating hours without an appointment. In Fall 2020 one-on-one tutoring was onlyoffered
problem, activate them to organize information and thinkof the relationships among information, elicit their explanations, and prompt them toself-monitor and self-reflect their learning and problem solving [7]. Davis and Linn alsofound that reflective prompts are able to prompt students' knowledge integration andencourage their reflection [8]. Other researchers have adopted scaffolding strategies to facilitate students to developskills of self-regulated learning and creative problem solving. Blank et al. developed andimplemented a Self-regulated Learning Assessment System as an intervention to helpstudents majoring in electromechanical engineering technology better reflect on feedbackabout their learning, their learning performance, and
entrepreneurial courses due to the crowded curriculum and doesnot require students to take entrepreneurial courses, entrepreneurial concepts were integrated inclassroom activities in the various and existing engineering courses.Another reason for using the above approach is that each author who are full-time faculty havetaught between 35-plus courses in electrical engineering, computer engineering, systemengineering, mathematics and physics at the University. This advantage allows CoE to carefullyintegrate entrepreneurial activities in a number of courses throughout the engineering curriculumto help students build an entrepreneurial mindset.CoE has integrated entrepreneurial classroom activities in several undergraduate courses [1] [2][3] [4]. By
to integrate the project at appropriate times in their already-busycurriculum. Therefore, the teacher suggested that the project could be more easily integrated as acapstone project in an AP Physics class once they complete their AP Physics exam, typically inMay. A final pilot at in three AP Physics courses, two of which are at a different school district,are being implemented during spring 2016.As these improvements are being made, the UC San Diego team is making preparations to trainadditional volunteers and expand the curriculum into more San Diego schools. The team iscurrently recruiting university students and local professional engineers from EERI student andprofessional chapters to broaden the number of available instructors and
their confidence for performing specificengineering tasks [5].This paper presents an evaluation of the 2021 Summer Engineering Experience for Kids program(SEEK), a summer program hosted by the National Society of Black Engineers (NSBE) designedto offer underrepresented students, not only access to a STEM curriculum, but to cultivate theiracademic self-efficacy in these fields. To determine the impact of the program, this paperexamines the following research questions: RQ1. Does participation in SEEK improve students’ academic self-efficacy? How does impact compare across gender? RQ2. How well does academic self-efficacy predict students’ aspirations of becoming an engineer? For boys? For girls?BackgroundNSBE created the
Session 3613The Use of Sophisticated Process Design Software to Teach Basic ChE PrinciplesThrough the Design of a Ketchup Manufacturing Process in a SophomoreLaboratory CourseZ. Otero Keil, Ph.D., P.E., Department of Chemical Engineering, Rowan University,Glassboro, NJ 08028Abstract:Engineering process design software and simulators allow for the effective integration ofdesign early in the engineering curriculum. Design experiences early in the curriculumoffer opportunities to expose students to engineering applications that serve to increaseunderstanding of technical material and enhance student interest in engineering. The useof sophisticated software has made it
approaches tailored mainly toward hands on activities. The key is not simply to testfor comprehension but to examine the science, technology, engineering, and mathematics(STEM) thinking of each student. This study examines the development of an engineering texttargeting early elementary grade levels and performs an early assessment of the potential impactof the literature on engineering thinking. The literature developed in this project maycomplement the Engineering is Elementary curriculum such that formal integration of theliterature may enhance early childhood learning.Science can be described as an enterprise that builds and organizes knowledge in the form oftestable explanations and predications about the world [7-8]. Engineering can be
focusing on innovation and leadership and solving unknownproblems.Educating engineers as creative professionals is a career long process of growth and furtherprofessional development including the development of intrinsic creative and innovativepotential for leadership in engineering practice. This process extends beyond entry levelundergraduate education to the highest levels of engineering leadership within the practicingprofession. Professional education at this level requires an integrative combination of self-directed learning, experiential learning, and advanced professional engineering studies combinedwith real-world experience in creative engineering practice.The Task Force believes that the development of the professional engineer in
United States has worked tobuild a scaffolded STEM program, using curriculum from STEM content areas andembedding it into an ROV building activity. The curriculum and activity require studentsto learn various basic STEM principles including buoyancy, pressure, density, circuits,and the engineering design process, while designing, building, testing, and competingwith a personally-built ROV. The data in this paper discusses the results from theimplementation this past year with over 400 students. The data results from a pre postSTEM survey. The survey was administered prior to the students participating in theactivity, and immediately following the final ROV competition (~5 month delay). Thedata shows some initial positive trends of student (n
government all comingtogether to advance engineering education for the practice of engineering in the national interest.This paper describes the critical innovation skills, knowledge, qualifications, and experiencefactor that is required for mid - career development of engineers for effective engineeringleadership of continuous technology development and innovation in industry at the technicalprogram management level. It describes the framework and an integrative educational approachconcurrent with engineering practice leading to the professional Doctor of Engineering forresponsible engineering leadership of systematic technology development and innovation.2. Professional Education for Engineers –The New Challenge for Industrial InnovationWhile the
problems, to work effectively in multidisciplinary teams, and to consider non-technical perspectives, long before the characteristics of the “Engineer of 2020”1 was everdefined.This paper discusses the EPP program over its four decades and how the program integrates withthe traditional engineering programs. We discuss the curriculum over time, the course selectionsstudents make, and the benefits our alumni receive from the program. We will give an overviewof our capstone EPP Projects course, a truly interdisciplinary teamwork situation addressingcurrent technology issues. Finally we reflect on how the program achieves the ABET (a) through(k) outcomes and work in the ABET system, and how the program has been successful these past40 years.We do not
