q. ITEC 3290 Technical Writing r. ITEC 3292 Industrial Safety s. ITEC 3300 Technology Project Management t. ITEC 3800 Cost and Capital Project Analysis u. ITEC 4293 Industrial Supervision v. ITEC 4300 Quality Assurance Concepts w. CHEM 1020 General Descriptive Chemistry Page 22.392.8 x. ITEC 3200 Introduction to Statistical Process Control y. MATH 1074 Applied TrigonometryIssues with a Bearing on the Creation of the New BS-PSET Program:Two additional issues that were identified as extremely important in the structuring of theprogram were the selection of the accreditation agency
#>8P* * * * * * *****!8'8?$8P* ** * *******1>#('P** *Q(%&*-/,"*),""8$&*#$A*"8)8$&*#)&(@(&(8%HA,&(8%*E()*#$AH/"*%)'#"'-*#)&(@(&(8%*E#-*?/%(&(@8'-*)/$&"(0,&8*&/*&<8*?"/;8)&*#$A*08*/=*08$8=(&*&/*-/,P* !<8%8*?"/?/%8A*#)&(@(&(8%*E(''*)/$&"(0,&8*&/*&<8*?"/;8)&*($*&<8*=/''/E($F*E#-%P* * * * * * * !<8%8*?"/?/%8A*#)&(@(&(8%*E(''*08*08$8=()(#'*&/*>8*($*&<8*=/''/E($F*E#-%P* * * * * * * Attention: This action has received funding from the European
be at multiple campus libraries, but only onecopy needed to be verified so additional processing needed to be done to select the libraries tocheck. Because the weeding reports are run by our call number range, there ended up beingmultiple checklists for each library. For example, we have one Physics monograph checklist forour A-P call number range and another for our Q-QC call number range.After duplicate copies were verified, there also needed to be coordination with the other librariesregarding items missing or found in poor condition. Sometimes the other libraries took ourcopies to replace their missing or poor condition volumes, sometimes they only wanted selectivevolumes, and sometimes they were not interested in any replacement
andacceptance analysis; to the DDT; to our industrial partners and finally to all studentsand external lecturers who have supported us graciously with significant and highlyuseful information and statements.Bibliography 1. Matusovich, H., Strevelar, R., and Miller, R.: Why do students choose engineering? A qualitative, longitudinal investigation of student’s motivational values. IJEE, October 2010 2. Li, Q., Swaminathan, H., & Tang, J., Development of a Classification System for Engineering Student Characteristics Affecting College Enrollment and Retention. Journal of Engineering Education, October 2009, Vol. 98 No. 4, 361 ff. 3. Gardner, H., Multiple Intelligences: New Horizons (2006: New York, Basic Books) 4
? Can they be assessed? Journal of Engineering Education 94, 41-55 (2005).2. Lattuca, L.R., Terenzini, P.T. & Volkwein, J.F. Engineering Change: A Study of the Impact of EC2000, (ABET, Baltimore, MD, 2006).3. Holliday, W. & Li, Q. Understanding the Millenials: Updating Our Knowledge About Students. Reference Service Review 32, 356-366 (2004).4. Brophy, J. & Bawden, D. Is Google Enough? Comparison of an Internet Search Engine with Academic Resources. New Information Perspectives 57, 498-512 (2005).5. Denick, D., Bhatt, J. & Layton, B. Citation Analysis of Engineering Design Reports for Information Literacy Assessment. in 2010 American Society for Engineerin Education Annual Conference &
internal shunt resistor in the model, the current-voltagecharacteristics of a solar cell can be obtained from (1) and (2): Page 22.44.5 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Vancouver, Canada, June 2011 Fig.4. Simplified equivalent circuit of a solar cell (1) (2)Where, Iq is light generated current, Isat is the reverse saturation current, q is the electroniccharge, A is a dimensionless factor, K is the Boltzmann constant, T is the temperature in
Education AnnualConference. AC 2010-1639.7. Brown, Q., Mongan, W., Kusic, D., Garbarine, E., Fromm, E. and Fontecchio, A. Computer aided instruction asa vehicle for problem solving: scratch boards in the middle years classroom. American Society for EngineeringEducation Annual Conference. 2008. AC 2008-1377.8. Cathell, M., Birnkrant, M., Robinson, J., Blount, P., Fontecchio, A., and Fromm, E. Using Simcity 4 software asan educational tool to complement middle school science and mathematics. American Society for EngineeringEducation Annual Conference. 2008 AC 2008-1970.9. Birnkrant, M., Cathell, M., Blount, P., Robinson, J., Fontecchio, A., and Fromm, E. Introducing engineeringthrough candy. ASEE Annual Conference. 2008. AC 2008-2070.10. Coyle, E
l Pressure P V T Pi i 1 i 1 i Ti 1ViTemperature Found by an iterative process by a pre-programmed routine to match Ucalc and U(T)Time t 360( RPM )q Normalized combustion function of time shown in Figure 2.Ucalc Internal energy of the fuel/air/exhaust mixture from the previous step minus the work from the previous step.U(T) Internal energy of the fuel/air/exhaust mixture as a function of