of theprogram faculty who were asked to rate for each of the courses they teach the degree to whichthey are promoting ES outcomes.Faculty felt that the outcome that they best promote and emphasize throughout the curriculum is“an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering”, while the outcomethat they promote and emphasize less is “an ability to communicate effectively in English inwritten form”. The five surveyed groups claim as one of the most important program outcomes“an ability to communicate effectively”. There are also two other outcomes that are consideredvery important for three stakeholder groups: “recognition of the need for, and an ability toengage in life-long learning” and “an ability to function on multi
evolving, a vision based upon career-long needs of professionals as a growth process for leadership of technological innovation. This paperfocuses on the critical skill-sets, knowledge, and experience that engineers need as technology leadersbeyond basic, four-year undergraduate education to stimulate constant technological innovation forenhanced U.S. competitiveness in the new economy. The paper outlines the functional requirements and anew approach to the design of professional graduate education as an integrated system for lifelong learningthat supports innovative practice throughout the working professional’s career.1. IntroductionAs we enter the 21st century, the process of engineering for creating technology has changed substantiallyfrom
highestbarrier in the questionnaire results. After lack of time, access to materials was cited as the secondbiggest barrier during the interview.The factors lack of knowledge, inability to figure out books and problems, and difficulty in NElesson planning were described as major concerns after the top three barriers. From the interviewresponses, it is apparent that figuring out books and problems is just one aspect of knowledgewhen it comes to integrating NE into curriculum. Being knowledgeable about which direction tofollow, what lessons to cover, and finding age appropriate materials were some of the otherproblems identified by teachers.2. Effects of PDIn order to determine whether there might be any relationship between participants
thatrequires faculty to develop a special kind of proposal. At its core, a CAREER proposal is acareer development plan that incorporates integrated research and education plans. TheCAREER program is a foundation-wide activity that offers NSF’s most prestigious awards forfaculty members beginning their independent careers (NSF 20-525). Awardees are expected topresent an integrated research and education plan that will provide the foundation for theircareers as researchers and educators.The goal of this paper is to serve as a resource to help principal investigators (PIs) developCAREER proposals for any division at the National Science Foundation (NSF). The content ofthe paper is based on my recent experience as an NSF program officer (2017-2019) in
technology education and mathematics for ten years. During that time, she was an Albert Einstein Fellow in 1996 and received the Presidential Award for Excellence in Mathematics Teaching in 1994. Pam holds a BS in Education and an MA in Curriculum and Instruction from Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. Address: 177 Stone Meadow Lane, Wytheville, VA 24382; Telephone: (276) 228-6502; Fax: (276) 228-6503; E-mail: pampltw@earthlink.netT. Richard Grimsley, Project Lead The Way T. Richard Grimsley is the Associate Vice President for Project Lead The Way®. PLTW is a non-profit organization that provides pre-engineering curricula for schools in 45 states and the District of Columbia
an online environment mid-semester.Benefits of online or blended classes include students being able to be constantly aware of theirperformance and able to identify areas that need more attention, instructors having a new level ofcontrol over a course, its grading and feedback, and preserving academic integrity [4].Limitations include increased isolation and reduced student-teacher interaction [9],implementation of engineering lab activities, effective communication, and increased preparationtime required for students and instructors [2]. Typically, students know upfront that they aresigning up for an online class and may be predisposed to successful learning in this environment.However, in a situation such as the COVID-19 response when
Paper ID #7226A Tool for ABET AccreditationDr. Ravi T. Shankar, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL Ravi Shankar is a professor in the computer and electrical engineering and computer science (CEECS) department in the college of engineering and computer science (COECS) at Florida Atlantic University (FAU), Boca Raton, FL. He is the director of a college-wide center on systems integration. He has a PhD from the University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, and an MBA from FAU. He is a registered Professional Engineer in the State of FL, a Senior member of IEEE, and a Fellow of the American Heart Association. Email
, NASA provides several references to thestudents, including the NASA Systems Engineering Handbook8 and a complete set of materialsfor an undergraduate space systems engineering course2. However, it is not practical to expectstudents to take the time to thoroughly review these references and comprehend the topic whilebeing overwhelmed by their capstone design course and the Lunabotics challenge. From thejudges’ view, the best papers appear to be the result of faculty integrating the systemsengineering concepts into the capstone curriculum, so that the students learn the critical conceptsand practice them real-time during the Luabotics design challenge. In fact, a faculty membercommented in the 2nd year of the competition that he noticed a marked
United States Patent and Trademark Office. This paper will demonstratethe value of understanding this process and a body of applied engineering knowledge that isavailable in the quest to obtain a patent. Students’ experiences and outcomes are documentedthrough individual interviews and assessment tools. The constraints and challenges of developinga product, engineering it and preparing it to be marketed will be presented in this paper. Realworld entrepreneurial experiences are valuable lesson and an integral part of the entrepreneurialmindset learning experience. Real world entrepreneurial learning experiences are linked to eachstudent E-Team as they move their product idea through the validation process. The patentsearch might lead to
the World Commission on Environment and Development, World Commission on Environment and Development, 1987. Published as Annex to General Assembly document A/42/427, Development and International Co-operation: Environment, August 2, 1987 [2] The Fun Theory, An Initiative of Volkswagen, Retrieved on 12/19/12 from URL: www.thefuntheory.com [3] Galambosi, A. and Ozelkan, E. C.,, Integrating Sustainability into Systems Engineering Curriculum,, Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conf. & Exposition, Vancouver, Canada, June 26-29, 2011. [4] Lockette et. al., Research Experiences in Pollution Prevention and Sustainability, Proceedings of the American Society for