, Minneapolis, MN.[4] Jeffrey L. Wieringa, Electric Motor Drive for A Boat. Patent Number: 5580287, December 31996. Accessed on January 10, 2011.http://www.google.com/patents?hl=en&lr=&vid=USPAT5580287&id=58slAAAAEBAJ&oi=fnd&dq=electric+boat+project&printsec=abstract#v=onepage&q=electric%20boat%20project&f=false[5] 3.5kW Hydrogen fuel cell assisted sail boat. Accessed on December 29, 2010.http://www.agoenvironmental.com/Under_development.htm[6] Solar Powered Electric Boats. Accessed on January 7, 2011.http://sunboat.com/history/history.html[7] General Dynamics. Electric Boat. Accessed on January 11, 2011. http://www.gdeb.com/[8] Duffy Boats. Accessed on January 15, 2011. http://www.duffyboats.com/[9] Nauticraft
. Matusovich, Ruth A. Streveler and Ronald M. Miller, How They See Themselves: Students whoidentify with engineering persist in the field. ASEE Prism, Vol. 20, Number 3, November 2010, page 47.17. Debbie Chachra, Adding Value to Teaching: what can we offer that students can’t get online?.ASEE Prism, Vol. 20, Number 3, November 2010, page 84.18. Group2: Drew Hudson, Jordan Knerr, and Jacques Janssens, Dynamics, CE/ME 251, Spring 2010.19. Group4: Blake Pettit, Joshua Schrock, and Zaadvinder Singh “Tony”, Dynamics, CE/ME 251, Spring 2010.20. http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Average_height_pro_basketball_player#ixzz1AO9jH4Ed Page 22.218.13
Middle Atlantic Regional Conference, April 29-30, 2011, Farmingdale State College, SUNY Toothpaste Toothbrushes Shaving Cream Q-Tips Wet Wipes Sun BlockGames/CardsStationaryMedications Tylenol, etc.Docking StationExtra Power CordComputer KeyboardOptical MouseWritable CDsUSB Hard DriveEuropean AdaptersReading Lists (for Afghanistan)*Hosseini, K. (2003). The Kite Runner, Riverhead Hardcover.*Hosseini, K. (2007). A Thousand Splendid Suns*Michener, J. A. (1986). Caravans, Fawcett.*Mortenson, G. and D. O. Relin (2006). Three Cups of Tea: One Man's Mission to PromotePeace . . .One School at a Time, Viking Adult*Seierstad, A. (2003). The Bookseller of Kabul Little, Brown and
. Page 22.904.12References[1] Malik Q, Koehler MJ, Mishra P, Buch N, Shanblatt M, Pierce SJ, 2010. Understanding student attitudes in a freshman design sequence. International Journal of Engineering Education; 26(5): 1179-1191[2] Farrell S, Hesketh RP, Newell JA, Slater CS, 2001. Introducing freshmen to reverse engineering and design through investigation of the brewing process. International Journal of Engineering Education; 17(6): 588-592[3] Al-Rizzo H, Mohan S, Reed M, Kinley D, Hemphill Z, Finley C, Pope A, Osborn D, Crolley W, 2010. Directional-based cellular e-commerce: undergraduate systems engineering capstone design project. International Journal of Engineering Education; 26(5): 1285-1304.[4] Hines PD
Averages 5.81 9.33 2.94 4.33 4.40 7.45 6.07 8.31 4.93 7.93 2.19 3.24 Table 3. Test Performance from 21 students in EGR302/394. Columns headed by QZ*(*) denote scores before the project with (*) being the maximum points available, columns headed by Q*FX denote scores after the project, administered during the final exam. The bottom row denotes the average score from each column and is paired for each quiz for the relevant comparison.VI. Conclusion The study evaluated the feasibility and effectiveness of a different approach to enhance students’competence in several technical areas during a junior level stand-alone project course. Specifically, theuniqueness of the
individual results as well as handouts tohelp the students interpret the meaning of and understand their results. Sessions also includedlecture, discussion, and Q&A about the research study and instruments, providing students withadditional scaffolding to understand and interpret their individual results. Results KAI and ATTAData analysisDescriptive statistics (mean and standard deviation) for first- and fourth-year students werecalculated for total scores on the KAI and ATTA and examined using SPSS (v.17). In addition,descriptive statistics were also calculated within and across groups using other demographicsincluding race, gender and nationality. Independent
research was supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation’s Scholarships inScience, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (S-STEM) Program entitled “Focus OnRetention in Cohorts of Engineering Students” (FORCES).References1. Veenstra, C.P., Dey, E.L. and Herrin, G.D. “A Model for Freshman Engineering Retention.” Advances in Engineering Education. Vol. 1 No. 3 (2009): 1-33.2. Li, Q., Swaminathan, H. and Tang, J. “Development of a Classification System for Engineering Student Characteristics Affecting College Enrollment and Retention.” Journal of Engineering Education. Vol. 98 No. 4. (2009): 361-376.3. Lenning, O.T., Ebbers, L. H. “The Powerful Potential of Learning Communities: Improving Education for the
knowledge g. Communicate effectively orally h. Communicate effectively in writing i. Work successfully as a member of a team j. Take initiative k. Integrate mathematics and science into your work l. Knowledge from humanities and the social sciences m. Evaluate the quality and validity of data, information and evidence n. Understanding and appreciation of ethics and professionalism o. Awareness of value of considering diversity and differences in cultures p. Awareness of the impact of your work in a global context q. Awareness of the importance of safety issues in your work 14. Use this space to provide additional comments (i.e. program
focuseson one school, identified here as Eastern Technical University (ETU). This analysis is restrictedto ETU’s first-year mechanical engineering curriculum, which typically involves students takingMechanics (ETU Physics), Calculus (ETU Math), Introduction to Manufacturing (ETUEngineering), and/or Introduction to CAD (ETU Design). Each course includes threecomponents: lecture, recitation, and laboratory. ETU’s curriculum generally identifies lectures asthe main venue through which content knowledge is imparted, while the recitation sessions areprimarily used as an opportunity to engage with the material through Q&A experiences andparticipation in group-work exercises. The laboratories serve as vehicles for specific skilldevelopment and attempt
Page 22.1347.137. Hmelo-Silver, C. (2004). Problem-based learning: what and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235-266.8. Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(2), 33-35.9. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). The discipline and practice of qualitative research. Handbook of qualitative research, 2, 1-28.10. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks, Ca.: Sage Publications.11. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis: Sage.12. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL Aldine.13. Dale, N
Practitioners. 96, 359-379 (2007).11. Bursic, K.M. & Atman, C.J. Information Gathering: A Critical Step for Quality in the Design Process. Quality Management Journal 4, 60-75 (1997).12. Brown, C., Murphy, T.J. & Nanny, M. Turning Techno-Savvy into Info-Savvy: Authentically Integrating Information Literacy into the College Curriculum. Journal of Academic Librarianship 29, 386-398 (2003).13. Kuhlthau, C.C. Seeking Meaning: A Process Approach to Library and Information Services, (Libraries Unlimited, Westport, CT, 2004).14. Holliday, W. & Li, Q. Understanding the Millenials: Updating Our Knowledge About Students. Reference Service Review 32, 356-366 (2004).15. Shanahan, M.C. Transforming information
Doctoral Education [Electronic Version]. Retrieved November 12, 2008, from www.phd-survey.org12. Altalib, H. (2002). Situated Cognition: Describing the Theory (No. IR 021 877 Document ED 475 183) (ERICdocument).13. Driscoll, M. P. (2005). Psychology of Learning for Instruction. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.14. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.15. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.16. Morgan, D. L. (1997). Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.17. Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational Research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.18. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation
Disk Reactor Technology for the Manufacture of Pharmaceuticals”, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 39, 2175-2182, (2000).14. Kaisare, N.S., G.D. Stefanidis, and D.G. Vlachos, “Millisecond Production of Hydrogen from Alternative, High Hydrogran Density Fuels in a Cocurrent Multifunctional Microreactor,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 48, 1749-1760, (2009).15. Zhang, H. G. Chen, J. Yue, and Q. Yuan, “Hydrodynamics and Mass Transfer of Gas-Liquid Flow in a Falling Film Microreactor.” AIChE Journal, 55(5), 1110-1120, (2009).16. Morena, A., K. Murphy, and B.A. Wilhite, “Parametric Study of Solid-Phase Axial Heat Conduction in Thermally Integrated Microchannel Networks,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 47, 9040-9054, (2008).17. Arseneault, G
would be the most efficient way to do this. 3. Calculate the amplitude ratio and the frequency ratio and create a graph similar to Figure 3.11a on page 230 in your textbook. Use the peak amplitude data from your accelerometer and PULSE analyzer instead of the ruler. You should have three different curves on one graph. Determine the damping ratio based on the above data and theory. 4. Determine the Q factor for the system with the lightest damping. 5. Divide the force amplitude by the velocity amplitude ( x peak ) for each frequency for both experiments. This is the magnitude of the mechanical impedance of the system at a given frequency. Create a graph of this. Show three curves on one chart – one curve for
-212.5 Shuman, L. J., Besterfield-Sacre, M., & McGourty, J. (2005). The ABET "Professional Skills" - Can They BeTaught? Can They Be Assessed? Journal of Engineering Education , 94 (1), 41-556 Paretti, M. C. (2008). Teaching Communication in Capstone Design: The Role of the Instructor in SituatedLearning. Journal of Engineering Education , 97 (4), 491-5037 Yin, A. (2010). Understanding Cooperative Education and Internships: The Influence of Engineering Students'Problem Solving Skills. ASEE Annual Conference. Louisville, KY: ASEE.8 Yin, A. (2010). Examining Problem-Solving Skills Between Students with and without Engineering WorkExperience. ASEE Annual Conference. Louisville, KY: ASEE9 Castro-Cedeno, M., & Mazumder, Q. (2010
. Page 22.296.12Adapting the Blackboard features to accommodate online courses University of Marylandinvolved simple features and processes to include regular use of the announcements feature,creation of discussion boards for general Q&A and topic-based dialogue, and posting of theinstructor biography. The feature that was not initially available in Blackboard, andcoincidentally was the most important feature needed to deliver the courses as envisioned, was avideo lecture capability.While video lectures are not synonymous with online learning, the University of Marylandbelieved that to provide a comparable experience for online students versus face-to-face studentsthat full video and audio capture of an actual face-to-face course was
, 2009.8 Luo, Q., Qi, C., and Zhou, S. (Dec. 2009) Multimedia Application for Fluid Mechanics Teaching.ComputationalIntelligence and Software Engineering (CiSE). December, 2009.9 Beauchamp, G.& Kennewell, S. (2010) Interactivity in the Classroom and Its Impact on Learning,Computers &Education, 54(3) 759-766.10 Wiggins, G. P., McTighe, J. (2005). Ch. 1, Backward Design? in Understanding By Design, Wiggins andMcTighe, eds. Expanded 2nd edition. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.11 The National Academy of Sciences (2000) How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School: ExpandedEdition. USA.12 Qualtrics Website: http://www.qualtrics.com
marketplace for technological goods and services.References 1. Hirleman E., Atkinson D., Groll E., Matthews J., Xu L., Allert B., Hong W., Purdue Univ.; Albers A., Univ. Karlsruhe; Wittig L., German Aerospace Center, Koln; Lin Q., Xi L., Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ.; “GEARE: A Comprehensive Program for Globalizing Engineering Education”, American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference, 2004 2. Parkinson A, Brigham Young Univ., “Engineering Study Abroad programs, Formats, Challenges, Best Practices”,2007-422, American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference, 2007 3. Abubakr S., Qi D., Western Michigan Univ., “Development of Global Engineering Education in China for Western Michigan University
procedures. Page 22.75.5 Table 2. Traffic Operations Knowledge TableConcepts Uninterrupted flow: Fundamental traffic flowBlooms: Comprehension modeling/relationshipsWiggins: Interpretation • General speed/flow/density model (parameters q, k, and u) • Greenshields realization: linear model relating speed and density • Modified speed-flow model as used in the Highway Capacity Manual • Capacity • Levels of service as well as the
,” ASEE Paper # AC 2009-1194, 200915. V. Lohani and T. Younos, “Implementation And Assessment Of An Interdisciplinary NSF/REU Site On Watershed Sciences,” ASEE Paper # AC 2008-1402, 2008.16. http://me-reu.secs.oakland.edu17. L. Guessous, B. Sangeorzan, Q. Zou And X. Wang, "Industrial Mentors: An Often Untapped Resource In Undergraduate Research Programs," Paper # 2008-66063, 2008 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, November 2008.18. C. Shellito, K. Shea, G. Weissmann, A. Mueller-Solger and W. Davis, “Successful Mentoring of Undergraduate Researchers – Tips for Creating Positive Student Research Experiences,” Journal of College Science Teaching, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 460-464 (2001